Buse, John B.

OBJECTIVE In many individuals, type 2 diabetes (T2D) remains poorly controlled despite taking multiple glucose-lowering therapies. Several studies have demonstrated that endogenous hypercortisolism is prevalent among these individuals. We tested whether cortisol-directed therapy improves their glycemic control. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS In this prospective, multicenter, double-blind study, 136 individuals with T2D (hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] 7.5%–11.5% [58–102 mmol/mol] on multiple medications) and hypercortisolism (by dexamethasone suppression test) were randomized 2:1 to the glucocorticoid receptor antagonist mifepristone (300–900 mg once daily; n = 91) or placebo (n = 45) for 24 weeks, with stratification by presence/absence of an adrenal imaging abnormality. The primary end point was the change in HbA1c. Secondary end points included changes in glucose-lowering medications, weight, and waist circumference and safety. RESULTS Mean baseline HbA1c in the study cohort was 8.55% (69.9 mmol/mol). At 24 weeks, the least squares mean (LSM) difference from placebo in HbA1c was −1.32% (95% CI −1.81 to −0.83; P < 0.001). Participants receiving mifepristone experienced reductions in body weight and waist circumference (placebo-adjusted LSM differences of −5.12 kg [95% CI −8.20 to −2.03] and −5.1 cm [−8.23 to −1.99], respectively). Of participants on mifepristone, 46% discontinued therapy, compared with 18% on placebo. Adverse events with mifepristone (>10% of participants) included hypokalemia, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, headache, peripheral edema, diarrhea, and dizziness, consistent with mifepristone’s known tolerability profile. Increases in blood pressure also occurred. CONCLUSIONS In individuals with inadequately controlled T2D and hypercortisolism, cortisol-directed medical therapy with mifepristone reduced HbA1c, with a manageable tolerability profile.

OBJECTIVE Despite the use of multiple glucose-lowering medications, glycemic targets are not met in a significant fraction of people with type 2 diabetes. In this prospective, observational study we assessed the prevalence of hypercortisolism, a potential contributing factor to inadequate glucose control. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Individuals with type 2 diabetes and HbA1c 7.5%–11.5% (58–102 mmol/mol) on two or more glucose-lowering medications with or without micro-/macrovascular complications or taking multiple blood pressure–lowering medications were screened with a 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test. Common causes of false-positive DSTs were excluded. The primary end point was the prevalence of hypercortisolism, defined as post-DST cortisol >1.8 μg/dL (50 nmol/L). Characteristics associated with hypercortisolism were assessed with multiple logistic regression. The percentage and characteristics of participants with hypercortisolism and adrenal imaging abnormalities were also assessed. RESULTS Post-DST cortisol was unsuppressed in 252 of 1,057 participants (prevalence 23.8%; 95% CI 21.3, 26.5). Hypercortisolism prevalence was 33.3% among participants with cardiac disorders and 36.6% among those taking three or more blood pressure–lowering medications. Adrenal imaging abnormalities were reported in 34.7% of participants with hypercortisolism. Use of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (odds ratio 1.558), maximum-dose glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (1.544), tirzepatide (1.981), or a higher number of blood pressure–lowering medications (1.390); older age (1.316); BMI <30 kg/m2 (1.639); non-Latino/Hispanic ethnicity (3.718); and use of fibrates (2.676) or analgesics (1.457) were associated with higher prevalence (all P < 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Hypercortisolism was associated with hyperglycemia in approximately one-quarter of individuals with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes despite multiple medications.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate a regimen of inhaled Technosphere insulin (TI) plus insulin degludec in adults with type 1 diabetes, who prestudy were predominately using either an automated insulin delivery (AID) system or multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) with continuous glucose monitoring. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS At 19 sites, adults with type 1 diabetes were randomly assigned to TI plus insulin degludec (N = 62) or usual care (UC) with continuation of prestudy insulin delivery method (N = 61) for 17 weeks. RESULTS Prestudy, AID was used by 48% and MDI by 45%. Mean ± SD HbA1c was 7.57% ± 0.97% at baseline and 7.62% ± 1.06% at 17 weeks in the TI group and 7.59% ± 0.80% and 7.54% ± 0.77%, respectively, in the UC group (adjusted difference 0.11%, 95% CI −0.10 to 0.33, P value for noninferiority = 0.01). HbA1c improved from baseline to 17 weeks by >0.5% (5.5 mmol/mol) in 12 (21%) in the TI group and in 3 (5%) in the UC group and worsened by >0.5% (5.5 mmol/mol) in 15 (26%) in the TI group and in 2 (3%) in the UC group. The most common TI side effect was a brief cough; eight participants discontinued TI due to side effects. CONCLUSIONS In adults with type 1 diabetes, HbA1c after 17 weeks with a regimen of TI and degludec was noninferior to UC, which consisted predominately of either AID or MDI. TI should be considered an option for people with type 1 diabetes, particularly those who are motivated to further reduce postprandial hyperglycemia.

OBJECTIVE To compare postprandial glucose excursions following a bolus with inhaled technosphere insulin (TI) or subcutaneous rapid-acting analog (RAA) insulin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A meal challenge was completed by 122 adults with type 1 diabetes who were using multiple daily injections (MDI), a nonautomated pump, or automated insulin delivery (AID) and who were randomized to bolus with their usual RAA insulin (n = 61) or TI (n = 61). RESULTS The primary outcome, the treatment group difference in area under the curve for glucose >180 mg/dL over 2 h, was less with TI versus RAA (adjusted difference −12 mg/dL, 95% CI −22 to −2, P = 0.02). With TI, the glucose excursion was smaller (P = 0.01), peak glucose lower (P = 0.01), and time to peak glucose shorter (P = 0.006). Blood glucose <70 mg/dL occurred in one participant in each group. CONCLUSIONS Postmeal glucose excursion was smaller with TI than with RAA insulin in a cohort that included both AID and MDI users.

Abstract Disclosure: J.P. Frias: Advisory Board Member; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. Consulting Fee; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. Other; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. R.J. Auchus: Consulting Fee; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. Grant Recipient; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. Speaker; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. Other; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. I. Bancos: None. L. Blonde: Advisory Board Member; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. Other; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. R.S. Busch: Consulting Fee; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. Speaker; Self; Bayer, Inc., Novo Nordisk, Amgen Inc, Eli Lilly & Company, AstraZeneca. J.B. Buse: Advisory Board Member; Self; AstraZeneca, Bayer, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly & Company, Jansen Pharmaceuticals, Mannkind Corporation, Sanofi, Alkahest, Altimmune, Anji, Biomea Fusion Inc, CeQur, Cirius Therapeutics Inc, GentiBio, Glycadia, Glyscend, Mellitus Health, Moderna, Pendulum Therapeutics, Praetego, Stability Health, Valo, Zealand Pharma. Consulting Fee; Self; AstraZeneca, Bayer, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly & Company, Janssen, Mannkind Corporation, Sanofi, Alkahest, Altimmune, Anji, Biomea Fusion Inc, CeQur, Cirius Therapeutics Inc, Dasman Diabetes Center (Kuwait), Fortress Biotech, GentiBio, Glycadia, Glyscend, Mediflix, Medscape, Mellitus Health, Moderna, Pendulum Therapeutics, Praetego, ReachMD, Stability Health, Valo, Zealand Pharma. Grant Recipient; Self; Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, VTV Therapeutics, Nanotype, NIH, NovaTarg, Tolerion, Dexcom. Stock Owner; Self; Glyscend, Mellitus Health, Pendulum Therapeutics, PhaseBio, Praetego, Stability Health. Other; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly & Company, Novo Nordisk, Dasman Diabetes Institute, Zealand, Association for Clinical and Translational Science. R.A. DeFronzo: None. J.W. Findling: Advisory Board Member; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. Consulting Fee; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. V. Fonseca: Advisory Board Member; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. Consulting Fee; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. O. Hamidi: Advisory Board Member; Self; Corcept Therapeutics, Lantheus, Recordati Rare Diseases, Neurocrine Biosciences, Amryt, Novo Nordisk, Strongbridge. Consulting Fee; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. Y. Handelsman: Consulting Fee; Self; Amgen Inc, Applied Therapeutic, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim, Corcept Therapeutics, Esperion, Mannkind Corporation, Merck, Pfizer, Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Vertis. Grant Recipient; Self; Amgen Inc, Applied Therapeutic, Ionis Pharmaceuticals Inc., Regor. Speaker; Self; AstraZeneca, Bayer, Inc., Esperion, Novo Nordisk, Vertis, Amarin. R.E. Pratley: Consulting Fee; Self; Bayer, Inc., Corcept Therapeutics, Gasherbrum Bio, Inc, Hanmi, Hengrui (USA) Ltd, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Inc., Rivus Pharmaceuticals Inc, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Sanofi, Scohia Pharma Inc, Dexcom. Grant Recipient; Self; Hanmi, Metavention, Novo Nordisk, Poxel SA. Speaker; Self; Novo Nordisk. J. Rosenstock: Advisory Board Member; Self; Applied Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly & Company, Hanmi, Novo Nordisk, Oramed, Sanofi, Structure Therapeutics, Zealand. Consulting Fee; Self; Applied Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly & Company, Hanmi, Novo Nordisk, Oramed, Sanofi, Structure Therapeutics, Zealand. Grant Recipient; Self; Applied Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly & Company, Hanmi, Merck, Oramed, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Inc., Sanofi. I. Tudor: Employee; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. Stock Owner; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. A.G. Moraitis: Employee; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. D. Einhorn: Employee; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. Studies suggest that the prevalence of hypercortisolism in persons with difficult-to-control type 2 diabetes (T2D) is higher than is currently appreciated. A recently published meta-analysis suggests that the prevalence of hypercortisolism is higher in persons with T2D who require a greater number of antihyperglycemic agents and/or who have more comorbidities. To better understand the prevalence and whether treatment of hypercortisolism may result in better control of diabetes and other hypercortisolism-associated comorbidities, we describe a 2-part phase 4 study in adults with difficult-to-control T2D (HbA1c 7.5-11.5%) despite receiving multiple antihyperglycemic agents. The study will be conducted at approximately 30 sites in the United States. In Part 1, approximately 1000 persons with difficult-to-control T2D will be screened with a 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test. Those responding with serum cortisol >1.8 µg/dL (50 nmol/L) and dexamethasone levels ≥140 ng/dL (3.6 nmol/L) will have adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, and cortisol measured in fasting blood samples obtained between 7-9 AM and a non-contrast adrenal computed tomography scan. Patients who may have ACTH-dependent hypercortisolism will be discontinued from the study and referred for further evaluation. The primary study endpoint is determining the prevalence of ACTH-independent hypercortisolism and will be evaluated in Part 1. Patients identified to have ACTH-independent hypercortisolism will advance to Part 2, a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment with the glucocorticoid receptor antagonist mifepristone. Patients will be randomized 2:1 to mifepristone or placebo, stratified by the presence or absence of adrenal adenomas on CT, and receive treatment for 24 weeks. The mifepristone dose will be 300 mg once daily for 4 weeks, then increased to 600 mg daily for 20 weeks based on clinical assessment of tolerability and degree of improvement. There will be an option to increase to mifepristone 900 mg. Placebo will be titrated accordingly from 1 up to 3 tablets. Part 2 will assess the secondary endpoint of change in HbA1c from baseline to 24 weeks, as well as changes in hypercortisolism-related comorbidities (e.g., blood pressure, weight, waist circumference, quality of life). This will be the first prospective study to assess the prevalence of ACTH-independent hypercortisolism in persons with difficult-to-control T2D and the first prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to assess the potential benefits and safety of treatment with mifepristone in this patient population. Presentation: Friday, June 16, 2023

A hepatoselective glucokinase activator reduced hyperglycemia without hypoglycemia or adverse effects on lipids, liver enzymes, or blood pressure.

Background: Compared with multiple daily injections (MDI), sensor-augmented pump (SAP) insulin therapy may reduce glycemic variability and oxidative stress in type 1 diabetes in a glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C)-independent manner. Subjects and Methods: The STAR 3 study compared SAP with MDI therapy for 1 year. Week-long continuous glucose monitoring studies were conducted at baseline and 1 year for assessment of glycemic variability in both groups. Soluble CD40 ligand (CD40L), a biomarker of inflammation and thrombocyte function, was measured at baseline and 1 year. Subjects were classified according to treatment group and 1-year A1C levels (<6.5%, 6.5–6.9%, 7–7.9%, ≥8%). Glycemic parameters were compared between SAP and MDI subjects in each A1C cohort. Results: At 1 year, sensor glucose values at A1C levels ≥6.5% were similar in the SAP and MDI groups. However, sensor glucose SD and coefficient of variation (CV) values were lower at A1C levels <8% among SAP than among MDI subjects; the overall between-group difference was significant for both SD ( P <0.01) and CV ( P =0.01). The overall mean amplitude of glycemic excursion was similar in MDI and SAP groups ( P =0.23). CD40L levels fell over the course of the study in both groups, but the between-group difference was not significant ( P =0.18). CD40L concentrations were unrelated to A1C, change in A1C from baseline, or glycemic variability. Conclusions: At comparable A1C levels of <8%, SAP reduced glycemic variability as measured by SD and CV compared with MDI. SAP may provide beneficial reductions in the number and severity of glycemic excursions.