Yuen, Kevin C.J.

OBJECTIVE Frailty is a known predictor of adverse outcomes in pituitary surgery, yet its impact regarding craniopharyngioma remains unclear. The authors assessed preoperative frailty, measured by the 11-factor modified frailty index (mFI-11), and its association with perioperative morbidity among adult patients undergoing craniopharyngioma surgery. METHODS Using the Registry for Adenomas of the Pituitary and Related Disorders (RAPID) database, the authors performed a retrospective cohort study of the records of patients ≥ 18 years of age who underwent craniopharyngioma surgery between June 2007 and November 2024. Patients were stratified into the following categories according to their numeric mFI-11 score: fit (scores 0 and 1), managing well (scores 2 and 3), and mildly frail (scores 4–6). Primary outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS) and discharge disposition. Secondary outcomes included 90-day readmission, surgical outcomes, and complications. Multivariable analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of hospital LOS and non-home discharge, adjusting for age, surgeon experience, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, complications, and surgical approach. RESULTS Among 278 patients (221 fit, 43 managing well, 14 mildly frail), higher-frailty patients were older (mean age 47.8 ± 16.1 years in fit vs 60.1 ± 12.5 years in managing well vs 67.6 ± 8 years in mildly frail, p < 0.001) and more likely to present urgently (24.2% vs 36.4% vs 78.6%, p = 0.001). Gross-total resection was achieved less frequently in frail patients (44.8% vs 24.3% vs 23.1%, p = 0.030). Overall complication rates were similar; however, increasing frailty was associated with higher rates of postoperative mortality (0% vs 2.8% [1/36] vs 7.7% [1/13], p = 0.018), pneumonia (0.5% [1/195] vs 2.8% [1/36] vs 15.4% [2/13], p = 0.006), and reintubation (2.6% [5/195] vs 2.8% [1/36] vs 30.8% [4/13], p = 0.002). Higher frailty was associated with a stepwise rise in median [IQR] LOS (5 [3–8] days vs 7 [4–12] days vs 13 [6.5–21.8] days, p < 0.001) and remained an independent predictor of extended LOS on multivariable analysis (β = 1.729 per point, p = 0.006). Rates of non-home discharge showed a similar pattern (9.2% vs 30.0% vs 64.3%, p < 0.001), with frailty independently predicting non-home discharge (OR 2.352, 95% CI 1.527–3.822). Unplanned 90-day readmission rates were significantly higher in the mildly frail cohorts (22.5% vs 45.7% vs 53.8%, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS The mFI-11 scores independently predicted perioperative morbidity following craniopharyngioma resection. Incorporating frailty screening into preoperative screening may improve risk stratification, family and patient counseling, and discharge planning.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Perioperative protocols facilitate earlier discharge without compromising safety in nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas, but no large multicenter studies in the United States have investigated protocols regarding Cushing disease (CD). We sought to characterize perioperative protocols and how their implementation influences clinical outcomes in patients with CD. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from the Registry of Adenomas of the Pituitary and Related Disorders consortium comprising 13 US academic pituitary centers. Institutions were surveyed regarding perioperative procedures for patients undergoing transsphenoidal tumor resection for CD. The impacts of institutional procedures and approaches to implementation on length of stay (LOS) and unplanned 90-day readmission were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirteen institutions contributed survey responses and clinical data for a total of 832 patients meeting inclusion criteria. Ten (76.9%) institutions reported having a postoperative protocol, 9 (69.2%) used a formal document to outline their protocol, and 3 (23.1%) had protocols implemented into hospital policy. Mean LOS was significantly reduced in centers with an established protocol (3.14 vs 3.42 days, P = .032), and more so with a formal document (3.10 vs 3.48 days, P = .001) or hospital policy (2.72 vs 3.36 days, P < .001). Patients treated after protocol implementation experienced shorter LOS ( P < .001). Other factors associated with reduced LOS were presence of a separate CD pathway, intraoperative checklist specific to pituitary surgery, non-narcotic pain regimen, Foley removal order, dedicated outpatient advanced practice provider follow-up, and target discharge date ≤2 days. Intraoperative checklist ( P = .045), non-narcotic pain regimen ( P = .048), nasal packing ( P = .005), and 1-day target discharge date ( P = .032) were important factors against readmission. Compared with microscopic surgery, endoscopic surgery was associated with shorter LOS but increased readmission odds. CONCLUSION: This is the first multicenter study to illustrate that implementation of perioperative protocols is associated with a reduction in LOS and readmission risk in patients with CD.

Abstract Context Adult growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) is characterized by metabolic abnormalities caused by insufficient GH production. Lonapegsomatropin, a prodrug administered once weekly, was designed to provide sustained release of unmodified somatropin to reduce the burden of daily somatropin injections. Objective This work aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lonapegsomatropin vs placebo as treatment for adults with GHD. Methods The foresiGHt trial was a multicenter, randomized, parallel-arm, placebo-controlled (double-blind) and active-controlled (open-label) trial (NCT04615273) conducted at 116 centers in North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific. The trial randomly assigned and dosed 259 adults with GHD. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive once-weekly lonapegsomatropin, once-weekly placebo, or daily somatropin for 38 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was change from baseline in trunk percent fat at week 38. Secondary efficacy end points included change from baseline in trunk fat mass and total body lean mass. Results At week 38, lonapegsomatropin significantly reduced trunk percent fat (−1.68% vs +0.37%; least squares [LS] mean difference −2.04%; P &lt; .001), increased total body lean mass (+1.60 kg vs −0.11 kg; LS mean difference 1.70 kg; P &lt; .0001), and reduced trunk fat mass (−0.48 kg vs +0.22 kg; LS mean difference −0.70 kg; P = .0053) vs placebo. The safety and tolerability profile of lonapegsomatropin was comparable to somatropin. Conclusion The foresiGHt trial met its primary efficacy end point by demonstrating superiority of lonapegsomatropin vs placebo with similar safety and tolerability, supporting its potential as a once-weekly treatment option for adults with GHD.

Abstract Disclosure: M. Fleseriu: None. C.P. Badiu: None. I. Bancos: None. E.B. Geer: None. M. Orbetzova: None. J.M. Silverstein: None. I. Uzunova: None. K.C. Yuen: None. T.K. Marmon: None. D.A. Katz: None. F.S. Czerwiec: None. Introduction: 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (HSD-1) regulates exposures of intracellular receptors to active glucocorticoids. HSD-1 deficiency suppresses a Cushing syndrome (CS) phenotype despite presence of hypercortisolism.1-3 Treatment with clofutriben (C), a potent and specific inhibitor of HSD-1, might improve CS comorbidities by decreasing intracellular cortisol. Methods: Seventeen adults with CS (16 pituitary, 1 ectopic), and type 2 diabetes (T2D), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), hypertension (HTN), hyperlipidemia, or osteopenia were randomized to a total of 12 weeks of oral C 6mg/d and 12 weeks of matching placebo (P) in 2 blinded sequences (PCCP, CCPP; “P” or “C” representing 6-week periods). Patients were offered open-label C treatment on completion. Primary endpoint was urinary ratio of cortisol and cortisone metabolites at Week 6 (hepatocellular HSD-1 activity biomarker). Key exploratory endpoints (and applicable population) at Week 6 were OGTT-AUCglucose decrease 25% (IGT/T2D), HbA1c decrease ≥ 0.5% (T2D), systolic blood pressure decrease ≥ 5mmHg or decreased treatment (HTN), and normalization of urinary free cortisol (baseline &gt;1.5xULN). Results: Mean baseline HSD-1 ratio was 1.95 +/- 0.171. At Week 6, mean ratio was 0.21 +/- 0.091 with C and 2.01 +/- 0.263 with P. More patients responded at Week 6 to C on OGTT-AUCglucose (4/8 v 0/5), HbA1c (4/5 v 0/4), systolic blood pressure (5/7 v 2/4), and urinary free cortisol (3/8 v 0/6). Concomitant medications for T2D were reduced in 4 C-treated but increased in 2 P-treated patients. For HTN there were also 4 reductions for C-treated and 1 increase for P-treated patients. One patient succumbed to ectopic Cushing’s due to cervical carcinoma after discontinuing the trial. Four patients discontinued for reasons other than an adverse event (AE). One serious AE of vomiting (possible glucocorticoid withdrawal syndrome per investigator) led to temporary drug interruption. Common AEs (≥ 3 patients) included Arthralgia, Fatigue, Headache, and Nausea, but only Headache was more common in C during the P-controlled period. There was no evidence of clinical or biochemical (defined by low morning plasma cortisol) adrenal insufficiency. All 13 patients who completed elected to enter the open-label extension (current treatment duration 3-15 months). Conclusions: Clofutriben decreased hepatic HSD-1 activity adequately to confer clinical benefit while maintaining safety and overall tolerability. These limited data support clofutriben’s potential for clinical improvement without adrenal insufficiency. References: 1Tomlinson JW 2002; 2Arai H 2008; 3Weber RJ 2024 Presentation: Sunday, July 13, 2025

Abstract Introduction Endogenous Cushing's syndrome (CS) is a rare endocrine disorder that chronically exposes patients to supraphysiological cortisol levels. Primary therapy for CS consists of surgery. Medical therapies are also considered for many patients with CS, including those who are not surgical candidates or have persistent or recurrent hypercortisolism after surgery. Osilodrostat, an adrenal steroidogenesis inhibitor, demonstrated sustained efficacy and safety in phase 3 clinical trials and is currently approved to treat endogenous CS in Europe and the United States. Because of limited clinical experience, questions remain about how to individualize osilodrostat treatment for different clinical scenarios and special populations. Additional guidance from experts based on clinical study and real-world experiences with osilodrostat is needed. Methods A modified Delphi consensus panel study was conducted consisting of 13 specialists from high-volume endocrinology centers with experience prescribing osilodrostat. Advisors participated in 3 consensus rounds (2 anonymous surveys, 1 virtual workshop) over approximately 10 months to provide guidance and recommendations on optimal osilodrostat use. Results Over 2 surveys and a 2-hour virtual workshop, 26 statements related to osilodrostat achieved consensus among Delphi panelists and 5 were excluded. Topics included patient preparation before osilodrostat initiation, baseline testing, dosing at onset and during treatment, managing dose adjustments, monitoring during dose titration, and treatment alterations for planned and unexpected clinical events. Conclusion Treatment guidance and recommendations for osilodrostat use were obtained using the Delphi method. These statements are intended to provide physicians with education and guidance on using osilodrostat to optimally treat patients with CS.

Abstract Disclosure: B.M. Biller: Consulting Fee; Self; HRA Pharmaceuticals, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Sparrow, Strongbridge Biopharma. Grant Recipient; Self; Strongbridge Biopharma. A. Gilis-Januszewska: Speaker; Self; Ipsen, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, Recordati, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.. M. Doknic: None. A.M. Pico: None. M. Fleseriu: Consulting Fee; Self; Ascendis, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson &Johnson, Karyopharm, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Inc., Pharmacosmos. Research Investigator; Self; Ascendis. G. Raverot: None. A.M. Isidori: None. Y. Takahashi: None. J.M. Garcia: None. J.M. Silverstein: None. I. Bancos: None. E. Huang: Employee; Self; Ascendis Pharma, Inc. J. Kang: Employee; Self; Ascendis Pharma, Inc. A.S. Komirenko: Employee; Self; Ascendis Pharma, Inc. L. Domrzalski: Employee; Self; Ascendis Pharma, Inc. A. Shu: Employee; Self; Ascendis Pharma, Inc. K. Yuen: Advisory Board Member; Self; Amryt, Ascendis, Corcept, Crinetics, Novo Nordisk, Recordati, Strongbridge, Xeris. Grant Recipient; Self; Amryt, Ascendis, Corcept, Crinetics. Speaker; Self; Corcept, Novo Nordisk, Recordati. Background: Adult GHD (aGHD) is characterized by metabolic abnormalities due to insufficient growth hormone (GH) production. Lonapegsomatropin was designed to provide sustained release of unmodified somatropin, with the identical amino acid sequence as endogenous GH, and once-weekly injection reduces the burden of daily GH replacement therapy. MethodsForesiGHt was a randomized, parallel-3-arm, placebo(PL)-controlled (double-blind) and active-controlled (open-label) trial designed to establish the efficacy and safety of lonapegsomatropin in aGHD. It evaluated 259 adults with GHD across 21 countries who were GH treatment-naïve or not treated with GH in the prior year, randomized 1:1:1 to receive lonapegsomatropin, once-weekly PL, or daily somatropin (dGH). Fixed dosing was based on age and oral estrogen intake, and designed to be comparable across lonapegsomatropin and dGH arms. Following a 12-week (w) titration period to target maintenance dose, fixed doses were administered for 26w. ResultsBaseline (BL) characteristics were similar between arms. Lonapegsomatropin demonstrated superiority on the primary efficacy endpoint of change from BL in trunk percent fat at Week 38 vs PL (lonapegsomatropin -1.7% vs PL 0.4%, LS mean difference -2.0%, p &lt; 0.0001) and on the key secondary efficacy endpoints of change from BL in total body lean mass (lonapegsomatropin 1.6 kg vs PL -0.1 kg, LS mean difference 1.7 kg, p &lt; 0.0001) and change from BL in trunk fat mass (lonapegsomatropin -0.5 kg vs PL 0.2 kg, LS mean difference -0.7 kg, p = 0.0053). Mean total exposure and maintenance doses were similar for lonapegsomatropin and dGH arms, with larger changes from BL in average IGF-I SDS mean at Week 38 in the lonapegsomatropin arm (1.4) vs dGH arm (0.5). To assess outcomes at comparable weekly IGF-I exposure, a post-hoc analysis was performed in a subset of participants with average IGF-I SDS ≤1.75 SDS at Week 38. Mean IGF-I SDS for these subsets were similar (lonapegsomatropin -0.1, dGH -0.5), and comparable effects in fat and lean tissue compartments were demonstrated (change from BL in trunk percent fat mean -2.4% and -2.6% respectively; change from BL in total body lean mass mean 1.7 kg and 1.4 kg respectively). In the safety population, the incidence of severe AEs was low (lonapegsomatropin, 3.4%; placebo, 1.2%; dGH, 2.3%) and the incidence of treatment-related AEs was similar (lonapegsomatropin 24.7%, dGH 22.1%). Injection site reaction incidence was low and similar for lonapegsomatropin (4.5%), dGH (5.8%) and placebo (4.8%), and A1c levels remained stable in all treatment arms. ConclusionsThe results of the foresiGHt trial indicate that lonapegsomatropin is a safe, efficacious, and tolerable replacement for endogenous GH. Once-weekly dosing may be impactful for adults with GHD who typically manage multiple other medical therapies. Presentation: 6/3/2024

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Cushing disease (CD) affects mortality and quality of life along with limited long-term remission, underscoring the need to better identify recurrence risk. The identification of surgical or imaging predictors for CD remission after transsphenoidal surgery has yielded some inconsistent results and has been limited by single-center, single-surgeon, or meta-analyses studies. We sought to evaluate the multicenter Registry of Adenomas of the Pituitary and Related Disorders (RAPID) database of academic US pituitary centers to assess whether robust nonhormonal recurrence predictors could be elucidated. METHODS: Patients with treated CD from 2011 to 2023 were included. The perioperative and long-term characteristics of CD patients with and without recurrence were assessed using univariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Of 383 patients with CD from 26 surgeons achieving postoperative remission, 288 (75.2%) maintained remission at last follow-up while 95 (24.8%) showed recurrence (median time to recurrence 9.99 ± 1.34 years). Patients with recurrence required longer postoperative hospital stays (5 ± 3 vs 4 ± 2 days, P = .002), had larger average tumor volumes (1.76 ± 2.53 cm 3 vs 0.49 ± 1.17 cm 3 , P = .0001), and more often previously failed prior treatment (31.1% vs 14.9%, P = .001) mostly being prior surgery. Multivariable hazard prediction models for tumor recurrence found younger age (odds ratio [OR] = 0.95, P = .002) and Knosp grade of 0 (OR = 0.09, reference Knosp grade 4, P = .03) to be protective against recurrence. Comparison of Knosp grade 0 to 2 vs 3 to 4 showed that lower grades had reduced risk of recurrence (OR = 0.27, P = .04). Other factors such as length of stay, surgeon experience, prior tumor treatment, and Knosp grades 1, 2, or 3 failed to reach levels of statistical significance in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: This multicenter study centers suggests that the strongest predictors of recurrence include tumor size/invasion and age. This insight can help with patient counseling and prognostication. Long-term follow-up is necessary for patients, and early treatment of small tumors may improve outcomes.