Ricks‐Santi, Luisel

Abstract Purpose Elective genomic sequencing (EGS) returns monogenic disease findings in multiple genes, including potentially novel variants, and may also provide participants with carrier status, pharmacogenomic and other health-related information. The PeopleSeq Study assessed participants’ motivations for and concerns about EGS and the associated clinical and psychosocial outcomes across diverse EGS providers. Methods We administered a shared questionnaire to participants who chose to undergo EGS via 18 academic, clinical, or commercial EGS platforms. Results We enrolled 1575 participants, of whom 1147 (72.8%) completed a questionnaire after receiving their EGS results. A majority (60.3%) of the participants who completed a post-result questionnaire self-reported receiving results they assessed as important, including negative findings, and 75.9% reported a form of health-related utility. Among a subset (19.4%) who shared their EGS reports, 16.6% (37 of n =223) received a monogenic finding and self-reported results deemed “important” were consistent with EGS reports. Most participants (74.1%) discussed their results with their family, but fewer discussed their results with a healthcare provider other than the site team (41.7%) or had one or more medical visits as a direct result of their EGS testing (23.1%). Participants expressed diverse motivations for EGS, with 91.4% expressing interest in their personal disease risk and 54% who expressed quasi-indication-based motivations related to family medical history. Individuals motivated by family history reported important results at a significantly higher rate. Conclusions Early adopters of EGS are motivated by general interest in their health as well as quasi-indication-based considerations such as family history. A majority of participants learned results they considered medically important, but a much smaller segment engaged healthcare providers with their results.

Quadruple-negative breast cancer (QNBC) is a triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype that lacks expression of the androgen (AR) receptor. Few studies have focused on this highly aggressive breast cancer, portending worse survival rates. We aimed to determine the following: (1) QNBC’s molecular and clinical characteristics and compare them with other subtypes and (2) QNBC’s association with clinicopathological factors and prognostic markers. We performed immunohistochemical evaluations of ARs on tissue tumor microarrays from FFPE tumor blocks of invasive ductal breast carcinomas in 202 African American women. Univariate analysis was performed using the chi-square test, with survival rates calculated using Kaplan–Meier curves. Overall, 75.8% of TNBCs were AR-negative. Compared to the luminal subtypes, TNBC and QNBC tumors were likely to be a higher grade (p < 0.001); HER2+/AR- and QNBCs were also larger than the other subtypes (p < 0.001). They also expressed increasing mean levels of proteins involved in invasion, such as CD44, fascin, and vimentin, as well as decreasing the expression of proteins involved in mammary differentiation, such as GATA3 and mammaglobin. We found no association between QNBC and stage, recurrence-free survival, or overall survival rates. The high prevalence of TNBC AR-negativity in these women could explain observed worse outcomes, supporting the existence of the unique QNBC subtype.

Abstract Introduction: Amplification of chromosome 9p24.1 encoding PDL1, PDL2, and JAK2 (the PDJ amplicon) has been detected in 5-25% of triplenegative breast cancers (TNBC), and is associated with poor outcome and activation of the JAK/STAT pathway. Here, we have developed a robust multiplexed fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay for detection of 9p24.1 amplification, and assessed the frequency and cellular distribution of the PDJ amplicon in a cohort of African American (AA) women with TNBC. Methods: The FISH assay combines three chromosome 9 probes to simultaneously target JAK2 and PD-L1 (9p24.1, PDJ), chromosome 9q22, and the 9q34.1 regions. This enables discrimination of PDJ amplicons from whole chromosome 9p arm gains and from chromosome 9 ploidies that occur in the background of genomic instability in aneuploid cancer genomes. Fifty cells were scored for each probe and the average copy number was obtained. We defined PDJ amplification as PDJ&gt;4, PDJ/9q22 ratio≥2, and/or PDJ/9q34.1 ratio≥2. The assay was benchmarked to array CGH of flow sorted TNBC tissue from Mayo Clinic Arizona (n=14). Tissue microarrays from TNBC PDX tumors (n=20) and from African American women with TNBC (n=87) were assessed. Results: Using selected TNBC tissue with known CGH data, the FISH assay tightly correlated with PDJ copy number in 13/14 cases. The discordant case was negative by CGH on a biopsy with low tumor content, but FISH positive on tissue section (PDJ &gt;7.5 and a PDJ/9q22 ratio=4). Of 20 TNBC PDX tumors, 5 were amplified by FISH. Twelve of 87 (14%) of tumors had PDJ amplification by FISH, of which ten were from breast tissue and two were from lymph node. Of these 12, PDJ&gt;4 (n=0), PDJ/9q22 ratio≥2 (n=6), and PDJ/9q34.1 ratio≥2 (n=10). Significant intratumoral variation was observed with the presence of single cells with &gt;10 PDJ copies in 8/17 (47%) amplified and 0/90 non-amplified total cases. Conclusion: 9p24.1 (PDJ) amplification encoding JAK2, PD-L1, and PD-L2 is detected by three-color FISH in 14% of TNBC from African American women. Individual cells with ≥10 copies of PDJ was seen exclusively in 8/17 amplified cases. We identified 5 PDX tumors which may provide valuable preclinical models for the amplicon. The association of this biomarker with clinical outcome will be presented. Citation Format: Karen S. Anderson, Tammey Naab, Lori K Koslosky, Megan Anderson, Michael Lewis, Yasmine Kanaan, Ali Afsari, Luisel Ricks-Santi, Barbara A. Pockaj, Michael T Barrett. Tissue prevalence and cellular heterogeneity of 9p24.1 amplification in TNBC in African American women [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-10-17.