Reiners, Stephanie

Abstract Background: The discovery of the driving oncogenic alterations in pediatric low-grade gliomas (pLGGs) has shifted our focus towards management with targeted therapies, especially in relapsing or progressive disease. Limited data is available on the durability of response to targeted therapy in pLGGs once the therapy has ceased. Methods: Multi-institutional retrospective chart review of patients with pLGGs younger than 25 years, between 2010-2021, was undertaken to evaluate the durability of response to targeted therapy and determine risk factors associated with disease progression after cessation of therapy. Results: Current analysis included 18 patients from two centers. Seven (39%) had neurofibromatosis type-1 (NF-1). Diagnoses included: optic pathway glioma (OPG) (6/18, 33%), pilocytic astrocytoma (8/18, 44%), diffuse fibrillary astrocytoma (1/18), ganglioglioma (1/18), glioneural neoplasm (2/18). Sixteen patients received at least one prior line of chemotherapy (range 1-5). Targeted agents included trametinib (50%), selumetinib (5%), binimetinib (22%), vemurafenib (11%) and everolimus (11%). Median time on therapy was 351 days (range 29-979 days). All, but one patient had residual intracranial findings at the end of therapy: eight patients (44%) had stable disease, while ten required additional therapy; 50% were NF-1 patients with OPG. Median time to progression was 203 days (range 29-615 days). Of those who did not require any additional therapies, 50% had suprasellar tumors. Genomic data was available for twelve patients; BRAF-KIAA1549 fusion was the most common genomic alteration. Others included mutations in KRAS, BRAF (V600E), PTPN11, SOX6-RAF1 fusion, NF-1, and a patient with FGFR1, KMT2C, and PTPN11 alterations. Conclusion: Preliminary analysis demonstrates that despite initial response, the majority of patients required additional line of therapy. Patients with NF-1 and OPGs tend to progress after discontinuing therapy, while suprasellar non-NF1 pLGGs tend to develop sustained response to targeted therapies. Additional multi-institutional analysis is underway and will be presented at the meeting.

Abstract BACKGROUND: Primary intracranial germ cell tumors (GCTs) are rare heterogeneous tumors, with germinoma accounting for two-thirds of cases. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with response-based reduced radiotherapy dose and field has become the standard management of localized CNS germinomas, however, treatment of primary metastatic disease has remained controversial. Furthermore, there is limited published research on the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary metastatic germinoma. METHODS: We performed a retrospective multi-institutional data collection and analysis of patients diagnosed with metastatic germinoma since 2000 to assess the overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) of the different treatment modalities administered. RESULTS: We identified 78 patients with germinoma, in two tertiary care centers, of which nine patients (11.5%; eight males) had metastatic disease. The median age at presentation was 13.3 years. All patients had a biopsy at presentation confirming the diagnosis. Three patients had positive CSF cytology (M1). Six patients received craniospinal irradiation (CSI) with boost to primary and metastatic sites, of which five patients received total CSI dose of 24 Gy, while the dose was unknown for one patient. One patient required one cycle of chemotherapy prior to CSI due to worsening visual changes, which subsequently resolved. One patient received two cycles followed by whole ventricular irradiation (WVI) of 23.4 Gy with a boost to the primary bed. One patient received WVI without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. One patient developed anoxic brain injury and only received chemotherapy. He died of recurrent progressive disease 15 months post-diagnosis. The median follow-up time was 77.5 months (range 15-130.5 months), with an OS of 88.9%. Further multi-institutional data collection and analysis is underway and will be presented at the meeting. CONCLUSION: We anticipate our results may elucidate the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic germinoma, and whether when combined with lower CSI doses did not compromise EFS/OS.