Back to Authors

Freitag, Suzanne K.

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0887-1487

Mayo Clinic

Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary

Citations 3

Consensus disease definitions for ophthalmic immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors
Chang, Eileen , Keyhanian, Kiandokht, Huynh, Katie , Bhatti, M. Tariq , Chen, John J. , Costello, Fiona , Lott, Lindsey B. De , Egan, Robert A. , Fraser, Clare L, Freitag, Suzanne K. , Guidon, Amanda C. , Johnson, Douglas B. , Kombo, Ninani , Kramer, Michal , Lobo-Chan, Anne-Marie, Mantopoulos, Dimosthenis , Papaliodis, George N. , Pimkina, Julia, Rubin, Krista M., Sen, H. Nida, Shariff, Afreen , Subramanian, Prem S. , Tsui, Edmund , Yoon, Michael K. , McDunn, Jon, Rine, Johnathan, Reynolds, Kerry L. , Chwalisz, Bart K. , Levy, Michael , Huynh, Katie , Pless, Misha, Levy, Michael , Chen, John J , De Lott, Lindsey B , Liu, Renee , Berkenstock, Meghan , Chodosh, James , Dalvin, Lauren A. , Dinkin, Marc , Fraser, Clare L, Gangaputra, Sapna , Gordon, Lynn K. , Lee, Andrew G. , Levy, Michael, Lobo-Chan, Ann-Marie , Pless, Misha L , Sen, H. Nida , McDunn, Jon , Sobrin, Lucia

Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer | April 8, 2025 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 4 | Pages: e011049

10.1136/jitc-2024-011049 Get It

Ophthalmic immune-related adverse events (Eye-irAEs) from immune checkpoint inhibitors can cause visual morbidity. The absence of standardized definitions for Eye-irAEs not only impedes the development of evidence-based treatments but also progress in translational research. The objective of this study was to develop consensus guidance for an approach to Eye-irAEs. Four ophthalmic physicians (uveitis specialists and neuro-ophthalmologists) drafted Eye-irAE consensus guidance and definitions, which were reviewed by the multidisciplinary Eye-irAE definition panel. The panel was divided into Group A (Neuro-ophthalmology/Orbital Disease) and Group B (Uveitis/Ocular Surface Disease). A modified Delphi consensus process was used, with two rounds of anonymous ratings by panelists and two meetings to discuss areas of controversy. For each disorder, five diagnostic components were evaluated: symptoms, examination findings, laboratory studies/imaging findings, diagnostic criteria, and treatment. Panelists rated content for usability, appropriateness and accuracy on 9-point scales in electronic surveys and provided free-text comments. Aggregated survey responses were incorporated into revised definitions. Consensus was based on numeric ratings using the RAND Corporation/ University of California Los Angeles Health Services Utilization Study (RAND/UCLA) Appropriateness Method with prespecified definitions. 29 panelists from 25 academic medical centers voted on 114 rating scales (66 neuro-ophthalmic/orbital disease components, 48 uveitis/ocular surface disease components); of these, 86.3% (57/66) in Group A and 89.6% (43/48) in Group B reached first-round consensus. After revisions, all items except 6.1% (4/66) in Group A and 1.6% (1/60) in Group B received second-round consensus. Consensus definitions were achieved for 10/11 neuro-ophthalmic/orbital disorders: optic neuritis, inflammatory optic disc edema, arteritic ischemic optic neuropathy, optic perineuritis, orbital inflammation, thyroid eye disease-like orbital inflammation, cavernous sinus syndrome, oculomotor mononeuritis, trochlear mononeuritis, and abducens mononeuritis. Consensus definitions were achieved for 9/10 uveitis/ocular surface disorders: anterior uveitis, intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, panuveitis, Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada-like syndrome, sarcoidosis-like syndrome, acute macular neuroretinopathy, dry eye disease, and scleritis. These disease definitions establish a standardized classification for Eye-irAE, highlighting differences between irAEs and other inflammatory disorders. Importantly, diagnostic certainty does not always align directly with the need to treat as an Eye-irAE. Given the consensus from this representative panel group, it is anticipated the definitions will be used broadly across clinical and research settings.
Orbital resection by intranasal technique (ORBIT): A new classification system for reporting endoscopically resectable primary benign orbital tumors
Jafari, Aria , Adappa, Nithin D. , Anagnos, Vincent J., Chalian, Ara A., Chambers, Christopher B. , Dallan, Iacopo , Freitag, Suzanne K. , Miranda, Juan Carlos Fernández, Gardner, Paul A. , Harvey, Richard J. , Huang, Qian , Humphreys, Ian M. , Kennedy, David W. , Lee, John Y. K. , Lehmann, Ashton E. , McKinney, Kibwei A. , Moreau, Annie, Nyquist, Gurston , Adappa, Nithin D. , Pribitkin, Edmund A. , Rabinowitz, Mindy, Sacks, Raymond , Sharma, Dhruv , Stefko, S. Tonya, Stokken, Janalee K., Workman, Alan D. , Wu, Arthur W. , Yu, Jen Y., Zhang, Matthew , Zhou, Bing , Stokken, Janalee K. , Humphreys, Ian M , Lehmann, Ashton E , Snyderman, Carl H , Wang, Eric W , Wu, Arthur W , Bleier, Benjamin , Carlson, Matthew L , Harvey, Richard J , Adappa, Nithin D. , Anagnos, Vincent , Campbell, Raewyn Gay , Castelnuovo, Paolo , Chitguppi, Chandala , Rassi, Edward El , Ferreira, Manuel Marques , Gudis, David A. , Locatelli, Davide , Prepageran, Narayanan , Rosen, Marc R , Bleier, Benjamin S.

International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology | February 17, 2023 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1852-1863

10.1002/alr.23141 Get It

AbstractBackgroundThe Cavernous Hemangioma Exclusively Endonasal Resection (CHEER) staging system has become the gold standard for outcomes reporting in endoscopic orbital surgery for orbital cavernous hemangiomas (OCHs). A recent systematic review demonstrated similar outcomes between OCHs and other primary benign orbital tumors (PBOTs). Therefore, we hypothesized that a simplified and more comprehensive classification system could be developed to predict surgical outcomes of other PBOTs.MethodsPatient and tumor characteristics as well as surgical outcomes from 11 international centers were recorded. All tumors were retrospectively assigned an Orbital Resection by Intranasal Technique (ORBIT) class and stratified based on surgical approach as either exclusively endoscopic or combined (endoscopic and open). Outcomes based on approach were compared using chi‐squared or Fisher's exact tests. The Cochrane‐Armitage test for trend was used to analyze outcomes by class.ResultsFindings from 110 PBOTs from 110 patients (age 49.0 ± 15.0 years, 51.9% female) were included in the analysis. Higher ORBIT class was associated with a lower likelihood of gross total resection (GTR). GTR was more likely to be achieved when an exclusively endoscopic approach was utilized (p < 0.05). Tumors resected using a combined approach tended to be larger, to present with diplopia, and to have an immediate postoperative cranial nerve palsy (p < 0.05).ConclusionEndoscopic treatment of PBOTs is an effective approach, with favorable short‐term and long‐term postoperative outcomes as well as low rate of adverse events. The ORBIT classification system is an anatomic‐based framework that effectively facilitates high‐quality outcomes reporting for all PBOTs.
Salivary and lacrimal dysfunction after radioactive iodine for differentiated thyroid cancer: American Head and Neck Society Endocrine Surgery Section and Salivary Gland Section joint multidisciplinary clinical consensus statement of otolaryngology, ophtha
Singer, Michael C. , Marchal, Francis, Bernet, Vic, Boucai, Laura , Buchholzer, Samanta , Burkey, Brian B., Eisele, David W. , Faure, Fréderic , Freitag, Suzanne K. , Gillespie, M. Boyd , Harrell, R. Mack, Hartl, Dana M. , Haymart, Megan R. , Leffert, Jonathan, Mandel, Susan J., Miller, Barbra S. , Pearce, Elizabeth N. , Rahmati, Rahmatullah, Ryan, William R. , Schaitkin, Barry M., Schlumberger, Martin, Stack, Brendan C. , Nostrand, Doug Van, Wong, Ka Kit , Stack, Brendan C , Pearce, Elizabeth N , Angelos, Peter , Bernet, Victor , Buchholzer, Samanta , Erkul, Evren , Morris, John, Nostrand, Douglas Van , Randolph, Gregory William

Head & Neck | August 26, 2020 | Volume: 42 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 3446-3459

10.1002/hed.26417 Get It

AbstractBackgroundPostoperative radioactive iodine (RAI) administration is widely utilized in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. While beneficial in select patients, it is critical to recognize the potential negative sequelae of this treatment. The prevention, diagnosis, and management of the salivary and lacrimal complications of RAI exposure are addressed in this consensus statement.MethodsA multidisciplinary panel of experts was convened under the auspices of the American Head and Neck Society Endocrine Surgery and Salivary Gland Sections. Following a comprehensive literature review to assess the current best evidence, this group developed six relevant consensus recommendations.ResultsConsensus recommendations on RAI were made in the areas of patient assessment, optimal utilization, complication prevention, and complication management.ConclusionSalivary and lacrimal complications secondary to RAI exposure are common and need to be weighed when considering its use. The recommendations included in this statement provide direction for approaches to minimize and manage these complications.