Zeidan, Amy

ABSTRACT Background The Academy for Women in Academic Emergency Medicine (AWAEM) within the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine was established to advance the recruitment, promotion, retention, and career satisfaction of women in academic emergency medicine (AEM). Despite progress, persistent gender disparities remain in several areas, including compensation, promotion, and leadership representation. Objective To better assess and evaluate current AWAEM programming, we developed a logic model to visually and systematically map AWAEM activities and initiatives with current and future metrics for evaluation. Methods The logic model was guided by AWAEM’s strategic plan and developed through an iterative process involving feedback from AWAEM members and leaders. Results The model outlines key inputs, describes activities categorized across five thematic areas, and identifies tangible outputs with corresponding metrics for those activities. The model concludes with short‐, intermediate‐, and long‐term outcomes that speak to the likely impact of AWAEM’s programming. Discussion The proposed logic model serves as a practical framework to align AWAEM’s efforts to outcomes while also embedding evaluation into ongoing programming. It provides a visual tool for identifying gaps and incorporating data‐driven modifications, as well as facilitating collaboration across the academy. While there are limitations to this logic model, it provides an initial roadmap and foundation for strategic planning and evaluation. It also provides an opportunity to periodically revise the model as AWAEM’s needs evolve to ensure continued relevance and alignment with the needs of the entire membership. Additionally, this model can serve as a framework for other professional development groups, academies, and societies external to SAEM.

Background Individuals with non-English language preferences (NELP) represent a growing proportion of the USA population. Prior studies demonstrate disparate health outcomes related to NELP status; however, this patient population is often excluded from medical research. There is a paucity of literature describing the impact of NELP status on trauma, specifically injury and outcomes related to vehicle occupants injured during motor vehicle collisions (MVCs). The goal of this study was to evaluate the representation of patients with NELP in both emergency medicine and trauma literature. Methods We conducted a systematic search of US-based publications from 2010 to 2021. Titles, abstracts and full texts of eligible articles were evaluated. Data were extracted using an a priori determined standardised reporting tool to evaluate language as study inclusion/exclusion criteria, manuscript reporting of language, assessment of language as a primary variable and consideration of language in study methodology. Results A total of 82 studies met inclusion criteria. Twenty-three studies (28%) excluded NELP populations and only one study explicitly included the NELP population. None of the studies evaluated language as a primary outcome of the study or included language as a variable in the analysis. Over half of the studies (53.6%) used a public data set or registry. Conclusion NELP populations are routinely excluded from and are difficult to identify in MVC trauma research. Without appropriate inclusion and identification, it will be difficult to understand the prevalence and outcomes of traumatic injury in NELP patients and to develop culturally and linguistically appropriate interventions.