Bradley, Julie A.

ABSTRACT Background Rhabdomyosarcoma is the most common soft tissue sarcoma in pediatrics and infants are reported to have inferior outcomes. ARST1431 recommended delayed primary excision (DPE) while discouraging radiation (RT) deviations. This analysis compared outcomes among very young and older patients in this study. Procedures Demographic and tumor characteristics were summarized using frequencies and percentages. Local failure (LF) frequency was summarized by age group, RT, and DPE status. Event‐free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared between age groups using the log‐rank test. Results Of 296 patients, 48 (16.2%) were <24 months: 14 (4.7%) < 12 months, 34 (11.5%) 12–24 months–compared with 248 (83.8%) ≥24 months. DPE was performed in: 7 (50%), <12 months; 9 (26%), 12–24 months; 56 (22%), ≥24 months. RT was given to 9 (64%), 27 (79%), and 195 (79%) of <12, 12–24, and >24 months, respectively. LF in DPE+RT was 8.3% and 6.1%, < 24 months and ≥ 24 months, respectively, compared to 29.3% and 20.5% for RT without DPE. The 4‐year EFS did not vary: 56% (95% CI = 26.5, 86.0), 68% (95% CI = 51.2, 84.1), and 61% (95% CI = 54.2, 68.3) <12, 12–24, and >24 months old, respectively. Conclusions Outcomes in younger children are comparable to older children with local failure more common in those without DPE. Optimization of local control will be important for future studies. Trial Registration Number NCT02567435

Objectives: Breast cancer (BC) remains a critical public health issue where early detection significantly improves outcomes. Despite advancements, disparities in screening awareness and access persist, particularly in underserved populations. This study evaluates a comprehensive, technology-driven educational campaign designed to empower individuals to advocate for their breast health, bridging gaps in knowledge and accessibility. Methods: Between 10/1/22 and 12/2/22, a multiplatform campaign was conducted with IRB approval. The initiative utilized traditional media, including televised ads and educational videos, and digital tools such as a mobile app and website in English and Spanish. Central to this campaign was an interactive risk calculator, offering personalized BC screening recommendations. Data collection included user demographics, platform engagement metrics, and the identification of high-risk individuals. A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using campaign budget data. Results: The campaign reached 673,920 individuals through televised ads and 152,672 impressions by digital ads. The website garnered 930 unique impressions, while the app recorded 2752 downloads across 131 countries. The risk calculator was completed 637 times, identifying 72 high-risk individuals. Follow-up data revealed ongoing engagement, with the calculator used an additional 1468 times. The cost per conversion was $1.62, and the cost to identify a high-risk individual was $209.27, demonstrating remarkable cost-efficiency. Conclusions: This campaign successfully increased BC awareness and early detection efforts, leveraging a cost-effective, multiplatform approach. The integration of personalized tools like the risk calculator underscores the potential of digital interventions in health education. Future efforts should build on this model to further enhance reach and health outcomes.

AbstractBackgroundPediatric esthesioneuroblastoma (EN) can infiltrate skull base anatomy, presenting challenges due to high radiation doses and pediatric tissue sensitivity. This study reports outcomes of pediatric EN treated with proton radiotherapy (PT).ProcedureUsing an IRB‐approved prospective outcomes registry, we evaluated patient, tumor, and treatment‐related variables impacting disease control and toxicity in pediatric nonmetastatic EN treated with modern multimodality therapy, including PT.ResultsFifteen consecutive patients (median age 16) comprising Kadish stage B (n = 2), C (n = 9), and D (n = 4) tumors were assessed, including six with intracranial involvement, four with cranial nerve deficits, and four with cervical lymphadenopathy. Before radiation, two had subtotal and 13 had gross total resections (endoscopic or craniofacial). Two underwent neck dissection. Eleven received chemotherapy before radiation (n = 5), concurrent with radiation (n = 4), or both (n = 2). Median total radiation dose (primary site) was 66 Gy/CGE for gross disease and 54 Gy/CGE (cobalt Gray equivalent) for microscopic disease. Median follow‐up was 4.8 years. No patients were lost to follow‐up. Five‐year disease‐free and overall survival rates were 86% (no local or regional recurrences). Two patients developed vertebral metastases and died. Two required a temporary feeding tube for oral mucositis/dysphagia. Late toxicities included symptomatic retinopathy, major reconstructive surgery, cataracts, chronic otitis media, chronic keratoconjunctivitis, hypothyroidism, and in‐field basal cell skin cancer.ConclusionsA multimodality approach for pediatric EN results in excellent local control. Despite the moderate‐dose PT, serious radiation toxicity was observed; further dose and target volume reductions may benefit select patients. Longer follow‐up and comparative data from modern photon series are necessary to fully characterize any relative PT advantage.

Abstract Purpose: To determine the rate of rib fracture in a cohort of patients with breast cancer treated with proton therapy and enrolled on a prospective registry. In series investigating photon therapy for breast cancer, the rib fracture rate ranges from 0.3-13% Methods: From a prospective database, we identified patients treated with proton therapy for breast cancer at our institution between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2020. Clinical and dosimetric data was extracted from the electronic medical record. The cumulative incidence method assessed rib fracture rate; the Fine-Gray test statistic assessed prognostic significance select variables. Results: 225 patients were identified, 223 women and 2 men. Median age at the time of radiation was 57.8 years (range, 25 – 87). 26% of patients were black, 69% white and 5% were other races or race not disclosed. 5% were Hispanic. 74% of patients had left-sided breast cancer, 5% bilateral, and 21% right-sided. DEXA scan was normal in 20%, showed osteopenia in 34%, osteoporosis in 6%, and not performed in 40%. 57% of patients received antiendocrine therapy with an aromatase inhibitor. For 16% of patients, the breast +/- internal mammary nodes (IMN) were treated, while 32% underwent proton therapy to treat the breast and comprehensive regional lymphatics. 1% of patients had chest wall +/- IMN treated, while 51% underwent proton therapy to treat the chest wall and comprehensive regional lymphatics. 41% of patients were treated with passive scatter proton therapy (n=92); 52% of these had mastectomy. 58% of patients received treatment with pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy (n=131); 53% of these had mastectomy. A combination of passive scatter and PBS was used for 2 patients (1%). 85% of patients received a boost. Median follow-up was 3.1 years (range, 0.2 – 9.1). 97% of patients had &gt; 12 months of follow-up. The 3 year cumulative incidence of in-field rib fracture was 3.7% (95%CI: 1.6%-7.1%). In total, 8 patients developed in-field rib fractures, one symptomatic and 7 identified incidentally on surveillance imaging, for a 0.4% rate of symptomatic rib fracture. Median time from completion of radiation to identification of rib fracture was 1.8 years (range, 0.4-7.4 years). Rib fractures occurred within 2.2 years from radiotherapy completion for seven of the eight patients who experienced this side effect. Three patients developed rib fractures outside of the radiation field, for a cumulative incidence of out-of-field rib fracture of 0.9% (95%CI: 0.2-3.0%). No variables were associated with rib fracture on univariate analysis. Of those with in-field rib fractures, 3 had low and 3 had normal bone density while 2 had not undergone testing; of those with out-of-field rib fractures, 2 had osteopenia and 1 did not have testing. Conclusions: Although a proton beam has higher biological dose deposition at end-of-range than the assumed constant RBE=1.1, the 3 year rate of any in-field rib fractures in our series remains low at 3.7%, with a 0.4% rate of symptomatic rib fracture. Contouring ribs as an OAR and establishing a dose constraint warrants further investigation as a means to maintaining a low rate of rib fracture with proton therapy. Citation Format: Julie Bradley, Xiaoying Liang, Raymond Mailhot Vega, Chunbo Liu, Eric Brooks, Teena Burchianti, Emma Viviers, Roi Dagan, Oluwadamilola Oladeru, Christopher Morris, Nancy Mendenhall. Incidence of rib fracture following treatment with proton therapy for breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-10-08.

AbstractPurposeTo evaluate the relative biological effectiveness (RBE)‐weighted dose to the heart and to estimate RBE uncertainties when assuming a constant RBE of 1.1, for breast cancer patients receiving intensity‐modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Further, to study the impact of RBE uncertainties on the risk of an acute coronary event (ACE).Material and methodsWe analyzed 20 patients who received IMPT to either the left breast (n = 10) or left chest wall (n = 10) and regional lymph nodes. The Monte Carlo simulation engine, MCsquare, was used to simulate the dose‐averaged linear energy transfer (LETd) map. The RBE‐weighted dose to the heart and its substructures was calculated using three different RBE models. The risk of ACE was estimated per its linear relationship with mean heart dose (MHD) as established by Darby et al.ResultsThe median MHD increased from 1.33 GyRBE assuming an RBE of 1.1 to 1.64, 1.87, and 1.99 GyRBE when using the RBE‐weighted dose models. The median values (and ranges) of the excess absolute risk of ACE were 0.4% (0.1%–0.8%) when assuming an RBE of 1.1, and 0.6% (0.2%–1.0%), 0.6% (0.2%–1.1%), and 0.7% (0.2%–1.1%) with the RBE‐weighted models. For our patient cohort, the maximum excess absolute risk of ACE increased by 0.3% with the RBE‐weighted doses compared to the constant RBE of 1.1, reaching an excess absolute ACE risk of 1.1%. The interpatient LETd variation was small for the relevant high‐dose regions of the heart.ConclusionAll three RBE models predicted a higher biological dose compared to the clinical standard dose assuming a constant RBE of 1.1. An underestimation of the biological dose results in underestimation of the ACE risk. Analyzing the voxel‐by‐voxel biological dose and the LET map alongside clinical outcomes is warranted in the development of a more accurate normal‐tissue complication probability model.

AbstractBackgroundChildren with chest wall Ewing sarcoma with malignant pulmonary effusion or pleural stranding require hemithorax radiation, often with plans that exceed lung constraints. We investigated disease control and pneumonitis in children requiring hemithorax radiation.ProcedureEleven children (median age 13 years) received hemithorax radiotherapy. Symptomatic radiation pneumonitis was considered National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 1+ with respiratory symptoms. Mean lung dose (MLD), volume of lung exposed to a dose ≥5 Gy (V5), ≥20 Gy (V20), and ≥35 Gy (V35) were recorded. Adult and pediatric lung constraints were obtained from Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC) guidelines and Children's Oncology Group (COG) protocols, respectively.ResultsMedian hemithorax dose was 15 Gy (1.5 Gy/fraction). Median total dose was 51 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction). Most plans delivered both protons and photons. The ipsilateral MLD, V5, and V20 were 27.2 Gy, 100%, and 48.3%; the bilateral MLD, V20, and V35 were 14.1 Gy, 22.8%, and 14.3%, respectively. One hundred percent, 36%, and 91% of treatments exceeded recommended adult ipsilateral lung constraints of V5 <65%, V20 <52%, and MLD of 22 Gy; 64%, 45%, and 82% exceeded COG bilateral lung constraints of V20 <20%, MLD <15 Gy, and MLD <12 Gy, respectively; 82% of treatments exceeded the COG ipsilateral lung constraint of V20 <30%. At a median 36 months (range 12–129), the symptomatic radiation pneumonitis incidence was 0%. Two patients progressed with nonpulmonary metastatic disease and died at a median 12 months following radiotherapy.ConclusionsExisting guidelines may overestimate pneumonitis risk, even among young children receiving multiagent chemotherapy. For children with chest wall Ewing sarcoma and other thoracic malignancies, more data are needed to refine pediatric dose–effect models for pulmonary toxicity.

AbstractThe clinical outcomes for infants with malignant tumors are often worse than older children due to a combination of more biologically aggressive disease in some cases, and increased toxicity—or deintensification of therapies due to concern for toxicity—in others. Especially in infants and very young children, finding the appropriate balance between maximizing treatment efficacy while minimizing toxicity—in particular late side effects—is crucial. We review here the management of malignant tumors in infants and very young children, focusing on central nervous system (CNS) malignancies and rhabdomyosarcoma.

Abstract Background Out‐of‐field neutron dissemination during double‐scattered proton therapy has raised concerns of increased second malignancies, disproportionally affecting pediatric patients due to the proportion of body exposed to scatter dose and inherent radiosensitivity of developing tissue. We sought to provide empiric data on the incidence of early second tumors. Methods Between 2006 and 2019, 1713 consecutive children underwent double‐scattered proton therapy. Median age at treatment was 9.1 years; 371 were ≤3 years old. Thirty‐seven patients (2.2%) had tumor predisposition syndromes. Median prescription dose was 54 Gy (range 15–75.6). Median follow‐up was 3.3 years (range 0.1–12.8), including 6587 total person‐years. Five hundred forty‐nine patients had ≥5 years of follow‐up. A second tumor was defined as any solid neoplasm throughout the body. Results Eleven patients developed second tumors; the 5‐ and 10‐year cumulative incidences were 0.8% (95% CI, 0.4–1.9%) and 3.1% (95% CI, 1.5–6.2%), respectively. Using age‐ and gender‐specific data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program, the standardized incidence ratio was 13.5; the absolute excess risk was 1.5/1000 person‐years. All but one patient who developed second tumors were irradiated at ≤5 years old ( p < .0005). There was also a statistically significant correlation between patients with tumor predisposition syndromes and second tumors ( p < .0001). Excluding patients with tumor predisposition syndromes, 5‐ and 10‐year rates were 0.6% (95% CI, 0.2–1.7%) and 1.7% (95% CI, 0.7–4.0%), respectively, with all five malignant second tumors occurring in the high‐dose region. Conclusion Second tumors are rare within the decade following double‐scattered proton therapy, particularly among children irradiated at >5 years old and those without tumor predisposition syndrome.

Abstract Background Previous studies of the prognostic importance of FOXO1 fusion status in patients with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) have had conflicting results. We re‐examined risk stratification by adding FOXO1 status to traditional clinical prognostic factors in children with localized or metastatic RMS. Methods Data from six COG clinical trials (D9602, D9802, D9803, ARST0331, ARTS0431, ARST0531; two studies each for low‐, intermediate‐ and high‐risk patients) accruing previously untreated patients with RMS from 1997 to 2013 yielded 1727 evaluable patients. Survival tree regression for event‐free survival (EFS) was conducted to recursively select prognostic factors for branching and split. Factors included were age, FOXO1, clinical group, histology, nodal status, number of metastatic sites, primary site, sex, tumor size, and presence of metastases in bone/bone marrow, soft tissue, effusions, lung, distant lymph nodes, and other sites. Definition and outcome of the proposed risk groups were compared to existing systems and cross‐validated results. Results The 5‐year EFS and overall survival (OS) for evaluable patients were 69% and 79%, respectively. Extent of disease (localized versus metastatic) was the first split (EFS 73% vs 30%; OS 84% vs. 42%). FOXO1 status (positive vs negative) was significant in the second split both for localized (EFS 52% vs 78%; OS 65% vs 88%) and metastatic disease (EFS 6% vs 46%; OS 19% vs 58%). Conclusions After metastatic status, FOXO1 status is the most important prognostic factor in patients with RMS and improves risk stratification of patients with localized RMS. Our findings support incorporation of FOXO1 status in risk stratified clinical trials.