Rachmasari, Kharisa N.

ABSTRACT Objective To estimate the incidence, prevalence, patient characteristics and healthcare utilization patterns of moderate to severe thyroid eye disease (TED) in the United States. Design Retrospective review of medical and prescription claims data from the Inovalon deidentified claims database. Patients Patients with moderate to severe TED were identified based on specific and sensitive definitions using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes selected by a group of TED specialists. Results The incident moderate to severe TED population included 3364 and 1730 patients using the sensitive and specific definitions, respectively. After adjusting for age and gender, corresponding incidence rates in the sensitive and specific populations were 8.97 (13.49 in women and 4.27 in men) and 4.37 (6.59 in women and 2.05 in men) per 100,000 person‐years, respectively. The prevalent population included 16,310 and 8018 patients using the sensitive and specific definitions, respectively, corresponding to adjusted prevalence rates of 44.13 (66.00 in women and 21.39 in men) and 20.55 (31.18 in women and 9.50 in men) per 100,000 persons. A preponderance of women was observed, and comorbidity rates were high, with > 40% of prevalent patients experiencing hypertension. Steroids were the most frequently prescribed medication. The impact of teprotumumab was not captured, since this study only included claims data through 2019. Conclusions The estimated incidence and prevalence rates of TED demonstrate the considerable impact of this disease in the United States, making the creation of a specific ICD code imperative for effective healthcare planning and management.

Abstract Disclosure: K.N. Rachmasari: None. A. Osman: None. D. Toro Tobon: None. S.B. Lund: None. D.J. Merlino: None. A.R. Hsu: None. M.M. Ryder: None. Background: In low-risk papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), radioactive iodine (RAI) remnant ablation has shown no impact on disease recurrence rates, which are overall low. The role of adjuvant RAI in intermediate risk disease (i.e. T3, N1) remains unproven with no randomized clinical trials to objectively assess efficacy. Thus, in our institution, its use is highly heterogenous. We retrospectively investigated the effects of adjuvant RAI on recurrence and recurrence free survival (RFS) in patients with PTC and positive cervical lymph nodes (CLN). Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent surgery at Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN for PTC between January 2007 and December 2016. Adult patients with Tx-T3 disease according to the 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) were identified. Patients with positive CLN (N1) and a minimum follow up of 36 months were included. Demographics, clinicopathologic characteristics, use of RAI therapy and recurrence were analyzed. Results: A total of 367 patients with PTC, Tx-3, N1, M0 were identified, of which 187 received adjuvant RAI and 180 did not. Most patients were female (63.8%), with a median age of 44 years (IQR 34-54), and a median follow up of 77 months (IQR 58.5-101.5). There were no differences in age, type of surgery, histology, multifocality, and follow up period between the RAI and no RAI subgroups. Adjuvant Thyrogen-stimulated or thyroid hormone withdrawal-based RAI was recommended at the discretion of the treating provider and/or per patient preference. Diagnostic I-123 whole body scans were performed in all patients and mostly demonstrated remnant uptake. The median dose of I-131 was 75 mCi (range 50-100). Recurrence was defined by new occurrence of disease after at least a year of absence of clinical, biochemical, and imaging evidence of disease since initial surgery. Within the entire cohort, 35 (9.5%) developed recurrence with a median time of 41 months (28-59.5). Overall, recurrence rate and RFS were not significantly different between both subgroups (p = 0.2). A subanalysis was performed in patients with clinically detectable nodal disease (n = 161), defined by abnormal cervical lymph node on preoperative neck ultrasound with or without positive fine needle aspiration biopsy. Overall recurrence rates were 17 (10.6%) in this group. There were no differences in recurrence rates and RFS in those that received RAI versus those that did not (p = 0.8). Conclusions: In patients with intermediate risk PTC defined by nodal disease and/or T3 disease, recurrences were not different between patients that did or did not receive adjuvant I-131 therapy postoperatively. A randomized, noninferiority study of adjuvant I-131 compared to no I-131 postoperatively for N1 disease is needed to determine the benefit of near total thyroidectomy and adjuvant I-131 for this cohort. Presentation: 6/3/2024

Background: Corticosteroid therapy is often employed in thyroid eye disease (TED), but its efficacy is variable. Teprotumumab and tocilizumab have been considered as effective alternatives. This study aims to evaluate their clinical outcomes and safety in patients with steroid-resistant TED. Methods: A retrospective case–control study was conducted between 2018 and 2022 within a national multicenter health system. Thirty-seven patients with moderate to severe steroid-resistant TED treated with teprotumumab or tocilizumab (cases) were compared with steroid-naïve patients treated with similar therapy (controls). Due to lack of steroid-naïve patients treated with tocilizumab, a control subgroup for tocilizumab was not included in the analysis. Demographic and clinical characteristics were described. Proptosis, diplopia, clinical activity score (CAS), and disease severity (European Group on Graves' orbitopathy classification) were evaluated at weeks 0, 12, 24, and 52 after therapy initiation. Results: Thirty-one patients received teprotumumab (13 cases and 18 controls) and 6 received tocilizumab (cases). The mean age was 57 years (standard deviation ±14.3), median duration of TED was 11.5 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 7.2–17.7), and median excess proptosis was 4 mm (IQR: 2–8) above the upper limit of normal for sex and race. At week 24, in the teprotumumab cases, 81% had proptosis response (reduction of ≥2 mm), 45.5% resolution of diplopia, 85.7% disease inactivation (CAS <3), and 58.3% reverted to mild disease severity. There were comparable results in teprotumumab controls, with no significant differences between subgroups. In the tocilizumab cases, 50% had a proptosis response, 16.7% resolution of diplopia, 100% disease inactivation, and 75% returned to mild disease. In the teprotumumab cases, there was a trend toward worsening proptosis and diplopia between weeks 24 and 52. In the same time frame, the tocilizumab cases had a trend toward worsening diplopia, disease activity, and severity. In the teprotumumab subgroup, 46.2% experienced otic changes and 23.1% hyperglycemia. In the tocilizumab subgroup, there were no reported adverse events. Conclusions: Teprotumumab and tocilizumab improved inflammation in patients with moderate to severe TED who had failed previous steroid therapy. Additionally, the teprotumumab cases demonstrated similar improvement in proptosis and diplopia to the teprotumumab controls. Further evaluation, particularly regarding the long-term response and side effect profile, of these medications in steroid-resistant TED is needed.