Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

2434 citation(s) found for "Ly, Amy".

Abstract A023: Different paths to the same destination: Molecular divergence and functional convergence in human and canine lymphomas
Treeful, Amy E ., Walker, Grace E., Seelig, Davis , Callaghan, Caitlyn M., O'Brien, Timothy D., Naik, Shruthi, Sarver, Aaron L. , Modiano, Jaime F. , Treeful, Amy E. , O’Brien, Timothy D.

Blood Cancer Discovery | June 24, 2026 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 3_Supplement | Pages: A023-A023

10.1158/2643-3249.lymphoma26-a023 Get It

Abstract Introduction: Lymphomas are among the most common malignancies in dogs, and their morphologic and biological similarities to human counterparts have established them as widely accepted models of human disease. However, emerging molecular data suggest that conservation varies by subtype, and that many common lymphoma subtypes are principally convergent rather than homologous conditions, requiring a critical reassessment of when and how canine lymphomas provide relevant models of human disease. Methods: We employed conventional pathology, immunohistochemistry, and next generation sequencing platforms, including single-cell sequencing and spatial genomics, to characterize the transcriptional landscape and cellular organization of canine lymphomas, complemented by population metadata. Results: Our analysis revealed that canine DLBCL lacks the traditional GCB/ABC bifurcation seen in humans. While activation of NFκB pathways is seen commonly in these tumors, a germinal center-like DLBCL subtype is not apparent in dogs, and the transcriptional signatures are distinct from those of activated B-cell like DLBCL. Instead, we identified a novel canine-specific DLBCL subset driven by an AP-1-associated transcriptional signature, mirroring advanced human follicular lymphoma rather than human DLBCL. In contrast, emerging data suggest that downregulation of quiescence programs might be a shared feature of both human and canine MZLs, making this subtype a candidate for conserved disease mechanisms. While canine T-cell lymphomas exhibited extensive transcriptional heterogeneity, the samples in our dataset did not align with established human T-cell subgroups, suggesting that high incidence in dogs might not equate to molecular similarity. Conclusions: Our results suggest canine and human lymphomas are principally convergent rather than homologous diseases whose evolution and topological organization are constrained by developmental programs. The distinct transcriptional programs of canine and human DLBCLs reveal informative biological divergence, while potential shared features of MZL suggest contexts where comparative oncology may illuminate conserved disease mechanisms. Canine T-cell lymphomas exhibit extensive transcriptional heterogeneity that, at present, defies simple classification, mirroring challenges in their human counterparts and underscoring the need for larger studies to establish molecular patterns that inform causation, prognosis, and treatment. These findings highlight contexts where distinct and conserved molecular features between canine and human lymphoma can reveal shared and divergent disease mechanisms, ultimately underscoring the need for subtype-specific validation as canine lymphomas are adopted as models of human disease. Use of AI: Generative AI was used to improve clarity and readability of the abstract. AI was not used to conduct the study or to produce new text or material. Citation Format: Jaime F. Modiano, Amy E . Treeful, Grace E. Walker, Davis M. Seelig, Caitlyn M. Callaghan, Timothy D. O'Brien, Shruthi Naik, Aaron L. Sarver. Different paths to the same destination: Molecular divergence and functional convergence in human and canine lymphomas [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Fifth AACR International Meeting on Advances in Malignant Lymphoma: From Discovery to Clinical Impact; 2026 Jun 24-27; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Blood Cancer Discov 2026;7(3_Suppl):Abstract nr A023.
ID #1015 A murine model system for IDH-mutant 1p/19q-codeleted oligodendroglioma
Kundu, Ipsita, Toro, Nicolás , Mochizuki, Aaron, Cronk, James, Langhnoja, Jaldeep, Ayyagari, Rithvik, Reel, Sarah, Arounleut, Phonepasong, Esqueda, Luis Tron, Fuller, Christine , Viswanath, Pavithra, Heimberger, Amy B. , Horbinski, Craig, Phoenix, Timothy, Kundu, Ipsita, Mochizuki, Aaron Y. , Langhnoja, Jaldeep , Ayyagari, Rithvik V, Reel, Sarah Martin , Esqueda, Luis Tron , Viswanath, Pavithra , Heimberger, Amy B. , Horbinski, Craig , Phoenix, Timothy N.

Neuro-Oncology Pediatrics | June 24, 2026 | Volume: 2 | Issue: Supplement_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/neuped/wuag026.446 Get It

Abstract Background Oligodendrogliomas were previously defined by histology, but since 2016, the WHO has integrated molecular signatures to create the entity of IDH-mutant 1p/19q-codeleted oligodendroglioma. These tumors harbor recurrent genetic alterations—including IDH mutations, CIC and FUBP1 loss-of-function mutations, and PI3K-activating mutations—that collectively define a genetic profile distinct from IDH-mutant astrocytoma and IDH wild-type glioblastoma. The paucity of faithful model systems has impeded progress in advancing mechanistic insights and therapeutic development for oligodendroglioma. Results To test whether recurrent mutations found in oligodendroglioma patients would drive tumor formation in mice, we utilized in utero electroporation to introduce combinations of gain- and loss-of-function mutations into the developing cortex. Initial tests that included expression of IDH-and PIK3CA-mutants with Cic and Fubp1 loss (termed Oligo) were non-tumorigenic but biased cells towards glial lineages. Introducing Cdkn2a-loss, which is normally suppressed by IDH-associated epigenetic changes in human tumors, to the Oligo combination (termed Oligo-Cdkn2a) resulted in fully penetrant tumor formation. Histopathological review showed the Oligo Cdkn2a-loss mouse model resembled grade II/III oligodendroglioma with rounded nuclei and open chromatin. If Trp53-loss is used (termed Oligo-Trp53) in place of Cdkn2a-loss, tumor histology shifts to a more astrocytic phenotype with angulated nuclei with denser chromatin, demonstrating a direct impact of Trp53-loss on histological features. Bulk RNA-sequencing verifies metabolic alterations driven by the presence of IDH-mutations in Oligo-Cdkn2a mouse models compared to an IDH wild-type GBM model. Single-cell transcriptional profiling shows that Oligo-Cdkn2a tumors contain an increased population of tumor cells that resemble more differentiated oligodendrocytes. Examination of the tumor immune microenvironment within Oligo-Cdkn2a and IDHWT GBM mouse models is being performed to determine changes in immune cell infiltration and transcriptional programs. Conclusion We have created, to our knowledge, the first murine model of IDH-mutant 1p/19q-codeleted oligodendroglioma that incorporates Cic loss. This immune-competent mouse model of IDH-mutant 1p/19q-codeleted oligodendroglioma offers a powerful new tool for interrogating tumor biology and evaluating preclinical therapeutic strategies.
Quality Measures Addressing Disparities to Improve Outcomes in Hand Surgery
Schultz, Emily , Richard, Marc J. , Ruch, David S. , Ring, David , Kakar, Sanjeev , Got, Christopher, Akelman, Edward , Blazar, Philip E., Yao, Jeffrey, Sears, Erika D. , Schultz, Emily A , Ring, David , Kakar, Sanjeev , Sears, Erika D , Kamal, Robin N , Shapiro, Lauren M , Snyder, Eli M. , Richard, Marc J., Got, Christopher , Blazar, Philip , Yao, Jeffrey , Ladd, Amy L. , Kamal, Robin N.

HAND | June 24, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1177/15589447261453556 | PMID 42337843 Get It

Background: There is growing evidence that social determinants of health (SDOH) are associated with disparities in access to care and hand and upper extremity health. Quality measures represent an opportunity to evaluate disparities in access and outcomes that can inform improvement interventions. We performed a systematic review of evidence regarding health disparities within hand surgery and aimed to develop suitable quality measures that are clinically important, feasible, usable, and scientifically acceptable. Methods: We performed a systematic review including common hand surgery terms to identify health disparities in hand surgery related to SDOH. Candidate quality measures were constructed based upon evidence from the systematic review. A consortium of 11 US-based hand and upper extremity surgeons completed a modified RAND/UCLA Delphi Appropriateness process to evaluate the importance, feasibility, usability, and scientific acceptability of the candidate quality measures. Panelists rated each measure on a scale of 1 ( definitely not important/feasible/usable/scientifically acceptable ) to 9 ( definitely important/feasible/usable/scientifically acceptable ) in 2 voting rounds separated by a face-to-face discussion. Agreement among panelists and validity were assessed using predetermined criteria. Results: Fourteen candidate quality measures addressing health disparities were identified based on evidence from the systematic review, including time to surgery and emergency department use after hand surgery based on insurance type, clinical outcomes based on social deprivation, among others. All 14 measures were accepted. Conclusions: Fourteen candidate quality measures were identified and accepted based upon consensus to address health disparities in hand surgery, although future investigation will be needed to evaluate their effectiveness.
The Target ALS Global Natural History Study: Cross-platform proteomics to accelerate biofluid biomarker and drug target discovery in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Yasui, Daisuke , Weatherill, Daniel, Dugom, Laura, Weiner, Sophia , Tran, Huy, Oskarsson, Björn, Nagle, Kyra, Miller, Timothy, Gutierrez, Gilbert, Ravits, John, Hoover, Benjamin, Harms, Matthew, Shneider, Neil, Neylon, Lizzi, Dailey, Whitney, Ladha, Shafeeq, Holmes, Cassandra, Lee, Joseph , Streicher, Nicholas, Nayar, Shakti, Harris, Brent T. , Raisinghani, Manish, Zetterberg, Henrik, Gobom, Johan, Easton, Amy, Bowser, R., Gopalakrishnan, Lathika , Ravits, John , Harms, Matthew B. , Shneider, Neil A. , Ladha, Shafeeq , Streicher, Nicholas, Nayar, Shakti, Zetterberg, Henrik , Gobom, Johan , Easton, Amy E. , Bowser, Robert , Ly, Cindy V.

No container title available | June 23, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.64898/2026.06.13.26355379 | PMID 42396333 Get It

Abstract Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal, rapidly progressive neurodegenerative disease of motor neurons for which therapeutics are limited. Improved biomarkers are imperative to improve patient care and therapeutic development. Here, we employed 35-plex isobaric tandem mass tag labeling based on isobutyl-proline reporter group (TMTpro) to perform unbiased proteomic analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma from control (n= 28, n= 31) and sporadic ALS (sALS) (n= 39, n= 41), from the Target ALS Global Natural History Study (TALS GNHS). We identified 2,875 proteins in CSF and 1,118 proteins in plasma and identified known and novel differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) between controls and sALS, some of which were orthogonally validated using immunoassay. Comparison of TMTpro-MS and Olink proximity extension assay proteomics revealed common and non-overlapping differentially expressed proteins illustrating strengths unique to each platform. This initial cross-sectional proteomic study of biofluids from the TALS GNHS, with unrestricted availability of study results to the research community, highlights the potential of this resource as a potent platform for ALS biomarker discovery.
Clinical Associations of Cerebrospinal Fluid TMEM106B in Familial and Sporadic Frontotemporal Dementia
Olzinski, Molly, Downer, Joshua, Rajbanshi, Binita, Li, Jingyao, Loureiro, Joseph, Heuer, Hilary, Ljubenkov, Peter, Vandevrede, Lawren, Staffaroni, Adam, Lario‐Lago, Argentina, Leichter, Dana, Wolf, Amy, Wise, Amy, Sanderson-Cimino, Mark, Barragan, Eden, Spina, S, Grinberg, Lea T., Seeley, William W., Casaletto, Kaitlin B., Kramer, Joel, Ramos, Eilana, Geschwind, Daniel, Cook, Casey, Petrucelli, L, Forsberg, Leah K., Gendron, Tania, Boeve, Bradley F., Rademakers, Rosa, Rosen, Howard J., Saloner, Rowan, Boxer, Adam L., Rojas, Julio C., Abdullah, M. Samy, Apostolova, Liana, Appleby, Brian, Bayram, Ece, Hp, Botha, Bozoki, Andrea, Brushaber, Danielle, Clark, David, Considine, Ciaran M., Darby, R. Ryan, Day, Gregory S., Dickerson, Bradford C., Dickson, Dennis, Domoto-Reilly, Kimiko, Dwosh, Emily, Faber, Kelley M., Fields, Julie A. , Fong, Jamie C., Foroud, Tatiana, Galasko, Douglas R., Gavrilova, Ralitza, Ghoshal, Nupur , Goldman, Jill, Graff-Radford, Jonathan, Graff-Radford, Neill, Grant, Ian M., Cn, Hales, Honig, Lawrence S., Gd, Hsiung, Huey, Edward D, Irwin, David, Jones, David T., Kantarci, Kejal, Knopman, David, Kolander, Tyler , Kornak, J M, Kremers, W., Kwan, Justin , Lapid, Maria, Lee, Suzee, Litvan, Irene, Lucente, Diane, Mackenzie, Ian R., Masdeu, J C, Massimo, Lauren, McGinnis, Scott, McMillan, Corey T., Mendez, Mario F., Mester, Carly, Miyagawa, Toji , Molden, Joie, Onyike, Chiadi, Pantelyat, Alexander, Pascual, Belen, Paulson, Henry, Ramanan, Vijay, Rankin, Katherine P., Rascovsky, Katya, Rhoads, Kristoffer , Savica, Rodolfo, Snyder, Allison, Sullivan, A. Campbell, Syrjanen, Jeremy, Tartaglia, M, Taylor, Jack, Tipton, P E, WEINTRAUB, S, Wint, Dylan, Wong, Bonnie, Yokoyama, Jennifer, Paulson, Henry L. , Barmada, Sami J. , Paulson, Henry L , Barmada, Sami , Cobigo, Yann , Worringer, Kathleen A. , Heuer, Hilary W. , VandeVrede, Lawren , Staffaroni, Adam M. , Wolf, Amy , Wise, Amy B. , Sanderson‐Cimino, Mark , Barragan, Eden V. , Grinberg, Lea T. , Seeley, William W. , Casaletto, Kaitlin B. , Kramer, Joel, Ramos, Eliana Marisa , Geschwind, Daniel H. , Forsberg, Leah K. , Gendron, Tania F. , Boeve, Bradley F. , Perneel, Jolien , Rademakers, Rosa , Rosen, Howard J. , Saloner, Rowan , Boxer, Adam L. , Rojas, Julio C. , Appleby, Brian S. , Barmada, Sami, Bayram, Ece , Botha, Hugo, Bozoki, Andrea C , Brushaber, Danielle , Clark, David, Considine, Ciaran , Dickerson, Bradford Clark , Dickson, Dennis, Domoto‐Reilly, Kimiko , Dwosh, Emily , Foroud, Tatiana, Graff‐Radford, Jonathan , Graff-Radford, Neill, Hales, Chadwick M., Honig, Lawrence S. , Hsiung, Ging-Yuek R., Huey, Edward D. , Jones, David T., Kantarci, Kejal , Kornak, John , Kremers, Walter, Kwan, Justin, Léger, Gabriel C. , Litvan, Irene , Lucente, Diane , Mackenzie, Ian R. , Massimo, Lauren , McGinnis, Scott, McMillan, Corey T. , Mendez, Mario F. , Mester, Carly , Pascual, Belén , Ramanan, Vijay, Rankin, Katherine P. , Roberson, Erik D. , Savica, Rodolfo , Snyder, Allison , Sullivan, A. Campbell , Syrjanen, Jeremy A. , Taylor, Jack C. , Tipton, Philip W., Vandebergh, Marijne , Weıntraub, Sandra , Wint, Dylan

JAMA Neurology | June 22, 2026 | Volume: 83 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 778

10.1001/jamaneurol.2026.1927 | PMID 42329632 Get It

Importance TMEM106B is a frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) genetic susceptibility factor, and TMEM106B protein aggregates are a feature of aging and neurodegeneration. Whether TMEM106B protein levels are associated with clinical features is unknown. Objective To investigate the clinical associations of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) TMEM106B in FTLD. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2 independent frontotemporal dementia (FTD) cohorts (recruitment from April 2009 through July 2023, with analyses from January 2025 through April 2026), with a 2-year follow up. This multicenter clinical study integrated clinical, genetic, biomarker, and neuroimaging data. Individuals were recruited through the University of California, San Francisco (n = 3733), or ALLFTD (n = 2343). Participants with available CSF were included. A discovery cohort (n = 271) included participants with sporadic neuropathology-confirmed FTLD; presymptomatic or symptomatic carriers of pathogenic variants in C9orf72 , GRN , or MAPT ; or controls. An independent validation cohort (n = 383) included participants with clinically diagnosed sporadic FTD, Alzheimer disease (AD), and controls. Exposures CSF samples for TMEM106B quantification with aptamer proteomics (SomaScan version 3.0 [discovery cohort] and SomaScan version 4.1 [validation cohort]). Main Outcomes and Measures Parametric tests compared the primary outcome, CSF TMEM106B, by disease severity, TMEM106B rs1990622 genotype, sex, clinical syndrome, pathological diagnosis, and pathogenic variant and determined associations with brain volume. Results In the discovery (n = 271; 136 women [51%]; median [IQR] age, 59 [38-80] years) and validation (n = 383; 183 women [48%]; median [IQR] age, 64 [50-78] years) cohorts, lower CSF TMEM106B was associated with more severe disease (β, −0.15; 95% CI, −0.24 to −0.04; P = .003), lower frontotemporal brain volumes (β, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.24-0.61; P < .001), and faster clinical progression (β, −2.21; 95% CI, −3.70 to −0.72; P = .001). Associations of TMEM106B with clinical disease severity were independent of those with neurofilament light chain. TMEM106B levels were influenced by TMEM106B rs1990622 genotype, where individuals with the protective G/G genotype had lower levels than the risk A/A genotype. CSF TMEM106B levels did not differentiate between FTLD subtypes or between FTLD and AD. Conclusions and Relevance Per the results of this cross-sectional study, TMEM106B is detectable in CSF and levels reflect disease severity in sporadic and genetic FTLD and AD, but levels are also influenced by the TMEM106B rs1990622 genotype. CSF TMEM106B could support further studies to understand the mechanisms of disease and develop clinical tools in FTLD and other neurodegenerative diseases.
Real‐world, multi‐omics validation of the clinical relevance of molecular taxonomy for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS)
Sauta, Elisabetta, Lanino, Luca, Bewersdorf, Jan P, Kewan, Tariq, Ali, Najla H. Al, Fenaux, Pierre, Platzbecker, Uwe, Santini, Valeria, Brunner, Andrew M., Kuykendall, Andrew T., Bennett, John M. , Buckstein, Rena, Bejar, Rafael, Carraway, Hetty E., DeZern, Amy E., Hasserjian, R., Loghavi, Sanam, Odenike, Olatoyosi, Padron, Eric , Patnaik, Mrinal M., Stahl, Maximilian, Sekeres, M., Steensma, David P., Savona, Michael R., Taylor, Justin, Xu, Mina L., Sallman, David A., Nimer, Stephen D. , Hourigan, Christopher S., Wei, Andrew H., Riva, Elena , Ventura, Denise, Pinocchio, Nicole, Buizza, Alessandro , Russo, Antonio, D'Amico, Saverio, Delleani, Mattia , Travaglino, Erica , Tentori, Cristina A., Ferrari, Ivan, Crespi, Alessandra, Figini, Giulia , Matteo, Maria Di, Milanesi, Chiara, Castellani, Gastone, Borate, Uma M., Gore, Steven D., Kim, Tae K., Loosdrecht, Arjan A. van de , Daver, N., Wang, Sa A. , Foucar, Kathryn, Iastrebner, Marcelo, Miyazaki, Yasushi, Al‐Kali, Aref, Mittelmann, Moshe, Cluzeau, Thomas , Ades, Lionel, Germing, Ulrich, Garcia‐Manero, Guillermo, Kordasti, Shahram, Haferlach, Torsten, Zeidan, Amer M., consortia, An international study on behalf of GenoMed4all, Synthema, and icMDS, Zeidan, Amer M. , Buizza, Alessandro , Ficara, Francesca , Efficace, Fabio , Diez-Campelo, Maria , Orfao, Alberto , Wang, Sa A , Cluzeau, Thomas , Komrokji, Rami S , Della Porta, Matteo Giovanni , Zeidan, Amer M , Maggioni, Giulia , Todisco, Gabriele , Sauta, Elisabetta , Lanino, Luca , Ball, Somedeb , Bewersdorf, Jan Philipp , Fenaux, Pierre , Platzbecker, Uwe , Santini, Valeria , Xie, Zhuoer , Brunner, Andrew M. , Kuykendall, Andrew , Buckstein, Rena , Bejar, Rafael , Carraway, Hetty E. , Dezern, Amy Elizabeth , Griffiths, Elizabeth A. , Halene, Stephanie , Hasserjian, Robert P. , List, Alan F. , Loghavi, Sanam , Odenike, Olatoyosi , Patnaik, Mrinal M. , Roboz, Gail J. , Sekeres, Mikkael A. , Steensma, David P. , Savona, Michael R. , Sallman, David A. , Hourigan, Christopher S. , Wei, Andrew H. , Campagna, Alessia , Ubezio, Marta , Ventura, Denise , Pinocchio, Nicole , Zampini, Matteo , Russo, Antonio , Pesce, Francesco , D'Amico, Saverio , Asti, Gianluca , Tentori, Cristina Astrid , Ferrari, Ivan , Matteo, Maria Di, Brindisi, Matteo , Manes, Nicla , Crisafulli, Laura , Ficara, Francesca , Castellani, Gastone , Borate, Uma , Efficace, Fabio , Gore, Steven D. , Díez‐Campelo, María , Rozman, Marı́a , Órfão, Alberto , Foucar, Kathryn , Iastrebner, Marcelo , Scheinberg, Phillip , Miyazaki, Yasushi , Madanat, Yazan F. , Al‐Kali, Aref , Mittelman, Moshe , Adès, Lionel , Germing, Ulrich , Garcia‐Manero, Guillermo , Kordasti, Shahram , Haferlach, Torsten , Komrokji, Rami S.

HemaSphere | June 22, 2026 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 6 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/hem3.70406 | PMID 42339339 Get It

Abstract Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are clinically and biologically diverse disorders, emphasizing the need for personalized treatment approaches. The International Working Group for Prognostication of MDS (IWG_PM) recently introduced a molecular classification, referred to as the MDS taxonomy, that categorizes patients into 16 subgroups based on 21 gene mutations, 6 cytogenetic abnormalities, and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at TP53 and TET2 loci. This study sought to validate and enhance the clinical relevance of the MDS taxonomy by analyzing a large retrospective cohort ( n = 5136) and transcriptomic data from a prospective cohort ( n = 477). The taxonomy successfully identified subgroups with distinct clinical characteristics and disease progression patterns. However, incorporating gene interactions from taxonomy subgroups did not improve the prognostic performance of the Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS‐M). We further assessed whether the taxonomy could guide management in patients receiving disease‐modifying therapies. Except for the “ TP53 ‐complex” subgroup, taxonomy classifications were not predictive of hypomethylating agent response or transplant outcomes. Nonetheless, they correlated with overall survival, suggesting that while both IPSS‐M and the taxonomy capture disease biology, other non‐genetic factors may influence treatment response. RNA sequencing confirmed the biological distinctiveness of the taxonomy groups. Transcriptomic profiling of CD34+ bone marrow cells revealed unique, homogeneous gene expression patterns, particularly within the AML‐like, bi TET2 , SF3B1 , and TP53 ‐complex subgroups. Further integration of multi‐omics data may refine MDS classification, improving clinical decision‐making and guiding the development of targeted therapies.
Developing a Logic Model Framework for the Academy for Women in Academic Emergency Medicine (AWAEM)
Zeidan, Amy, Walker, Laura E., Samuels‐Kalow, Margaret, Salhi, Rama A. , Moser, J. , Love, Jennifer S., Agrawal, Pooja , Moser, Joe-Ann S , Zeidan, Amy , Walker, Laura E., Samuels‐Kalow, Margaret

AEM Education and Training | June 22, 2026 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 3 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/aet2.70222 | PMID 42338625 Get It

ABSTRACT Background The Academy for Women in Academic Emergency Medicine (AWAEM) within the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine was established to advance the recruitment, promotion, retention, and career satisfaction of women in academic emergency medicine (AEM). Despite progress, persistent gender disparities remain in several areas, including compensation, promotion, and leadership representation. Objective To better assess and evaluate current AWAEM programming, we developed a logic model to visually and systematically map AWAEM activities and initiatives with current and future metrics for evaluation. Methods The logic model was guided by AWAEM’s strategic plan and developed through an iterative process involving feedback from AWAEM members and leaders. Results The model outlines key inputs, describes activities categorized across five thematic areas, and identifies tangible outputs with corresponding metrics for those activities. The model concludes with short‐, intermediate‐, and long‐term outcomes that speak to the likely impact of AWAEM’s programming. Discussion The proposed logic model serves as a practical framework to align AWAEM’s efforts to outcomes while also embedding evaluation into ongoing programming. It provides a visual tool for identifying gaps and incorporating data‐driven modifications, as well as facilitating collaboration across the academy. While there are limitations to this logic model, it provides an initial roadmap and foundation for strategic planning and evaluation. It also provides an opportunity to periodically revise the model as AWAEM’s needs evolve to ensure continued relevance and alignment with the needs of the entire membership. Additionally, this model can serve as a framework for other professional development groups, academies, and societies external to SAEM.
Emerging directions in tauopathy research
Wildsmith, Kristin R., Alladi, Suvarna, Bertucci, Taylor, Bowles, Kathryn R. , Boxer, Adam, Brummet, Jennifer, DeVos, Sarah L., Diaz, Kristophe , Duff, Karen, Duran‐Aniotz, Claudia, Farrell, Kurt, Fontana, Igor C., Franzmeier, Nicolai, Frost, Bess, Petrucelli, Leonard, Rexach, Jessica, Reyderman, Larisa, Rommel, Amy, Bohórquez, Sandra M. Sanabria, Schöll, Michael, Schneider, Anja, Silva, Rohan de , Snyder, Heather M. , VandeVrede, Lawren, Varga, Andrew W, Vogel, Jacob W., Yeh, Felix L. , Yoo, Andrew S., Carrillo, Maria C., Duff, Karen , Bertucci, Taylor , Mahinrad, Simin , Buée, Luc , Alladi, Suvarna , Boche, Delphine , DeVos, Sarah L. , Dreyer, Anna J. , Duran‐Aniotz, Claudia , Durrant, Claire S. , Farrell, Kurt , Fontana, Igor C. , Franzmeier, Nicolai , Frost, Bess , Horie, Kanta , Kaňovský, Petr , Kao, Aimee W. , Mahinrad, Simin , Malpetti, Maura , Morris, Huw R. , Palleis, Carla , Petrucelli, Leonard , Rexach, Jessica E. , Reyderman, Larisa, Rowe, James B. , Bohórquez, Sandra Sanabria , Sato, Chihiro , Schneider, Anja , VandeVrede, Lawren , Varga, Andrew W. , Vogel, Jacob W. , Yoo, Andrew S.J. , Carrillo, María C.

Alzheimer's & Dementia | June 22, 2026 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 6 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.71431 | PMID 42324487 Get It

Abstract The Tau Global Conference 2025, hosted by the Alzheimer's Association, CurePSP, and the Rainwater Charitable Foundation, convened international experts from academia, industry, government, and philanthropy to explore advances and challenges in tauopathy research. The meeting highlighted progress across tau biology, including emerging models of tau regulation, degradation, and propagation; advances in biomarker development for the diagnosis and staging of tauopathies; and evolving therapeutic strategies targeting diverse aspects of tau pathophysiology. Discussions also emphasized the importance of cross‐sector collaboration, and global initiatives to address disparities in tau research. This report synthesizes key insights from the conference and underscores the critical role of interdisciplinary, biomarker‐driven, and globally inclusive approaches in accelerating the translation of tau research into effective clinical applications.
Elective genomic sequencing for adults in research, clinical and commercial contexts
Linderman, Michael D. , Adelson, Sophia , Berro, Tala , Crawford, Scott , Cunningham, Tshaka J., Esplin, Edward D. , Ewing-Crawford, Altovise T, Nielsen, Daiva E. , Andrighetti, Heather, Bleyl, Steven B., Haverfield, Eden , Hegde, Madhuri , Konstantinos, Lazaridis N, Leonard, Debra G. B. , May, Thomas , McGinniss, Molly, Pandya, Vaibhav, Schadt, Eric E. , Zettler, Bethany , Team, PeopleSeq Study, Adelson, Sophia M , Berro, Tala M , Crawford, Scott D , Esplin, Edward D , Nielsen, Daiva E , Pereira, Stacey , Schmidlen, Tara , Haverfield, Eden V , Hegde, Madhuri , Kruszka, Paul , Leonard, Debra , May, Thomas , Schadt, Eric E , Tzovaras, Bastian Greshake , Zettler, Bethany , McGuire, Amy L , Green, Robert C. , Berro, Tala M., Anderson, Jennifer L., Cunningham, Tshaka, Ewing, Altovise T. , Nielsen, Daiva E., Church, George M. , Konstantinos, Lazaridis N., McGinniss, Molly A. , Schadt, Eric E., Green, Robert C., Juusola, Jane , McWalter, Kirsty , Esplin, Ed, Haverfield, Eden, Hazell, Allison, Gu, Jessica, Hogan, Jennifer, Church, George , Ball, Mad Price , McGinnis, Molly, Schadt, Eric, Linderman, Michael, McGuire, Amy, Christensen, Kurt D. , Caskey, Thomas, Zoltick, Emilie S. , Crawford, Scott, Young, Robert, Hunsanger, Jillian, Bradley, Sophia, Cunningham, Tshaka, Roberts, Scott, Ricks‐Santi, Luisel , Lillard, James, Washington, Kareem N., Johnson, Anthony

No container title available | June 19, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.64898/2026.06.09.26355296 | PMID 42369514 Get It

Abstract Purpose Elective genomic sequencing (EGS) returns monogenic disease findings in multiple genes, including potentially novel variants, and may also provide participants with carrier status, pharmacogenomic and other health-related information. The PeopleSeq Study assessed participants’ motivations for and concerns about EGS and the associated clinical and psychosocial outcomes across diverse EGS providers. Methods We administered a shared questionnaire to participants who chose to undergo EGS via 18 academic, clinical, or commercial EGS platforms. Results We enrolled 1575 participants, of whom 1147 (72.8%) completed a questionnaire after receiving their EGS results. A majority (60.3%) of the participants who completed a post-result questionnaire self-reported receiving results they assessed as important, including negative findings, and 75.9% reported a form of health-related utility. Among a subset (19.4%) who shared their EGS reports, 16.6% (37 of n =223) received a monogenic finding and self-reported results deemed “important” were consistent with EGS reports. Most participants (74.1%) discussed their results with their family, but fewer discussed their results with a healthcare provider other than the site team (41.7%) or had one or more medical visits as a direct result of their EGS testing (23.1%). Participants expressed diverse motivations for EGS, with 91.4% expressing interest in their personal disease risk and 54% who expressed quasi-indication-based motivations related to family medical history. Individuals motivated by family history reported important results at a significantly higher rate. Conclusions Early adopters of EGS are motivated by general interest in their health as well as quasi-indication-based considerations such as family history. A majority of participants learned results they considered medically important, but a much smaller segment engaged healthcare providers with their results.
Development of a Core Outcome Domain Set for Facial Aging
Dirr, McKenzie A. , Ahmed, Areeba, Schlessinger, Daniel I., Lazaro-Camp, Vanessa, Smith, SJ, Gullapalli, Thanvi, Dragovic, Doroteja, Chang, Joycie, Zhang, Elizabeth, Alam, Murad, Group, Facial Aging Core Outcome Domain Set Study, Anvery, Noor , Kang, Bianca Y. , Wong, Clarissa, Iyengar, Sanjana, Yanes, Arianna F. , Cotseones, Jill, Ashchyan, Hovik J. , Patel, P. M., Sheikh, Umar A., Franklin, Matthew , Hanna, Courtney, Chiren, Sarah G., Schmitt, J, Furlan, Karina C., Alexiades, Macrene, Alhusayen, Raed, Alster, Tina S. , Beer, Kenneth, Bertucci, Vince , Bloom, Jason D. , Briceño, César A., Bucay, Vivian, Butterwick, Kimberly J., Hugues, Cartier, Casabona, Gabriela, Connolly, Karen , Cox, Sue Ellen , Darmanescu, Monica, Boulle, Koenraad De , Desai, Shraddha, Donofrio, Lisa, Dover, Jeffrey S., Draelos, Zoe, Eisen, Daniel B. , El-Domyati, Moetaz, El-Garem, Yehia, Fischer, John, Fitzgerald, Rebecca, GALADARI, Hassan, Gladstone, Hayes B., Goldman, Mitchel P., Goodman, Greg J., Hanke, C. William , Humphrey, Shannon, Ibrahim, Sherrif F., Jagdeo, Jared, Karen, Julie, Kauvar, Arielle, Ag, Kibbi, KIM, JENNY, Lacerda, D T D, Lask, G, Lopez, Grace M., Lupo, Mary P. , Mariwalla, Kavita , Matarasso, Seth, Mekokishvili, L, Narins, Rhoda S., Ogilvie, P, Orringer, Jeffrey S. , Osaki, Tammy H. , Ozog, David, Pacheco, Theresa, Polder, Kristel, Rossi, Anthony M, Sadick, Neil, Saedi, Nazanin, Schlessinger, Joel, Sharad, Jaishree , Shenoy, SuchitraM, Sinclair, Rd, Solish, Nowell, Piansay‐Soriano, Miriam Emily , Sulyman, Omotara , Szeimies, Rolf‐Markus , Tanzi, Elizabeth L., Taub, Amy Forman , Taylor, Mark B., Thomas, J. Regan, Torezan, Luis, Tosti, Antonella, Touma, Dany, Almeida, Ada Regina Trindade de , Vedamurthy, Maya , Viana, Giovanni, Waldman, Abigail, Weinkle, Susan, Weiss, Robert, Poon, Emily, Cartee, Todd V. , Sobanko, Joseph F. , Eisen, Daniel B. , Ahmed, Areeba , Schlessinger, Daniel Isaac , Lazaro-Camp, Vanessa J, Christensen, Rachel E. , Ibrahim, Sarah A. , Cotseones, J.K., Umar, Sheikh Ahmad , Furlan, Karina Colossi , Alexiades, Macrene , Alhusayen, Raed , Beer, Kenneth Robert, Briceño, César Augusto , Bucay, Vivian , Casabona, Gabriela , Cotofana, Sebastian , Desai, Shraddha , Dover, Jeffrey S. , Draelos, Zoe Diana , Eisen, Daniel B., El-Domyati, Moetaz M. , El-Garem, Yehia, Fitzgerald, Rebecca, Friedmann, Daniel P. , Galadari, Hassan , Gladstone, Hayes B., Goldman, Mitchel P. , Goodman, Greg , Green, Jeremy B. , Halachmi, Shlomit , Humphrey, Shannon , Jagdeo, Jared R. , Jiang, Shang I. Brian , Kauvar, Arielle N.B. , Kibbi, Abdul‐Ghani , Kim, John V. S., LASK, GARY P., Matarasso, Seth L., Narins, Rhoda S., Ogilvie, Patricia , Osaki, Tammy H. , Pacheco, Theresa , Polder, Kristel D., Saedi, Nazanin, Shenoy, Manjunath , Sinclair, Rod, Solish, Nowell , Torezan, Luís , Tosti, Antonellá , Waldman, Abigail , Weiss, Robert, Maher, Ian A. , Kirkham, Jamie J

JAMA Dermatology | June 17, 2026 | Volume: 162 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 829

10.1001/jamadermatol.2026.1697 | PMID 42307924 Get It

Importance Currently, there are no standardized outcome domains or measures in clinical trials for facial aging. Heterogeneity in outcome domains and measurement instruments across clinical trials creates difficulty in directly comparing interventions, determining superior therapies, and developing high-quality meta-analyses. Objective To develop a core outcome set (COS) of essential domains to be reported in clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of interventions for facial aging. Evidence Review PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and CINAHL were searched from September 2005 to September 2015. An updated search of the same databases was performed from September 2015 to February 2026. Studies were included if (1) they were randomized clinical trial or controlled clinical trial in design, (2) they assessed the efficacy or safety of an intervention for facial aging, (3) they were published in English, and (4) they involved human participants. Complementary sources, including patient interviews, were used to capture further relevant outcomes. Two rounds of Delphi surveys, followed by consensus meetings, were used to identify outcome domains considered most important by both patient and physician stakeholders. Findings The final COS consists of 6 outcome domains: (1) overall convenience of treatment; (2) time to return to normal work and social activity; (3) overall assessment of focused area of treatment (at the point in time when treatment is expected to provide peak benefit); (4) duration of treatment effect; (5) severity of persistent local or systemic adverse events, including pigmentary change, skin texture change, delayed healing, scarring, and serious adverse events; and (6) patient satisfaction with treatment. Conclusions and Relevance The 6 outcome domains identified through a Delphi consensus are recommended for reporting in future facial aging trials to ensure that outcomes that matter most to patients and clinicians are measured and that results are comparable across interventions.