Kamal, Robin N.

Background: There is growing evidence that social determinants of health (SDOH) are associated with disparities in access to care and hand and upper extremity health. Quality measures represent an opportunity to evaluate disparities in access and outcomes that can inform improvement interventions. We performed a systematic review of evidence regarding health disparities within hand surgery and aimed to develop suitable quality measures that are clinically important, feasible, usable, and scientifically acceptable. Methods: We performed a systematic review including common hand surgery terms to identify health disparities in hand surgery related to SDOH. Candidate quality measures were constructed based upon evidence from the systematic review. A consortium of 11 US-based hand and upper extremity surgeons completed a modified RAND/UCLA Delphi Appropriateness process to evaluate the importance, feasibility, usability, and scientific acceptability of the candidate quality measures. Panelists rated each measure on a scale of 1 ( definitely not important/feasible/usable/scientifically acceptable ) to 9 ( definitely important/feasible/usable/scientifically acceptable ) in 2 voting rounds separated by a face-to-face discussion. Agreement among panelists and validity were assessed using predetermined criteria. Results: Fourteen candidate quality measures addressing health disparities were identified based on evidence from the systematic review, including time to surgery and emergency department use after hand surgery based on insurance type, clinical outcomes based on social deprivation, among others. All 14 measures were accepted. Conclusions: Fourteen candidate quality measures were identified and accepted based upon consensus to address health disparities in hand surgery, although future investigation will be needed to evaluate their effectiveness.

Background: Proximal pole scaphoid fracture nonunions are challenging conditions to treat. When significant comminution of the proximal pole and avascular necrosis is present, scaphoid proximal pole reconstructive options are considered. The proximal pole of the hamate is a local autograft option; however, little has been described on the outcomes of this procedure. Methods: Patients who underwent proximal pole scaphoid reconstruction using proximal hamate autograft at 3 tertiary care centers were retrospectively reviewed. Radiographic union was classified by greater than 50% bony trabeculae across the reconstruction site on computed tomography scan. Results: Ten patients were included. Average age at the time of surgery was 27.9 years, and 60% were men. Average length of proximal hamate autograft harvested was 10 mm. All patients healed at an average of 14.3 weeks following surgery. At final follow-up, 3 patients reported no pain, 3 reported mild occasional pain, 2 reported moderate tolerable pain (1 at the hamate graft site), and 2 had no reports on their pain level. Conclusions: In small proximal pole scaphoid nonunions with fragmentation and avascular necrosis, ipsilateral proximal hamate autograft reconstruction of the scaphoid proximal pole is a viable and reproducible option with high rates of union and patient satisfaction.

* The wrist maintains stability through complex articulations of the carpal bones, dependent upon intrinsic and extrinsic ligaments. * Injury to the scapholunate interosseous ligament may lead to dissociative carpal instability, abnormal carpal kinetics, and sometimes arthritis. * The kinematics, kinetics, and self-stabilizing role of the tendons and their influence on the scapholunate interosseous ligament continue to be studied. * Critical to successful treatment of scapholunate interosseous ligament injuries is timely and complementary therapy. * There is currently no gold standard for a treatment algorithm for this condition.

Background: Quality measures are now commonplace and are increasingly tied to financial incentives. We reviewed the existing quality measures that address the upper limb and tested the null hypothesis that structure (capacity to deliver care), process (appropriate care), and outcome (the result of care) measures are equally represented. Methods: We systematically reviewed MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines, the National Quality Forum, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and the Physician Quality Reporting System for quality measures addressing upper limb surgery. Measures were characterized as structure, process, or outcome measures and were categorized according to their developer and their National Strategy for Quality Improvement in Health Care (National Quality Strategy) priority as articulated by the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Results: We identified 134 quality measures addressing the upper limb: 131 (98%) process and three (2%) outcome measures. The majority of the process measures address the National Quality Strategy priority of effective clinical care (90%), with the remainder addressing communication and care coordination (5%), person and caregiver-centered experience and outcomes (4%), and community/population health (1%). Conclusions: Our review identified opportunities to develop more measures in the structure and outcome domains as well as measures addressing patient and family engagement, public health, safety, care coordination, and efficient use of resources. The most common existing measures—process measures addressing care—might not be the best measures of upper limb surgery quality given the relative lack of evidence for their use in care improvement.