le Roux, Carel W

Abstract Aims Retatrutide, a novel synthetic molecule, is a triple agonist activating the glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, glucagon‐like peptide‐1 and glucagon receptors. The TRIUMPH clinical development program evaluates its safety and efficacy concurrently for the treatment of obesity and two related complications—obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and knee osteoarthritis (OA). A novel basket trial design simultaneously evaluates retatrutide treatment across these multiple adiposity‐related disease states. Materials and methods TRIUMPH consists of four Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double‐blind studies assessing weekly subcutaneous retatrutide compared to placebo, in conjunction with healthy diet and physical activity in over 5800 participants. The four trials consist of two weight management basket trials (TRIUMPH‐1 and TRIUMPH‐2) with OSA and/or OA protocols nested within the weight management trial; one weight management trial in a population with CVD (TRIUMPH‐3); and one stand‐alone OA trial (TRIUMPH‐4). The primary endpoint for weight management is percent change in body weight, for OSA is change in Apnea‐Hypopnea Index and for knee OA includes change in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain subscale score. The basket trial permits independent analysis of weight management, OSA and OA studies with type I error rate controlled at α = 0.05, split between the overarching weight management and each basket trial. Conclusions By recruiting participants with shared disease exposures, the TRIUMPH program will assess the safety and efficacy of retatrutide for the treatment of adults with obesity and two of its common complications—OSA and OA.

Key Points In individuals undergoing bariatric surgery, the magnitude of decline in GFR postbariatric surgery is directly associated with presurgery GFR. Reductions in GFR postsurgery were only weakly correlated with weight loss. In obese individuals, GFR-estimating equations performed best when deindexed and when applied in people with reduced kidney function. Background Important questions remain about how bariatric ( i.e ., weight loss) surgery affects measured GFR (mGFR) and eGFR as well as what factors influence change in mGFR postsurgery. Methods Data were pooled from all seven available studies (dates: 2004–2018) measuring GFR prebariatric and postbariatric surgery using gold standard methods. Change in postsurgery mGFR, factors that could influence change in mGFR, and effects on five GFR-estimating equations were analyzed using standard statistical methods. Results The cohort included 105 individuals from the United States and Europe. Sixty-eight percent were female, 97% were White, the mean age was 50 years (range, 24–70), and the mean body mass index was 46±8 kg/m 2 . The mean presurgery mGFR of 107 ml/min (range, 31–215) fell to 92 ml/min (−14%; 95% confidence interval, −21 to −10) postsurgery, with a strong linear relationship existing between presurgery mGFR and % change in GFR ( r =−0.51; −0.64 to −0.35). Individuals with presurgery mGFR ≥90, 60 to <90, and<60 ml/min had −25 (−32 to −19), 1 (−11 to 13), and 7 (0 to 14) ml/min mean postoperative changes in mGFR. Change in weight was significantly correlated with change in mGFR ( r =0.22; 0.03 to 0.40). After adjusting for sex, changes in mGFR postsurgery were associated with higher presurgical age (−0.6 ml/min per year; −1.1 to −0.2), mGFR (−0.5 ml/min per 1 ml/min; −0.6 to −0.4), and change in systolic BP (−0.3 ml/min per 1 mm Hg; −0.6 to 0.0). All GFR-estimating equations significantly underestimated postsurgical GFR reductions in people with preserved kidney function and had improved bias, precision, and accuracy when deindexed and applied to individuals with mGFR <90 ml/min. Conclusions In individuals with obesity undergoing bariatric surgery, the magnitude of postsurgical decline in mGFR was directly associated with presurgery GFR and weakly correlated with weight loss. In addition, GFR-estimating equations' performance improved when deindexed and used in people with reduced kidney function, with the combined creatinine/cystatin C equations having the best overall performance.

Abstract The ongoing obesity epidemic represents a global public health crisis that contributes to poor health outcomes, reduced quality of life, and &gt;2.8 million deaths each year. Obesity is relapsing, progressive, and heterogeneous. It is considered a chronic disease by the World Obesity Federation (WOF) and a chronic condition by the World Heart Federation (WHF). People living with overweight/obesity are at greater risk for cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality. Increased adiposity (body fat), particularly visceral/abdominal fat, is linked to CV risk and CV disease (CVD) via multiple direct and indirect pathophysiological mechanisms. The development of CVD is driven, in part, by obesity-related metabolic, endocrinologic, immunologic, structural, humoral, haemodynamic, and functional alterations. The complex multifaceted nature of these mechanisms can be challenging to understand and address in clinical practice. People living with obesity and CVD often have concurrent chronic physical or psychological disorders (multimorbidity) requiring multidisciplinary care pathways and polypharmacy. Evidence indicates that intentional weight loss (particularly when substantial) lowers CVD risk among people with overweight/obesity. Long-term weight loss and maintenance require ongoing commitment from both the individual and those responsible for their care. This position paper, developed by the WOF and the WHF, aims to improve understanding of the direct and indirect links between overweight/obesity and CVD, the key controversies in this area and evidence relating to cardiometabolic outcomes with available weight management options. Finally, an action plan for clinicians provides recommendations to help in identifying and addressing the risks of obesity-related CVD (recognizing resource and support variances between countries).

AbstractThe goal of the National Institutes of Health–funded American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 2017 research workshop (RW) “Gastric Bypass: Role of the Gut” was to focus on the exciting research evaluating gut‐derived signals in modulating outcomes after bariatric surgery. Although gastric bypass surgery has undoubted positive effects, the mechanistic basis of improved outcomes cannot be solely explained by caloric restriction. Emerging data suggest that bile acid metabolic pathways, luminal contents, energy balance, gut mucosal integrity, as well as the gut microbiota are significantly modulated after bariatric surgery and may be responsible for the variable outcomes, each of which was rigorously evaluated. The RW served as a timely and novel academic meeting that brought together clinicians and researchers across the scientific spectrum, fostering a unique venue for interdisciplinary collaboration among investigators. It promoted engaging discussion and evolution of new research hypotheses and ideas, driving the development of novel ameliorative, therapeutic, and nonsurgical interventions targeting obesity and its comorbidities. Importantly, a critical evaluation of the current knowledge regarding gut‐modulated signaling after bariatric surgery, potential pitfalls, and lacunae were thoroughly addressed.