Schadt, Eric E.

Abstract Purpose Elective genomic sequencing (EGS) returns monogenic disease findings in multiple genes, including potentially novel variants, and may also provide participants with carrier status, pharmacogenomic and other health-related information. The PeopleSeq Study assessed participants’ motivations for and concerns about EGS and the associated clinical and psychosocial outcomes across diverse EGS providers. Methods We administered a shared questionnaire to participants who chose to undergo EGS via 18 academic, clinical, or commercial EGS platforms. Results We enrolled 1575 participants, of whom 1147 (72.8%) completed a questionnaire after receiving their EGS results. A majority (60.3%) of the participants who completed a post-result questionnaire self-reported receiving results they assessed as important, including negative findings, and 75.9% reported a form of health-related utility. Among a subset (19.4%) who shared their EGS reports, 16.6% (37 of n =223) received a monogenic finding and self-reported results deemed “important” were consistent with EGS reports. Most participants (74.1%) discussed their results with their family, but fewer discussed their results with a healthcare provider other than the site team (41.7%) or had one or more medical visits as a direct result of their EGS testing (23.1%). Participants expressed diverse motivations for EGS, with 91.4% expressing interest in their personal disease risk and 54% who expressed quasi-indication-based motivations related to family medical history. Individuals motivated by family history reported important results at a significantly higher rate. Conclusions Early adopters of EGS are motivated by general interest in their health as well as quasi-indication-based considerations such as family history. A majority of participants learned results they considered medically important, but a much smaller segment engaged healthcare providers with their results.

Abstract Osteogenic differentiation is essential for bone development, metabolism, and repair; however, the underlying regulatory relationships among genes remain poorly understood. To elucidate the transcriptomic changes and identify novel regulatory genes involved in osteogenic differentiation, we differentiated mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) derived from 20 human iPSC lines into preosteoblasts (preOBs) and osteoblasts (OBs). We then performed transcriptome profiling of MSCs, preOBs and OBs. The iPSC-derived MSCs and OBs showed similar transcriptome profiles to those of primary human MSCs and OBs, respectively. Differential gene expression analysis revealed global changes in the transcriptomes from MSCs to preOBs, and then to OBs, including the differential expression of 840 genes encoding transcription factors (TFs). TF regulatory network analysis uncovered a network comprising 451 TFs, organized into five interactive modules. Multiscale embedded gene co-expression network analysis (MEGENA) identified gene co-expression modules and key network regulators (KNRs). From these analyses, KLF16 emerged as an important TF in osteogenic differentiation. We demonstrate that overexpression of Klf16 in vitro inhibited osteogenic differentiation and mineralization, while Klf16+/- mice exhibited increased bone mineral density, trabecular number, and cortical bone area. Our study underscores the complexity of osteogenic differentiation and identifies novel regulatory genes such as KLF16, which plays an inhibitory role in osteogenic differentiation both in vitro and in vivo.

Abstract Osteogenic differentiation is essential for bone development, metabolism, and repair; however, the underlying regulatory relationships among genes remain poorly understood. To elucidate the transcriptomic changes and identify novel regulatory genes involved in osteogenic differentiation, we differentiated mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) derived from 20 human iPSC lines into preosteoblasts (preOBs) and osteoblasts (OBs). We then performed transcriptome profiling of MSCs, preOBs and OBs. The iPSC-derived MSCs and OBs showed similar transcriptome profiles to those of primary human MSCs and OBs, respectively. Differential gene expression analysis revealed global changes in the transcriptomes from MSCs to preOBs, and then to OBs, including the differential expression of 840 genes encoding transcription factors (TFs). TF regulatory network analysis uncovered a network comprising 451 TFs, organized into five interactive modules. Multiscale embedded gene co-expression network analysis (MEGENA) identified gene co-expression modules and key network regulators (KNRs). From these analyses, KLF16 emerged as an important TF in osteogenic differentiation. We demonstrate that overexpression of Klf16 in vitro inhibited osteogenic differentiation and mineralization, while Klf16+/- mice exhibited increased bone mineral density, trabecular number, and cortical bone area. Our study underscores the complexity of osteogenic differentiation and identifies novel regulatory genes such as KLF16, which plays an inhibitory role in osteogenic differentiation both in vitro and in vivo.

AbstractIntroductionA few copy number variations (CNVs) have been reported for Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, there is a lack of a systematic investigation of CNVs in AD based on whole genome sequencing (WGS) data.MethodsWe used four methods to identify consensus CNVs from the WGS data of 1,411 individuals and further investigated their functional roles in AD using the matched transcriptomic and clinicopathological data.ResultsWe identified 3,012 rare AD‐specific CNVs whose residing genes are enriched for cellular glucuronidation and neuron projection pathways. Genes whose mRNA expressions are significantly correlated with common CNVs are involved in major histocompatibility complex class II receptor activity. Integration of CNVs, gene expression, and clinical and pathological traits further pinpoints a key CNV that potentially regulates immune response in AD.DiscussionWe identify CNVs as potential genetic regulators of immune response in AD. The identified CNVs and their downstream gene networks reveal novel pathways and targets for AD.

AbstractBackgroundOur understanding of the biological changes in the brain associated with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology and cognitive impairment remains incomplete. Unbiased discovery proteomic analysis of AD brain can help to increase our understanding of these changes.MethodWe analyzed dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, precuneus, and temporal cortex of control, asymptomatic AD, and AD brains from multiple different centers by label‐free quantitative mass spectrometry and weighted protein co‐expression analysis to obtain a consensus protein co‐expression network of AD brain. We also analyzed cerebrospinal fluid to investigate potential biomarkers related to this network.ResultThe network consisted of 13 protein co‐expression modules. Six of these modules correlated with amyloid‐β plaque burden, tau neurofibrillary tangle burden, cognitive function, and clinical functional status, and were altered in asymptomatic AD, AD, or in both disease states. These six modules reflected synaptic, mitochondrial, sugar metabolism, extracellular matrix, cytoskeletal, and RNA binding/splicing biological functions. The identified protein network modules were preserved in a community‐based cohort analyzed by a different quantitative mass spectrometry approach. They were also preserved in temporal lobe and precuneus brain regions. Some of the modules were influenced by aging, and showed changes in other neurodegenerative diseases such as frontotemporal dementia and corticobasal degeneration. The module most strongly associated with AD pathology and cognitive impairment was the sugar metabolism module. This module was enriched in AD genetic risk factors, and was also highly enriched in microglia and astrocyte protein markers associated with an anti‐inflammatory state, suggesting that the biological functions it represents may serve a protective role in AD. Proteins from the sugar metabolism module were increased in cerebrospinal fluid from asymptomatic AD and AD cases, highlighting their potential as biomarkers of the altered brain network.ConclusionIn this study of >2000 brains and nearly 400 cerebrospinal fluid samples by quantitative proteomics, we identify proteins and biological processes in AD brain that may serve as therapeutic targets and fluid biomarkers for the disease.