Esplin, Edward D.

ABSTRACT Background Genetic testing for cardiomyopathy and arrhythmia (CM/ARRH) provides diagnostic information and informs screening for at-risk relatives. Clinical guidelines recommend genetic testing for these conditions; however, data on how genetic test results influence clinical management recommendations are limited. Here, we determined the frequency of cardiologist-recommended management changes for patients following CM/ARRH genetic testing. Methods This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of patients referred for multigene panel testing between April 2016 and April 2024. Genetically-experienced cardiologists at multicenter academic clinical practices were recruited for participation to complete surveys indicating clinical decision making on patients who had genetic testing. Cases for review were randomly selected to have both positive and non-positive results. Results Among 249 patients (138 positive, 111 non-positive), 136 (54.6%) received clinical management recommendations for their own or their at-risk relatives’ care. Of these, 75 (55.1%) received recommendations for the patient’s own care, most frequently additional diagnostic tests/procedures (n=33). Compared to non-positive results, patients with positive results were more likely to receive recommendations for their own management (66/138, 47.8% vs 9/111, 8.1%; P<0.00001). Patients with positive results in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy genes had 263% higher odds of recommended management changes compared to those with TTN (OR=3.63, CI:1.40-9.84, P=0.009). Conclusions The results from CM/ARRH genetic testing on affected patients influenced cardiologists’ medical decision making and management recommendations. Additional research is needed to evaluate how genetic testing for CM/ARRH impact health outcomes.

Abstract Purpose Elective genomic sequencing (EGS) returns monogenic disease findings in multiple genes, including potentially novel variants, and may also provide participants with carrier status, pharmacogenomic and other health-related information. The PeopleSeq Study assessed participants’ motivations for and concerns about EGS and the associated clinical and psychosocial outcomes across diverse EGS providers. Methods We administered a shared questionnaire to participants who chose to undergo EGS via 18 academic, clinical, or commercial EGS platforms. Results We enrolled 1575 participants, of whom 1147 (72.8%) completed a questionnaire after receiving their EGS results. A majority (60.3%) of the participants who completed a post-result questionnaire self-reported receiving results they assessed as important, including negative findings, and 75.9% reported a form of health-related utility. Among a subset (19.4%) who shared their EGS reports, 16.6% (37 of n =223) received a monogenic finding and self-reported results deemed “important” were consistent with EGS reports. Most participants (74.1%) discussed their results with their family, but fewer discussed their results with a healthcare provider other than the site team (41.7%) or had one or more medical visits as a direct result of their EGS testing (23.1%). Participants expressed diverse motivations for EGS, with 91.4% expressing interest in their personal disease risk and 54% who expressed quasi-indication-based motivations related to family medical history. Individuals motivated by family history reported important results at a significantly higher rate. Conclusions Early adopters of EGS are motivated by general interest in their health as well as quasi-indication-based considerations such as family history. A majority of participants learned results they considered medically important, but a much smaller segment engaged healthcare providers with their results.

Purpose: Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are increasingly recognized to have a hereditary predilection, yet the prevalence and clinical relevance of pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) in unselected patients with NEN remain poorly defined. This prospective, multicenter study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and clinical utility of PGVs through universal multigene panel testing in a diverse cohort of patients with NENs. Patients and Methods: Between 2018 and 2024, we enrolled unselected patients with NENs from 3 Mayo Clinic Cancer Centers. Germline genetic testing was performed using a next-generation sequencing panel of up to 84 cancer predisposition genes. Patients were not selected based on age, disease stage, ethnicity, or family history. Variants were classified as PGVs, variants of uncertain significance (VUS), or negative. Clinical and demographic data were analyzed descriptively. Results: Among 88 patients, PGVs were identified in 15.9% (n=14), most frequently in high- or moderate-penetrance genes including MEN1 , CHEK2 , MITF , and MUTYH . PGVs were most commonly found in pancreatic NENs [n=12/55 (21.8%)], followed by small bowel NENs [n=2/20 (10%)], with no PGVs detected in lung NENs. Mismatch repair (MMR) gene alterations were identified in 5.7% of patients, including 1 MLH1 PGV and 4 MSH2/MSH6 VUS, 2 of which demonstrated MMR deficiency by protein testing. VUS were reported in 34.1% of patients. Notably, 35.7% of PGV-positive patients did not meet current NCCN or ACMG testing criteria, and 53.9% had PGVs in genes outside of cancer-specific guideline recommendations. Conclusions: Universal germline testing in unselected patients with NEN identified clinically relevant PGVs in over 15% of cases. These findings support broader genetic testing approaches to guide treatment, enhance familial risk assessment, and inform cascade testing—regardless of traditional clinical selection criteria.

Sarcomas are rare heterogenous mesenchymal tumors with over seventy-five different subtypes, with varying biology and outcomes, with no clear inciting factor in the vast majority. To determine the prevalence of pathogenic germline variants (PGV) in patients with sarcomas, we undertook a prospective multi-site study of germline sequencing using an 84-gene next-generation sequencing panel among patients receiving care at the four Mayo Clinic Cancer Centers. Of 115 patients with bone and soft tissue sarcoma, the median age was 60 years, 49.6% were female, 82.6% were White. The anatomical location of the primary tumor included extremities (34.8%), retroperitoneum (19.1%), trunk (13.0%), and head and neck (7.8%). Family history of cancer was present in 62.6% of the study population. Ten patients (8.7%) had a pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant (PGV). Of these, three had stage IV sarcoma, and seven had earlier-stage sarcoma (stages I–III). Among the 55 (48.7%) patients who had variant of uncertain significance (VUS), 41.1% (22/55) had stage IV sarcoma and 58.9% (33/55) had earlier-stage disease. Of the ten patients with PGV, high-to-moderate penetrance gene abnormalities were identified in eight patients (80%) involving TP53 (3), BRCA1 (1), SDHA (1), ATM (2), and NBN (1) genes. The vast majority of the PGVs (70%) would not have been detected using the current guidelines. Because of the paucity of sarcomas and lack of effective treatment options for advanced disease, germline testing in sarcomas represents a potentially impactful strategy to assess therapeutic options and for assessment of familial risk.

Indications for and implications of germline genetic testing (GGT) in patients with prostate cancer have expanded over the past decade, particularly related to precision therapies and management. GGT has become the standard of care for many cancers such as breast, ovarian, colorectal, pancreatic, and metastatic prostate cancer, and it is imperative that patients be offered timely and equitable access to testing as it can inform patient-physician shared decision making for management of the current cancer as well as anticipatory guidance for disease progression. Additionally, GGT guides screening for and prevention of secondary malignancies for the patient and cascade testing for at-risk family members. Here, we present data supporting the notion that clinicians should offer all patients with prostate cancer the opportunity to undergo comprehensive GGT for pathogenic germline variants known to be associated with familial cancer and/or known to have implications for treatment and management.

e22537 Background: Germline and tumor next-generation sequencing (NGS) are complementary tests whose benefit in capturing patients (pts) potentially eligible for precision therapies is maximized when the tests are paired, as qualifying pathogenic variants (PVs) are missed if either test was done in isolation (Lincoln et al. 2020). Germline NGS has the additional benefit of informing prevention through surveillance and cascade testing. We highlight the benefits of a universal approach to concurrent testing in a subset of the previously reported cohort of pan-cancer pts who underwent universal germline NGS (Samadder et al. 2020). Methods: Unselected pts with solid tumors underwent an 80+ gene germline panel and 315+ gene tumor panel. Variants in genes unique to the germline or tumor panels, including microsatellite instability (MSI) and tumor mutation burden (TMB), were also evaluated. Results: 104 pts [81.7% White, non-Hispanic, 71.2% male] with 23 cancer types [28% colorectal, 13% lung, 11% prostate, 49% other] were included. Five (5%) pts had no actionable tumor alterations or germline variants identified (Table). 18 pts (17%) had 19 pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) identified, 11 (58%) of which were detected on tumor NGS (Table). 92 pts had >1 tumor alteration identified, of which 12% were confirmed as PGVs (Table). Notably, tumor NGS revealed 81 pts (78%) pts with biomarkers that would could not have been identified with germline testing alone, such as variants in genes not on germline panel (80) or MSI-high (4), or TMB-high (21) status of the tumor. Conclusions: Germline and tumor NGS are complementary tests that often detect different actionable alterations. There is value in confirming both the presence and absence of somatic variants in the germline in order to make appropriate clinical recommendations for the patient and their family members. [Table: see text]

ObjectiveThis study describes the prevalence of pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) in head and neck cancer patients, the incremental yield compared to a guideline‐based approach to genetic evaluation, and the uptake of family variant testing.Study DesignProspective cohort study.SettingThree tertiary academic medical centers.MethodsGermline sequencing using an 84‐gene screening platform among unselected head and neck cancer patients who received care at Mayo Clinic Cancer Centers between April 2018 and March 2020.ResultsAmongst 200 patients, the median age was 62.0 years (Q1, Q3: 55, 71), 23.0% were female, 89.0% white/non‐Hispanic, 5.0% Hispanic/Latinx, 6% of another race, and 42.0% had prognostic stage IV disease. The most common subsites were the oropharyngeal (45.0%) and salivary glands (12.0%). The most common histology was squamous cell carcinoma (74.5%). Twenty‐one patients (10.5%) had a total of 22 PGVs; 20 of the 21 patients (95.2%) did not meet criteria for testing by current guidelines. Regarding penetrance of the 22 PGVs, 11 were high or moderate (most commonPMS2orHOXB13), and 11 were low or recessive (most commonMUTYH,WNR, orRECQL4). One patient had a change in care based on an identified PGV. Family variant testing was completed at a rate of 4.8%.ConclusionsUniversal gene panel testing identified a PGV in 10.5% of head and neck cancer patients; almost all would have been missed by current guideline‐based testing. One of 21 patients had a treatment change due to their PGV, indicating that head and neck cancer treatment decisions are not yet widely informed by germline alterations.Level of Evidence3Laryngoscope, 133:3378–3388, 2023

Abstract Hereditary factors play a role in the development of several cancers. Identification of germline predisposition can have implications for treatment and cancer prevention. While previous studies have found that universal multigene panel testing in patients with cancer yields increased detection of actionable heritable variants compared to targeted testing, patients belonging to racial and ethnic minority groups have been underrepresented in these studies. We undertook a prospective multi-site study of germline alternations among solid tumor cancer patients from under-represented minority (URM) populations receiving care at Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Centers between January 2020 and November 2022. Patients with a new or active cancer diagnosis (all stages) not selected for family history of cancer were tested with a &gt;80-gene next generation sequencing panel. Of 532 patients (mean [SD] age, 57.2 [12.7] years; 320 (60.2%) female), 247 (46.4%) were Hispanic/Latino, 130 (24.4%) Black/African American, 80 (15.0%) Asian, 66 (12.4%) American Indian/Alaskan Native, 2 (0.4%) Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, and 7 (1.3%) other. PGV were found in 43 patients (8.1%), including 29 moderate- or high- penetrance cancer susceptibility genes. Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) were found in 272 patients (51.1%). Of those with a PGV, 29 (67.4%) had incremental clinically actionable findings that would not have been detected by established testing criteria, of which 16 were moderate- or high-penetrance variants. Younger age of diagnosis, gender, race, ethnicity, and stage of disease were not predictive of PGV. In this study of under-represented minority cancer patients, universal genetic testing found that 1 in 12 patients harbor a PGV, more than two-thirds of whom would remain undetected using current guidelines. The paucity of genomic data in URM populations also results in a large proportion of VUS which may lead to under-estimation of disease associated variants. Table 1. Clinical and Demographic Characteristics of Included Patients Positive Negative VUS Total N (%) 43 217 272 532 (8.1%) (40.8%) (51.1%) Age - mean (SD) 53.7 57.0 57.8 57.2 (12.7) (12.6) (12.8) (12.7) Gender - Female 26 132 162 320 (60.5%) (60.8%) (59.6%) (60.2%) Race/Ethnicity Hispanic/Latino 24 110 113 247 (55.8%) (50.7%) (41.5%) (46.4%) Black/African 5 56 69 130 American (11.6%) (25.8%) (25.4%) (24.4%) Asian 10 (23.3%) 23 (10.6%) 47 (17.3%) 80 (15.0%) American Indian/Alaskan Native 4 (9.3%) 26 (12.0%) 36 (13.2%) 66 (12.4%) Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 2 (0.7%) 2 (0.4%) Other 0 (0.0%) 2 (0.9%) 5 (1.8%) 7 (1.3%) Tumor Types Breast 19 (44.2%) 80 (36.9%) 110 (40.4%) 209 (39.3%) CNS 1 (2.3%) 2 (0.9%) 1 (0.4%) 4 (0.8%) GI 7 (16.3%) 46 (21.2%) 58 (21.3%) 111 (20.9%) GU 8 (18.6%) 57 (26.3%) 62 (22.8%) 127 (23.9%) GYN 0 (0.0%) 8 (3.7%) 10 (3.7%) 18 (3.4%) Head/Neck 5 (11.6%) 8 (3.7%) 6 (2.2%) 19 (3.6%) Lung 0 (0.0%) 6 (2.8%) 11 (4.0%) 17 (3.2%) Melanoma 0 (0.0%) 2 (0.9%) 1 (0.4%) 3 (0.6%) Sarcoma 2 (4.7%) 4 (1.8%) 4 (1.5%) 10 (1.9%) Other 1 (2.3%) 4 (1.8%) 9 (3.3%) 14 (2.6%) Citation Format: Kevork A. Khadarian, Sailaja Pisipati, Jeremy C. Jones, Gerardo Colon-Otero, Donald W. Northfelt, Lindsey Gary, Idara U. Ekpoh, Giovanna G. Moreno, Edward D. Esplin, Robert Nussbaum, Brandie Heald, Margaret A. Klint, Kathleen A. Barrus, Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, Aleksandar Sekulic, Michael A. Golafshar, Katie L. Kunze, Cheryl L. Willman, Konstantinos N. Lazaridis, Niloy Jewel Samadder. Universal genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes in an under-represented minority population [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 1921.

Abstract Sarcomas are rare heterogenous mesenchymal tumors with over 75 different subtypes, with varying biology and outcomes, with no clear inciting factor in the vast majority. The germline genetic susceptibility to sarcoma is not very well characterized. Identification of any underlying germline predisposition can have important implications for treatment of patients and screening recommendations for family members. To determine the prevalence of pathogenic germline variants (PGV) in patients with sarcomas, we undertook the Interrogating Cancer Etiology Using Proactive Genetic Testing (INTERCEPT) study, a prospective multi-site study of germline sequencing using a &gt;80-gene next-generation sequencing platform. The study was done at the three Mayo Clinic Cancer Centers between April 1, 2018, and March 31, 2020. Patients were not selected based on stage, family cancer history, ethnicity, or age. Family cascade testing was offered at no charge. Results: 115 adult patients with soft tissue sarcoma were included in the study. The median age was 60 years, 58.5% were male, 81% were White. The anatomical location of the primary tumor included extremities (33.0%), retroperitoneum (18.2%), trunk (12.2%), head and neck (7.8%). Family history of cancer was present in 63% of the study population. Ten patients (8.7%) had a PGV. Thirty percent of the patients with PGV had stage IV sarcoma (3/10), and 70% (7/10) had earlier stage sarcoma (stages I-III). Among patients who were found to have a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), 40% (22/55) had stage IV sarcoma and 60% (33/55) had earlier stage disease. Of the 10 patients with PGV, high to medium penetrance gene abnormalities were identified in 8 patients (80%) involving TP53 (3), BRCA1 (1), SDHA (1), ATM (2) and heterozygous deletion of NBN (1) genes. Of these PGV, gene deletions were observed in 6/10 while missense variants comprised the remaining 4. The vast majority of the PGV (70%) would not have been identified using the current guidelines utilizing the 2018 or 2020 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) or American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Conclusion: In this prospective, multi-site study comprising over 100 patients with diverse sarcomas, unselected germline testing identified a PGV in 1 in 11 patients (8.7%) with the majority of these not being detected using current standard of care guidelines for genetic testing. Because of the rarity of sarcomas, in addition to limited effective treatment options for advanced disease, large scale germline testing in sarcomas represents a potentially impactful strategy to assess therapeutic options and for assessment of familial risk. Citation Format: Isaak Ailts, Michael A. Golafshar, Katie L. Kunze, Margaret Klint, Kathleen Barrus, Samuel Nussbaum, Edward Esplin, Brandie Leach, Sarah Young, Niloy Jewel Samadder, Mahesh Seetharam. Germline cancer susceptibility gene testing in unselected patients with soft tissue sarcoma: a multi-center prospective study. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Precision Prevention, Early Detection, and Interception of Cancer; 2022 Nov 17-19; Austin, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Can Prev Res 2023;16(1 Suppl): Abstract nr P056.