Zaghloul, Mohamed S.

Abstract BACKGROUND Primary intracranial germ cell tumors (GCTs) are rare heterogeneous tumors; germinoma accounts for two-thirds of cases. While neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by response-based reduced radiotherapy dose and field is the established approach for managing localized CNS germinomas, controversy persists regarding the treatment of primary metastatic disease. Additionally, limited research exists on the utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary metastatic germinoma. METHODS A retrospective multi-institutional analysis was conducted to assess overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) among patients diagnosed with metastatic germinoma who were treated with various modalities. RESULTS We identified 88 patients, including 63 males and 25 females. The median age at presentation was 13.5 years. All patients, who had undergone both brain and spine MRIs, had their diagnoses confirmed through a biopsy, positive CSF cytology, and/or positive CSF tumor markers at presentation. Primary Tumor location was pineal (n=37), suprasellar (n=27), bifocal (n=14) and others (n=9). Eight patients underwent subtotal resection. Craniospinal irradiation (CSI; 21-24 Gy) was administered to 71 patients (81%), while eight patients (9%) received whole ventricular irradiation (WVI; 23.4-30 Gy). Whole brain radiation was given to four patients (5%; 24 Gy), and two patients (2%) had unknown fields. Boosts to primary and/or metastatic sites were administered in all but seven patients. Notably, thirty patients (34%) received CSI without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. At the end of therapy, 69 patients had complete response, 10 partial response and the response was unknown in six. Three patients did not receive irradiation, all died of disease progression. The median follow-up was 64 months (range 6-159 months), yielding an OS of 96.6%. Ongoing multi-institutional data collection and analysis will be presented at the meeting. CONCLUSION Our study is one of the largest studies to date in metastatic germinoma and may provide insight into the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with lower CSI doses.

Abstract BACKGROUND: Primary intracranial germ cell tumors (GCTs) are rare heterogeneous tumors, with germinoma accounting for two-thirds of cases. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with response-based reduced radiotherapy dose and field has become the standard management of localized CNS germinomas, however, treatment of primary metastatic disease has remained controversial. Furthermore, there is limited published research on the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary metastatic germinoma. METHODS: We performed a retrospective multi-institutional data collection and analysis of patients diagnosed with metastatic germinoma since 2000 to assess the overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) of the different treatment modalities administered. RESULTS: We identified 78 patients with germinoma, in two tertiary care centers, of which nine patients (11.5%; eight males) had metastatic disease. The median age at presentation was 13.3 years. All patients had a biopsy at presentation confirming the diagnosis. Three patients had positive CSF cytology (M1). Six patients received craniospinal irradiation (CSI) with boost to primary and metastatic sites, of which five patients received total CSI dose of 24 Gy, while the dose was unknown for one patient. One patient required one cycle of chemotherapy prior to CSI due to worsening visual changes, which subsequently resolved. One patient received two cycles followed by whole ventricular irradiation (WVI) of 23.4 Gy with a boost to the primary bed. One patient received WVI without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. One patient developed anoxic brain injury and only received chemotherapy. He died of recurrent progressive disease 15 months post-diagnosis. The median follow-up time was 77.5 months (range 15-130.5 months), with an OS of 88.9%. Further multi-institutional data collection and analysis is underway and will be presented at the meeting. CONCLUSION: We anticipate our results may elucidate the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic germinoma, and whether when combined with lower CSI doses did not compromise EFS/OS.

In part one of this two-part paper, we present eight principles that we believe must be considered for more effective treatment of the currently incurable cancers. These are addressed by multidrug adjunctive cancer treatment (MDACT), which uses multiple repurposed non-oncology drugs, not primarily to kill malignant cells, but rather to reduce the malignant cells’ growth drives. Previous multidrug regimens have used MDACT principles, e.g., the CUSP9v3 glioblastoma treatment. MDACT is an amalgam of (1) the principle that to be effective in stopping a chain of events leading to an undesired outcome, one must break more than one link; (2) the principle of Palmer et al. of achieving fractional cancer cell killing via multiple drugs with independent mechanisms of action; (3) the principle of shaping versus decisive operations, both being required for successful cancer treatment; (4) an idea adapted from Chow et al., of using multiple cytotoxic medicines at low doses; (5) the idea behind CUSP9v3, using many non-oncology CNS-penetrant drugs from general medical practice, repurposed to block tumor survival paths; (6) the concept from chess that every move creates weaknesses and strengths; (7) the principle of mass—by adding force to a given effort, the chances of achieving the goal increase; and (8) the principle of blocking parallel signaling pathways. Part two gives an example MDACT regimen, gMDACT, which uses six repurposed drugs—celecoxib, dapsone, disulfiram, itraconazole, pyrimethamine, and telmisartan—to interfere with growth-driving elements common to cholangiocarcinoma, colon adenocarcinoma, glioblastoma, and non-small-cell lung cancer. gMDACT is another example of—not a replacement for—previous multidrug regimens already in clinical use, such as CUSP9v3. MDACT regimens are designed as adjuvants to be used with cytotoxic drugs.

AbstractBackgroundLocal‐regional failure (LF) for locally advanced bladder cancer (LABC) after radical cystectomy (RC) is common even with chemotherapy and is associated with high morbidity/mortality. Postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) can reduce LF and may enhance overall survival (OS) but has no defined role. We hypothesized that the addition of PORT would improve OS in LABC in a large nationwide oncology database.MethodsWe identified ≥ pT3pN0‐3M0 LABC patients in the National Cancer Database diagnosed 2004‐2014 who underwent RC ± PORT. OS was calculated using Kaplan‐Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to identify predictors of OS. Propensity matching was performed to match RC patients who received PORT vs those who did not.Results15,124 RC patients were identified with 512 (3.3%) receiving PORT. Median OS was 20.0 months (95% CI, 18.2‐21.8) for PORT vs 20.8 months (95% CI, 20.3‐21.3) for no PORT (P = 0.178). In multivariable analysis, PORT was independently associated with improved OS: hazard ratio 0.87 (95% CI, 0.78‐0.97); P = 0.008. A one‐to‐three propensity match yielded 1,858 patients (24.9% receiving PORT and 75.1% without). In the propensity‐matched cohort, median OS was 19.8 months (95% CI, 18.0‐21.6) for PORT vs 16.9 months (95% CI, 15.6‐18.1) for no PORT (P = 0.030). In the propensity‐matched cohort of urothelial carcinoma patients (N = 1,460), PORT was associated with improved OS for pT4, pN+, and positive margins (P < 0.01 all).ConclusionIn this observational cohort, PORT was associated with improved OS in LABC. While the data should be interpreted cautiously, these results lend support to the use of PORT in selected patients with LABC, regardless of histology. Prospective trials of PORT are warranted.