Back to Authors

Chapurin, Nikita

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3744-0451

Mayo Clinic

University of Florida Health

Citations 3

Clinical Features and Dental Pathologies in Maxillary Sinus Fungal Balls and Odontogenic Sinusitis
Im, E., Donaldson, Lane , Adappa, Nithin D, Chen, Y. P., Chapurin, Nikita , Espinosa, Maria, Fu, Chia‐Hsiang , Fox, Meha G, Garg, Rohit, Kohanski, Michael A. , Li, Kevin L. , Liu, Duxuan , Locke, Tran Bao, Lin, Chih‐Feng, Ottavi, Alice, Papagiannopoulos, Peter , Je, Palmer, Tong, C., Tajudeen, Bobby A. , Venkatesh, Sanjena , Wei, Kimberly , Yoo, Frederick , Yu, Alison J. , Jin, Jun, Saibene, Alberto Maria , Craig, John, Im, Eunice , Douglas, Jennifer E , Eide, Jacob, Espinosa, Maria , Fox, Meha G , Locke, Tran Bao , Makary, Chadi , Venkatesh, Sanjena , Saibene, Alberto M , Adelman, Avraham E. , Adappa, Nithin D. , D’Souza, Glen , Eide, Jacob G. , Fox, Meha G. , Garg, Rohit , Kuan, Edward C , Kwiatkowska, Marta Aleksandra , Liu, Derek H., Locke, Tran B. , Jin, Jun

The Laryngoscope | February 8, 2026 | Volume: 136 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 2913-2924

10.1002/lary.70429 Get It

ABSTRACT Objectives While maxillary sinus fungal balls (MSFB) can be associated with odontogenic conditions (MSFBO), MSFBO clinical and dental features have not been compared to odontogenic sinusitis (ODS). This multicenter study aimed to compare characteristics of MSFB, MSFBO, and ODS. Methods A multicenter international retrospective cohort study was conducted on adults with MSFBs and ODS who underwent sinus surgery. First in MSFBs, it was determined whether different dental conditions were more likely in FB versus non‐FB sides. Second, clinical features and dental pathologies were compared between MSFBO and ODS. For analyses, dental conditions were considered individually and as two groups: infectious pathologies and dental/oral procedures with indwelling metallic materials. Results After exclusions, there were 203 MSFBs and 163 ODS. Among MSFBs, 141 were MSFBOs. FB sides were associated with sinus protrusion of root canal treatment (RCT) materials ( p = 0.040) and dental implants ( p = 0.040). Compared to MSFBO, ODS patients were younger, more likely to have MS purulence (OR = 40.9, p < 0.010), more likely associated with apical periodontitis (OR = 2.59, p = 0.010) and oroantral fistulas (OR = 6.94, p = 0.020), and less likely associated with extruded RCT materials (OR = 0.01, p = 0.010) and protruded midface screws (OR < 0.01, p = 0.010). Comparing purulent MSFBO and ODS, ODS was more associated with infectious dental pathologies ( p < 0.009). Conclusion Compared to MSFBs, MSFBOs were associated with RCT extrusion and implant protrusion. Compared to MSFBOs, ODS was more likely purulent and associated with infectious dental pathologies. While ODS is often distinct from MSFBO, the two conditions can coexist, and surgeons must determine whether patients have infectious dental pathology requiring treatment with both conditions. Level of Evidence 4.
International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors
Adappa, Nithin D. , Beswick, Daniel M. , London, Nyall R. , Su, Shirley Y. , Wang, Marilene B. , Alexiev, Borislav A. , Antognoni, Paolo , Alonso‐Basanta, Michelle , Batra, Pete S., Bhayani, Mihir K. , Bell, Diana , Betz, Christian , Callejas, Claudio , Casiano, Roy R. , Chatzinakis, Vasileios , Chen, Simon , Chowdhury, Naweed I. , Citardi, Martin J. , Cohen, Marc A. , Dagan, Roi , Dalfino, Gianluca , Dassi, Camila , Almeida, John R. de , Tos, Angelo Paolo Dei , DelGaudio, John M. , Ebert, Charles S. , Eloy, Jean Anderson , Evans, James J., Fang, Christina H. , Farrell, Nyssa Fox , Ferrari, Marco , Fischbein, Nancy J. , Folbe, Adam J. , Fox, Meha G. , Lund, Valerie J. , Gallia, Gary L. , Gardner, Paul A. , Getz, Anne E., Govindaraj, Satish, Gray, Stacey T. , Gross, Bradley A. , Guo, Ruifeng , Ha, Patrick K. , Halderman, Ashleigh A. , Hanna, Ehab Y., Harvey, Richard J. , Hernandez, Stephen, Hopkins, Claire , Huang, Zhigang , Huang, Zhenxiao , Humphreys, Ian M. , Hwang, Peter H. , Iloreta, Alfred Marc, Ishii, Masaru , Jafari, Aria , Kennedy, David W. , Khan, Mohemmed, Kimple, Adam J. , Kingdom, Todd T. , Knisely, Anna, Kuo, Ying‐Ju , Lamarre, Eric , Lan, Ming‐Ying , Le, Hien , Lee, Nancy Y. , Lee, Jivianne K., Lee, Victor , Levine, Corinna G. , Lin, Jin‐Ching , Lin, Derrick T., Locke, Tran B. , Luong, Amber , Magliocca, Kelly R. , Matnjani, G., Meço, Cem , Michel, Loren S. , Na'ara, Shorook, Nicolai, Piero , Nuss, Daniel W. , Nyquist, Gurston , Oakley, Gretchen M. , Omura, Kazuhiro , Orlandi, Richard R. , Otori, Nobuyoshi , Papagiannopoulos, Peter , Patel, Zara M. , Pfister, David G. , Rabinowitz, Mindy, Sanusi, Olabisi , Sargi, Zoukaa , Schafhausen, Philippe, Schlosser, Rodney J. , Sedaghat, Ahmad R. , Senior, Brent A. , Shrivastava, Raj , Sindwani, Raj , Smith, Timothy L. , Smith, Kristine A. , Solares, C. Arturo , Stamm, Aldo Cassol , Stölzel, Katharina , Sumer, Baran D. , Tajudeen, Bobby A. , Thorp, Brian D. , Tsang, Raymond K. , VanKoevering, Kyle K. , Welch, Kevin C. , Wise, Sarah K. , Witterick, Ian , Won, Tae‐Bin , Wong, Stéphanie , Woodworth, Bradford A. , Wormald, Peter‐John , Zhou, Bing , Adappa, Nithin D. , Chapurin, Nikita , Ayoub, Noel , Bitner, Benjamin F. , Chang, Michael T. , Kuan, Edward C , Wang, Eric W , Beswick, Daniel , Wang, Marilene B , Alt, Jeremiah A , Bleier, Benjamin , Callejas, Claudio , Choby, Garret , Dalfino, Gianluca , Eloy, Jean Anderson , Fang, Christina H , Farrell, Nyssa F , Ferrari, Marco , Georgalas, Christos , Grayson, Jessica W , Harvey, Richard J , Holtzman, Adam L. , Hopkins, Claire , Humphreys, Ian M , Hwang, Peter H , Jafari, Aria , Kimple, Adam J , Lal, Devyani , Lan, Ming-Ying , Luong, Amber U , Meço, Cem , Omura, Kazuhiro , Orlandi, Richard , Patel, Zara , Sedaghat, Ahmad R , Senior, Brent A , Smith, Timothy L , Smith, Kristine , Snyderman, Carl H , Tong, Charles C L , van Zele, Thibaut , Won, Tae-Bin , Woodworth, Bradford A , Yao, William C , Yeh, Chien-Fu , Zhou, Bing , Schlosser, Rodney J , Bitner, Benjamin , Guo, Ruifeng , Chang, Michael T , Su, Shirley Y , Locke, Tran Bao , Adappa, Nithin D. , Abuzeid, Waleed M. , Alt, Jeremiah A. , Bernal‐Sprekelsen, Manuel , Blay, Jean‐Yves , Bleier, Benjamin S. , Bonilla‐Velez, Juliana , Carrau, Ricardo L. , Castelnuovo, Paolo , Chandra, Rakesh Kumar , Chiu, Alexander G. , Choby, Garret , Dallan, Iacopo , El‐Sayed, Ivan H. , Fokkens, Wytske Johanna , Geltzeiler, Mathew , Grayson, Jessica W. , Gross, Bradley , Grube, Jordon G. , Hanna, Ehab Y., Ivan, Michael E , Khan, Mohemmed N., Lal, Devyani , Lechner, Matt , Lobo, Brian C. , Markovic, Svetomir N. , McKean, Erin L. , Mendenhall, William M , Phan, Jack , Psaltis, Alkis J. , Ramanathan, Murugappan , Rimmer, Ryan , Rosen, Marc R , Sreenath, Satyan B , Šurda, Pavol , Thompson, Lester D.�R. , Turner, Justin H. , Turri‐Zanoni, Mario , Udager, Aaron M , Yao, William C.

International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology | September 2, 2023 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 149-608

10.1002/alr.23262 Get It

Abstract Background Sinonasal neoplasms, whether benign and malignant, pose a significant challenge to clinicians and represent a model area for multidisciplinary collaboration in order to optimize patient care. The International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors (ICSNT) aims to summarize the best available evidence and presents 48 thematic and histopathology‐based topics spanning the field. Methods In accordance with prior International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology documents, ICSNT assigned each topic as an Evidence‐Based Review with Recommendations, Evidence‐Based Review, and Literature Review based on the level of evidence. An international group of multidisciplinary author teams were assembled for the topic reviews using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses format, and completed sections underwent a thorough and iterative consensus‐building process. The final document underwent rigorous synthesis and review prior to publication. Results The ICSNT document consists of four major sections: general principles, benign neoplasms and lesions, malignant neoplasms, and quality of life and surveillance. It covers 48 conceptual and/or histopathology‐based topics relevant to sinonasal neoplasms and masses. Topics with a high level of evidence provided specific recommendations, while other areas summarized the current state of evidence. A final section highlights research opportunities and future directions, contributing to advancing knowledge and community intervention. Conclusion As an embodiment of the multidisciplinary and collaborative model of care in sinonasal neoplasms and masses, ICSNT was designed as a comprehensive, international, and multidisciplinary collaborative endeavor. Its primary objective is to summarize the existing evidence in the field of sinonasal neoplasms and masses.
Noninvasive optical spectroscopy for identification of non‐melanoma skin cancer: Pilot study
Carpenter, David , Sajisevi, Mirabelle , Chapurin, Nikita , Brown, C. Scott , Cheng, Tracy , Palmer, Gregory M. , Stevenson, Daniel, Rao, Caroline L., Hall, Russell P. , Woodard, Charles R., Sajisevi, Mirabelle B

Lasers in Surgery and Medicine | January 13, 2018 | Volume: 50 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 246-252

10.1002/lsm.22786 Get It

ObjectiveOptical spectroscopy offers a noninvasive alternative to biopsy as a first‐line screening tool for suspicious skin lesions. This study sought to define several optical parameters across malignant and benign tissue types.Study DesignProspective pilot trial utilizing the Zenalux IM1 optical spectroscopy device from April 2016 to February 2017. For each skin lesion, provider pre‐biopsy probability of malignancy was compared to histolopathologic diagnosis. Optical data were characterized across basal cell carcinoma (BCC; n = 9), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC; n = 5), actinic keratosis (AK; n = 4), scar tissue (n = 6), nevus (n = 2), and neurofibroma (NF; n = 1). Across all patients, agreement was determined between control measurements collected adjacent to the lesion and from the upper extremity.MethodsProspective single center pilot study. The optical properties of 27 cutaneous lesions were collected from 18 adult patients presenting to Otolaryngology and Dermatology clinics with suspicious skin lesions warranting biopsy. Spectroscopy measurements were recorded for each lesion: two at the lesion site, two at an adjacent site (internal control), and one at the central medial upper extremity (arm control). Variables of interest included absolute oxygenated hemoglobin (Hb), Hb saturation, total Hb concentration, and Eumelanin concentration. For each lesion, internal control averages were subtracted from lesion averages to provide delta parameter values, and lesion averages were divided by internal control averages to provide ratio parameter values.ResultsMean percent difference between pre‐biopsy probability of malignancy and histology was 29%, with a difference of 75% or greater seen in 5 of 25 lesions. Mean values for BCC, SCC, AK, and scar tissue varied most between extracted mean reduced scatter estimate (; cm−) delta values (BCC: −2.2 ± 3.8; SCC: −3.9 ± 2.0; AK: −3.3 ± 4.2, Scar: −1.7 ± 1.2) and total Hb (µM) ratio (BCC: 2.0 ± 3.3; SCC: 3.0 ± 1.3; AK: 1.1 ± 0.6; Scar: 1.4 ± 1.1). Agreement between local and arm controls was poor.ConclusionThis pilot trial utilizes optical spectroscopy as a noninvasive method for determining cutaneous lesion histology. Effect sizes observed across optical parameters for benign and malignant tissue types will guide larger prospective studies that may ultimately lead to prediction of lesional histology without need for invasive biopsy. Lasers Surg. Med. 50:246–252, 2018. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.