Back to Authors

Antonarakis, Emmanuel S

0000-0003-0031-9655

Mayo Clinic

Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Citations 22

B7-H3 Gene Expression Shapes Prognosis and Therapeutic Opportunities across Patient Groups with Prostate Cancer
Makovec, Allison , Gustafson, Ava, Gandhi, N., Rampalli, Swati , Arafa, Ali T. , Elliott, Andrew , Smith, Norm, Felices, Martin , Kennedy, Philippa R. , Shenderov, Eugene , Heath, Elisabeth I. , Zorko, Nicholas A. , Shi, Xiaolei , McKay, Rana R. , Hwang, Justin H. , Gandhi, Nishant , Gustafson, Ava P , Gandhi, Nishant , Smith, Norm D. , Patnaik, Akash , Narayan, Vivek , Heath, Elisabeth I , Zorko, Nicholas A , Shi, Xiaolei , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S , McKay, Rana R , Hwang, Justin H , Arafa, Ali , Elliott, Andrew , Makovec, Allison , Shenderov, Eugene , Patnaik, Akash , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S.

Clinical Cancer Research | April 21, 2026 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 15 | Pages: 3381-3394

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-26-0322 Get It

Abstract Purpose: B7-H3 (CD276) represents a promising therapeutic target tested in high-risk localized and treatment-refractory metastatic prostate cancer. To guide therapeutic development and treatment strategies, we examined prostate tumors and evaluated expression, molecular features, and overall survival (OS), accounting for tissue site, hormone sensitivity status, and race. Experimental Design: A total of 8,157 prostate cancer samples with paired DNA/RNA were analyzed based on annotations by tissue site, self-reported race, and disease state: hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC), castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), or neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC). Expression quartiles were B7-H3–high (>75th percentile) or B7-H3–low (<25th percentile). The OS was evaluated using Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: B7-H3 expression was broadly maintained but varied by tumor site, hormone sensitivity status, and race. High expression aligned with AR-associated transcription factors (HOXB13 and FOXA1), AR-associated pathogenic dysregulations (AR-V7, SPOP, FOXA1, and TMPRSS2:ERG fusions), and actionable surface antigens (TROP2 and NECTIN-4). Weak correlations were found for lineage-plastic program regulators (EZH2, SOX2, and ASCL1) and NEPC-associated surface antigens (DLL3 and CEACAM5). High B7-H3 expression in primary tumors and HSPCs portended adverse OS [hazard ratio (HR), 1.342 and 1.30; confidence interval (CI), 1.19–1.512 and 1.15–1.46; q < 0.0001] although it was favorable in metastatic tumors (HR, 0.823; CI, 0.719–0.942; q = 0.0048). No significant differences in OS were observed among CRPCs and NEPCs, although OS varied by race, with the poorest survival in Asian/Pacific Islander patients with metastatic prostate cancer (HR, 3.72; CI, 1.49–9.29; q = 0.012). Conclusions: Maintained B7-H3 expression in various prostate cancer settings supports its viability as a target. The associations with AR-related molecular factors, surface antigens, and investigative targets for cell therapy or antibody–drug conjugates suggest potential dual-targeting strategies. See related article by Sharma et al., p. 3365
Carboplatin, Cabazitaxel, and Abiraterone in High-Volume Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: The CASCARA Phase II Study
Antonarakis, Emmanuel S., Cao, Qing , Catharine, Victoria , Carneiro, Benedito A. , Souza, André , VanderWeele, David James , Singh, Parminder, Bryce, Alan H. , Kelly, W. Kevin., Jha, Gautam , Lewis, Brian , Barata, P., Sartor, A. Oliver, Proudfoot, James A. , Davicioni, Elai, Dhawan, Mallika, Morgans, Alicia K., Ryan, Charles J. , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S. , Singh, Parminder , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S. , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S , De Souza, Andre L , VanderWeele, David J , Singh, Parminder , Kelly, W Kevin , Jha, Gautam G , Barata, Pedro , Sartor, A Oliver , Stadler, Walter M , Proudfoot, James A , Davicioni, Elai , Dhawan, Mallika , Morgans, Alicia K , Ryan, Charles J , Bryce, Alan H , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S , Barata, Pedro C. , Sartor, Oliver , Stadler, Walter M. , Davicioni, Elai , Dhawan, Mallika , Morgans, Alicia K.

Clinical Cancer Research | March 25, 2026 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 2403-2412

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-25-4823 Get It

Abstract Purpose: This multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of cabazitaxel and carboplatin followed by abiraterone, plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), in patients with high-volume metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). Patients and Methods: Eligible patients had high-volume mCSPC and ≤3 months of prior ADT. Patients received six 21-day cycles of cabazitaxel (20 mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC 4) with continuous ADT, followed by maintenance abiraterone (1,000 mg daily) and prednisone (5 mg daily). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients free of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or radiographic progression at 12 months. Secondary endpoints included complete PSA response (≤0.2 ng/mL), objective response, progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. Overall survival (OS) was also reported. Results: Sixty-one participants were enrolled at eight sites. The median age was 64 years, median baseline PSA was 6.6 ng/mL (0.07–745.7 ng/mL), 73.3% had Gleason grade group 5, 69.5% had 10 or more metastases, and 19.6% had a homologous recombination repair (HRR) mutation. PSA PFS at 12 months was 84.6% [95% confidence interval (CI), 72.5%–91.7%], and OS at 12 months was 94.8% (84.7%–98.3%). Complete PSA response was 66.7%, and complete objective response was 30.7%. Contrary to our hypothesis, relative to HRR wild-type patients, HRR-mutated patients (19.6%) had numerically fewer complete PSA responses (33.3% vs. 70.3%) and inferior PFS (HR, 2.43; 95% CI, 0.93–6.39). Common side effects of this quadruplet regimen included fatigue, nausea, and diarrhea. Conclusions: Cabazitaxel and carboplatin followed by abiraterone, together with ADT, were feasible, safe, and efficacious in patients with high-volume mCSPC and warrant further study in larger randomized trials.
Molecular landscape of prostate cancers with clival metastases
Likasitwatanakul, Pornlada , Blinka, Steven , Zarka, Jabra , Gebrael, Georges , Weg, Emily S. , Longoria, Ossian , Moore, Joseph A , Sharp, Adam , Bono, Johann de, Sternberg, Cora N, Agarwal, Neeraj, Swami, Umang , Orme, Jacob J. , Schweizer, Michael T. , Hwang, Justin H, Antonarakis, Emmanuel S, Bono, Johann S. de , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S. , Hwang, Justin H. , Gebrael, Georges , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S. , Blinka, Steven M , Zarka, Jabra G , Weg, Emily , de Bono, Johann , Agarwal, Archana M , Sloan, Lindsey , Hwang, Justin H , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S , Sternberg, Cora N , Agarwal, Neeraj

The Oncologist | March 1, 2026 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/oncolo/oyag074 Get It

Abstract Background Clival metastases are a rare and clinically aggressive manifestation of advanced prostate cancer, associated with cranial nerve palsy and poor survival. The molecular features of prostate cancers giving rise to clivus metastases remain unknown. Patients and methods We performed a multi-center retrospective study across six institutions, identifying prostate cancer patients with radiographically confirmed clival metastases and available next-generation sequencing (NGS) data. Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were collected. Genomic alterations from tissue- and/or blood-based assays were aggregated at the patient level and compared with a publicly available metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) cohort (SU2C/PCF). Results Fifty-nine patients with clival metastases contributed 87 molecular assays. More than half of patients had Gleason grade group 5 cancer and presented with de novo metastatic (M1) disease. The median interval from initial prostate cancer diagnosis to clival metastasis was 71.4 months (95% CI, 42.0-101.7), while median overall survival following clival involvement was only 15.3 months (95% CI, 6.9-22.8). Compared with the SU2C/PCF mCRPC cohort, clival metastases showed significant enrichment of BRAF and CHEK2 alterations as well as homologous recombination repair (HRR) with relative depletion of AR-related, PI3K pathway, and G2–M pathway alterations. Conclusion Prostate cancers giving rise to clival metastases exhibit a distinct molecular profile enriched for DNA damage–repair and RAF kinase alterations, suggesting unique metastatic biology and potential therapeutic vulnerabilities.
Integrated Single-Cell Profiling Reveals Dichotomous NK Cell Populations Associated with Immunosuppression in Solid Tumors
Ali, Atef , Luo, Christine, Plagens, Rosemary N. , Zhang, Bin, Elliott, A., Boytim, Ella, Zorko, Nicholas, Heath, Elisabeth I. , Patnaik, Akash, VanderWalde, A., Antonarakis, Emmanuel S., Miller, Jeffrey S., Hwang, Justin H., Cichocki, Frank, Hwang, Justin H. , Patnaik, Akash , Elliott, Andrew , Zorko, Nicholas A. , Lozada, John R , Ali, Atef , Luo, Christine , Plagens, Rosemary N , Zhang, Bin , Elliott, Andrew , Boytim, Ella , Zorko, Nicholas A , Heath, Elisabeth I , Patnaik, Akash , VanderWalde, Ari , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S , Miller, Jeffrey S , Hwang, Justin H , Cichocki, Frank , Vanderwalde, Ari M. , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S. , Miller, Jeffrey S.

Cancer Immunology Research | February 27, 2026 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1008-1021

10.1158/2326-6066.cir-25-1229 Get It

Abstract Natural killer (NK) cells represent key effectors of antitumor immunity, yet emerging evidence highlights populations with distinct roles in cancer. Despite such expanded diversity within the NK cell repertoire, we lack an understanding of how this heterogeneity affects immune responses and downstream clinical outcomes. Using single-cell RNA sequencing, we systematically profiled NK cells across cancer and uncovered a dichotomous phenotypic and functional landscape of tumor-infiltrating NK cells shaped by opposing intrinsic signaling programs that drive the expression of IFNG or TGFB1. These divergent programs are associated with distinct transcription factor circuits that integrate cues within the tumor microenvironment and skew NK cells toward proinflammatory or suppressive functions. We found that the capacity for NK cells to engage in either functional direction is intrinsically linked to their phenotypic identity. Canonical NK cells recruited from circulation predominantly directed suppressive TGFB1 signals toward effector CD8+ T cells in tumors. Of note, these subsets exhibited higher TGFB1 expression than intratumoral myeloid cells across tumor types. In contrast, a tissue-resident (TR) adaptive subset exhibited exclusively proinflammatory IFNG-driven profiles and was associated with prolonged survival in both primary and metastatic tumor settings. Moreover, these TR adaptive NK cells, but not other subsets, were linked to response to immune checkpoint blockade. Collectively, our study reveals a previously unrecognized regulatory axis in NK cells that shapes NK cell diversity and augments broader antitumor immune responses.
Trial Design and Objectives for Patients With Prostate Cancer: Recommendations From the Prostate Cancer Working Group 4
Armstrong, Andrew J., Morris, M., Abida, Wassim , Aggarwal, Rahul R., Antonarakis, Emmanuel S., Attard, Gerhardt , Beltran, Himisha, Bryce, Alan H. , Carducci, Michael A. , Cheng, Heather H., Dahut, William L. , Emmett, Louise , Fizazi, Karim, Gafita, Andrei, George, Daniel J., Hermann, Ken, Hofman, Michael S., Hope, MD Thomas A., Hussain, Maha, Kelly, W. Kevin, Kuo, Phillip H. , Liu, Glenn X., Morgans, Alicia K., McKay, Rana R., Nanus, David, Nelson, P., Reichert, Zachery R. , Ryan, Charles J. , Sartor, A. Oliver, Schwartz, Lawrence H., Sharifi, Nima , Stadler, Walter M., Stein, M., Sternberg, Cora N., Szmulewitz, Russell Z., Tagawa, Scott T., Sokolova, Alexandra O., Wyatt, Alex, Yu, Evan Y., Halabi, S., Scher, Howard I., Group, for the PCWG4 Writing, Alumkal, Joshi J. , Aparicio, Ana, Barata, Pedro C., Drake, Charles G., Hamid, Anis , Heath, Elisabeth I. , Nauseef, Jones, Lage, Daniel E. , Mallak, Nadine , Patnaik, Akash, Prepelica, Kristofer, Rowe, Steven P., Slovin, Susan F. , Taplin, Mary‐Ellen , Zorko, Nicholas, Carducci, Michael A. , Halabi, Susan , Cheng, Heather H. , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S. , Morris, Michael J. , Armstrong, Andrew J. , Nauseef, Jones T. , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S. , Zorko, Nicholas A. , Armstrong, Andrew J , Morris, Michael J , Aggarwal, Rahul , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S , Beltran, Himisha , Bryce, Alan H , Cheng, Heather H , Chen, Delphine L , Chi, Kim N , Childs, Daniel S , Dahut, William , Emmett, Louise , Fizazi, Karim , Gafita, Andrei , George, Daniel J , Hermann, Ken , Hofman, Michael S , Hope, Thomas A , Hussain, Maha H A , Kelly, W Kevin , Kessler, Elizabeth , Lang, Joshua M , Liu, Glenn , Marshall, Catherine H , Morgans, Alicia K , McKay, Rana R , Nelson, Peter S , Paller, Channing J , Reichert, Zachery R , Sartor, A Oliver , Schöder, Heiko , Sharifi, Nima , Stadler, Walter M , Stein, Mark , Sternberg, Cora N , Szmulewitz, Russell Z , Tagawa, Scott T , Sokolova, Alexandra O , Wyatt, Alexander , Yamoah, Kosj , Yu, Evan Y , Halabi, Susan , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S , Zorko, Nicholas A , Nauseef, Jones T , N., Kim , Childs, Daniel S. , Fizazi, Karim , Gafita, Andrei , George, Daniel J. , Hofman, Michael S. , Lang, Joshua M. , Liu, Glenn , Marshall, Catherine H. , Morgans, Alicia K. , McKay, Rana R. , Paller, Channing J. , Sartor, Oliver , Schöder, Heiko , Schwartz, Lawrence H., Stadler, Walter M. , Tagawa, Scott T. , Scher, Howard I. , Aparicio, Ana, Barata, Pedro C. , Drake, Charles G. , Graff, Julie Nicole , Patnaik, Akash , Rathkopf, Dana E , Rettig, Matthew B.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 26, 2026 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 13 | Pages: 1249-1265

10.1200/jco-25-02834 Get It

PURPOSE The continuous development of new imaging approaches, molecular phenotyping, genetic subtypes, prognosis assessments, and effective therapies across a range of disease states has created a need to redefine terminology and best practices for clinical trial conduct in patients with advanced prostate cancer. Methods We convened an international expert committee of diverse working groups, the Prostate Cancer Working Group 4 (PCWG4), between 2016 and 2025. Our objective was to formulate updated criteria based on emerging evidence and clinical trial data in a biomarker context to provide guidance for clinical trial design, eligibility, and end point assessments for patients with advanced prostate cancer. RESULTS PCWG4 redefines terminology around the disease state and previous therapies in a patient-centric context and terminology focused on androgen pathway modulation. We consider imaging, with a particular focus on positron emission tomography (PET)–defined disease. New recommendations are provided for disease state terminology, defining eligibility criteria, response and delay/prevent end points, intervals for reassessments including imaging, and patient-reported outcome determination. We provide recommendations in a biomarker-based context of use for the intended indication, reflective of patient benefit for specific interventions. We emphasize the need for development of validated PET imaging and molecular and phenotypic criteria as well as trial designs to appropriately risk stratify patients, predict and assess benefit, and measure post-treatment outcomes reliably in a trial framework. CONCLUSION PCWG4 updates recommendations on patient and tumor characterization, therapy development, and imaging criteria and extends guidance into earlier androgen pathway modulator–naïve/sensitive disease states to reflect an evolving, heterogeneous, and diverse patient population to optimize treatment benefits for all patients.
Off-pore Nucleoporin sPOM121 Transcriptionally Propels β-Catenin–driven Tumor Progression and Immune Escape in Prostate Cancer
Kirthika, Perumalraja , Jawalagatti, Vijayakumar , Li, Peiyao , Xu, Michael , Carceles‐Cordon, Marc , Ertel, Adam , Quinn, S. Aidan , Petrylak, Daniel P. , Orme, Jacob J. , Dehm, Scott M. , Heath, Elisabeth I. , Cordon‐Cardo, Carlos , Zhu, Shijia , Domingo‐Domenech, Josep , Rodríguez-Bravo, Verónica , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S , Heath, Elisabeth I , Pandey, Mukesh K , Cordon-Cardo, Carlos , Huang, Rui , Dong, Haidong , Zhu, Shijia , Domingo Domenech, Josep M , Rodriguez-Bravo, Veronica , Dehm, Scott M , Kirthika, Perumalraja , Jawalagatti, Vijayakumar , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S. , Pandey, Mukesh K. , Huang, Haojie , Dong, Haidong

Cancer Discovery | July 25, 2025 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 2374-2396

10.1158/2159-8290.cd-25-0629 Get It

Abstract The roles of nucleoplasm-residing nucleoporins (NUP) in solid tumors, including prostate cancer, remain unknown. In this study, we reveal the clinical significance and mechanistic role of the off-pore NUP, soluble POM121 (sPOM121), as a crucial transcriptional regulator that enhances the aggressiveness of metastatic prostate cancer. Using orthogonal methodologies in human samples, sPOM121 was identified as the predominantly expressed nucleoplasmic NUP in prostate cancer. Unbiased proteomic and epigenomic studies demonstrate that sPOM121, through its C-terminus, interacts with the chromatin remodeler SMARCA5 at gene promoter sites and localizes at nuclear condensates, reprogramming gene expression. Indeed, sPOM121 regulates a distinct oncogenic gene network, including β-catenin, leading to prostate cancer progression and immune evasion. Importantly, targeting the sPOM121/β-catenin axis in patient-derived preclinical and syngeneic mouse models halts prostate cancer aggressiveness and enhances antitumor immunity. Taken together, these findings reveal previously unknown actionable reprogramming functions of off-pore NUPs in solid tumors. Significance: This study uncovers how oncogenic signaling programs are transcriptionally heightened by the NUP sPOM121 in metastatic prostate cancer. Localization of sPOM121 at active transcriptional nuclear condensates propels disease progression and immune evasion, offering novel anticancer therapeutic opportunities.
Outcomes of Radium-223 and Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy Versus Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancers: The RAVENS Phase II Randomized Trial
Wang, Jarey H. , Sherry, Alexander D. , Bazyar, Soha , Sutera, Philip , Radwan, Noura , Phillips, Ryan , Deek, Matthew P. , Lu, Jiayun , Dipasquale, Shirl, Deville, Curtiland , DeWeese, Theodore L. , Malek, Reem , Dudley, S.A. , Greco, Stephen , Denmeade, Samuel R. , Ramotar, Matthew , Leenstra, James L. , Desai, Neil , Stish, Bradley J. , Tang, Chad , Kiess, Ana P. , Phillips, Ryan , Hobbs, Robert F , Malek, Reem , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S , Marshall, Catherine H , Denmeade, Samuel , Paller, Channing J , Pienta, Kenneth J , Oz, Orhan K , Leenstra, James L , Park, Sean S , Abramowitz, Matthew C , Desai, Neil , Berlin, Alejandro , Stish, Bradley J , Tang, Chad , Tran, Phuoc T , Kiess, Ana , Deville, Curtiland , Sherry, Alexander D , Song, Daniel Y. , Wang, Hao , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S. , Marshall, Catherine H. , Paller, Channing J. , Carducci, Michael A. , Park, Sean S. , Abramowitz, Matthew C.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 7, 2025 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 18 | Pages: 2059-2068

10.1200/jco-25-00131 Get It

PURPOSE Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have shown progression-free survival (PFS) benefits of metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) without androgen deprivation therapy for oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (omCSPC). Most patients with bone metastatic (BM) omCSPC recur with additional bone disease after MDT. We hypothesized the BM-targeting alpha-emitter radium-223 dichloride (Ra223) could target subclinical bone disease and delay progression. METHODS This is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, open-label phase II RCT. Eligible men with recurrent omCSPC with ≥one bone metastasis (≤three on conventional imaging and/or ≤five on molecular imaging) were randomly assigned (1:1) to stereotactic ablative radiation (SABR) MDT alone or SABR MDT with Ra223 (six cycles). Primary end point was composite PFS. RESULTS From August 9, 2019, to March 2, 2023, 64 patients were randomly assigned, 33 to SABR MDT and 31 to SABR MDT/Ra223 balancing for key covariates. Most SABR MDT/Ra223 patients (87%) received six cycles of Ra223. The median PFS was 11.8 months with SABR MDT and 10.5 months with SABR MDT/Ra223 (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.42 [95% CI, 0.79 to 2.56]; P = .24). Seven patients (11%) experienced grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (no grade 4 or 5), 2 of 33 (6%) with SABR and 5 of 30 (17%) with SABR MDT/Ra223. Patients with high-risk (HiRi) pathogenic mutations in ATM , BRCA1/2 , RB1 , or TP53 had worse PFS (HR, 5.95 [95% CI, 1.83 to 19.3]; P = .003). Greater T-cell receptor (TCR) unique productive rearrangements were prognostic for improved PFS independent of the treatment arm (aHR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.21 to 0.96]; P = .04). CONCLUSION Adding Ra223 to SABR MDT in BM omCSPC does not delay progression of disease. We provide evidence for an HiRi mutational signature and TCR repertoire as prognostic biomarkers in omCSPC treated with SABR MDT, highlighting the importance of collecting biological correlates in RCTs for omCSPC.
Germline–Somatic Interactions in BRCA-Associated Cancers: Unique Molecular Profiles and Clinical Outcomes Linking ATM to TP53 Synthetic Essentiality
Arafa, Ali T., Yadav, Siddhartha , Marshall, Catherine H. , Mauer, Elizabeth , Huang, Minxuan , Yilma, Binyam , Pol, Ymke van der , Fragkogianni, Stamatina , Teslow, Emily A. , Kellen, Samuel , Boytim, Ella , Luo, Christine , Ludwig, Megan , Jayaraj, Arockia, Armstrong, Deborah K. , Isaacs, William B. , Nguyen, Hai Dang , Huang, R. Stephanie , Dehm, Scott M. , Hwang, Justin H. , Arafa, Ali T. , Arafa, Ali , van der Pol, Ymke , Zhang, Weijie , Jayaraj, Arockia , Armstrong, Deborah K , Isaacs, William B , Drake, Justin M , Nguyen, Hai Dang , Huang, R Stephanie , Chao, Calvin Y. , Lou, Emil , Dehm, Scott M , Couch, Fergus J. , Hwang, Justin H , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S , Mauer, Elizabeth , Yadav, Siddhartha , Marshall, Catherine H , Teslow, Emily A , Fragkogianni, Stamatina , Lou, Emil , Couch, Fergus J. , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S.

Clinical Cancer Research | February 28, 2025 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1730-1745

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-2058 Get It

Abstract Purpose: Germline alterations in homologous recombination repair (gHRR) genes affect the pathogenesis, treatment options, and survival of patients with cancer. However, distinct gHRR gene alterations may differentially affect treatment response and oncogenic signaling. In this study, we interrogated genomic and transcriptomic data and assessed clinical outcomes of patients with gHRR mutations across four BRCA-associated cancers (breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancers) to identify therapeutic vulnerabilities. Experimental Design: We assessed 24,309 patients undergoing matched tumor/normal next-generation DNA and RNA sequencing. Annotated gHRR gene variants [germline BRCA1, germline BRCA2, germline PALB2, germline ATM (gATM), and germline CHEK2] were analyzed. HRs were used to assess survival outcomes comparing germline versus sporadic groups. Somatic alterations and their frequencies were compared across gHRR-altered groups. Differential gene expression and gene set enrichment analysis were used to compare transcriptomic profiles. Results: Somatic TP53 mutations were depleted in gATM carriers (P < 0.05) across all four BRCA-associated cancers by up to 2.5-fold. Tumors with germline BRCA1/2 mutations were associated with improved survival in patients with ovarian cancer and had consistent enrichment of TP53 mutations in all four cancers. gATM mutations displayed elevated p53 transcriptional activity in all four cancers, with significance reached in breast and prostate cancers (P < 0.01). In breast, ovarian, and prostate cancers, gATM tumors demonstrated significantly increased inflammatory pathways (P < 0.001). Finally, using gene dependency data, we found that cell lines that were highly dependent on ATM were co-dependent on canonical p53 function. Conclusions: gATM-associated cancers seem to require intact p53 activity and this synthetic essentiality may be used to guide targeted therapies that perturb canonical TP53 function.
Structurally Oriented Classification of FOXA1 Alterations Identifies Prostate Cancers with Opposing Clinical Outcomes and Distinct Molecular and Immunologic Subtypes
Hwang, Justin H. , Likasitwatanakul, Pornlada , Deshmukh, Sachin Kumar , Wu, Sharon , Kwon, Jason J. , Toye, Eamon , Moline, David , Evans, Mark G. , Elliott, Andrew , Passow, Rachel , Luo, Christine , John, Emily , McKay, Rana R. , Heath, Elisabeth I. , Nabhan, Chadi , Reizine, Natalie , Orme, Jacob J. , Domingo‐Domenech, Josep , Dehm, Scott M. , Hwang, Justin H , Gandhi, Nishant , McKay, Rana R , Heath, Elisabeth I , Nabhan, Chadi , Reizine, Natalie , Orme, Jacob J , Domingo Domenech, Josep M , Sartor, A Oliver , Baca, Sylvan C , Dehm, Scott M , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S , Elliott, Andrew , Gandhi, Nishant , Sartor, Oliver , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S.

Clinical Cancer Research | January 2, 2025 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 936-948

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-3471 Get It

Abstract Purpose: Around 10% to 15% of prostate cancers harbor recurrent aberrations in the Forkhead Box A1 gene, FOXA1, whereby the alteration type and the effect on the forkhead (FKH) domain affect protein function. We developed a FOXA1 classification system to inform clinical management. Experimental Design: A total of 5,014 prostate cancer samples were examined using whole-exome and -transcriptome sequencing from the Caris Life Sciences database. We denoted class 1 FOXA1 alterations as missense and in-frame insertions/deletions with subclasses oriented with respect to the FKH domain. These were in the first part of the FKH domain [class 1A: amino acids (AA) 168–246], within the Wing2 region of FKH (class 1B: AA 247–269), or outside FKH (class 1C: AA 1–167, 270+). Two hotspot missense mutations at R219 were denoted class 2. Class 3 included predicted truncating mutations with subclasses partitioned based on the FKH domain (class 3A: AA 1–269 and class 3B: AA 270+). Class 4 represented FOXA1 amplifications. Real-world overall survival and therapy outcomes were determined from insurance claims. Results: FOXA1 alterations did not influence survival when considered in aggregate but had distinct prognostic effects when stratified by class. In primary prostate samples, class 1A alterations were associated with overall improved survival (HR, 0.57; P = 0.03); a similar trend was seen in metastatic biopsies with class 1B (HR, 0.84; P = 0.09). Conversely, in primary specimens, class 1C exhibited worse survival upon second-generation androgen receptor signaling inhibitor treatment (HR, 1.93; P < 0.001). Class 2 mutations (R219C/S) were enriched in neuroendocrine prostate cancers and were associated with overall poor survival (HR, 2.05; P < 0.001) and worse outcomes to first-line androgen-deprivation therapies (HR, 2.5; P < 0.001). Class 3A alterations indicated improved survival (HR, 0.70; P = 0.01), whereas class 3B alterations portended poor outcomes (HR, 1.50; P < 0.001). Amplifications (class 4) indicated poor outcomes in metastatic samples (HR, 1.48; P = 0.02). Molecularly, different FOXA1 alteration classes harbored distinct mutational and immunologic features as well as unique transcriptional programs. Finally, relative to European Americans, African Americans had increased class 1C alterations, whereas Asian/Pacific Islander patients had increased class 1B alterations. Conclusions: FOXA1 alterations should not be interpreted in aggregate, as different classes are associated with divergent molecular features and clinical outcomes. Our revised classification schema facilitates clinical decision-making for patients with prostate cancer and uncovers important racial differences.
Implementation of Universal Germline Genetic Testing Into Standard of Care for Patients With Prostate Cancer: The Time Is Now
Shore, Neal D. , Nielsen, Sarah M. , Esplin, Edward D. , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S. , Barata, Pedro C. , Beltran, Himisha , Bryce, Alan H. , Cookson, Michael S. , Crawford, E. David , Dorff, Tanya B. , George, Daniel J. , Heath, Elisabeth I. , Hussain, Maha , McKay, Rana R. , Ross, Ashley E. , Shen, John , Sieber, Paul , Armstrong, Andrew J. , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S. , Shore, Neal , Beer, Tomasz M , Beltran, Himisha , Bryce, Alan H , Dorff, Tanya , George, Daniel J , Heath, Elisabeth I , Helfand, Brian T. , Hussain, Maha H A , McKay, Rana R , Morgans, Alicia K , Morris, Michael J , Ross, Ashley E , Sartor, A Oliver , Wise, David R , Armstrong, Andrew J , Barata, Pedro , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S , Esplin, Edward D , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S , Beer, Tomasz M. , Morgans, Alicia K. , Morris, Michael J. , Paller, Channing J. , Sartor, Oliver , Smith, Matthew Ryan

JCO Oncology Practice | December 19, 2024 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 747-753

10.1200/op-24-00626 Get It

Indications for and implications of germline genetic testing (GGT) in patients with prostate cancer have expanded over the past decade, particularly related to precision therapies and management. GGT has become the standard of care for many cancers such as breast, ovarian, colorectal, pancreatic, and metastatic prostate cancer, and it is imperative that patients be offered timely and equitable access to testing as it can inform patient-physician shared decision making for management of the current cancer as well as anticipatory guidance for disease progression. Additionally, GGT guides screening for and prevention of secondary malignancies for the patient and cascade testing for at-risk family members. Here, we present data supporting the notion that clinicians should offer all patients with prostate cancer the opportunity to undergo comprehensive GGT for pathogenic germline variants known to be associated with familial cancer and/or known to have implications for treatment and management.