Somers, Virend K.

Abstract Aims Retatrutide, a novel synthetic molecule, is a triple agonist activating the glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, glucagon‐like peptide‐1 and glucagon receptors. The TRIUMPH clinical development program evaluates its safety and efficacy concurrently for the treatment of obesity and two related complications—obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and knee osteoarthritis (OA). A novel basket trial design simultaneously evaluates retatrutide treatment across these multiple adiposity‐related disease states. Materials and methods TRIUMPH consists of four Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double‐blind studies assessing weekly subcutaneous retatrutide compared to placebo, in conjunction with healthy diet and physical activity in over 5800 participants. The four trials consist of two weight management basket trials (TRIUMPH‐1 and TRIUMPH‐2) with OSA and/or OA protocols nested within the weight management trial; one weight management trial in a population with CVD (TRIUMPH‐3); and one stand‐alone OA trial (TRIUMPH‐4). The primary endpoint for weight management is percent change in body weight, for OSA is change in Apnea‐Hypopnea Index and for knee OA includes change in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain subscale score. The basket trial permits independent analysis of weight management, OSA and OA studies with type I error rate controlled at α = 0.05, split between the overarching weight management and each basket trial. Conclusions By recruiting participants with shared disease exposures, the TRIUMPH program will assess the safety and efficacy of retatrutide for the treatment of adults with obesity and two of its common complications—OSA and OA.

AbstractIntroductionThe use of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is beneficial during the ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Evidence is conflicting regarding the clinical impact of using ICE on arrhythmia recurrence and mortality.MethodsPatients undergoing catheter ablation of AF during 2010–2017 were identified using the International Classification of Diseases‐9th and 10th Revision‐Clinical Modification (ICD‐9‐CM and ICD‐10‐CM) from the Nationwide Readmissions Database. Propensity matching was used to generate a control group. Patient demographics, Charlson comorbidity indexes, time from discharge to readmission, and the reason of readmission were extracted.ResultsFrom 2010 to 2017, 51 129 patients were included in the analysis out of which ICE was used in 8005 (15.7%) patients. The in‐hospital mortality at readmission was significantly higher in the patients without ICE use (2.9% vs. 1.7%, p = .02). The length of stay (LOS) at readmission was significantly higher in non‐ICE arm (median [interquartile range, IQR]: 3 [2–6] vs. 2 [3–5] days, p < .0001) with similar healthcare‐associated cost (HAC) in both the groups (median [IQR]: US$7507.3 [4057.8–15 474.2] vs. 7339.4 [4024.8–15 191.6], p = .43). Freedom from readmission was 12% higher (hazard ratio [HR] [95% confidence interval, CI]: 0.88 [0.83–0.94], p < .0001) with the use of ICE at 90‐day follow‐up, which was driven by 24% reduction in heart failure (HF) at follow‐up (HR [95% CI]: 0.76 [0.60–0.96], p = .02).ConclusionsICE use during AF ablation procedure reduces readmissions at 90 days by 12%, driven by a 24% decrease in HF‐related admissions. The non‐ICE arm showed a significantly higher LOS which offsets marginally higher HAC in the ICE arm.

Recent reports suggest that IGF (insulin-like growth factor)-I and IGFBP-3 (IGF-binding protein-3) have independent and opposing mechanistic effects on insulin. The aim of the present study was to assess the relationship between the IGF-I/IGFBP-3 ratio and the metabolic syndrome. We examined 3281 subjects (1463 men and 1818 women, aged 20–49 years), otherwise healthy adults, who participated in NHANES III (Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey), which has released measurements of IGF-I and IGFBP-3. Insulin resistance was estimated using the computer HOMA2 (homoeostatic model assessment 2) model. The updated ATP-III (Adult Treatment Panel III) definition of the metabolic syndrome was used. We applied adjusted logistic and linear regression models. After adjusting for age and race, men and women in the lowest quartile of the IGF-I/IGFBP-3 ratio were 3-fold more likely to meet the ATP-III definition of the metabolic syndrome and twice as likely to be insulin-resistant. Mean values of the IGF-I/IGFBP-3 ratio decreased significantly as the number of metabolic syndrome components increased (P&lt;0.0001, as determined by ANOVA). The area under the ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve for detecting insulin resistance using the IGF-I/IGFBP-3 ratio was 0.760, significantly improving upon either protein alone (P=0.01). In conclusion, the IGF-I/IGFBP-3 ratio is significantly associated with the metabolic syndrome. Calculating the ratio of these two proteins may provide insight into the metabolic syndrome clustering phenomenon.