Back to Authors

Kim, Albert H.

Mayo Clinic

Washington University in St. Louis

Citations 2

Comparison of clinical outcomes in adamantinomatous and papillary craniopharyngioma: a baseline analysis before the targeted therapy era
Juncker, Ryan B. , Kim, Albert H., Evans, James J., Barkhoudarian, Garni, Fernandez-Miranda, Juan C., Pacione, Donato , Kim, Won, Zada, Gabriel, Kshettry, Varun R., BENJAMIN, CAROLINA, Gompel, Jamie J. Van, Catalino, Michael, Mamelak, Adam, Zwagerman, Nathan, Little, Andrew S., Gardner, Paul, Karsy, Michael, Couldwell, William T., Rennert, Robert C., Palmer, Joshua D., Prevedello, Daniel M., Wu, Kyle C., Karsy, Michael , Barkhoudarian, Garni , Van Gompel, Jamie, Karsy, Michael , Damante, Mark A. , Kim, Albert H , Evans, James J., Fernandez‐Miranda, Juan C. , Chicoine, Michael , Zada, Gabriel , Kshettry, Varun R. , Gompel, Jamie J. Van , Catalino, Michael P. , Mamelak, Adam N. , Zwagerman, Nathan T. , Little, Andrew S. , Pacult, Mark A. , Couldwell, William T. , Rennert, Robert C , Palmer, Joshua D. , Prevedello, Daniel M.

Neurosurgical Focus | May 27, 2026 | Volume: 60 | Issue: 6 | Pages: E11

10.3171/2026.2.focus251172 Get It

OBJECTIVE Historically, craniopharyngioma (CP) was divided into adamantinomatous CP (ACP) and papillary CP (PCP) subtypes based on histopathological features. However, each harbors a unique genetic profile and progressively differing treatment paradigms, leading to their reclassification by the WHO in 2016 as two distinct entities. Descriptive in nature, this large multi-institutional study aimed to establish current differences between the presentation, treatment patterns, and clinical course of these pathologies to serve as a baseline for future studies as new treatment paradigms emerge. METHODS The authors queried the Registry for Adenomas of the Pituitary and Related Disorders (RAPID) database, which encompassed patients from 14 participating institutions across the United States between 2000 and 2024. The database was screened for adult patients who underwent initial CP treatment with a confirmed histopathological diagnosis of ACP or PCP. Patient demographic characteristics, clinical course, tumor treatment, and outcomes data were collected and compared by CP type. RESULTS The final analysis included 273 ACP and 99 PCP adult patients who underwent initial surgical treatment. ACP patients presented younger on average (mean 48.3 vs 52.8 years, p = 0.034). PCP patients were more likely to present with hypothyroidism (33.3% vs 20.5%, p = 0.010), hyperlipidemia (25.3% vs 15.8%, p = 0.036), fatigue (28.3% vs 17.6%, p = 0.024), temperature intolerance (9.1% vs 1.5%, p < 0.001), and cardiac arrhythmia (6.1% vs 1.1%, p = 0.006). The groups demonstrated similar postsurgical and neuroendocrinological outcomes. Postoperative median (IQR) progression-free survival did not significantly differ between groups (19.0 [7.0–37.0] for ACP vs 5.0 [3.5–7.5] months for PCP, p = 0.972). ACP patients were more likely to receive radiation after surgery (27.8% vs 15.2%, p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS This large multicenter descriptive study aimed to characterize similarities and differences between the clinical courses of molecularly distinct ACP and PCP, which has not previously been described. The findings should serve as a baseline to inform future studies, particularly with the recent introduction of targeted therapy for PCP.
Predictors of hospital length of stay, discharge disposition, and readmission after craniopharyngioma surgery: a multicenter study from the RAPID database
Tenhoeve, Samuel A. , Tang, Anthony , Orton, Cody , Gautam, Diwas, Abdul-Rahman, Nana-Hawwa, Silverstein, Julie M., Kim, Albert H., Evans, James J., Barkhoudarian, Garni, Fernandez-Miranda, Juan C., Pacione, Donato , Kim, Won, Bergsneider, Marvin, Zada, Gabriel, Kshettry, Varun R., Wu, Kyle C., Benjamin, Carolina G., Gompel, Jamie J. Van, Catalino, Michael P., Mamelak, Adam N., Zwagerman, Nathan T., Cheok, Stephanie K., Little, Andrew S., Zenonos, Georgios A., Karsy, Michael, Morshed, Ramin A., Blackburn, Spiros L., Mukherjee, Debraj, Beer-Furlan, Andre, Couldwell, William T., Gardner, Paul A., Rennert, Robert C., Karsy, Michael , Mukherjee, Debraj , Barkhoudarian, Garni , Van Gompel, Jamie, Palit, Sandhya R. , Mukherjee, Debraj , Karsy, Michael , Gautam, Diwas , Abdul‐Rahman, Nana‐Hawwa , Silverstein, Julie , Kim, Albert H , Evans, James J., Fernandez‐Miranda, Juan C. , Bergsneider, Marvin , Chicoine, Michael , Zada, Gabriel , Kshettry, Varun R. , Gompel, Jamie J. Van , Catalino, Michael Paul, Mamelak, Adam N, Zwagerman, Nathan T. , Cheok, Stephanie , Little, Andrew S. , Zenonos, Georgios A. , Morshed, Ramin A. , Blackburn, Spiros L., Beer‐Furlan, André , Couldwell, William T. , Gardner, Paul A. , Rennert, Robert C

Neurosurgical Focus | May 27, 2026 | Volume: 60 | Issue: 6 | Pages: E6

10.3171/2026.2.focus251047 Get It

OBJECTIVE Craniopharyngiomas are benign intracranial tumors that can be difficult to manage operatively and often result in postoperative complications and prolonged recovery. Understanding the factors that influence length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and readmission can guide perioperative planning and patient counseling. The authors examined the clinical, radiographic, and surgical predictors of extended LOS (eLOS), nonhome discharge, 90-day readmission, and hospitalization ratio (HR) after craniopharyngioma resection using a large, multicenter cohort. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted using the Registry of Adenomas of the Pituitary and Related Disorders database, encompassing 469 patients who underwent craniopharyngioma resection at 14 US academic centers from 2011 to 2025. Patients were stratified by 4 outcomes: eLOS (> 75th percentile), discharge to home versus skilled nursing facility/rehabilitation, 90-day hospital readmission, and hospitalization ratio (i.e., integration of initial and readmission LOS). Multivariable logistic regression models identified independent predictors for each outcome among patient and surgical variables. RESULTS An eLOS (> 10 days) was independently associated with preoperative memory loss (OR 3.75, 95% CI 1.95–7.21), gait imbalance (OR 5.90, 95% CI 1.53–22.70), and postoperative complications (OR 4.07, 95% CI 2.34–7.06). The use of a nasoseptal flap was protective against an eLOS (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.28–0.93). Discharge to home was predicted by an endoscopic approach (OR 3.87, 95% CI 1.78–8.44) and postoperative intact thirst (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.05–4.66) and negatively predicted by preoperative diabetes mellitus (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.09–0.50), LOS (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.84–0.91), and postoperative cognitive dysfunction (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.13–0.72). Among 385 patients with follow-up data, a 90-day readmission was independently associated with postoperative complications (OR 5.62, 95% CI 3.12–10.13), preexisting coronary artery disease (OR 4.30, 95% CI 1.46–12.69), and postoperative cognitive dysfunction (OR 3.33, 95% CI 1.76–6.44). A higher HR was associated with diabetes mellitus (unstandardized B 0.059, 95% CI 0.010–0.108, p = 0.02), postoperative complications (unstandardized B 0.054, 95% CI 0.021–0.086, p = 0.001), and postoperative cognitive dysfunction (unstandardized B 0.049, 95% CI 0.006–0.092, p = 0.02). Tumor pathologic subtype and size, prior treatment, extent of resection, and surgeon experience were not directly predictive of outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Cognitive and functional status, systemic comorbidities, and postoperative complications, in addition to surgical approach, are important predictors of the early clinical course after craniopharyngioma surgery. Early identification of high-risk patients may help to guide treatment decisions, improve discharge planning, and reduce healthcare utilization.