Sattar, Naveed

ABSTRACT Background Sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 (SGLT2) inhibitors improve glycemic and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, their impact on quality of life (QoL) and patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) has not been systematically evaluated. We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis to assess the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on QoL in patients with T2DM. Methods MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched until 18 August 2025 for randomised controlled trials and post hoc analyses of SGLT2 inhibitors reporting validated QoL or PRO outcomes in adults with T2DM. A random‐effects model was used to estimate mean differences (MD) or odds ratios (OR) with 95% CIs. Subgroup analyses compared SGLT2 inhibitors with placebo and active comparators. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB‐2 tool. Results Ten studies including 5294 patients (SGLT2i: 2807; control: 2487) were included. SGLT2 inhibitors significantly improved: EQ‐5D Index score versus placebo (MD: 0.04, p = 0.008), DTR‐QoL against active comparators (MD: 6.99; p = 0.0006), DTSQ compared to active comparators (MD: 0.54; p = 0.006) and IWQoL (MD: 1.44; p = 0.005) versus placebo. Improvements were also observed in SHIELD WQ‐9 overall QoL (OR: 2.11; p = 0.005), emotional health (OR: 2.16; p = 0.006), self‐esteem (OR: 2.26; p = 0.006) and work performance (OR: 1.99; p = 0.04) compared with placebo. Conclusion Randomised evidence suggests SGLT2 inhibitors enhance EQ‐5D Index score, diabetes‐specific QoL and several PROs in T2DM, particularly in physical, emotional and treatment satisfaction domains, supporting their earlier use in this population.

Abstract The ongoing obesity epidemic represents a global public health crisis that contributes to poor health outcomes, reduced quality of life, and >2.8 million deaths each year. Obesity is relapsing, progressive, and heterogeneous. It is considered a chronic disease by the World Obesity Federation (WOF) and a chronic condition by the World Heart Federation (WHF). People living with overweight/obesity are at greater risk for cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality. Increased adiposity (body fat), particularly visceral/abdominal fat, is linked to CV risk and CV disease (CVD) via multiple direct and indirect pathophysiological mechanisms. The development of CVD is driven, in part, by obesity-related metabolic, endocrinologic, immunologic, structural, humoral, haemodynamic, and functional alterations. The complex multifaceted nature of these mechanisms can be challenging to understand and address in clinical practice. People living with obesity and CVD often have concurrent chronic physical or psychological disorders (multimorbidity) requiring multidisciplinary care pathways and polypharmacy. Evidence indicates that intentional weight loss (particularly when substantial) lowers CVD risk among people with overweight/obesity. Long-term weight loss and maintenance require ongoing commitment from both the individual and those responsible for their care. This position paper, developed by the WOF and the WHF, aims to improve understanding of the direct and indirect links between overweight/obesity and CVD, the key controversies in this area and evidence relating to cardiometabolic outcomes with available weight management options. Finally, an action plan for clinicians provides recommendations to help in identifying and addressing the risks of obesity-related CVD (recognizing resource and support variances between countries).

Ramadan fasting is observed by most of the 1.8 billion Muslims around the world. It lasts for 1 month per the lunar calendar year and is the abstention from any food and drink from dawn to sunset. While recommendations on ‘safe’ fasting exist for patients with some chronic conditions, such as diabetes mellitus, guidance for patients with cardiovascular disease is lacking. We reviewed the literature to help healthcare professionals educate, discuss and manage patients with cardiovascular conditions, who are considering fasting. Studies on the safety of Ramadan fasting in patients with cardiac disease are sparse, observational, of small sample size and have short follow-up. Using expert consensus and a recognised framework, we risk stratified patients into ‘low or moderate risk’, for example, stable angina or non-severe heart failure; ‘high risk’, for example, poorly controlled arrhythmias or recent myocardial infarction; and ‘very high risk’, for example, advanced heart failure. The ‘low-moderate risk’ group may fast, provided their medications and clinical conditions allow. The ‘high’ or ‘very high risk’ groups should not fast and may consider safe alternatives such as non-consecutive fasts or fasting shorter days, for example, during winter. All patients who are fasting should be educated before Ramadan on their risk and management (including the risk of dehydration, fluid overload and terminating the fast if they become unwell) and reviewed after Ramadan to reassess their risk status and condition. Further studies to clarify the benefits and risks of fasting on the cardiovascular system in patients with different cardiovascular conditions should help refine these recommendations.