Citations 2
International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Allergic rhinitis – 2023
Wise, Sarah K. , Damask, Cecelia, Ebert, Charles S. , Levy, Joshua M. , Lin, Sandra Y. , Luong, Amber , Rodriguez, Kenneth , Sedaghat, Ahmad R. , Toskala, Elina , Akdiş, Cezmi A. , Ansotegui, Ignacio J. , Azar, Antoine , Baroody, Fuad M. , Benninger, Michael S. , Casale, Thomas B. , Chaaban, Mohamad R. , Chew, Fook Tim , Chambliss, Jeffrey , Cianferoni, Antonella , Čustović, Adnan , Davis, Elizabeth Mahoney , DelGaudio, John M. , Flanagan, Carrie E. , Franzese, Christine B., Gill, Amarbir S. , Halderman, Ashleigh A. , Joe, Stephanie, Joshi, Shyam , Kuruvilla, Merin , Kim, Jean , Klein, Adam M. , Krouse, Helene J. , Lang, David M. , Laury, Adrienne M., Lee, Victoria S. , Loftus, Patricia A. , Marzouk, Haidy, Mims, James W., Oppenheimer, John , Orlandi, Richard R. , Phillips, Katie M. , Raymond, Mallory , Ryan, Matthew W., Sastre, J. , Schlosser, Rodney J. , Shaker, Marcus , Smith, Kristine A. , Soyka, Michael , Tang, Monica , Tantilipikorn, Pongsakorn , Taw, Malcolm B., Tversky, Jody , Tyler, Matthew A. , Veling, Maria C., Wallace, Dana , White, Andrew A. , Roland, Lauren T , Levy, Joshua M , Luong, Amber U , Sedaghat, Ahmad R , Villwock, Jennifer , Abdullah, Baharudin , Alt, Jeremiah A , Chaaban, Mohamad R , Gill, Amarbir , Kuruvilla, Merin Elizabeth , Kim, Jean , Kuan, Edward C , Lee, Victoria S , Marcus, Sonya , Mattos, Jose , McCoul, Edward D , Nayak, Jayakar V , Orlandi, Richard , Schuman, Theodore A , Smith, Kristine , Soyka, Michael B , Tantilipikorn, Pongsakorn , Tyler, Matthew A , Zhang, Luo , Schlosser, Rodney J , Chew, Fook Tim , Casale, Thomas , Alt, Jeremiah A. , Bernstein, Jonathan A. , Brook, Christopher D. , Campbell, Raewyn Gay , Ellis, Anne K. , Fokkens, Wytske Johanna , Greenhawt, Matthew , Hohlfeld, Jens Michael , Incorvaia, Cristoforo , Larenas‐Linnemann, Désirée E. , Lechner, Matt , Lee, Stella E. , Mattos, José L. , McCoul, Edward D. , Melén, Erik , Mullol, Joaquim , Nayak, Jayakar V. , Platt, Michael P. , Ramanathan, Murugappan , Raymond, Mallory J , Rhee, Chae‐Seo , Reitsma, Sietze , Sheikh, Aziz , Takashima, Masayoshi , Wang, De Yun , Zhang, Luo
International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology | March 6, 2023 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 293-859
Abstract Background In the 5 years that have passed since the publication of the 2018 International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (ICAR‐Allergic Rhinitis 2018), the literature has expanded substantially. The ICAR‐Allergic Rhinitis 2023 update presents 144 individual topics on allergic rhinitis (AR), expanded by over 40 topics from the 2018 document. Originally presented topics from 2018 have also been reviewed and updated. The executive summary highlights key evidence‐based findings and recommendation from the full document. Methods ICAR‐Allergic Rhinitis 2023 employed established evidence‐based review with recommendation (EBRR) methodology to individually evaluate each topic. Stepwise iterative peer review and consensus was performed for each topic. The final document was then collated and includes the results of this work. Results ICAR‐Allergic Rhinitis 2023 includes 10 major content areas and 144 individual topics related to AR. For a substantial proportion of topics included, an aggregate grade of evidence is presented, which is determined by collating the levels of evidence for each available study identified in the literature. For topics in which a diagnostic or therapeutic intervention is considered, a recommendation summary is presented, which considers the aggregate grade of evidence, benefit, harm, and cost. Conclusion The ICAR‐Allergic Rhinitis 2023 update provides a comprehensive evaluation of AR and the currently available evidence. It is this evidence that contributes to our current knowledge base and recommendations for patient evaluation and treatment.
Orbital resection by intranasal technique (ORBIT): A new classification system for reporting endoscopically resectable primary benign orbital tumors
Jafari, Aria , Adappa, Nithin D. , Anagnos, Vincent J., Chalian, Ara A., Chambers, Christopher B. , Dallan, Iacopo , Freitag, Suzanne K. , Miranda, Juan Carlos Fernández, Gardner, Paul A. , Harvey, Richard J. , Huang, Qian , Humphreys, Ian M. , Kennedy, David W. , Lee, John Y. K. , Lehmann, Ashton E. , McKinney, Kibwei A. , Moreau, Annie, Nyquist, Gurston , Adappa, Nithin D. , Pribitkin, Edmund A. , Rabinowitz, Mindy, Sacks, Raymond , Sharma, Dhruv , Stefko, S. Tonya, Stokken, Janalee K., Workman, Alan D. , Wu, Arthur W. , Yu, Jen Y., Zhang, Matthew , Zhou, Bing , Stokken, Janalee K. , Humphreys, Ian M , Lehmann, Ashton E , Snyderman, Carl H , Wang, Eric W , Wu, Arthur W , Bleier, Benjamin , Carlson, Matthew L , Harvey, Richard J , Adappa, Nithin D. , Anagnos, Vincent , Campbell, Raewyn Gay , Castelnuovo, Paolo , Chitguppi, Chandala , Rassi, Edward El , Ferreira, Manuel Marques , Gudis, David A. , Locatelli, Davide , Prepageran, Narayanan , Rosen, Marc R , Bleier, Benjamin S.
International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology | February 17, 2023 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1852-1863
AbstractBackgroundThe Cavernous Hemangioma Exclusively Endonasal Resection (CHEER) staging system has become the gold standard for outcomes reporting in endoscopic orbital surgery for orbital cavernous hemangiomas (OCHs). A recent systematic review demonstrated similar outcomes between OCHs and other primary benign orbital tumors (PBOTs). Therefore, we hypothesized that a simplified and more comprehensive classification system could be developed to predict surgical outcomes of other PBOTs.MethodsPatient and tumor characteristics as well as surgical outcomes from 11 international centers were recorded. All tumors were retrospectively assigned an Orbital Resection by Intranasal Technique (ORBIT) class and stratified based on surgical approach as either exclusively endoscopic or combined (endoscopic and open). Outcomes based on approach were compared using chi‐squared or Fisher's exact tests. The Cochrane‐Armitage test for trend was used to analyze outcomes by class.ResultsFindings from 110 PBOTs from 110 patients (age 49.0 ± 15.0 years, 51.9% female) were included in the analysis. Higher ORBIT class was associated with a lower likelihood of gross total resection (GTR). GTR was more likely to be achieved when an exclusively endoscopic approach was utilized (p < 0.05). Tumors resected using a combined approach tended to be larger, to present with diplopia, and to have an immediate postoperative cranial nerve palsy (p < 0.05).ConclusionEndoscopic treatment of PBOTs is an effective approach, with favorable short‐term and long‐term postoperative outcomes as well as low rate of adverse events. The ORBIT classification system is an anatomic‐based framework that effectively facilitates high‐quality outcomes reporting for all PBOTs.