Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

104 citation(s) found for "Espinosa, M".

S2088 Racial and Ethnic Disparities and Their Association With Obesity Phenotypes: A Prospective Single-Center Registry ACG Outstanding Research Award in the Obesity Category (Trainee)
Nwankwo, Eugene , Fansa, Sima , Espinosa, M, Acosta, Andres, Añazco, Diego , Hurtado, Maria D.

American Journal of Gastroenterology | October 24, 2024 | Volume: 119 | Issue: 10S | Pages: S1491-S1492

10.14309/01.ajg.0001037720.54947.f9 Get It

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Melanoma: Cutaneous, Version 2.2024
Johnson, Douglas B. , Albertini, Mark R. , Barker, Christopher A. , Bateni, Sarah B. , Baumgartner, Joel , Bichakjian, Christopher K. , Chandra, Sunandana , DiMaio, Dominick J. , Dronca, Roxana , Fleming, Martin D. , Galan, Anjela , Guild, Samantha, Hyngstrom, John , Karakousis, Giorgos C. , Kendra, Kari , Lange, Julie R., Lanning, Ryan M. , Logan, Theodore F. , Ott, Patrick A. , Ross, Merrick I. , Skitzki, Joseph J. , Smith, Emily , Tsai, Katy K., Wuthrick, Evan , Xing, Yan, McMillian, Nicole R., Espinosa, Sara, Olson, Daniel J. , Swetter, Susan M. , Bhatia, Shailender , Boland, Genevieve M. , Chmielowski, Bartosz , Fields, Ryan C. , Kiuru, Maija H. , Olson, Daniel, Olszanski, Anthony J. , Rothermel, Luke D. , Salama, April K.S. , Sharma, Rohit R. , Xing, Yan

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | July 26, 2024 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 290-298

10.6004/jnccn.2024.0036 | PMID 39019054 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Cutaneous Melanoma (termed Melanoma: Cutaneous ) provide multidisciplinary recommendations for diagnostic workup, staging, and treatment of patients. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on the update to neoadjuvant systemic therapy options and summarize the new clinical data evaluated by the NCCN panel for the recommended therapies in Version 2.2024 of the NCCN Guidelines for Cutaneous Melanoma.
A Randomized Comparison of Postprandial Glucose Excursion Using Inhaled Insulin Versus Rapid-Acting Analog Insulin in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Using Multiple Daily Injections of Insulin or Automated Insulin Delivery
Hirsch, Irl B., Beck, Roy W. , Marak, Martin Chase , Calhoun, Peter , Mottalib, Adham , Salhin, Amna, Manessis, Anastasios , Bhargava, Anuj , Thorsell, Ashley, Atakov-Castillo, Astrid , Bode, Bruce W., Levister, Camilla, Donahue, Cassandra, Cordero, Christian, Beatson, Christie , Langel, Christine R., Jacobson, Christopher , Kurek, Corey, Cruse, Dana, Pickering, David, Tamarez, Denisa, Desjardins, Donna, O’Malley, Grenye , Aktürk, Halis Kaan , Diner, Jamie, Baran, Jesica D., Ruedy, Katrina J., Codorniz, Kevin , Klein, Klara R. , Castorino, Kristin , Jordan, L.F., Kipnes, Mark, Church, Mei Mei , Raskin, Philip, Nguyen, Quang T., Weinstock, Ruth S. , Rizvi, Shafaq, Bzdick, Suzan, Rodriguez, Tahereh Ghorbani, Salah, Tareq , Blevins, Thomas , Kudva, Yogish C. , Haider, Zehra, Group, INHALE-3 Study, Bode, Bruce W., Ownby, Jonathan G., Johnson, Joseph H., Ruiz, Adriana, Stephens, Nashia, Maxson, Amanda, Beatson, Christie, Mason, E E , Steenkamp, Devin W., Wolpert, Howard , Sullivan, Asya, Salhin, Amna, Copple, Tina, Beltran, Stephanie, Ryan, Terri, O’Malley, Grenye, Tamarez, Denisa, Ipek, Aslihan, Burke, Christine, Langel, Christine, Bauman, Shannon , Haight, Cristina, Bohr, A., Badri, Marwa Al, Nguyen, Loida, Cordero, Christian, Migliozzi, Brittney, Reid, Corey, Kaur, Ravinder Jeet , Livingood, Daine, Cruse, Dana, Kravarusic, Jelena, Coyne, Kasey, Herrmann, Stefanie, Fronczyk, Evelyn, McKillop, Lorcan, Hyatt, Jamie, Patruno, Maria, Shuirman, Maggie, Cobb, Brandon, Watt, Olivia, Casaubon, Luis, Espinosa, Valerie, Pandit, Keta, Perez, Jennifer, Armstrong, Chloe, Martinez-Arredondo, Maritza, Stewart, Ana, Rodriguez, Tahereh Ghorbani, Young, Laura , Kass, Alexander, Fulghum, Karla, Jordan, Lin, Shao, Baomei, Baran, Jesica, Mandava, Patali, Holod, Rosanna, Kaiserman, Kevin B. , Ulloa, Johanna, Pleitez, Jennifer, Sylvan, Joey, Badgett, Lynn, Borgman, Sarah, Frey, Sarah, Mba-Oduwusi, Nnenna, Miller, Paige , Fults, Ashleigh, Marak, Martin, Pritchard, Rosa, Dolzhenko, E. N. , Gabrielson, Deanna, Brown, Sue A. , Ahmann, Andrew , Bergenstal, Richard M. , Levy, Carol J , Steenkamp, Devin W , Aleppo, Grazia , Akturk, Halis K , Klein, Klara R , Castorino, Kristin , Church, Mei Mei , Hamdy, Osama , Weinstock, Ruth S , Salah, Tareq , Kudva, Yogish C. , Beck, Roy W , Calhoun, Peter , Coviello, Andrea D. , Bode, Bruce W., Levy, Carol J. , Donahue, Cassandra, Aleppo, Grazia , Buse, John B. , Nguyen, Quang T., Lee, Scott Jeffery , Group, INHALE-3 Study, Bode, Bruce W., Beatson, Christie, Mason, Emma, Steenkamp, Devin W., Salhin, Amna, O’Malley, Grenye, Bauman, Shannon, Dhaver, Shilton , Nguyen, Quang T., Cordero, Christian, Cruse, Dana, Johnson, Olivia, Rodriguez, Tahereh Ghorbani, Miller, Paige, McCarthy, Chris

Diabetes Care | July 23, 2024 | Volume: 47 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1682-1687

10.2337/dc24-0838 | PMID 39042575 Get It

OBJECTIVE To compare postprandial glucose excursions following a bolus with inhaled technosphere insulin (TI) or subcutaneous rapid-acting analog (RAA) insulin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A meal challenge was completed by 122 adults with type 1 diabetes who were using multiple daily injections (MDI), a nonautomated pump, or automated insulin delivery (AID) and who were randomized to bolus with their usual RAA insulin (n = 61) or TI (n = 61). RESULTS The primary outcome, the treatment group difference in area under the curve for glucose >180 mg/dL over 2 h, was less with TI versus RAA (adjusted difference −12 mg/dL, 95% CI −22 to −2, P = 0.02). With TI, the glucose excursion was smaller (P = 0.01), peak glucose lower (P = 0.01), and time to peak glucose shorter (P = 0.006). Blood glucose <70 mg/dL occurred in one participant in each group. CONCLUSIONS Postmeal glucose excursion was smaller with TI than with RAA insulin in a cohort that included both AID and MDI users.
Abstract 8803: Bioprosthetic Tricuspid Valve Regurgitation Associated with Device Lead Implantation
Eleid, Mackram F. , Blauwet, Lori A, Cha, Yong‐Mei , Connolly, Heidi M. , Brady, Peter A. , Espinosa, Raúl E. , Blauwet, Lori A, Dearani, Joseph A.

Circulation | April 23, 2024 | Volume: 124 | Issue: suppl_21 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/circ.124.suppl_21.a8803 Get It

Background Little is known about the effects of permanent transvenous device leads on bioprosthetic tricuspid valve (BTV) function. Hypothesis The goal of this study was to test the hypothesis that transvalvular device leads promote clinically significant BTV regurgitation. Methods A retrospective review of 58 patients who underwent BTV implantation and subsequently required endocardial pacemaker (n=52) or defibrillator (n=6) lead implantation through the BTV was conducted. Patient and prosthesis characteristics, lead type, and clinical events were collected. The incidence and severity of prosthetic tricuspid regurgitation (TR), determined by Doppler echocardiography, was compared to 265 patients who underwent BTV implantation without undergoing subsequent transvalvular device lead implantation. Results Over a mean follow up of 25 months, 5 patients (9%) with a transvalvular lead developed ≥ moderate prosthetic TR compared to 12 patients (5%) in the control group (P = 0.20). Kaplan Meier survival analysis revealed no significant difference in the incidence of TR in BTV patients with and without transvalvular leads (p = 0.45). Clinically significant prosthetic TR in patients with and without a transvalvular lead more commonly occurred 2 years or later after lead implantation or BTV implantation (4/5, 80% and 10/12, 83%). Conclusions Compared to BTV controls, there was no significant difference in the incidence of ≥ moderate prosthetic TR in patients with a transvalvular pacemaker or defibrillator lead (p = 0.45). Transvalvular lead implantation appears to be an acceptable approach for patients with a BTV who require permanent pacemaker or defibrillator placement.
Vulvar Cancer, Version 3.2024, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Abu‐Rustum, Nadeem R. , Yashar, Catheryn M. , Barber, Emma L. , Bradley, Kristin , Brooks, Rebecca , Campos, Susana M. , Chino, Junzo , Chon, Hye Sook, Damast, Shari , Fisher, Christine M. , Frederick, Peter J., Gaffney, David K. , Gaillard, Stéphanie , Giuntoli, Robert , Glaser, Scott , Howitt, Brooke E. , Kendra, Kari , Mantia-Smaldone, Gina , Mariani, Andrea , Nagel, Christa , Nekhlyudov, Larissa , Podoll, Mirna, Rodabaugh, Kerry J. , Salani, Ritu , Schorge, John O., Siedel, Jean , Sisodia, Rachel , Soliman, Pamela T. , Ueda, Stefanie , Urban, Renata R. , Wyse, Emily , Zanotti, Kristine , McMillian, Nicole R., Espinosa, Sara, Gaillard, Stéphanie , Arend, Rebecca C. , Crispens, Marta Ann , Holmes, Jordan A. , Lea, Jayanthi Sivasothy , Lee, Nita Karnik , Mutch, David G. , Wethington, Stephanie L.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | March 18, 2024 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 117-135

10.6004/jnccn.2024.0013 | PMID 38503056 Get It

Vulvar cancer is annually diagnosed in an estimated 6,470 individuals and the vast majority are histologically squamous cell carcinomas. Vulvar cancer accounts for 5% to 8% of gynecologic malignancies. Known risk factors for vulvar cancer include increasing age, infection with human papillomavirus, cigarette smoking, inflammatory conditions affecting the vulva, and immunodeficiency. Most vulvar neoplasias are diagnosed at early stages. Rarer histologies exist and include melanoma, extramammary Paget’s disease, Bartholin gland adenocarcinoma, verrucous carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, and sarcoma. This manuscript discusses recommendations outlined in the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for treatments, surveillance, systemic therapy options, and gynecologic survivorship.
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Thyroid Cancer: A Narrative Review
Ycaza, Ana E. Espinosa De, Brito, Juan P. , Ospina, Naykky Singh , Ospina, Naykky Singh , Singh Ospina, Naykky , Brito, Juan P , McCoy, Rozalina G. , Shao, Hui

Thyroid® | February 12, 2024 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1089/thy.2023.0530 | PMID 38343381 Get It

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Merkel Cell Carcinoma, Version 1.2024
Schmults, Chrysalyne D. , Blitzblau, Rachel , Aasi, Sumaira Z. , Alam, Murad , Amini, Arya , Bibee, Kristin , Bolotin, Diana, Chen, Pei-Ling , DiMaio, Dominick J. , Farma, Jeffrey M. , Ghosh, Karthik, Harms, Kelly L. , Lukens, John N. , Manber, Susan, Mark, Lawrence A. , Medina, Theresa , Nehal, Kishwer S. , Patel, Tejesh , Rich, Jason T. , Shaha, Ashok R. , Thomas, Valencia D., Tomblinson, Courtney M. , Venkat, Puja , Xu, Yaohui , Yu, Siegrid S., McCullough, Beth, Espinosa, Sara, Sekulić, Aleksandar , Alam, Murad , Bordeaux, Jeremy S. , Contreras, Carlo M. , Donigan, Jessica M. , Ho, Alan L. , Medina, Theresa Michelle , Nghiem, Paul , Olino, Kelly L. , Park, Soohyung , Puzanov, Igor , Sekulic, Aleksander , Srivastava, Divya , Tomblinson, Courtney, Yusuf, Mehran Behruj

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | January 19, 2024 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 1D | Pages: 1-11

10.6004/jnccn.2024.0002 | PMID 38244274 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC) provide recommendations for diagnostic workup, clinical stage, and treatment options for patients. The panel meets annually to discuss updates to the guidelines based on comments from expert review from panel members, institutional review, as well as submissions from within NCCN and external organizations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on the introduction of a new page for locally advanced disease in the setting of clinical node negative status, entitled “Clinical N0 Disease, Locally Advanced MCC.” This new algorithm page addresses locally advanced disease, and the panel clarifies the meaning behind the term “nonsurgical” by further defining locally advanced disease. In addition, the guideline includes the management of in-transit disease and updates to the systemic therapy options.
Molecular Tumor Board Improves Outcomes for Hispanic Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors
Sotelo, Carolina , Vallejo-Ardila, Dora L. , Ruíz-Patiño, Alejandro , Rodríguez, July, Isaza, Hernán Carranza , Otero, Jorge, Archila, Pilar , Rojas, Leonardo , Zuluaga, Jairo , Gómez, Cladelis Rubio , García-Robledo, Juan Esteban , Espinosa, Sergio Andrés Mejía , Jaller, Elvira , Cardona, Andrés F. , Sotelo-Rodríguez, Carolina , Vallejo-Ardila, Dora , Carranza, Hernán , Rojas, Leonardo , Rubio, Cladelis , Ordóñez-Reyes, Camila , Garcia-Robledo, Juan Esteban , Mejía, Sergio , Jaller, Elvira , Arrieta, Oscar , Cardona, Andrés F , Pérez, Darwin Andrés Moreno , Carranza, Hernán, Vargas, Carlos, Ordóñez‐Reyes, Camila , Arrieta, Óscar

JCO Global Oncology | January 18, 2024 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: 10 | Pages: No page available

10.1200/go.23.00011 | PMID 38237094 Get It

PURPOSE Multidisciplinary molecular tumor boards (MTBs) decode complex genomic data into clinical recommendations. Although MTBs are well-established in the oncology practice in developed countries, this strategy needs to be better explored in developing countries. Herein, we describe the possible benefits and limitations of the first MTB established in Colombia. METHODS Demographic, clinical, and genomic information was collected between August 2020 and November 2021. By mid-2020, an MTB strategy was created to discuss clinical cases with one or more genomic alterations identified by next-generation sequencing using an open-access virtual platform. We characterized the patient population as benefiting from the recommended treatment option. We assessed the benefits and access to available targeted therapies that have the potential to change clinical management by making recommendations to treating oncologists on the basis of genomic profiling. However, we did not assess the treatment oncologists' compliance with MTB recommendations because they were not intended to replace clinical judgment/standard of care. RESULTS A total of 146 patients were included in the discussions of the MTB. The median age was 59 years, and 59.6% were women. Genomic results prompting a change in therapeutic decisions were obtained in 53.1% of patients (95% CI, 44.9 to 61.3). The most prevalent malignancy was non–small-cell lung cancer (51%). Other malignancies represented 60%, 50%, and 30% of patients with soft-tissue sarcomas, brain tumors, and breast cancer, respectively. CONCLUSION Using an open-access virtual platform, MTBs were feasible in low- and middle-income countries on the basis of the capability to provide the benefits and access to available targeted therapies that are not standard of care. Furthermore, MTB recommendations were made available to the treating oncologist in different locations across Colombia, providing the option to modify clinical management in most of these patients.
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Cervical Cancer, Version 1.2024
Abu‐Rustum, Nadeem R. , Yashar, Catheryn M. , Arend, Rebecca C. , Barber, Emma L. , Bradley, Kristin , Brooks, Rebecca , Campos, Susana M. , Chino, Junzo , Chon, Hye Sook, Damast, Shari , Fisher, Christine M. , Frederick, Peter J., Gaffney, David K. , Gaillard, Stéphanie , Giuntoli, Robert , Glaser, Scott , Holmes, Jordan A. , Howitt, Brooke E. , Mantia-Smaldone, Gina , Mariani, Andrea , Nagel, Christa , Nekhlyudov, Larissa , Podoll, Mirna, Rodabaugh, Kerry J. , Salani, Ritu , Schorge, John O., Siedel, Jean , Sisodia, Rachel , Soliman, Pamela T. , Ueda, Stefanie , Urban, Renata R. , Wyse, Emily , McMillian, Nicole R., Aggarwal, Shaili, Espinosa, Sara, Gaillard, Stéphanie , Crispens, Marta Ann , Lea, Jayanthi Sivasothy , Mutch, David G.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | December 11, 2023 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1224-1233

10.6004/jnccn.2023.0062 | PMID 38081139 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Cervical Cancer provide recommendations for all aspects of management for cervical cancer, including the diagnostic workup, staging, pathology, and treatment. The guidelines also include details on histopathologic classification of cervical cancer regarding diagnostic features, molecular profiles, and clinical outcomes. The treatment landscape of advanced cervical cancer is evolving constantly. These NCCN Guidelines Insights provide a summary of recent updates regarding the systemic therapy recommendations for recurrent or metastatic disease.
Basal Cell Skin Cancer, Version 2.2024, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Schmults, Chrysalyne D. , Blitzblau, Rachel , Aasi, Sumaira Z. , Alam, Murad , Amini, Arya , Bibee, Kristin , Chen, Pei-Ling , DiMaio, Dominick J. , Farma, Jeffrey M. , Ghosh, Karthik, Harms, Kelly L. , Lukens, John N. , Mark, Lawrence A. , Medina, Theresa , Nehal, Kishwer S. , Patel, Tejesh , Rich, Jason T. , Sekulić, Aleksandar , Shaha, Ashok R. , Thomas, Valencia D., Tomblinson, Courtney M. , Venkat, Puja , Xu, Yaohui , Yu, Siegrid S., McCullough, Beth, Espinosa, Sara, Alam, Murad , Bordeaux, Jeremy S. , Contreras, Carlo M. , Donigan, Jessica M. , Ho, Alan L. , Medina, Theresa Michelle , Nghiem, Paul , Olino, Kelly L. , Park, Soohyung , Puzanov, Igor , Srivastava, Divya , Tomblinson, Courtney, Yusuf, Mehran Behruj

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | November 7, 2023 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1181-1203

10.6004/jnccn.2023.0056 | PMID 37935106 Get It

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common form of skin cancer in the United States. Due to the high frequency, BCC occurrences are not typically recorded, and annual rates of incidence can only be estimated. Current estimated rates are 2 million Americans affected annually, and this continues to rise. Exposure to radiation, from either sunlight or previous medical therapy, is a key player in BCC development. BCC is not as aggressive as other skin cancers because it is less likely to metastasize. However, surgery and radiation are prevalent treatment options, therefore disfigurement and limitation of function are significant considerations. The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) outline an updated risk stratification and treatment options available for BCC.