Citations

The NCCN Guidelines for Ovarian Cancer/Fallopian Tube Cancer/Primary Peritoneal Cancer provide multidisciplinary diagnostic workup, staging, and treatment recommendations for this disease. These NCCN Guidelines Insights detail how the evolution of the use of PARP inhibitors as maintenance and single-agent regimens for the treatment of ovarian cancer informed panel recommendations in the guidelines.

AbstractObjectiveEpilepsy raises critical challenges to accurately localize the epileptogenic zone (EZ) to guide presurgical planning. Previous research has suggested that interictal spikes overlapping with high‐frequency oscillations, referred to here as pSpikes, serve as a reliable biomarker for EZ estimation, but there remains a question as to whether and to how pSpikes perform as compared to other types of epileptic spikes. This study aims to address this question by investigating the source imaging capabilities of pSpikes alongside other spike types.MethodsA total of 2819 interictal spikes from 76‐channel scalp electroencephalography (EEG) were analyzed in a cohort of 24 drug‐resistant focal epilepsy patients. All patients received surgical resection, and 16 were declared seizure‐free based on at least 1 year of postoperative follow‐up. A recently developed electrophysiological source imaging algorithm—fast spatiotemporal iteratively reweighted edge sparsity (FAST‐IRES)—was used for source imaging of the detected interictal spikes. The performance of 217 pSpikes was compared with 772 nSpikes (spikes with irregular high‐frequency activations), 1830 rSpikes (spikes with no high‐frequency activity), and all 2819 aSpikes (all interictal spikes).ResultsThe localization and extent estimation using pSpikes are concordant with the clinical ground truth; using pSpikes yields the best performance compared with nSpikes, rSpikes, and conventional spike imaging (aSpikes). For multiple spike type seizure‐free patients, the mean localization error for pSpike imaging was 6.8 mm, compared with 15.0 mm for aSpikes. The sensitivity, precision, and specificity were .41, .67, and .93 for pSpikes compared with .32, .48, and .93 for aSpikes.SignificanceThese results demonstrate the merits of noninvasive EEG source localization, and that (1) pSpike is a superior biomarker, outperforming conventional spike imaging for the localization of epileptic sources, and especially those with multiple irritative zones; and (2) FAST‐IRES provides accurate source estimation that is highly concordant with clinical ground truth, even in situations of single spike analysis with low signal‐to‐noise ratio.

Objectives: The role of psychological factors in the clinical presentation and outcomes of treated is increasingly recognized in orthopaedic surgery. Particularly, in prearthritic hip disorders, young adult hip patients often have significant psychological undertones. Patient resiliency, as quantified by the brief resiliency scale (BRS), is a static patient characteristic and has been increasingly recognized for its potential role in pain and symptomatology. The purpose of the current study was to investigate the correlation between BRS and traditional hip patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Methods: A prospective multicenter cohort study of 696 patients undergoing femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) primary hip arthroscopy surgery was performed and utilized for the current study. Inclusion criteria are patients aged 14 to 45 years old with idiopathic FAI not caused by childhood disease. Exclusion criteria are previous ipsilateral hip procedures or disease processes such as neuromuscular disease or high-grade osteoarthritis. PROMs included the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) domains of pain interference, physical function, mobility, anxiety, and depression, as well as hip disability and osteoarthritis and outcome score (HOOS), modified Harris hip score (mHHS), international hip outcome tool (iHOT-12), and short form-12 (SF-12). Resiliency was divided into low resiliency (score < 3), normal resiliency (score 3 to 4.3), and high resiliency (score > 4.3) as described by Smith et al 1 to use as categorical variables to compare to the other patient-reported scores. The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was calculated and the Kruskall Willis test was used to measure association between BRS and the other PROMs for continuous and categorical values, respectively. R values ≥0.7, ≥0.4, and ≥0.1 signify a strong, moderate, and weak correlation, respectively. For categorical analysis, P values < 0.05 were considered significant. Results: The cohort of 696 patients had mean age was 24.9 ± 7.9 years and a female predominance at 56%. Average BRS scores were 3.7 ± 0.7. Overall, 13.7% of patients had low resiliency, while 65.8% had normal resiliency and 20.5% had high resiliency. Linear correlation, using Pearson coefficients, found associations between BRS and all other scores. There were only weak associations between BRS scores and PROs (all r < 0.25) except a moderate correlation with PROMIS depression (r = -0.476, p < 0.001) and PROMIS anxiety (r = -0.481, p < 0.001). Patients in higher resiliency groups reported less severe symptoms in HOOS – quality of life (p < 0.001), HOOS – sports and recreation (p = 0.004), HOOS – activities of daily living (p = 0.004), HOOS – pain (p = 0.026), iHOT-12 (p = 0.01), mHHS (p = 0.004), SF-12 mental (p < 0.001), PROMIS physical function (p = 0.003), PROMIS pain (p < 0.001), PROMIS mobility (p < 0.001), PROMIS depression (p < 0.001), and PROMIS anxiety (p < 0.001). Patients with higher activity levels (UCLA ≥9) demonstrated higher resiliency (p = 0.04). Conclusions: In FAI patients, patient resiliency appears to influence baseline PROs. Overall, 14% of patients had low resiliency while 21% had high resiliency. Further studies are needed to investigate this relationship and whether concurrent psychological treatment will help improve patient outcomes after hip arthroscopy for FAI. [Figure: see text]

Abstract Context Conventional therapy for hypoparathyroidism aims to alleviate symptoms of hypocalcemia but does not address insufficient parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels. Objective Assess the long-term efficacy and safety of TransCon PTH (palopegteriparatide) for hypoparathyroidism. Design Phase 3 trial with a 26-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled period followed by a 156-week, open-label extension (OLE). Setting Twenty-one sites across North America and Europe. Participants A total of 82 adults with hypoparathyroidism were randomized and received study drug and 78 completed week 52. Intervention(s) All OLE participants received TransCon PTH administered once daily. Main Outcome Measure(s) Multicomponent efficacy endpoint: proportion of participants at week 52 who achieved normal serum calcium (8.3-10.6 mg/dL) and independence from conventional therapy (≤600 mg/day of elemental calcium and no active vitamin D). Other efficacy endpoints included patient-reported outcomes and bone mineral density. Safety was assessed by 24-hour urine calcium and treatment-emergent adverse events. Results At week 52, 81% (63/78) met the multicomponent efficacy endpoint, 95% (74/78) achieved independence from conventional therapy, and none required active vitamin D. Patient-reported outcomes showed sustained improvements in quality of life, physical functioning, and well-being. Mean bone mineral density Z-scores decreased toward age- and sex-matched norms from baseline to week 52. Mean (SD) 24-hour urine calcium excretion decreased from 376 (168) mg/day at baseline to 195 (114) mg/day at week 52. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild or moderate and none led to trial discontinuation during the OLE. Conclusion At week 52 of the PaTHway trial, TransCon PTH showed sustained efficacy, safety, and tolerability in adults with hypoparathyroidism.

Abstract Objective Wearable nonelectroencephalographic biosignal recordings captured from the wrist offer enormous potential for seizure monitoring. However, signal quality remains a challenging factor affecting data reliability. Models trained for seizure detection depend on the quality of recordings in peri‐ictal periods in performing a feature‐based separation of ictal periods from interictal periods. Thus, this study aims to investigate the effect of epileptic seizures on signal quality, ensuring accurate and reliable monitoring. Methods This study assesses the signal quality of wearable data during peri‐ictal phases of generalized tonic–clonic and focal to bilateral tonic–clonic seizures (TCS), focal motor seizures (FMS), and focal nonmotor seizures (FNMS). We evaluated accelerometer (ACC) activity and the signal quality of electrodermal activity (EDA) and blood volume pulse (BVP) data. Additionally, we analyzed the influence of peri‐ictal movements as assessed by ACC (ACC activity) on signal quality and examined intraictal subphases of focal to bilateral TCS. Results We analyzed 386 seizures from 111 individuals in three international epilepsy monitoring units. BVP signal quality and ACC activity levels differed between all seizure types. We found the largest decrease in BVP signal quality and increase in ACC activity when comparing the ictal phase to the pre‐ and postictal phases for TCS. Additionally, ACC activity was strongly negatively correlated with BVP signal quality for TCS and FMS, and weakly for FNMS. Intraictal analysis revealed that tonic and clonic subphases have the lowest BVP signal quality and the highest ACC activity. Significance Motor elements of seizures significantly impair BVP signal quality, but do not have significant effect on EDA signal quality, as assessed by wrist‐worn wearables. The results underscore the importance of signal quality assessment methods and careful selection of robust modalities to ensure reliable seizure detection. Future research is needed to explain whether seizure detection models' decisions are based on signal responses induced by physiological processes as opposed to artifacts.

Abstract Disclosure: R.J. Auchus: Consulting Fee; Self; Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc., Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, OMass Therapeutics, H Lundbeck A/S, Adrenas Therapeutics. Research Investigator; Self; Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc., Diurnal, Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Spruce Biosciences. O. Hamidi: Advisory Board Member; Self; Corcept Therapeutics, Recordati Rare Diseases, Amryt Pharma, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc., Xeris, Lantheus. R. Pivonello: Advisory Board Member; Self; Corcept Therapeutics, Recordati AG, Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, H. Lundbeck A/S. Research Investigator; Self; Corcept Therapeutics, Recordati AG, Strongbridge Biopharma, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. I. Bancos: Consulting Fee; Self; Corcept Therapeutics, Recordati Rare Diseases, HRA Pharmaceuticals, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc., Diurnal, Spruce Biosciences, Sparrow Pharmaceuticals, Adrenas Therapeutics. Research Investigator; Self; Recordati Rare Diseases. G. Russo: Advisory Board Member; Self; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Sandoz, Diurnal. Speaker; Self; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Sandoz, Diurnal. S.F. Witchel: Research Investigator; Self; Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. A.M. Isidori: Research Investigator; Self; Pfizer, Inc., Merck Serono, HRA Pharmaceuticals, Recordati AG, Corcept. P. Rodien: Consulting Fee; Self; Pfizer, Inc., Novo Nordisk, Lilly USA, LLC, Ipsen, HRA Pharmaceuticals, IBSA Pharma, Recordati Rare Diseases. U. Srirangalingam: Advisory Board Member; Self; Diurnal. Speaker; Self; Diurnal. F.W. Kiefer: Advisory Board Member; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly & Company, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Inc., Sanofi. Speaker; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly & Company, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Inc., Sanofi. H. Falhammar: Consulting Fee; Self; Diurnal, Roche Diagnostics, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc., H Lundbeck A/S, Adrenas Therapeutics. D.P. Merke: Research Investigator; Self; Diurnal, Adrenas Therapeutics, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. N. Reisch: Consulting Fee; Self; Diurnal, Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc., Spruce Biosciences, H Lundbeck A/S. J. Sturgeon: Employee; Self; Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. E. Roberts: Employee; Self; Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. V.H. Lin: Employee; Self; Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. J.L. Chan: Employee; Self; Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. R. Farber: Employee; Self; Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.. Introduction: Classic congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency (21OHD), a genetic disorder characterized by cortisol deficiency and excess adrenal androgens, typically requires management with supraphysiological glucocorticoid (GC) doses. Crinecerfont is a novel oral CRF1 antagonist that reduced elevated adrenocorticotropic hormone and adrenal androgens in patients with 21OHD in 14-day open-label Phase 2 studies. This Phase 3 study (CAHtalyst: NCT04490915) evaluated whether crinecerfont can reduce daily GC dose while maintaining androgen control in adults with 21OHD. Methods: Adults (≥18 years) with 21OHD, stable GC regimens at doses &gt;13 mg/m2/d in hydrocortisone equivalents (HCe), and normal or elevated androstenedione (A4) were randomized (2:1) to crinecerfont 100 mg BID or placebo for 24 weeks. GC dosing was maintained stable for 4 weeks, followed by a planned GC down-titration over 8 weeks to achieve a GC dose of 8-10 mg/m2/d. GC doses were adjusted as needed during the last 12 weeks to maintain A4 control (≤120% of baseline or ≤upper limit of normal [ULN]) by week 24. Results: In the 182 randomized participants (51% male, mean age 31 years), demographics and baseline characteristics were similar between treatment arms (122 crinecerfont, 60 placebo). Mean GC dose at baseline was 17.6 mg/m2/d HCe (32 mg/d), with 58% on HC alone, 29% taking predniso[lo]ne, and 13% taking dexamethasone; mean pre-GC A4 (620 ng/dL) was elevated &gt;2-3-fold the ULN. Over 95% of participants completed the double-blind treatment period. At week 24, the crinecerfont arm had a significantly greater percent reduction in GC dose while maintaining A4 control vs placebo (-27% vs -10%; least squares mean difference [LSMD]: -17%; p&lt;0.0001) (primary endpoint). At week 4 (end of GC-stable period), a greater reduction in A4 prior to the morning GC dose was observed with crinecerfont vs placebo (LSMD: -345 ng/dL; p&lt;0.0001) (key secondary endpoint). At week 24, a higher percentage of participants reached a protocol-defined physiological GC dose (≤11 mg/m2/d) while maintaining A4 control with crinecerfont (63% vs 18% for placebo; p&lt;0.0001) (key secondary endpoint). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) in the crinecerfont arm were fatigue (25% vs 15% for placebo), headache (16% vs 15%), and COVID-19 (14% vs 9%). There were few serious AEs (3% overall), with none assessed as related to the study drug. Conclusions: Crinecerfont, an oral CRF1 antagonist, represents a novel treatment option to improve androgen control for patients with 21OHD. In the largest interventional Phase 3 study conducted to date in adults with 21OHD, crinecerfont led to a significant reduction in A4 while GC dose was stable, enabling a significant percent reduction in GC dose while maintaining A4 control at 24 weeks. Crinecerfont was overall well tolerated. Presentation: 6/1/2024

Abstract Disclosure: B.M. Biller: Consulting Fee; Self; HRA Pharmaceuticals, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Sparrow, Strongbridge Biopharma. Grant Recipient; Self; Strongbridge Biopharma. A. Gilis-Januszewska: Speaker; Self; Ipsen, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, Recordati, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.. M. Doknic: None. A.M. Pico: None. M. Fleseriu: Consulting Fee; Self; Ascendis, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson &Johnson, Karyopharm, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Inc., Pharmacosmos. Research Investigator; Self; Ascendis. G. Raverot: None. A.M. Isidori: None. Y. Takahashi: None. J.M. Garcia: None. J.M. Silverstein: None. I. Bancos: None. E. Huang: Employee; Self; Ascendis Pharma, Inc. J. Kang: Employee; Self; Ascendis Pharma, Inc. A.S. Komirenko: Employee; Self; Ascendis Pharma, Inc. L. Domrzalski: Employee; Self; Ascendis Pharma, Inc. A. Shu: Employee; Self; Ascendis Pharma, Inc. K. Yuen: Advisory Board Member; Self; Amryt, Ascendis, Corcept, Crinetics, Novo Nordisk, Recordati, Strongbridge, Xeris. Grant Recipient; Self; Amryt, Ascendis, Corcept, Crinetics. Speaker; Self; Corcept, Novo Nordisk, Recordati. Background: Adult GHD (aGHD) is characterized by metabolic abnormalities due to insufficient growth hormone (GH) production. Lonapegsomatropin was designed to provide sustained release of unmodified somatropin, with the identical amino acid sequence as endogenous GH, and once-weekly injection reduces the burden of daily GH replacement therapy. MethodsForesiGHt was a randomized, parallel-3-arm, placebo(PL)-controlled (double-blind) and active-controlled (open-label) trial designed to establish the efficacy and safety of lonapegsomatropin in aGHD. It evaluated 259 adults with GHD across 21 countries who were GH treatment-naïve or not treated with GH in the prior year, randomized 1:1:1 to receive lonapegsomatropin, once-weekly PL, or daily somatropin (dGH). Fixed dosing was based on age and oral estrogen intake, and designed to be comparable across lonapegsomatropin and dGH arms. Following a 12-week (w) titration period to target maintenance dose, fixed doses were administered for 26w. ResultsBaseline (BL) characteristics were similar between arms. Lonapegsomatropin demonstrated superiority on the primary efficacy endpoint of change from BL in trunk percent fat at Week 38 vs PL (lonapegsomatropin -1.7% vs PL 0.4%, LS mean difference -2.0%, p &lt; 0.0001) and on the key secondary efficacy endpoints of change from BL in total body lean mass (lonapegsomatropin 1.6 kg vs PL -0.1 kg, LS mean difference 1.7 kg, p &lt; 0.0001) and change from BL in trunk fat mass (lonapegsomatropin -0.5 kg vs PL 0.2 kg, LS mean difference -0.7 kg, p = 0.0053). Mean total exposure and maintenance doses were similar for lonapegsomatropin and dGH arms, with larger changes from BL in average IGF-I SDS mean at Week 38 in the lonapegsomatropin arm (1.4) vs dGH arm (0.5). To assess outcomes at comparable weekly IGF-I exposure, a post-hoc analysis was performed in a subset of participants with average IGF-I SDS ≤1.75 SDS at Week 38. Mean IGF-I SDS for these subsets were similar (lonapegsomatropin -0.1, dGH -0.5), and comparable effects in fat and lean tissue compartments were demonstrated (change from BL in trunk percent fat mean -2.4% and -2.6% respectively; change from BL in total body lean mass mean 1.7 kg and 1.4 kg respectively). In the safety population, the incidence of severe AEs was low (lonapegsomatropin, 3.4%; placebo, 1.2%; dGH, 2.3%) and the incidence of treatment-related AEs was similar (lonapegsomatropin 24.7%, dGH 22.1%). Injection site reaction incidence was low and similar for lonapegsomatropin (4.5%), dGH (5.8%) and placebo (4.8%), and A1c levels remained stable in all treatment arms. ConclusionsThe results of the foresiGHt trial indicate that lonapegsomatropin is a safe, efficacious, and tolerable replacement for endogenous GH. Once-weekly dosing may be impactful for adults with GHD who typically manage multiple other medical therapies. Presentation: 6/3/2024

Abstract Disclosure: K.N. Rachmasari: None. A. Osman: None. D. Toro Tobon: None. S.B. Lund: None. D.J. Merlino: None. A.R. Hsu: None. M.M. Ryder: None. Background: In low-risk papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), radioactive iodine (RAI) remnant ablation has shown no impact on disease recurrence rates, which are overall low. The role of adjuvant RAI in intermediate risk disease (i.e. T3, N1) remains unproven with no randomized clinical trials to objectively assess efficacy. Thus, in our institution, its use is highly heterogenous. We retrospectively investigated the effects of adjuvant RAI on recurrence and recurrence free survival (RFS) in patients with PTC and positive cervical lymph nodes (CLN). Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent surgery at Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN for PTC between January 2007 and December 2016. Adult patients with Tx-T3 disease according to the 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) were identified. Patients with positive CLN (N1) and a minimum follow up of 36 months were included. Demographics, clinicopathologic characteristics, use of RAI therapy and recurrence were analyzed. Results: A total of 367 patients with PTC, Tx-3, N1, M0 were identified, of which 187 received adjuvant RAI and 180 did not. Most patients were female (63.8%), with a median age of 44 years (IQR 34-54), and a median follow up of 77 months (IQR 58.5-101.5). There were no differences in age, type of surgery, histology, multifocality, and follow up period between the RAI and no RAI subgroups. Adjuvant Thyrogen-stimulated or thyroid hormone withdrawal-based RAI was recommended at the discretion of the treating provider and/or per patient preference. Diagnostic I-123 whole body scans were performed in all patients and mostly demonstrated remnant uptake. The median dose of I-131 was 75 mCi (range 50-100). Recurrence was defined by new occurrence of disease after at least a year of absence of clinical, biochemical, and imaging evidence of disease since initial surgery. Within the entire cohort, 35 (9.5%) developed recurrence with a median time of 41 months (28-59.5). Overall, recurrence rate and RFS were not significantly different between both subgroups (p = 0.2). A subanalysis was performed in patients with clinically detectable nodal disease (n = 161), defined by abnormal cervical lymph node on preoperative neck ultrasound with or without positive fine needle aspiration biopsy. Overall recurrence rates were 17 (10.6%) in this group. There were no differences in recurrence rates and RFS in those that received RAI versus those that did not (p = 0.8). Conclusions: In patients with intermediate risk PTC defined by nodal disease and/or T3 disease, recurrences were not different between patients that did or did not receive adjuvant I-131 therapy postoperatively. A randomized, noninferiority study of adjuvant I-131 compared to no I-131 postoperatively for N1 disease is needed to determine the benefit of near total thyroidectomy and adjuvant I-131 for this cohort. Presentation: 6/3/2024

Abstract Disclosure: S.W. Ing: Advisory Board Member; Self; Ultragenyx, Amolyt. Grant Recipient; Self; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Research Investigator; Self; BridgeBio Pharma, Takeda, Amolyt, Radius Health, Inc, Ultragenyx. P. Harmatz: Research Investigator; Self; BridgeBio Pharma. S. Mora: Research Investigator; Self; BridgeBio Pharma. E.A. Imel: Research Investigator; Self; BridgeBio Pharma. P.J. Tebben: Research Investigator; Self; BridgeBio Pharma. M.L. Warren: Research Investigator; Self; BridgeBio Pharma, Ascendis, Amolyt. Speaker; Self; Ascendis. N. Ma: Research Investigator; Self; Calcilytix Therapeutics, Ultragenyx, Inozyme. Other; Self; Up To Date. A.A. Khan: Research Investigator; Self; BridgeBio Pharma, Ascendis. A. Palermo: Research Investigator; Self; BridgeBio Pharma. B. Decallonne: Research Investigator; Self; BridgeBio Pharma. S. Lemoine: Research Investigator; Self; BridgeBio Pharma, Kyowa Kirin. G. Mantovani: Research Investigator; Self; BridgeBio Pharma. A. Linglart: Consulting Fee; Self; Alexion, Novo Nordisk, Merck, Pfizer, Inc.. Research Investigator; Self; BridgeBio Pharma, Kyowa Kirin. H. Wasserman: Research Investigator; Self; BridgeBio Pharma. A.P. Barbosa: Research Investigator; Self; BridgeBio Pharma. C. Cardot-bauters: Research Investigator; Self; BridgeBio Pharma. M. Roberts: Employee; Self; BridgeBio Pharma. A. Mathew: Employee; Self; BridgeBio Pharma. S. Adler: Employee; Self; BridgeBio Pharma. M.C. Zillikens: Research Investigator; Self; BridgeBio Pharma. R.J. Clifton-Bligh: Consulting Fee; Self; Ipsen, Kyowa Kirin, Amgen Inc, Eisai. Research Investigator; Self; BridgeBio Pharma. L. Rejnmark: Research Investigator; Self; BridgeBio Pharma, Ascendis, Amolyt, Takeda, Kyowa Kirin. Autosomal dominant hypocalcemia type 1 (ADH1), caused by gain-of-function calcium-sensing receptor gene (CASR) variants, is characterized by low parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentrations, hypocalcemia, hypercalciuria, hyperphosphatemia and hypomagnesemia. While a rare disease, ADH1 is one of the more frequently identified causes of genetic hypoparathyroidism. Conventional therapy includes calcium (Ca) and/or active vitamin D, but this regimen incompletely corrects the hypocalcemia and is associated with persistent hypercalciuria, which may result in renal complications including nephrocalcinosis (NC), nephrolithiasis (NL), and chronic kidney disease (CKD). The CLARIFY disease monitoring study [NCT05227287] is a global, multicenter, longitudinal study to understand disease burden, management, and progression in children and adults with ADH1 over a 5-year period. Here we report data on the characteristics of adult participants at study entry. As of November 2023, 45 adults (≥18 years) with ADH1 were enrolled, with a mean±SD age of 42.1±16.5 years (range 18-80). The mean±SD age of a hypocalcemia diagnosis was 19.1±19.1 years, while the mean±SD age for a diagnosis of ADH1 was 28.2±20.6 years. As reported on medical history, in decreasing order of prevalence, 36% (16) had NC, 22% (10) had intracranial calcifications, 11% (5) had history of seizures, 11% (5) had CKD, 9% (4) had cataracts, 7% (3) had NL, and 4% (2) had undergone renal transplant. Treatment data were available for 43 participants and included the following: 74% (32) Ca and active vitamin D, 9% (4) Ca alone, 9% (4) active vitamin D alone, 37% (16) magnesium, 33% (14) thiazide diuretics, 26% (11) potassium, 7% (3) phosphate binder, 7% (3) PTH, and 5% (2) no treatment. Mean±SD fasting values collected prior to conventional therapy dose are presented. PTH concentrations (10.1±8.2 pg/mL [nl 15-65]) and albumin-corrected calcium ([cCa]=7.5±1.0 mg/dL [nl 8.5-10.5]) were low. Despite the low mean cCa, the mean 24-hr urine calcium was elevated (268±183 mg/d, [nl &lt;250 women, &lt;300 men]). Blood phosphate was 4.8±0.8 mg/dL [nl 2.5-4.8] while blood magnesium was 1.8±0.2 mg/dL [nl 1.8-2.4]. 25-OH vitamin D was 35.0±13.5 ng/mL [nl 30-80]. Renal function as assessed by CKD-EPIcr_R showed eGFR of 86±23 mL/min/1.73m² (range 36-123). This study represents the largest cohort of adults with ADH1 described to date. These data highlight variability in therapeutic approaches in a real-world setting with some participants receiving up to 6 different medications/supplements. Despite being followed in expert centers, and treated with available therapies, patients on average have low cCa with relatively high 24-hr urine calcium excretion. The CLARIFY study provides an opportunity to better understand the progression and burden of disease in participants with ADH1. Presentation: 6/3/2024