Domingo Domenech, Josep M

Abstract The nuclear pore complex (NPC) and its building-block proteins, nucleoporins (NUP), play fundamental roles in maintaining cellular fitness by regulating nucleocytoplasmic transport, chromatin and transcriptional activity, and genome stability. These core biological processes are critical for cancer cells, and thus, tumor-driven co-option of NUP-regulated functions has emerged as an important mechanism contributing to the pathogenesis of multiple malignancies. This review discusses how NUP dysregulation mechanistically contributes to tumor initiation and progression and how these insights open opportunities for innovative anticancer therapies, including using clinical-grade molecular glues that induce selective NUP degradation and pharmacologically inhibiting NPC-regulated epigenomic/transcriptomic signaling and nucleocytoplasmic transport. Significance: Recent studies demonstrate that NUPs play fundamental roles in cancer pathogenesis by dysregulating key NPC functions and driving tumorigenesis and disease progression. NUPs and NPC-regulated mechanisms can be pharmacologically targeted, providing a strong rationale for developing much-needed innovative therapeutic strategies to combat cancer.

Abstract The roles of nucleoplasm-residing nucleoporins (NUP) in solid tumors, including prostate cancer, remain unknown. In this study, we reveal the clinical significance and mechanistic role of the off-pore NUP, soluble POM121 (sPOM121), as a crucial transcriptional regulator that enhances the aggressiveness of metastatic prostate cancer. Using orthogonal methodologies in human samples, sPOM121 was identified as the predominantly expressed nucleoplasmic NUP in prostate cancer. Unbiased proteomic and epigenomic studies demonstrate that sPOM121, through its C-terminus, interacts with the chromatin remodeler SMARCA5 at gene promoter sites and localizes at nuclear condensates, reprogramming gene expression. Indeed, sPOM121 regulates a distinct oncogenic gene network, including β-catenin, leading to prostate cancer progression and immune evasion. Importantly, targeting the sPOM121/β-catenin axis in patient-derived preclinical and syngeneic mouse models halts prostate cancer aggressiveness and enhances antitumor immunity. Taken together, these findings reveal previously unknown actionable reprogramming functions of off-pore NUPs in solid tumors. Significance: This study uncovers how oncogenic signaling programs are transcriptionally heightened by the NUP sPOM121 in metastatic prostate cancer. Localization of sPOM121 at active transcriptional nuclear condensates propels disease progression and immune evasion, offering novel anticancer therapeutic opportunities.

Abstract Purpose: Around 10% to 15% of prostate cancers harbor recurrent aberrations in the Forkhead Box A1 gene, FOXA1, whereby the alteration type and the effect on the forkhead (FKH) domain affect protein function. We developed a FOXA1 classification system to inform clinical management. Experimental Design: A total of 5,014 prostate cancer samples were examined using whole-exome and -transcriptome sequencing from the Caris Life Sciences database. We denoted class 1 FOXA1 alterations as missense and in-frame insertions/deletions with subclasses oriented with respect to the FKH domain. These were in the first part of the FKH domain [class 1A: amino acids (AA) 168–246], within the Wing2 region of FKH (class 1B: AA 247–269), or outside FKH (class 1C: AA 1–167, 270+). Two hotspot missense mutations at R219 were denoted class 2. Class 3 included predicted truncating mutations with subclasses partitioned based on the FKH domain (class 3A: AA 1–269 and class 3B: AA 270+). Class 4 represented FOXA1 amplifications. Real-world overall survival and therapy outcomes were determined from insurance claims. Results: FOXA1 alterations did not influence survival when considered in aggregate but had distinct prognostic effects when stratified by class. In primary prostate samples, class 1A alterations were associated with overall improved survival (HR, 0.57; P = 0.03); a similar trend was seen in metastatic biopsies with class 1B (HR, 0.84; P = 0.09). Conversely, in primary specimens, class 1C exhibited worse survival upon second-generation androgen receptor signaling inhibitor treatment (HR, 1.93; P < 0.001). Class 2 mutations (R219C/S) were enriched in neuroendocrine prostate cancers and were associated with overall poor survival (HR, 2.05; P < 0.001) and worse outcomes to first-line androgen-deprivation therapies (HR, 2.5; P < 0.001). Class 3A alterations indicated improved survival (HR, 0.70; P = 0.01), whereas class 3B alterations portended poor outcomes (HR, 1.50; P < 0.001). Amplifications (class 4) indicated poor outcomes in metastatic samples (HR, 1.48; P = 0.02). Molecularly, different FOXA1 alteration classes harbored distinct mutational and immunologic features as well as unique transcriptional programs. Finally, relative to European Americans, African Americans had increased class 1C alterations, whereas Asian/Pacific Islander patients had increased class 1B alterations. Conclusions: FOXA1 alterations should not be interpreted in aggregate, as different classes are associated with divergent molecular features and clinical outcomes. Our revised classification schema facilitates clinical decision-making for patients with prostate cancer and uncovers important racial differences.