Zeidler, Michelle

Abstract Rationale Sleep is an important dimension of COPD symptomology. Poor self-reported sleep quality has been independently associated with increased exacerbation risk and worse quality of life. There is limited evidence around the longitudinal sleep quality of patients with smoking-related lung disease. Methods Using the SPIROMICS longitudinal cohort of heavy smokers, we used group-based trajectory modeling to understand sleep quality over time as measured by serial retests of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). We considered all participants of Black or Non-Hispanic White race who completed the PSQI in Visits 1-4, a span of 3 years. We considered race, gender, and social environmental exposures as time-stable risk factors for trajectory group membership. We adjusted for age, lung function, mood symptoms and self-reported COPD symptom severity were considered as time-varying factors. We selected the number of trajectory groups by minimizing Bayesian Information Criteria and polynomial order by maximizing the significance of exponential terms. For quality assurance we calculated average posterior probability of correct group assignment. Calculations were performed by complete case analysis and multiple imputation with chained equations. Results We analyzed 2,838 participants yielding 76,153 usable observations. Overall, 39.2% of participants had complete observations for all variables of interest at every measured visit, and 60.8% had at least one relevant observation missing. The largest single source of missingness in our dataset was the comorbidity count, for which 44% of participants had a missing observation. We identified two major trajectory groups. In one group, the PSQI was persistently high with little variation over time, containing 77.7% of the overall study population. The second group had low PSQI at baseline but experienced wide fluctuation over time. Risk factors for persistently poor sleep included female gender, Black race, and more adverse social conditions at either the neighborhood or individual level (Table). The average posterior probability of correct group assignment was 94.6% among the Low Variable group and 89.5% among the Persistent High group. Results were similar by complete case and imputed analysis, save that BMI did not independently predict group membership in the latter. Conclusion Historically underserved groups are at long term risk for poor sleep outcomes in smoking-related lung disease, even among those who are highly motivated and participate in clinical research. More work is needed to ensure equitable access to sleep medicine in order to improve the quality of care in COPD. This abstract is funded by: Nina Ireland Program for Lung Health

ABSTRACT Background Evaluation and interpretation of the literature on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) allows for consolidation and determination of the key factors important for clinical management of the adult OSA patient. Toward this goal, an international collaborative of multidisciplinary experts in sleep apnea evaluation and treatment have produced the International Consensus statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (ICS:OSA). Methods Using previously defined methodology, focal topics in OSA were assigned as literature review (LR), evidence‐based review (EBR), or evidence‐based review with recommendations (EBR‐R) formats. Each topic incorporated the available and relevant evidence which was summarized and graded on study quality. Each topic and section underwent iterative review and the ICS:OSA was created and reviewed by all authors for consensus. Results The ICS:OSA addresses OSA syndrome definitions, pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors for disease, screening methods, diagnostic testing types, multiple treatment modalities, and effects of OSA treatment on multiple OSA‐associated comorbidities. Specific focus on outcomes with positive airway pressure (PAP) and surgical treatments were evaluated. Conclusion This review of the literature consolidates the available knowledge and identifies the limitations of the current evidence on OSA. This effort aims to create a resource for OSA evidence‐based practice and identify future research needs. Knowledge gaps and research opportunities include improving the metrics of OSA disease, determining the optimal OSA screening paradigms, developing strategies for PAP adherence and longitudinal care, enhancing selection of PAP alternatives and surgery, understanding health risk outcomes, and translating evidence into individualized approaches to therapy.

Abstract Study Objectives Sleep is an important dimension in the care of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but its relevance to exacerbations is unclear. We wanted to assess whether sleep quality as measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is associated with an increased risk of COPD exacerbations and does this differ by socio-environmental exposures. Methods We included 1647 current and former smokers with spirometrically confirmed COPD from the SPIROMICS cohort. We assessed incidence rate ratios for exacerbation using zero-inflated negative binomial regression adjusting for demographics, medical comorbidities, and multiple metrics of disease severity, including respiratory medications, airflow obstruction, and symptom burden. Our final model adjusted for socio-environmental exposures using the Area Deprivation Index, a composite measure of contemporary neighborhood quality, and Adversity–Opportunity Index, a composite measure of individual-level historic and current socioeconomic indicators. We used a pre-determined threshold of 20% missingness to undertake multiple imputation by chained equations. As sensitivity analyses, we repeated models in those with complete data and after controlling for prior exacerbations. As an exploratory analysis, we considered an interaction between socio-environmental condition and sleep quality. Results After adjustment for all co-variates, increasing PSQI scores (range 0–21) were associated with a 5% increased risk for exacerbation per point (p = .001) in the imputed dataset. Sensitivity analyses using complete cases and after controlling for prior exacerbation history were similar. Exploratory analysis suggested less effect among those who lived in poor-quality neighborhoods (p-for-interaction = .035). Conclusions Poor sleep quality may contribute to future exacerbations among patients with COPD. This represents one target for improving disease control. Clinical Trial Registration Subpopulations and Intermediate Outcome Measures in COPD Study (SPIROMICS). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier# NCT01969344. Registry URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/.