Back to Authors

Alt, Jeremiah A.

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0560-5028

Mayo Clinic

University of Utah

Citations 8

Intraoperative Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Enables Primary Tumor Localization and Treatment De‐Escalation in SCCUP : A Case Report
Bellamkonda, Nikhil , Khurana, Nitish , Babajanian, Eric E. , Cannon, Richard B. , Babajanian, Eric, Ghandehari, Hamidreza , Alt, Jeremiah A.

Head & Neck | March 27, 2026 | Volume: 48 | Issue: 9 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/hed.70240 Get It

ABSTRACT Background Unknown primary cancer in the head and neck presents a difficult surgical treatment dilemma. Patients with squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary (SCCUP) typically present with an enlarging neck mass found on biopsy but with no indication of primary site on diagnostic exams such as flexible laryngoscopy, CT, MRI, and/or PET/CT. Failure to identify primary sites eliminates surgical treatment as an option, pushing patients toward definitive chemoradiation with associated side effects. Methods Indocyanine green (ICG) has been used to identify primary carcinoma in known oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma while using transoral robotic surgery (TORS). In this case, we injected ICG intraoperatively in a patient with SCCUP to help with the real‐time localization of ICG in the tumor. Results ICG fluorescence successfully identified a previously undetected primary lesion within the oropharynx during TORS, which enabled precise surgical excision of the tumor. Conclusions This case demonstrates the potential of ICG‐guided TORS to localize primary tumors in SCCUP patients, offering a pathway to surgical treatment and potentially reducing reliance on chemoradiation.
Predictors of Durable Remission After Successful Surgery for Cushing Disease: Results From the Multicenter RAPID Registry
Tenhoeve, Sam , Evans, James, Collopy, Sarah , Delery, William , Pacione, Donato , Silverstein, Julie , Gardner, Paul A. , Rotman, Lauren E., Yuen, Kevin C.J. , Barkhoudarian, Garni , Fernandez‐Miranda, Juan C. , Benjamin, Carolina , Kshettry, Varun R. , Zada, Gabriel , Catalino, Michael P. , Little, Andrew S. , Karsy, Michael , Van Gompel, Jamie, Karsy, Michael , Findlay, Matthew C. , Alt, Jeremiah A. , Rennert, Robert C , Couldwell, William T. , Evans, James, Kim, Won Bae , Kim, Albert H. , Chicoine, Michael , Gompel, Jamie J. Van

Neurosurgery | June 21, 2024 | Volume: 95 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 761-769

10.1227/neu.0000000000003042 Get It

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Cushing disease (CD) affects mortality and quality of life along with limited long-term remission, underscoring the need to better identify recurrence risk. The identification of surgical or imaging predictors for CD remission after transsphenoidal surgery has yielded some inconsistent results and has been limited by single-center, single-surgeon, or meta-analyses studies. We sought to evaluate the multicenter Registry of Adenomas of the Pituitary and Related Disorders (RAPID) database of academic US pituitary centers to assess whether robust nonhormonal recurrence predictors could be elucidated. METHODS: Patients with treated CD from 2011 to 2023 were included. The perioperative and long-term characteristics of CD patients with and without recurrence were assessed using univariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Of 383 patients with CD from 26 surgeons achieving postoperative remission, 288 (75.2%) maintained remission at last follow-up while 95 (24.8%) showed recurrence (median time to recurrence 9.99 ± 1.34 years). Patients with recurrence required longer postoperative hospital stays (5 ± 3 vs 4 ± 2 days, P = .002), had larger average tumor volumes (1.76 ± 2.53 cm 3 vs 0.49 ± 1.17 cm 3 , P = .0001), and more often previously failed prior treatment (31.1% vs 14.9%, P = .001) mostly being prior surgery. Multivariable hazard prediction models for tumor recurrence found younger age (odds ratio [OR] = 0.95, P = .002) and Knosp grade of 0 (OR = 0.09, reference Knosp grade 4, P = .03) to be protective against recurrence. Comparison of Knosp grade 0 to 2 vs 3 to 4 showed that lower grades had reduced risk of recurrence (OR = 0.27, P = .04). Other factors such as length of stay, surgeon experience, prior tumor treatment, and Knosp grades 1, 2, or 3 failed to reach levels of statistical significance in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: This multicenter study centers suggests that the strongest predictors of recurrence include tumor size/invasion and age. This insight can help with patient counseling and prognostication. Long-term follow-up is necessary for patients, and early treatment of small tumors may improve outcomes.
International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors
Adappa, Nithin D. , Beswick, Daniel M. , London, Nyall R. , Su, Shirley Y. , Wang, Marilene B. , Alexiev, Borislav A. , Antognoni, Paolo , Alonso‐Basanta, Michelle , Batra, Pete S., Bhayani, Mihir K. , Bell, Diana , Betz, Christian , Callejas, Claudio , Casiano, Roy R. , Chatzinakis, Vasileios , Chen, Simon , Chowdhury, Naweed I. , Citardi, Martin J. , Cohen, Marc A. , Dagan, Roi , Dalfino, Gianluca , Dassi, Camila , Almeida, John R. de , Tos, Angelo Paolo Dei , DelGaudio, John M. , Ebert, Charles S. , Eloy, Jean Anderson , Evans, James J., Fang, Christina H. , Farrell, Nyssa Fox , Ferrari, Marco , Fischbein, Nancy J. , Folbe, Adam J. , Fox, Meha G. , Lund, Valerie J. , Gallia, Gary L. , Gardner, Paul A. , Getz, Anne E., Govindaraj, Satish, Gray, Stacey T. , Gross, Bradley A. , Guo, Ruifeng , Ha, Patrick K. , Halderman, Ashleigh A. , Hanna, Ehab Y., Harvey, Richard J. , Hernandez, Stephen, Hopkins, Claire , Huang, Zhigang , Huang, Zhenxiao , Humphreys, Ian M. , Hwang, Peter H. , Iloreta, Alfred Marc, Ishii, Masaru , Jafari, Aria , Kennedy, David W. , Khan, Mohemmed, Kimple, Adam J. , Kingdom, Todd T. , Knisely, Anna, Kuo, Ying‐Ju , Lamarre, Eric , Lan, Ming‐Ying , Le, Hien , Lee, Nancy Y. , Lee, Jivianne K., Lee, Victor , Levine, Corinna G. , Lin, Jin‐Ching , Lin, Derrick T., Locke, Tran B. , Luong, Amber , Magliocca, Kelly R. , Matnjani, G., Meço, Cem , Michel, Loren S. , Na'ara, Shorook, Nicolai, Piero , Nuss, Daniel W. , Nyquist, Gurston , Oakley, Gretchen M. , Omura, Kazuhiro , Orlandi, Richard R. , Otori, Nobuyoshi , Papagiannopoulos, Peter , Patel, Zara M. , Pfister, David G. , Rabinowitz, Mindy, Sanusi, Olabisi , Sargi, Zoukaa , Schafhausen, Philippe, Schlosser, Rodney J. , Sedaghat, Ahmad R. , Senior, Brent A. , Shrivastava, Raj , Sindwani, Raj , Smith, Timothy L. , Smith, Kristine A. , Solares, C. Arturo , Stamm, Aldo Cassol , Stölzel, Katharina , Sumer, Baran D. , Tajudeen, Bobby A. , Thorp, Brian D. , Tsang, Raymond K. , VanKoevering, Kyle K. , Welch, Kevin C. , Wise, Sarah K. , Witterick, Ian , Won, Tae‐Bin , Wong, Stéphanie , Woodworth, Bradford A. , Wormald, Peter‐John , Zhou, Bing , Adappa, Nithin D. , Chapurin, Nikita , Ayoub, Noel , Bitner, Benjamin F. , Chang, Michael T. , Kuan, Edward C , Wang, Eric W , Beswick, Daniel , Wang, Marilene B , Alt, Jeremiah A , Bleier, Benjamin , Callejas, Claudio , Choby, Garret , Dalfino, Gianluca , Eloy, Jean Anderson , Fang, Christina H , Farrell, Nyssa F , Ferrari, Marco , Georgalas, Christos , Grayson, Jessica W , Harvey, Richard J , Holtzman, Adam L. , Hopkins, Claire , Humphreys, Ian M , Hwang, Peter H , Jafari, Aria , Kimple, Adam J , Lal, Devyani , Lan, Ming-Ying , Luong, Amber U , Meço, Cem , Omura, Kazuhiro , Orlandi, Richard , Patel, Zara , Sedaghat, Ahmad R , Senior, Brent A , Smith, Timothy L , Smith, Kristine , Snyderman, Carl H , Tong, Charles C L , van Zele, Thibaut , Won, Tae-Bin , Woodworth, Bradford A , Yao, William C , Yeh, Chien-Fu , Zhou, Bing , Schlosser, Rodney J , Bitner, Benjamin , Guo, Ruifeng , Chang, Michael T , Su, Shirley Y , Locke, Tran Bao , Adappa, Nithin D. , Abuzeid, Waleed M. , Alt, Jeremiah A. , Bernal‐Sprekelsen, Manuel , Blay, Jean‐Yves , Bleier, Benjamin S. , Bonilla‐Velez, Juliana , Carrau, Ricardo L. , Castelnuovo, Paolo , Chandra, Rakesh Kumar , Chiu, Alexander G. , Choby, Garret , Dallan, Iacopo , El‐Sayed, Ivan H. , Fokkens, Wytske Johanna , Geltzeiler, Mathew , Grayson, Jessica W. , Gross, Bradley , Grube, Jordon G. , Hanna, Ehab Y., Ivan, Michael E , Khan, Mohemmed N., Lal, Devyani , Lechner, Matt , Lobo, Brian C. , Markovic, Svetomir N. , McKean, Erin L. , Mendenhall, William M , Phan, Jack , Psaltis, Alkis J. , Ramanathan, Murugappan , Rimmer, Ryan , Rosen, Marc R , Sreenath, Satyan B , Šurda, Pavol , Thompson, Lester D.�R. , Turner, Justin H. , Turri‐Zanoni, Mario , Udager, Aaron M , Yao, William C.

International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology | September 2, 2023 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 149-608

10.1002/alr.23262 Get It

Abstract Background Sinonasal neoplasms, whether benign and malignant, pose a significant challenge to clinicians and represent a model area for multidisciplinary collaboration in order to optimize patient care. The International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors (ICSNT) aims to summarize the best available evidence and presents 48 thematic and histopathology‐based topics spanning the field. Methods In accordance with prior International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology documents, ICSNT assigned each topic as an Evidence‐Based Review with Recommendations, Evidence‐Based Review, and Literature Review based on the level of evidence. An international group of multidisciplinary author teams were assembled for the topic reviews using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses format, and completed sections underwent a thorough and iterative consensus‐building process. The final document underwent rigorous synthesis and review prior to publication. Results The ICSNT document consists of four major sections: general principles, benign neoplasms and lesions, malignant neoplasms, and quality of life and surveillance. It covers 48 conceptual and/or histopathology‐based topics relevant to sinonasal neoplasms and masses. Topics with a high level of evidence provided specific recommendations, while other areas summarized the current state of evidence. A final section highlights research opportunities and future directions, contributing to advancing knowledge and community intervention. Conclusion As an embodiment of the multidisciplinary and collaborative model of care in sinonasal neoplasms and masses, ICSNT was designed as a comprehensive, international, and multidisciplinary collaborative endeavor. Its primary objective is to summarize the existing evidence in the field of sinonasal neoplasms and masses.
International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Allergic rhinitis – 2023
Wise, Sarah K. , Damask, Cecelia, Ebert, Charles S. , Levy, Joshua M. , Lin, Sandra Y. , Luong, Amber , Rodriguez, Kenneth , Sedaghat, Ahmad R. , Toskala, Elina , Akdiş, Cezmi A. , Ansotegui, Ignacio J. , Azar, Antoine , Baroody, Fuad M. , Benninger, Michael S. , Casale, Thomas B. , Chaaban, Mohamad R. , Chew, Fook Tim , Chambliss, Jeffrey , Cianferoni, Antonella , Čustović, Adnan , Davis, Elizabeth Mahoney , DelGaudio, John M. , Flanagan, Carrie E. , Franzese, Christine B., Gill, Amarbir S. , Halderman, Ashleigh A. , Joe, Stephanie, Joshi, Shyam , Kuruvilla, Merin , Kim, Jean , Klein, Adam M. , Krouse, Helene J. , Lang, David M. , Laury, Adrienne M., Lee, Victoria S. , Loftus, Patricia A. , Marzouk, Haidy, Mims, James W., Oppenheimer, John , Orlandi, Richard R. , Phillips, Katie M. , Raymond, Mallory , Ryan, Matthew W., Sastre, J. , Schlosser, Rodney J. , Shaker, Marcus , Smith, Kristine A. , Soyka, Michael , Tang, Monica , Tantilipikorn, Pongsakorn , Taw, Malcolm B., Tversky, Jody , Tyler, Matthew A. , Veling, Maria C., Wallace, Dana , White, Andrew A. , Roland, Lauren T , Levy, Joshua M , Luong, Amber U , Sedaghat, Ahmad R , Villwock, Jennifer , Abdullah, Baharudin , Alt, Jeremiah A , Chaaban, Mohamad R , Gill, Amarbir , Kuruvilla, Merin Elizabeth , Kim, Jean , Kuan, Edward C , Lee, Victoria S , Marcus, Sonya , Mattos, Jose , McCoul, Edward D , Nayak, Jayakar V , Orlandi, Richard , Schuman, Theodore A , Smith, Kristine , Soyka, Michael B , Tantilipikorn, Pongsakorn , Tyler, Matthew A , Zhang, Luo , Schlosser, Rodney J , Chew, Fook Tim , Casale, Thomas , Alt, Jeremiah A. , Bernstein, Jonathan A. , Brook, Christopher D. , Campbell, Raewyn Gay , Ellis, Anne K. , Fokkens, Wytske Johanna , Greenhawt, Matthew , Hohlfeld, Jens Michael , Incorvaia, Cristoforo , Larenas‐Linnemann, Désirée E. , Lechner, Matt , Lee, Stella E. , Mattos, José L. , McCoul, Edward D. , Melén, Erik , Mullol, Joaquim , Nayak, Jayakar V. , Platt, Michael P. , Ramanathan, Murugappan , Raymond, Mallory J , Rhee, Chae‐Seo , Reitsma, Sietze , Sheikh, Aziz , Takashima, Masayoshi , Wang, De Yun , Zhang, Luo

International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology | March 6, 2023 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 293-859

10.1002/alr.23090 Get It

Abstract Background In the 5 years that have passed since the publication of the 2018 International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (ICAR‐Allergic Rhinitis 2018), the literature has expanded substantially. The ICAR‐Allergic Rhinitis 2023 update presents 144 individual topics on allergic rhinitis (AR), expanded by over 40 topics from the 2018 document. Originally presented topics from 2018 have also been reviewed and updated. The executive summary highlights key evidence‐based findings and recommendation from the full document. Methods ICAR‐Allergic Rhinitis 2023 employed established evidence‐based review with recommendation (EBRR) methodology to individually evaluate each topic. Stepwise iterative peer review and consensus was performed for each topic. The final document was then collated and includes the results of this work. Results ICAR‐Allergic Rhinitis 2023 includes 10 major content areas and 144 individual topics related to AR. For a substantial proportion of topics included, an aggregate grade of evidence is presented, which is determined by collating the levels of evidence for each available study identified in the literature. For topics in which a diagnostic or therapeutic intervention is considered, a recommendation summary is presented, which considers the aggregate grade of evidence, benefit, harm, and cost. Conclusion The ICAR‐Allergic Rhinitis 2023 update provides a comprehensive evaluation of AR and the currently available evidence. It is this evidence that contributes to our current knowledge base and recommendations for patient evaluation and treatment.
International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Chang, Jolie L. , Goldberg, Andrew N. , Alzoubaidi, Mohammed , Ashbrook, Liza , Auckley, Dennis , Ayappa, Indu , Bakhtiar, H., Bartley, Bethany L. , Billings, Martha E. , Boon, Maurits , Bosschieter, Pien F. N. , Braverman, Itzhak , Brodie, Kara D. , Caesar, Ray, Cahali, Michel Burihan, Cai, Yi , Cao, Michelle , Capasso, Robson , Caples, Sean M., Chang, Corissa P. , Chang, Katherine W. , Chaudhary, Nilika, Cheong, Crystal , Chowdhuri, Susmita , Cistulli, Peter A. , Claman, David M., Collen, Jacob , Coughlin, Kevin , Creamer, Jennifer , Davis, Eric M. , Dupuy-McCauley, Kara , Durr, Megan L. , Dutt, Mohan, Ali, Mazen El, Elkassabany, Nabil , Epstein, Lawrence J., Fiala, Justin A. , Freedman, Neil, Gill, Kirat, Gillespie, M. Boyd , Golisch, Lea, Gooneratne, Nalaka S., Gottlieb, Daniel J. , Green, Katherine K., Gurubhagavatula, Indira , Hayward, Nathan, Hoffmann, Oliver M. G., Holfinger, Steven , Hsia, Jennifer, Huoh, Kevin C. , Inala, Sanjana , Jobanputra, Aesha M. , Johnson, Andrew P. , Junna, Mithri R. , Kado, Jenna T. , Kaffenberger, Thomas M. , Khan, Meena , Kirsch, Douglas B. , Kominsky, Alan, Kryger, Meir H. , Kushida, Clete A. , Kuzniar, Thomas J., Lim, Diane C , Liu, Stanley Yung‐Chuan , MacKay, Stuart G. , Maurer, Joachim T. , May, Anna M. , Mitchell, Ron B. , Mullins, Anna , Nada, Eman , Naik, Sreelatha , Nokes, Brandon , Olson, Michael D. , Pang, Edward B. , Pang, Kenny P. , Perck, Eli Van de , Piccirillo, Jay F. , Pien, Grace W. , Plawecki, Andrea , Quigg, Mark , Ravesloot, Madeline J. L. , Redline, Susan , Rotenberg, Brian , Ryden, Armand, Sarmiento, Kathleen , Sbeih, Firas , Schell, Amy E., Schotland, Helena , Schwab, Richard J. , Seo, Jiyeon , Shah, Neomi , Shelgikar, Anita V., Shochat, Isaac , Soose, Ryan J. , Steele, Toby O. , Stephens, Erika M. , Stepnowsky, Carl , Thaler, Erica R. , Thapa, Sritika, Vries, Nico de, Weaver, Edward M. , Weir, Ian, Wolfe, Lisa F. , Woodson, B. Tucker , Won, Christine , Xu, Josie , Yalamanchi, Pratyusha , Yaremchuk, Kathleen , Yeghiazarians, Yerem, Yu, Jason L. , Zeidler, Michelle , Rosen, Ilene M. , Alt, Jeremiah A , Mohammed, Alzoubaidi , Ashbrook, Liza , Auckley, Dennis , Ayappa, Indu , Bartley, Bethany L , Braverman, Itzhak , Cahali, Michel B , Cai, Yi , Cheong, Crystal S J , Chowdhuri, Susmita , Cistulli, Peter A , Creamer, Jennifer , Dupuy-McCauley, Kara L , Durr, Megan L , Elkassabany, Nabil M , Fiala, Justin A , Gottlieb, Daniel J , Gulati, Arushi , Holfinger, Steven J , Huntley, Colin , Huyett, Phillip , Inala, Sanjana , Ishman, Stacey L , Jobanputra, Aesha M , Kado, Jenna T , Kezirian, Eric J , Kirsch, Douglas B , Kushida, Clete A , Lam, Derek J , Lettieri, Christopher J , Lin, Hsin-Ching , Magalang, Ulysses J , Malhotra, Atul , Mansukhani, Meghna P , Maurer, Joachim T , May, Anna M , Mitchell, Ron B , Mullins, Anna E , Nada, Eman M , Naik, Sreelatha , Nokes, Brandon T , Pack, Allan I , Pien, Grace W , Piper, Amanda J , Ravesloot, Madeline J L , Redline, Susan , Rotenberg, Brian W , Sarmiento, Kathleen F , Schmickl, Christopher N , Shelgikar, Anita Valanju , Shochat, Isaac , Soose, Ryan J , Steele, Toby O , Stephens, Erika , Strohl, Kingman P , Suurna, Maria V , Vanderveken, Olivier M , Yu, Jason L , Rosen, Ilene M , Alt, Jeremiah A. , Barrera, Jose Enrique , Cabrera‐Muffly, Cristina , Chahine, Lana M. , Hoff, Paul T. , Ishman, Stacey L. , Jella, Tarun K. , Kapur, Vishesh K. , Kezirian, Eric J. , Krystal, Andrew D. , Lam, Derek J. , Malhotra, Atul , Mansukhani, Meghna P. , Mokhlesi, Babak , Pack, Allan I , Patil, Susheel P. , Sutherland, Kate

International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology | September 7, 2022 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1061-1482

10.1002/alr.23079 Get It

ABSTRACT Background Evaluation and interpretation of the literature on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) allows for consolidation and determination of the key factors important for clinical management of the adult OSA patient. Toward this goal, an international collaborative of multidisciplinary experts in sleep apnea evaluation and treatment have produced the International Consensus statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (ICS:OSA). Methods Using previously defined methodology, focal topics in OSA were assigned as literature review (LR), evidence‐based review (EBR), or evidence‐based review with recommendations (EBR‐R) formats. Each topic incorporated the available and relevant evidence which was summarized and graded on study quality. Each topic and section underwent iterative review and the ICS:OSA was created and reviewed by all authors for consensus. Results The ICS:OSA addresses OSA syndrome definitions, pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors for disease, screening methods, diagnostic testing types, multiple treatment modalities, and effects of OSA treatment on multiple OSA‐associated comorbidities. Specific focus on outcomes with positive airway pressure (PAP) and surgical treatments were evaluated. Conclusion This review of the literature consolidates the available knowledge and identifies the limitations of the current evidence on OSA. This effort aims to create a resource for OSA evidence‐based practice and identify future research needs. Knowledge gaps and research opportunities include improving the metrics of OSA disease, determining the optimal OSA screening paradigms, developing strategies for PAP adherence and longitudinal care, enhancing selection of PAP alternatives and surgery, understanding health risk outcomes, and translating evidence into individualized approaches to therapy.
Surgical repair of nasal septal perforations: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Fermin, Janmaris Marin , Bui, Roger , McCoul, Edward D. , Avila‐Quintero, Victor J. , Yim, Michael , McCoul, Edward D , Alt, Jeremiah A , Chang, Brent A. , Alt, Jeremiah A.

International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology | January 3, 2022 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1104-1119

10.1002/alr.22965 Get It

Abstract Background A wide variety of techniques for the surgical repair of nasal septal perforations (NSPs) have been described. Surgical management of NSPs can be broadly divided into open versus endonasal approaches, with additional variables involving unilateral or bilateral flaps, use of grafts, and placement of splints. The objective of this study was to compare surgical approaches and their outcomes. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL Plus databases were examined for patients undergoing NSP repair. English‐language studies reporting surgical management of patients with the primary diagnosis of NSP were included. Outcome measures of interest included perforation size, surgical approach characteristics, and success rate defined as complete closure assessed by surgeon postoperatively. The quality of articles was assessed with the methodological index for nonrandomized studies (MINORS) criteria. A random‐effects model was used to calculate pooled proportions for the different outcomes. Results The electronic database search yielded 1076 abstracts for review. A total of 64 articles met the inclusion criteria, with 1591 patients: 1127 (71%) underwent an endonasal approach and 464 (29%) an open approach. The median (range) MINORS score was 10 (5–12) out of 16 points. Overall, 91% of patients had total closure (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89–0.93, p < 0.01), with moderate heterogeneity between studies ( I 2 = 42.03%). There was no difference in closure success between open and endonasal approaches. Use of bilateral versus unilateral flaps, interposition grafts, and intranasal splints and packing were not associated with differences in outcomes. Conclusion Nasal septal perforation surgical repair success rates are comparable regardless of technique.
Characterizing the complexity of frontal endoscopic sinus surgery: a multi‐institutional, prospective, observational trial
Levy, Joshua M. , Smith, Kristine A. , Yao, William C. , Halderman, Ashleigh A. , Oakley, Gretchen M. , Brunworth, Joseph D., Alt, Jeremiah A. , Chen, Philip G , Levy, Joshua M , Choby, Garret , Smith, Kristine , Yao, William C , Alt, Jeremiah A , Chen, Philip G. , Choby, Garret

International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology | December 4, 2020 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 941-945

10.1002/alr.22746 Get It

International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: rhinosinusitis 2021
Orlandi, Richard R. , Kingdom, Todd T. , Smith, Timothy L. , Bleier, Benjamin S. , DeConde, Adam S., Luong, Amber , Poetker, David M., Welch, Kevin C. , Wise, Sarah K. , Adappa, Nithin D. , Anselmo‐Lima, Wilma Terezinha , Bachert, Claus , Baroody, Fuad M. , Batra, Pete S., Bernal‐Sprekelsen, Manuel , Bhattacharyya, Neil , Chang, Eugene H., Chowdhury, Naweed I. , Citardi, Martin J. , Cohen, Noah , Conley, David B. , DelGaudio, John M. , Desrosiers, Martin , Douglas, Richard , Eloy, Jean Anderson , Gray, Stacey T. , Gudis, David A. , Hamilos, Daniel L. , Han, Joseph K., Harvey, Richard J. , Hellings, Peter W. , Hopkins, Claire , Hwang, Peter H. , Javer, Amin R. , Kennedy, David W. , Kern, Robert C. , Lee, Heung‐Man , Lee, Jivianne T. , Levy, Joshua M. , Lin, Sandra Y. , Lund, Valerie, McMains, Kevin C. , Metson, Ralph, Naclerio, Robert M. , Oakley, Gretchen M. , Otori, Nobuyoshi , Parikh, Sanjay R., Patel, Zara M. , Peters, Anju T. , Philpott, Carl , Roh, Hwan‐Jung , Rudmik, Luke , Sacks, Raymond , Schlosser, Rodney J. , Sedaghat, Ahmad R. , Senior, Brent A. , Sindwani, Raj , Smith, Kristine A. , Stewart, Michael G. , Suh, Jeffrey D. , Tan, Bruce K. , Drunen, Cornelis M. van , Woodworth, Bradford A. , Wormald, Peter‐John , Wright, Erin D. , Yan, Carol H. , Zhang, Luo , Zhou, Bing , Chang, Michael T. , Bleier, Benjamin , Alt, Jeremiah A , Beswick, Daniel , Eloy, Jean Anderson , Gudis, David A , Holbrook, Eric H , Hopkins, Claire , Javer, Amin R , Jiang, Rong-San , Lal, Devyani , Lee, Heung-Man , Levy, Joshua M , Patel, Zara , Philpott, Carl , Ramakrishnan, Vijay R , Smith, Kristine , Yan, Carol , Zhang, Luo , Schlosser, Rodney J , Harvey, Richard J , Hwang, Peter H , Chang, Michael T , Soler, Zachary M. , Adappa, Nithin D. , Alt, Jeremiah A. , Beswick, Daniel M. , Chandra, Rakesh Kumar , Chang, Eugene H., Chiu, Alexander G. , Cohen, Noam A., Fokkens, Wytske Johanna , Holbrook, Eric H. , Laidlaw, Tanya M. , Lal, Devyani , Lane, Andrew P , Mullol, Joaquim , Passàli, Desiderio , Psaltis, Alkis J. , Ramanathan, Murugappan , Snidvongs, Kornkiat , Turner, Justin H. , Voegels, Richard Louis , Wang, De Yun

International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology | November 25, 2020 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 213-739

10.1002/alr.22741 Get It

I. Executive Summary Background The 5 years since the publication of the first International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis (ICAR‐RS) has witnessed foundational progress in our understanding and treatment of rhinologic disease. These advances are reflected within the more than 40 new topics covered within the ICAR‐RS‐2021 as well as updates to the original 140 topics. This executive summary consolidates the evidence‐based findings of the document. Methods ICAR‐RS presents over 180 topics in the forms of evidence‐based reviews with recommendations (EBRRs), evidence‐based reviews, and literature reviews. The highest grade structured recommendations of the EBRR sections are summarized in this executive summary. Results ICAR‐RS‐2021 covers 22 topics regarding the medical management of RS, which are grade A/B and are presented in the executive summary. Additionally, 4 topics regarding the surgical management of RS are grade A/B and are presented in the executive summary. Finally, a comprehensive evidence‐based management algorithm is provided. Conclusion This ICAR‐RS‐2021 executive summary provides a compilation of the evidence‐based recommendations for medical and surgical treatment of the most common forms of RS.