Citations 2
Development of a Core Outcome Domain Set for Facial Aging
Dirr, McKenzie A. , Ahmed, Areeba, Schlessinger, Daniel I., Lazaro-Camp, Vanessa, Smith, SJ, Gullapalli, Thanvi, Dragovic, Doroteja, Chang, Joycie, Zhang, Elizabeth, Alam, Murad, Group, Facial Aging Core Outcome Domain Set Study, Anvery, Noor , Kang, Bianca Y. , Wong, Clarissa, Iyengar, Sanjana, Yanes, Arianna F. , Cotseones, Jill, Ashchyan, Hovik J. , Patel, P. M., Sheikh, Umar A., Franklin, Matthew , Hanna, Courtney, Chiren, Sarah G., Schmitt, J, Furlan, Karina C., Alexiades, Macrene, Alhusayen, Raed, Alster, Tina S. , Beer, Kenneth, Bertucci, Vince , Bloom, Jason D. , Briceño, César A., Bucay, Vivian, Butterwick, Kimberly J., Hugues, Cartier, Casabona, Gabriela, Connolly, Karen , Cox, Sue Ellen , Darmanescu, Monica, Boulle, Koenraad De , Desai, Shraddha, Donofrio, Lisa, Dover, Jeffrey S., Draelos, Zoe, Eisen, Daniel B. , El-Domyati, Moetaz, El-Garem, Yehia, Fischer, John, Fitzgerald, Rebecca, GALADARI, Hassan, Gladstone, Hayes B., Goldman, Mitchel P., Goodman, Greg J., Hanke, C. William , Humphrey, Shannon, Ibrahim, Sherrif F., Jagdeo, Jared, Karen, Julie, Kauvar, Arielle, Ag, Kibbi, KIM, JENNY, Lacerda, D T D, Lask, G, Lopez, Grace M., Lupo, Mary P. , Mariwalla, Kavita , Matarasso, Seth, Mekokishvili, L, Narins, Rhoda S., Ogilvie, P, Orringer, Jeffrey S. , Osaki, Tammy H. , Ozog, David, Pacheco, Theresa, Polder, Kristel, Rossi, Anthony M, Sadick, Neil, Saedi, Nazanin, Schlessinger, Joel, Sharad, Jaishree , Shenoy, SuchitraM, Sinclair, Rd, Solish, Nowell, Piansay‐Soriano, Miriam Emily , Sulyman, Omotara , Szeimies, Rolf‐Markus , Tanzi, Elizabeth L., Taub, Amy Forman , Taylor, Mark B., Thomas, J. Regan, Torezan, Luis, Tosti, Antonella, Touma, Dany, Almeida, Ada Regina Trindade de , Vedamurthy, Maya , Viana, Giovanni, Waldman, Abigail, Weinkle, Susan, Weiss, Robert, Poon, Emily, Cartee, Todd V. , Sobanko, Joseph F. , Eisen, Daniel B. , Ahmed, Areeba , Schlessinger, Daniel Isaac , Lazaro-Camp, Vanessa J, Christensen, Rachel E. , Ibrahim, Sarah A. , Cotseones, J.K., Umar, Sheikh Ahmad , Furlan, Karina Colossi , Alexiades, Macrene , Alhusayen, Raed , Beer, Kenneth Robert, Briceño, César Augusto , Bucay, Vivian , Casabona, Gabriela , Cotofana, Sebastian , Desai, Shraddha , Dover, Jeffrey S. , Draelos, Zoe Diana , Eisen, Daniel B., El-Domyati, Moetaz M. , El-Garem, Yehia, Fitzgerald, Rebecca, Friedmann, Daniel P. , Galadari, Hassan , Gladstone, Hayes B., Goldman, Mitchel P. , Goodman, Greg , Green, Jeremy B. , Halachmi, Shlomit , Humphrey, Shannon , Jagdeo, Jared R. , Jiang, Shang I. Brian , Kauvar, Arielle N.B. , Kibbi, Abdul‐Ghani , Kim, John V. S., LASK, GARY P., Matarasso, Seth L., Narins, Rhoda S., Ogilvie, Patricia , Osaki, Tammy H. , Pacheco, Theresa , Polder, Kristel D., Saedi, Nazanin, Shenoy, Manjunath , Sinclair, Rod, Solish, Nowell , Torezan, Luís , Tosti, Antonellá , Waldman, Abigail , Weiss, Robert, Maher, Ian A. , Kirkham, Jamie J
JAMA Dermatology | June 17, 2026 | Volume: 162 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 829
10.1001/jamadermatol.2026.1697
Importance Currently, there are no standardized outcome domains or measures in clinical trials for facial aging. Heterogeneity in outcome domains and measurement instruments across clinical trials creates difficulty in directly comparing interventions, determining superior therapies, and developing high-quality meta-analyses. Objective To develop a core outcome set (COS) of essential domains to be reported in clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of interventions for facial aging. Evidence Review PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and CINAHL were searched from September 2005 to September 2015. An updated search of the same databases was performed from September 2015 to February 2026. Studies were included if (1) they were randomized clinical trial or controlled clinical trial in design, (2) they assessed the efficacy or safety of an intervention for facial aging, (3) they were published in English, and (4) they involved human participants. Complementary sources, including patient interviews, were used to capture further relevant outcomes. Two rounds of Delphi surveys, followed by consensus meetings, were used to identify outcome domains considered most important by both patient and physician stakeholders. Findings The final COS consists of 6 outcome domains: (1) overall convenience of treatment; (2) time to return to normal work and social activity; (3) overall assessment of focused area of treatment (at the point in time when treatment is expected to provide peak benefit); (4) duration of treatment effect; (5) severity of persistent local or systemic adverse events, including pigmentary change, skin texture change, delayed healing, scarring, and serious adverse events; and (6) patient satisfaction with treatment. Conclusions and Relevance The 6 outcome domains identified through a Delphi consensus are recommended for reporting in future facial aging trials to ensure that outcomes that matter most to patients and clinicians are measured and that results are comparable across interventions.
Assessing the Utility of a Cosmetic Dermatology Journal Club
Chang, Joycie, Alvi, Saira , Zhang, Elizabeth, Smith, SJ, Gullapalli, Thanvi, Lazaro-Camp, Vanessa J, Dragovic, Doroteja, Ahmed, Areeba, Carter, Drake , Mills, Dawson , Henderson, Asia A., El-Khateeb, Hanin, Kang, Bianca Y. , Alam, Murad , Carter, Drake C , Ahmed, Areeba , Henderson, Asia
Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology | April 14, 2026 | Volume: 25 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available
ABSTRACT Background Journal clubs provide opportunities for discussion of new and evolving practices and technologies. Objective We sought to evaluate the utility and effectiveness of a monthly web‐based cosmetic dermatology journal club facilitated by faculty, residents, and medical students. Results From May 2025 to September 2025, 16 articles were discussed and 41 responses were recorded (response rate: 60%). Most respondents found the journal club was an appropriate length, engaging, and very useful. Relevance, frequency, and likelihood to participate in the future varied significantly by participant type. Medical students and residents collectively considered the journal club too infrequent ( p = 0.03) and reported it had less relevance to their practice ( p < 0.001). Conclusion A monthly web‐based cosmetic dermatology journal club was generally positively received by respondents.