Mantia-Smaldone, Gina

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Vaginal Cancer outline the recommended diagnostic workup, staging considerations, and treatment options for this rare malignancy. Because vaginal cancer is uncommon and shares many biologic and clinical characteristics with cervical cancer, several management recommendations, particularly systemic therapy, are extrapolated from evidence and practices established for cervical cancer. This guideline excerpt summarizes key components of management, including diagnostic evaluation and workup, principles of staging, pathology considerations, radiation therapy principles, and primary treatment recommendations for both early-stage and advanced disease. It also details approaches to manage relapses, including locoregional recurrence and distant metastases, and provides an in-depth overview of systemic therapy recommendations for vaginal cancer.

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Cervical Cancer provide diagnostic workup, staging, and various treatment recommendations for cervical cancer based on clinical and surgical staging. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for cervical cancer specifically focuses on diagnosis and workup, principles of staging and surgery, and primary treatment recommendations for early-stage and advanced disease and provides a detailed overview of systemic therapy recommendations for cervical cancer.

The NCCN Guidelines for Uterine Neoplasms provide recommendations for diagnostic workup, clinical staging, and treatment options for patients with endometrial cancer and uterine sarcoma. The NCCN Cervical Uterine Panel meets at least annually to review comments from reviewers within their institutions; examine relevant new data from publications, abstracts, and recent FDA approvals; and reevaluate and update recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s deliberations on the new FIGO 2023 staging system and updates on the new systemic therapy recommendations for the management of endometrial cancer.

Vulvar cancer is annually diagnosed in an estimated 6,470 individuals and the vast majority are histologically squamous cell carcinomas. Vulvar cancer accounts for 5% to 8% of gynecologic malignancies. Known risk factors for vulvar cancer include increasing age, infection with human papillomavirus, cigarette smoking, inflammatory conditions affecting the vulva, and immunodeficiency. Most vulvar neoplasias are diagnosed at early stages. Rarer histologies exist and include melanoma, extramammary Paget’s disease, Bartholin gland adenocarcinoma, verrucous carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, and sarcoma. This manuscript discusses recommendations outlined in the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for treatments, surveillance, systemic therapy options, and gynecologic survivorship.

The NCCN Guidelines for Cervical Cancer provide recommendations for all aspects of management for cervical cancer, including the diagnostic workup, staging, pathology, and treatment. The guidelines also include details on histopathologic classification of cervical cancer regarding diagnostic features, molecular profiles, and clinical outcomes. The treatment landscape of advanced cervical cancer is evolving constantly. These NCCN Guidelines Insights provide a summary of recent updates regarding the systemic therapy recommendations for recurrent or metastatic disease.

5579 Background: Adavosertib (AZD-1775) is a potent small molecule inhibitor of Wee-1, currently in clinical development. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial (NCT02151292), adavosertib and gemcitabine significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with recurrent platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOV) compared to gemcitabine alone. We investigated whether plasma and intra-tumoral adavosertib concentrations correlated with survival in these patients. Methods: Adavosertib was administered orally on Days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15 and 16 at 175 mg per day, and gemcitabine was administered on Days 1, 8 and 15 at 1000 mg/m2 every 28 days. Serial blood samples were collected on Day 1 of cycle 1 after adavosertib administration. Tumor biopsies were taken 1-2 weeks after initiation of study treatments. Plasma and tumor adavosertib concentrations were determined using validated HPLC-MS/MS. Patients were divided into groups with plasma or tumor adavosertib concentrations above or below the biologically active concentration (BAC) of 125 ng/ml (Leijen et al, J Clin Onco 2016). Survival was described using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Among 61 HGSOV patients who received adavosertib, plasma samples were available in 47, and tumor samples were available in 31 patients. Among 25 non-HGSOV patients (exploratory cohort), plasma and tumor samples were available in 21 and 17 patients respectively. The mean maximum adavosertib concentration (Cmax) was 355.3 ± 120.9 ng/ml and 358.6 ± 117.9 ng/ml respectively. Cmax was above BAC in all patients. The mean tumor adavosertib concentration was 609.2 ± 1129.2 ng/ml (range: 0.47 – 5501 ng/ml) for HGSOV patients, and 964.2 ± 1611.2 ng/ml (range: 0.22 – 6116 ng/ml) for non-HGSOV patients. There was no correlation between Cmax and tumor adavosertib concentrations. In HGSOV, the median PFS was 5.8 months for patients with tumor concentrations above BAC, and 3.5 months for those with tumor concentrations below BAC (Hazard ratio (HR): 0.46, 95% confidence interval: 0.19 – 1.14, p = 0.06). No difference in PFS was seen in non-HGSOV patients according to tumor adavosertib concentration. Tumor adavosertib concentration did not correlate with OS. Conclusions: Although Cmax was above BAC in all patients, there was a high variability in tumor adavosertib concentrations. In HGSOV, higher tumor adavosertib concentration was associated with a trend towards improved PFS, but not OS. Our results indicate that the current adavosertib dosing regimen may not produce the desired concentrations in tumors for some patients, and further optimization may be needed.

5518 Background: Platinum resistant ovarian cancer (OC) remains a therapeutic challenge. High grade serous OC (HGSOC) harbors TP53 mutations leading to increased dependency on S- and G2-phase checkpoints. Wee1 inhibition with Adavosertib (AZD 1775) (A) induces G2 checkpoint escape. Gemcitabine (G) is an antimetabolite therapy and blocks the progression of cells through the G1/S phase. We hypothesized that combining G+A would be synergistic and overcome resistance. Methods: We conducted a multicentre double-blind 2:1 randomized phase 2 trial to assess the progression free survival (PFS) in women with recurrent platinum-resistant/refractory HGSOC receiving G+A or G+placebo (P) (NCT02151292). Eligibility required measurable disease and feasibility of paired tumor biopsies; no limitation in prior lines of therapy. Non HGSOC histologic subtypes were enrolled in a separate non-randomized exploratory cohort. A/P was given orally at 175mg QD on D1-2, D8-9 and D15-16 with G 1000mg/m² IV D1, D8 and D15 in a 28-day cycle until progression or unacceptable AE. Tumor staging was scheduled every 8 weeks. TP53 mutations were analyzed on archival tissue with Sanger sequencing, TAm-Seq and IHC. TP53 mutation will be also assessed in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Whole exome and RNA sequencing were performed on paired tumor tissues. Results: 124 patients (pts) with median of 3 prior lines of therapy (range 1-10) from 12 centres across Canada and US were enrolled between Sep 2014 to May 2018, with 99 pts randomized (65 in Arm G+A and 34 in G+P). 5 pts were ineligible; 64 pts have died. The median follow-up was 14.3 months. Main related AE was hematologic toxicity (Anemia G≥3: 31% in G+A vs 18% in G+P; Thrombocytopenia G≥3: 31% vs 6%; Neutropenia G≥3: 62% vs 30%). PFS was significantly improved from 3.0 to 4.6 months (HR 0.56 (95%CI: 0.35-0.90, p=0.015 Log rank). There was a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) from 7.2 to 11.5 months (HR 0.56 (95%CI: 0.34-0.92, P=0.022). Partial response by RECIST 1.1 was observed in 13 (21%) and 1 (3%) pts for Arms G+A and G+P, respectively (p=0.02). From the 25 pts in the exploratory cohort, 3 (12%) partial responses were observed. Final results will be reported at the meeting. Conclusion: Addition of adavosertib to gemcitabine in women with platinum resistant/refractory OC improved response rate, PFS and OS with manageable toxicity. Clinical trial information: NCT02151292.