Gandhi, Nishant

Abstract Purpose: B7-H3 (CD276) represents a promising therapeutic target tested in high-risk localized and treatment-refractory metastatic prostate cancer. To guide therapeutic development and treatment strategies, we examined prostate tumors and evaluated expression, molecular features, and overall survival (OS), accounting for tissue site, hormone sensitivity status, and race. Experimental Design: A total of 8,157 prostate cancer samples with paired DNA/RNA were analyzed based on annotations by tissue site, self-reported race, and disease state: hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC), castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), or neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC). Expression quartiles were B7-H3–high (>75th percentile) or B7-H3–low (<25th percentile). The OS was evaluated using Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: B7-H3 expression was broadly maintained but varied by tumor site, hormone sensitivity status, and race. High expression aligned with AR-associated transcription factors (HOXB13 and FOXA1), AR-associated pathogenic dysregulations (AR-V7, SPOP, FOXA1, and TMPRSS2:ERG fusions), and actionable surface antigens (TROP2 and NECTIN-4). Weak correlations were found for lineage-plastic program regulators (EZH2, SOX2, and ASCL1) and NEPC-associated surface antigens (DLL3 and CEACAM5). High B7-H3 expression in primary tumors and HSPCs portended adverse OS [hazard ratio (HR), 1.342 and 1.30; confidence interval (CI), 1.19–1.512 and 1.15–1.46; q < 0.0001] although it was favorable in metastatic tumors (HR, 0.823; CI, 0.719–0.942; q = 0.0048). No significant differences in OS were observed among CRPCs and NEPCs, although OS varied by race, with the poorest survival in Asian/Pacific Islander patients with metastatic prostate cancer (HR, 3.72; CI, 1.49–9.29; q = 0.012). Conclusions: Maintained B7-H3 expression in various prostate cancer settings supports its viability as a target. The associations with AR-related molecular factors, surface antigens, and investigative targets for cell therapy or antibody–drug conjugates suggest potential dual-targeting strategies. See related article by Sharma et al., p. 3365

Abstract Purpose: Around 10% to 15% of prostate cancers harbor recurrent aberrations in the Forkhead Box A1 gene, FOXA1, whereby the alteration type and the effect on the forkhead (FKH) domain affect protein function. We developed a FOXA1 classification system to inform clinical management. Experimental Design: A total of 5,014 prostate cancer samples were examined using whole-exome and -transcriptome sequencing from the Caris Life Sciences database. We denoted class 1 FOXA1 alterations as missense and in-frame insertions/deletions with subclasses oriented with respect to the FKH domain. These were in the first part of the FKH domain [class 1A: amino acids (AA) 168–246], within the Wing2 region of FKH (class 1B: AA 247–269), or outside FKH (class 1C: AA 1–167, 270+). Two hotspot missense mutations at R219 were denoted class 2. Class 3 included predicted truncating mutations with subclasses partitioned based on the FKH domain (class 3A: AA 1–269 and class 3B: AA 270+). Class 4 represented FOXA1 amplifications. Real-world overall survival and therapy outcomes were determined from insurance claims. Results: FOXA1 alterations did not influence survival when considered in aggregate but had distinct prognostic effects when stratified by class. In primary prostate samples, class 1A alterations were associated with overall improved survival (HR, 0.57; P = 0.03); a similar trend was seen in metastatic biopsies with class 1B (HR, 0.84; P = 0.09). Conversely, in primary specimens, class 1C exhibited worse survival upon second-generation androgen receptor signaling inhibitor treatment (HR, 1.93; P < 0.001). Class 2 mutations (R219C/S) were enriched in neuroendocrine prostate cancers and were associated with overall poor survival (HR, 2.05; P < 0.001) and worse outcomes to first-line androgen-deprivation therapies (HR, 2.5; P < 0.001). Class 3A alterations indicated improved survival (HR, 0.70; P = 0.01), whereas class 3B alterations portended poor outcomes (HR, 1.50; P < 0.001). Amplifications (class 4) indicated poor outcomes in metastatic samples (HR, 1.48; P = 0.02). Molecularly, different FOXA1 alteration classes harbored distinct mutational and immunologic features as well as unique transcriptional programs. Finally, relative to European Americans, African Americans had increased class 1C alterations, whereas Asian/Pacific Islander patients had increased class 1B alterations. Conclusions: FOXA1 alterations should not be interpreted in aggregate, as different classes are associated with divergent molecular features and clinical outcomes. Our revised classification schema facilitates clinical decision-making for patients with prostate cancer and uncovers important racial differences.