Thapa, Sritika

Body positioning exerts profound physiological effects in critically ill patients, influencing respiratory mechanics, ventilation-perfusion matching, hemodynamics, and overall clinical outcomes. Transitioning from an upright to a recumbent position alters thoracoabdominal pressure relationships, reduces ribcage contribution to tidal ventilation, and shifts ventilatory load to the diaphragm. These changes decrease functional residual capacity and promote airway closure in dependent lung regions, predisposing patients to atelectasis—an effect further amplified by intra-abdominal pathology or diaphragmatic weakness. Positioning also reshapes pulmonary perfusion and ventilation, which impact cardiopulmonary hemodynamics. These physiologic principles translate to important therapeutic applications across disease states. In ARDS, prone positioning improves oxygenation via a number of mechanisms, reduces ventilator-induced lung injury, and confers substantial mortality benefit. Prone position may also improve air flow distribution in COPD and enhance venous return in select cardiac physiologies. Conversely, conditions such as ascites, morbid obesity, and hepatopulmonary syndrome exemplify pathologic interactions between abdominal pressure, lung volumes, and posture, often requiring tailored positioning strategies to optimize respiratory performance. Overall, body positioning represents a potent, underutilized intervention in critical care. Understanding the mechanistic foundations of position-dependent changes in ventilation, perfusion, and pleural pressure can help clinicians strategically leverage positioning to improve patient outcomes across a spectrum of pulmonary and systemic illnesses.

ABSTRACT Background Evaluation and interpretation of the literature on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) allows for consolidation and determination of the key factors important for clinical management of the adult OSA patient. Toward this goal, an international collaborative of multidisciplinary experts in sleep apnea evaluation and treatment have produced the International Consensus statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (ICS:OSA). Methods Using previously defined methodology, focal topics in OSA were assigned as literature review (LR), evidence‐based review (EBR), or evidence‐based review with recommendations (EBR‐R) formats. Each topic incorporated the available and relevant evidence which was summarized and graded on study quality. Each topic and section underwent iterative review and the ICS:OSA was created and reviewed by all authors for consensus. Results The ICS:OSA addresses OSA syndrome definitions, pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors for disease, screening methods, diagnostic testing types, multiple treatment modalities, and effects of OSA treatment on multiple OSA‐associated comorbidities. Specific focus on outcomes with positive airway pressure (PAP) and surgical treatments were evaluated. Conclusion This review of the literature consolidates the available knowledge and identifies the limitations of the current evidence on OSA. This effort aims to create a resource for OSA evidence‐based practice and identify future research needs. Knowledge gaps and research opportunities include improving the metrics of OSA disease, determining the optimal OSA screening paradigms, developing strategies for PAP adherence and longitudinal care, enhancing selection of PAP alternatives and surgery, understanding health risk outcomes, and translating evidence into individualized approaches to therapy.