Back to Authors

Yuen, Kevin C J

0000-0002-8169-2728

Mayo Clinic

Creighton University

Citations 2

Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Lonapegsomatropin in Adults With Growth Hormone Deficiency: foresiGHt Trial Results
Biller, Beverly M. K. , Gilis‐Januszewska, Aleksandra , Doknić, Mirjana , Picó, Antonio , Fleseriu, Maria , Raverot, Gérald , Takahashi, Yutaka , Garcia, José M. , Silverstein, Julie M, Huang, Eric, Kang, Jennifer, Domrzalski, Laurie, Shu, Aimee D , Beckert, Michael, Yuen, Kevin C.J. , Pico, Antonio Miguel , Isidori, Andrea M , Takahashi, Yutaka , Garcia, Jose M , Bancos, Irina , Fukuoka, Hidenori , Komirenko, Allison S , Shu, Aimee D , Yuen, Kevin C J , Biller, Beverly M K , Gilis-Januszewska, Aleksandra , Doknic, Mirjana , Fleseriu, Maria , Silverstein, Julie M, Huang, Eric, Kang, Jennifer, Domrzalski, Laurie, Beckert, Michael

The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism | December 19, 2025 | Volume: 111 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1640-1650

10.1210/clinem/dgaf680 Get It

Abstract Context Adult growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) is characterized by metabolic abnormalities caused by insufficient GH production. Lonapegsomatropin, a prodrug administered once weekly, was designed to provide sustained release of unmodified somatropin to reduce the burden of daily somatropin injections. Objective This work aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lonapegsomatropin vs placebo as treatment for adults with GHD. Methods The foresiGHt trial was a multicenter, randomized, parallel-arm, placebo-controlled (double-blind) and active-controlled (open-label) trial (NCT04615273) conducted at 116 centers in North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific. The trial randomly assigned and dosed 259 adults with GHD. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive once-weekly lonapegsomatropin, once-weekly placebo, or daily somatropin for 38 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was change from baseline in trunk percent fat at week 38. Secondary efficacy end points included change from baseline in trunk fat mass and total body lean mass. Results At week 38, lonapegsomatropin significantly reduced trunk percent fat (−1.68% vs +0.37%; least squares [LS] mean difference −2.04%; P < .001), increased total body lean mass (+1.60 kg vs −0.11 kg; LS mean difference 1.70 kg; P < .0001), and reduced trunk fat mass (−0.48 kg vs +0.22 kg; LS mean difference −0.70 kg; P = .0053) vs placebo. The safety and tolerability profile of lonapegsomatropin was comparable to somatropin. Conclusion The foresiGHt trial met its primary efficacy end point by demonstrating superiority of lonapegsomatropin vs placebo with similar safety and tolerability, supporting its potential as a once-weekly treatment option for adults with GHD.
Management of Osilodrostat Therapy in Patients With Cushing's Syndrome: A Modified Delphi Consensus Panel
Samson, Susan L. , Donegan, Diane , Geer, Eliza B. , Gordon, Murray B. , Huang, Wenyu , Ioachimescu, Adriana G. , Silverstein, Julie , Yuen, Kevin C.J. , Huang, Wenyu , Ioachimescu, Adriana G , Yuen, Kevin C J , Hamidi, Oksana , Spencer-Segal, Joanna L. , Tritos, Nicholas A.

Journal of the Endocrine Society | June 27, 2025 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 8 | Pages: No page available

10.1210/jendso/bvaf103 Get It

Abstract Introduction Endogenous Cushing's syndrome (CS) is a rare endocrine disorder that chronically exposes patients to supraphysiological cortisol levels. Primary therapy for CS consists of surgery. Medical therapies are also considered for many patients with CS, including those who are not surgical candidates or have persistent or recurrent hypercortisolism after surgery. Osilodrostat, an adrenal steroidogenesis inhibitor, demonstrated sustained efficacy and safety in phase 3 clinical trials and is currently approved to treat endogenous CS in Europe and the United States. Because of limited clinical experience, questions remain about how to individualize osilodrostat treatment for different clinical scenarios and special populations. Additional guidance from experts based on clinical study and real-world experiences with osilodrostat is needed. Methods A modified Delphi consensus panel study was conducted consisting of 13 specialists from high-volume endocrinology centers with experience prescribing osilodrostat. Advisors participated in 3 consensus rounds (2 anonymous surveys, 1 virtual workshop) over approximately 10 months to provide guidance and recommendations on optimal osilodrostat use. Results Over 2 surveys and a 2-hour virtual workshop, 26 statements related to osilodrostat achieved consensus among Delphi panelists and 5 were excluded. Topics included patient preparation before osilodrostat initiation, baseline testing, dosing at onset and during treatment, managing dose adjustments, monitoring during dose titration, and treatment alterations for planned and unexpected clinical events. Conclusion Treatment guidance and recommendations for osilodrostat use were obtained using the Delphi method. These statements are intended to provide physicians with education and guidance on using osilodrostat to optimally treat patients with CS.