BENJAMIN, CAROLINA

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pediatric large-volume brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) carry a substantial lifelong hemorrhage risk, neurological symptoms, and treatment morbidity. Single-session stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is often unsuitable due to constraints on dose-volume toxicity. Volume-staged SRS (VS-SRS) enables sequential dosing of large nidus volumes, potentially enhancing safety while maintaining efficacy. Evidence in children remains limited. We aimed to evaluate outcomes of VS-SRS for large AVMs in pediatric patients. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective cohort was assembled from 21 centers, including patients aged younger than 21 years treated with VS-SRS for AVMs >10 cm 3 . Clinical and radiological end points included obliteration, hemorrhage, and permanent symptomatic radiation-induced changes (RIC). RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were included (median age 14 years; IQR, 12-17). The median nidus volume at first stage was 18.2 cm 3 (IQR, 12.3-25.6). Median prescription dose per stage was 17 Gy (IQR, 16-18). The median clinical follow-up from the first stage was 57.5 months (IQR, 25-138). Obliteration occurred in 42 of 103 patients (40.8%), with actuarial rates of 6.9% (95% CI: 2.8-14) at 3 years and 29% (95% CI: 20-39) at 5 years. Hemorrhage occurred in 17 of 103 patients (16.5%) during follow-up, and permanent RIC was observed in 9 of 103 patients (8.7%). CONCLUSION: VS-SRS is a reasonably safe, selected option for pediatric large-volume AVMs when microsurgical or endovascular cure is not feasible or prudent. Delivering ≥17 Gy per stage while limiting each treatment volume to <15 cm 3 supports durable nidus control with acceptable toxicity. VS-SRS represents a key modality in multidisciplinary management of this historically difficult-to-treat population.

OBJECTIVE Ruptured, large pediatric arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) pose a significant management challenge due to high rerupture risk and the morbidity of conventional treatments. Volume-staged stereotactic radiosurgery (VS-SRS) has emerged as an alternative; however, evidence for its use in this specific population is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of VS-SRS for ruptured, large AVMs in a dedicated pediatric cohort. METHODS This international, multicenter, retrospective cohort study from 21 centers analyzed outcomes for 42 pediatric patients (age < 18 years) with previously ruptured, large AVMs treated with VS-SRS. The primary outcome was complete AVM obliteration, and secondary outcomes included post-SRS hemorrhage, radiation-induced changes (RICs), and favorable outcome. Favorable outcome in this study was defined as obliteration without post-SRS hemorrhage or permanent RIC. RESULTS At the initial SRS, the median patient age was 14.5 years, and the median AVM volume was 15.0 cm 3 ; most AVMs were high grade (Spetzler-Martin grades IV and V). With a median follow-up of 41.5 months, complete AVM obliteration was achieved in 21 patients (50.0%). The cumulative obliteration rate was 37% at 5 years and 56% at 10 years. Patients with a nidus volume of ≤ 10 cm 3 had significantly higher cumulative obliteration rates than those with a nidus volume > 10 cm 3 (log-rank test, p = 0.021). Similarly, patients treated with a prescription dose > 17 Gy showed significantly higher cumulative obliteration rates compared to those treated with a dose ≤ 17 Gy (log-rank test, p = 0.012). The cumulative 5-year incidences of hemorrhage and RICs following VS-SRS were 19% and 7%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, only larger total AVM volume was an independent predictor of a lower likelihood of favorable outcome (hazard ratio 0.89, 95% CI 0.80–0.99; p = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS In this multicenter pediatric cohort, VS-SRS for ruptured, large AVMs provides a reasonable chance of long-term obliteration, but generally acceptable risks of post-SRS hemorrhage and RICs exist. VS-SRS should be considered as an option for pediatric patients with large, ruptured AVMs.

OBJECTIVE Historically, craniopharyngioma (CP) was divided into adamantinomatous CP (ACP) and papillary CP (PCP) subtypes based on histopathological features. However, each harbors a unique genetic profile and progressively differing treatment paradigms, leading to their reclassification by the WHO in 2016 as two distinct entities. Descriptive in nature, this large multi-institutional study aimed to establish current differences between the presentation, treatment patterns, and clinical course of these pathologies to serve as a baseline for future studies as new treatment paradigms emerge. METHODS The authors queried the Registry for Adenomas of the Pituitary and Related Disorders (RAPID) database, which encompassed patients from 14 participating institutions across the United States between 2000 and 2024. The database was screened for adult patients who underwent initial CP treatment with a confirmed histopathological diagnosis of ACP or PCP. Patient demographic characteristics, clinical course, tumor treatment, and outcomes data were collected and compared by CP type. RESULTS The final analysis included 273 ACP and 99 PCP adult patients who underwent initial surgical treatment. ACP patients presented younger on average (mean 48.3 vs 52.8 years, p = 0.034). PCP patients were more likely to present with hypothyroidism (33.3% vs 20.5%, p = 0.010), hyperlipidemia (25.3% vs 15.8%, p = 0.036), fatigue (28.3% vs 17.6%, p = 0.024), temperature intolerance (9.1% vs 1.5%, p < 0.001), and cardiac arrhythmia (6.1% vs 1.1%, p = 0.006). The groups demonstrated similar postsurgical and neuroendocrinological outcomes. Postoperative median (IQR) progression-free survival did not significantly differ between groups (19.0 [7.0–37.0] for ACP vs 5.0 [3.5–7.5] months for PCP, p = 0.972). ACP patients were more likely to receive radiation after surgery (27.8% vs 15.2%, p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS This large multicenter descriptive study aimed to characterize similarities and differences between the clinical courses of molecularly distinct ACP and PCP, which has not previously been described. The findings should serve as a baseline to inform future studies, particularly with the recent introduction of targeted therapy for PCP.

OBJECTIVE Frailty is a known predictor of adverse outcomes in pituitary surgery, yet its impact regarding craniopharyngioma remains unclear. The authors assessed preoperative frailty, measured by the 11-factor modified frailty index (mFI-11), and its association with perioperative morbidity among adult patients undergoing craniopharyngioma surgery. METHODS Using the Registry for Adenomas of the Pituitary and Related Disorders (RAPID) database, the authors performed a retrospective cohort study of the records of patients ≥ 18 years of age who underwent craniopharyngioma surgery between June 2007 and November 2024. Patients were stratified into the following categories according to their numeric mFI-11 score: fit (scores 0 and 1), managing well (scores 2 and 3), and mildly frail (scores 4–6). Primary outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS) and discharge disposition. Secondary outcomes included 90-day readmission, surgical outcomes, and complications. Multivariable analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of hospital LOS and non-home discharge, adjusting for age, surgeon experience, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, complications, and surgical approach. RESULTS Among 278 patients (221 fit, 43 managing well, 14 mildly frail), higher-frailty patients were older (mean age 47.8 ± 16.1 years in fit vs 60.1 ± 12.5 years in managing well vs 67.6 ± 8 years in mildly frail, p < 0.001) and more likely to present urgently (24.2% vs 36.4% vs 78.6%, p = 0.001). Gross-total resection was achieved less frequently in frail patients (44.8% vs 24.3% vs 23.1%, p = 0.030). Overall complication rates were similar; however, increasing frailty was associated with higher rates of postoperative mortality (0% vs 2.8% [1/36] vs 7.7% [1/13], p = 0.018), pneumonia (0.5% [1/195] vs 2.8% [1/36] vs 15.4% [2/13], p = 0.006), and reintubation (2.6% [5/195] vs 2.8% [1/36] vs 30.8% [4/13], p = 0.002). Higher frailty was associated with a stepwise rise in median [IQR] LOS (5 [3–8] days vs 7 [4–12] days vs 13 [6.5–21.8] days, p < 0.001) and remained an independent predictor of extended LOS on multivariable analysis (β = 1.729 per point, p = 0.006). Rates of non-home discharge showed a similar pattern (9.2% vs 30.0% vs 64.3%, p < 0.001), with frailty independently predicting non-home discharge (OR 2.352, 95% CI 1.527–3.822). Unplanned 90-day readmission rates were significantly higher in the mildly frail cohorts (22.5% vs 45.7% vs 53.8%, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS The mFI-11 scores independently predicted perioperative morbidity following craniopharyngioma resection. Incorporating frailty screening into preoperative screening may improve risk stratification, family and patient counseling, and discharge planning.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Perioperative protocols facilitate earlier discharge without compromising safety in nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas, but no large multicenter studies in the United States have investigated protocols regarding Cushing disease (CD). We sought to characterize perioperative protocols and how their implementation influences clinical outcomes in patients with CD. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from the Registry of Adenomas of the Pituitary and Related Disorders consortium comprising 13 US academic pituitary centers. Institutions were surveyed regarding perioperative procedures for patients undergoing transsphenoidal tumor resection for CD. The impacts of institutional procedures and approaches to implementation on length of stay (LOS) and unplanned 90-day readmission were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirteen institutions contributed survey responses and clinical data for a total of 832 patients meeting inclusion criteria. Ten (76.9%) institutions reported having a postoperative protocol, 9 (69.2%) used a formal document to outline their protocol, and 3 (23.1%) had protocols implemented into hospital policy. Mean LOS was significantly reduced in centers with an established protocol (3.14 vs 3.42 days, P = .032), and more so with a formal document (3.10 vs 3.48 days, P = .001) or hospital policy (2.72 vs 3.36 days, P < .001). Patients treated after protocol implementation experienced shorter LOS ( P < .001). Other factors associated with reduced LOS were presence of a separate CD pathway, intraoperative checklist specific to pituitary surgery, non-narcotic pain regimen, Foley removal order, dedicated outpatient advanced practice provider follow-up, and target discharge date ≤2 days. Intraoperative checklist ( P = .045), non-narcotic pain regimen ( P = .048), nasal packing ( P = .005), and 1-day target discharge date ( P = .032) were important factors against readmission. Compared with microscopic surgery, endoscopic surgery was associated with shorter LOS but increased readmission odds. CONCLUSION: This is the first multicenter study to illustrate that implementation of perioperative protocols is associated with a reduction in LOS and readmission risk in patients with CD.

Abstract Purpose: This multicenter, multi-surgeon retrospective study aimed to identify risk factors for postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak following endonasal resection of craniopharyngioma, while evaluating the "perception gap" through a surgeon survey. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 416 patients who underwent endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ETS) for craniopharyngioma from 20 institutions. Factors were compared between patients with and without postoperative CSF leak, and between Early (2007-2015) and Late (2016-2025) Epochs. Complementing the clinical data, a survey of 19 neurosurgeons captured expert perspectives on risk stratification and management strategies. Results: Overall postoperative CSF leak rate was 13.5% (56/416 patients). Univariate analysis identified predominantly cystic tumors (34% vs. 21%, p = 0.034)and intraoperative lumbar drain (LD) use ( p < 0.028) as associated with postoperative CSF leak. BMI ( p = 0.587), prior surgery ( p = 0.576), and tumor size ( p = 0.363) were not significant. In the multivariable analysis, LD use was associated with a higher postoperative CSF leak rate (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.06–3.46; p = 0.030). Between Epochs, nasoseptal flap (NSF) utilization increased from 70.7% to 87.6% ( p <0.001). NSF was protective (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.07–0.92; p = 0.037) in the Early Epoch; no factors were significant in the Late Epoch. The surgeons’ survey identified prior surgery and intraoperative high flow leaks as primary risks; however, their LD protocols diverged from clinical data. Conclusion: Despite increased use of NSF, CSF leak persists. The study highlights a significant divergence between expert perception and clinical data regarding lumbar drains.