Citations

Introduction: Atherosclerotic arterial disease is the leading cause of death throughout the world. One of the most advanced forms of atherosclerosis, peripheral arterial disease (PAD), affects over 8.5 million people in the United States and over 230 million globally. This disease begins from an inflammatory lesion, known as the fatty streak, formed by mononuclear phagocytes (MNPs), a broad cell type classification that includes monocytes, dendritic cells, and macrophages. Development of more efficacious treatments for PAD requires that we better understand the cellular and molecular processes by which MNPs form these inflammatory lesions. Methods: To compare gene expression of MNPs, we performed scRNAseq on PBMCs from an initial cohort of 4 patients with PAD, mild claudicants to minor tissue loss (Rutherford 1-5), and 5 healthy individuals, defined as those without any chronic diseases and a hsCRP <2.0 mg/L. We conducted single cell RNA library generation using Parse Bio and sequenced to a depth of 70k reads per cell and downstream bioinformatic and differentially gene expression analysis via R and Seurat. Results: Gene expression differences in healthy versus PAD cells were visualized on a UMAP plot. Aligning our cells to the human PBMC Cell Atlas, we found that the cell type with the greatest transcriptional change (healthy vs. PAD) was CD14 + MNPs. Next, we screened for differentially expressed genes within this CD14 + MNP cluster between healthy and PAD subjects and identified 854 upregulated and 730 downregulated genes (log 2 fold change ≥ 0.25 and p < 0.05, Welch’s t-test). Two of the most significantly upregulated genes in PAD CD14 + MNPs are FAM20A and TMTC1. FAM20A encodes a psuedokinase important in calcium homeostasis as well as bone mineralization and that is upregulated in advanced atherosclerotic plaques. TMTC1 encodes for an endoplasmic reticulum protein also involved in calcium homeostasis, vascular homeostasis, and endothelial cadherin egress. Finally, one gene we found downregulated in PAD is CD83, a molecule implicated in resolution of inflammation, that when downregulated promotes an inflammatory state. Conclusion: Based on these findings we hypothesize that in PAD there exists a distinct transcriptional program along the CD14 + MNP cell type lineage that is pro-inflammatory and that may play a role in disease progression and response to intervention.

ObjectivesAchalasia is an esophageal motility disorder that impairs quality of life and is often missed (20–50%) on endoscopy. A newly developed computer‐aided detection (CAD) software has shown high accuracy for achalasia diagnosis in preclinical settings. However, its benefit in a clinical setting remains unclear.MethodsBetween February and August 2023, 83 endoscopists from 27 centers assessed 50 randomized endoscopic videos (25 achalasia, 25 nonachalasia) without and with CAD. Endoscopists assessed videos without CAD, then with CAD after 2 months. The primary end‐point was improvement in sensitivity for nonexperienced endoscopists (no endoscopic experience of achalasia). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy with and without CAD were compared using the McNemar test.ResultsSensitivity for diagnosing achalasia increased significantly with CAD, rising from 74.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 72.2–76.0%) to 91.2% (95% CI 89.9–92.4%) for all readers, showing a difference of 17.1% (95% CI 15.1–19.0%). Specifically, sensitivity improved from 66.9% (95% CI 63.6–70.0%) to 91.9% (95% CI 89.9–93.6%) among nonexperienced endoscopists, resulting in a difference of 25.0% (95% CI 21.7–28.4%), and from 79.5% (95% CI 77.1–81.8%) to 90.8% (95% CI 89.0–92.3%) among experienced endoscopists (endoscopic experience of at least one achalasia case), with a difference of 11.3% (95% CI 8.9–13.6%). Accuracy and specificity improved significantly with CAD assistance, regardless of reader's experience.ConclusionCAD improves achalasia detection by 17%, confirming preclinical results. The benefit was higher for nonexperienced endoscopists. CAD assistance may lead to prompt and effective treatment, minimizing the risk of false‐negative diagnosis in clinical practice.Trial registrationThis study was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/) number: UMIN000053047.

Objective: To establish benchmark cutoffs for robotic liver resection (R-LR), encompassing both major and minor resections, and to determine the impact of patient selection on outcomes. Background: R-LR is a key advancement in minimally invasive liver surgery but lacks standardized benchmarks, especially for minor resections. While guidelines endorse R-LR, its role in optimizing outcomes remains unclear. This study establishes the first benchmarks for R-LR, enabling comparisons across surgical modalities and refining patient selection. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study analyzed consecutive adult patients undergoing R-LR at 30 international centers (2020–2023). Benchmark centers had an annual case volume of ≥15 R-LR. Benchmark criteria included ASA ≤2, no major comorbidities, no prior liver resections, and Child-Pugh A status. Benchmark cutoffs for 14 key outcomes were set at the 50th and 75th percentiles of median values across benchmark centers. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of textbook outcomes. Results: Eighteen high-volume centers contributed 4028 cases with 2632 (65.3%) meeting benchmark criteria. Malignancy was the indication in 29.6%, most commonly hepatocellular carcinoma followed by colorectal liver metastases. Major liver resection was performed in 42.6%. The distribution of Iwate difficulty scores was low (25.4%), intermediate (53.9%), advanced (15.9%), and expert (4.9%). Benchmark cutoffs were established for minor and major resection, and stratified by Iwate low (0-3), intermediate (4-6) and high (7-12): Open conversion (≤6.5% minor, ≤10.5% major), major complications within 90 days (≤5.2% minor, ≤16.7% major), R1 resection (≤9.2% minor, ≤6.7% major). Benchmark cases performed at low-volume centers were able to achieve outcomes within the corresponding benchmark cutoffs. In fact, patient selection reflected by the proportion of benchmark patients, rather than case volume, was associated with textbook outcomes. Conclusions: This study defines R-LR benchmarks, emphasizing patient selection over center volume for optimal outcomes. Benchmark cutoffs guide training and support the expansion of R-LR.

Abstract Introduction Mediastinal masses may exhibit various clinical and pathological features. Posterior mediastinal lesions are often neurogenic, followed by lymphadenopathy, extramedullary hematopoiesis, paraspinal abscess, and rarely, foregut duplication cysts (prevalence: 0.122%). Given the rarity and diagnostic challenges, these masses are often biopsied, though may not be ideal. We present a case of esophageal duplication cyst (EDC). Case presentation A 33-year-old woman with mild intermittent asthma, had initially presented to an outside facility for chronic productive cough, episodic chest tightness and dyspnea both at rest and with exertion, inspiratory and expiratory wheezes. Despite multiple courses of prednisone for presumed asthma exacerbation, her symptoms persisted. An initial Computer Tomography (CT) Chest demonstrated a 5 x 4 x 3 cm mass within the visceral mediastinum. Bronchoscopy with endobronchial ultrasound and transbronchial needle aspiration of the mediastinal lymph nodes was nondiagnostic, showing scant lymphocytes and abundant mucin. Broad autoimmune, connective tissue disease, and infectious disease workups were negative, prompting referral to our facility. Physical exam and labs were unremarkable and pulmonary function testing showed no evidence of small airway obstruction. A High-Resolution CT Chest revealed a 3.1 x 3.7 x 4.5 cm noncalcified, well-circumscribed mass soft tissue density, adjacent to the esophagus with elevated Hounsfield units close to esophagus. Ultimately duplication cyst was suspected and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) with contrast showed high T1 and T2 signal within the lesion and no enhancement after contrast, deemed compatible with proteinaceous/hemorrhagic cyst (Figure 1 A-D). Biopsy was deferred given diagnostic MRI characteristics, and risk of secondary infection. The diagnosis of EDC was confirmed via multidisciplinary thoracic tumor board revision. Ultimately, she was referred for surgical resection. Discussion The incidence of EDC is 1 in 8,200, with a two-fold male prevalence over women. These patients may present with dysphagia, cough, stridor, pain, or arrhythmia since childhood, or may be entirely asymptomatic. EDCs can develop along the esophagus, with 90% lacking communication with the esophageal lumen. Although posterior mediastinal mass typically require biopsy to exclude malignancy, tissue biopsy should be avoided in cases with suspected duplication cyst given risk of infection, abscess formation and mediastinitis. Transesophageal endoscopic ultrasonography could further characterize the cyst, however MRI is considered the gold standard diagnostic modality. Conclusion MRI is the gold standard diagnostic modality of EDC. Biopsy should be avoided given the risk of infection. Clinicians should consider a broad differential for posterior mediastinal mass and avoid unnecessary invasive testing.

Background We hypothesized treatment with nivolumab and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) would be feasible, well tolerated, and may improve intracranial tumor control over SRS alone for breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM). Methods The study is a phase Ib trial of nivolumab and SRS for BCBM. Clinical trial information: NCT03807765 . Key eligibility criteria include BCBM of all subtypes, age ≥18, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performace Status (ECOG-PS)≤2 with ≤10 brain metastases. Treatment was initiated with a dose of nivolumab (480 mg intravenously) that was repeated every 4 weeks. The initial dose of nivolumab was followed 1 week later by SRS. Blood was collected at baseline and every 4 weeks for flow cytometry and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) assessment. Results A total of 12 patients received SRS to 17 brain metastases. Breast cancer subtypes included triple negative (50%), hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2− (33%), and HR−/HER2+ (17%). Median follow-up from start of protocol therapy is 56 months. No cases of radionecrosis were noted. Two lesions were noted to undergo local failure, both pathologically confirmed, for a 12-month local control of 94%. Median distant intracranial control was 7.4 months with a 12-month control rate of 33%. Median systemic progression-free survival was 7.7 months with a 12-month rate of 42%. Median overall survival (OS) was 24.7 months with a 12-month OS of 75%. Most patients were noted to have an increase in cfDNA throughout study treatment, at week 5 compared with baseline (83%), week 25 compared with baseline (89%), and 100% at first follow-up. Intracranial control was associated with lower levels of CD4 regulatory T cells (Treg) (p=0.03) and higher levels of CD4 T effector memory (p=0.04). Conclusions Nivolumab and SRS is a safe and feasible treatment option in BCBM. Long-term follow-up revealed no cases of radiation necrosis. Trial registration number NCT03807765 .

The NCCN Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancers address tumors arising in the oral cavity (including mucosal lip), pharynx, larynx, and paranasal sinuses, as well as occult primary cancer, salivary gland cancer, and mucosal melanoma (MM). The specific site of disease, stage, and pathologic findings guide treatment (eg, the appropriate surgical procedure, radiation targets, dose and fractionation of radiation, indications for systemic therapy). The NCCN Head and Neck Cancers Panel meets at least annually to review comments from reviewers within their institutions, examine relevant new data from publications and abstracts, and reevaluate and update their recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s most recent recommendations regarding management of nasopharynx cancer and ongoing research in this area.

BACKGROUND: Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a debilitating and painful condition accompanied by sensory, autonomic, trophic, and/or motor abnormalities. Although CRPS is rare in the general population, the prevalence among individuals at higher risk, particularly posttraumatic and postsurgical patients, remains unknown. This study aims to provide a benchmark that quantifies CRPS prevalence in high-risk groups, and offers insights on potential predictors of developing CRPS. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify studies reporting prevalence of CRPS after an inciting event (eg, fracture, surgery), specifically 12-month and 24-month prevalence (primary outcomes), as well as 3-month and 6-month prevalence (secondary outcomes). Estimates from individual studies were transformed using double-arcsine transformation, and the resulting estimates with 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled in a meta-analysis using a random-effects model. RESULTS: We included 214 articles with data from 2491,378 participants worldwide (35 countries), of which 16,873 had CRPS. The pooled 12-month and 24-month global prevalence was 3.04% (95% CI, 2.64–3.48) and 6.46% (95% CI, 5.46–7.53), respectively. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were performed to understand the impact of population-dependent (mechanism of injury, type of CRPS), contextual-dependent (socioeconomic status), and methodological-dependent (study design, publication year) factors. The 12-month prevalence was higher in countries with a high human development index (HDI) compared to those with a medium or very high HDI, was higher in participants with a traumatic inciting injury only versus those with surgical injury only or traumatic/surgical injury, and was higher in prospective versus retrospective studies. Meta-regression analysis showed that publication year was a significant moderator, with more recent articles reporting lower 12-month prevalence. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a benchmark of the global prevalence of CRPS, which anesthesiologists and pain specialists can use to prioritize early diagnosis and identify those at the highest risk for CRPS.

Abstract Purpose: NFE2L2/KEAP1/CUL3 mutations have been validated for radioresistance in cell-based assays and animal models. However, clinical validation of these biomarkers has been challenging because of multimodality treatment regimens. This study aims to investigate the association between NFE2L2/KEAP1/CUL3 mutations and patient outcomes, including local failure, locoregional failure, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival, using samples from a phase III trial in which patients were treated with radiation monotherapy at two controlled doses. Patients and Methods: We investigated NFE2L2/KEAP1/CUL3 mutations in 250 randomized patients with T2N0 glottic squamous cell carcinoma receiving definitive radiotherapy in the NRG/RTOG 9512 trial. A total of 119 patients had available biospecimens that were subjected to amplicon-based next-generation sequencing to assess for the presence of NFE2L2/KEAP1/CUL3 mutations without regard to outcomes. Mutations in NFE2L2/KEAP1/CUL3 were assessed blinded to clinical outcomes. Cox models (two-sided α = 0.05) were used to evaluate the association with clinical outcomes, performed by an independent statistical team. Results: Nineteen of 119 patients (16.0%) had NFE2L2/KEAP1/CUL3 mutations. Patient, treatment, and tumor characteristics were similar between those with and without mutations. Patients with mutation compared with those without had significantly more local failure [HR = 3.50; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.56–7.89; P = 0.0025] and locoregional failure (HR = 3.80; 95% CI, 1.80–8.03; P = 0.0005). DFS was significantly worse for the mutated compared with the nonmutated group in the first 2 years (HR = 2.88; 95% CI, 1.46–5.66; P = 0.0022). The median DFS was shorter in the mutation group (10.3 months) versus those with intact NFE2L2/KEAP1/CUL3 (4.2 years). Conclusions: NFE2L2/KEAP1/CUL3 mutations may predict radiation treatment failure in T2N0 glottic cancer. See related commentary by Rao, p. 1563

Abstract Background and Aims Active inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) at conception is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. International guidelines address antenatal care, but contraception counseling and risk assessment are not addressed. Data on healthcare professionals’ guidance for women with IBD regarding contraception are scarce. We aimed to describe contraceptive use, preferences, knowledge, and barriers among women with IBD. Methods A 34-item questionnaire was administered to female IBD patients aged 18-45. Disease control was measured using PRO-2 and IBD-control questionnaire, and contraceptive preferences were assessed by the contraceptive features survey. Logistic regression explored associations between contraceptive use, attitudes, disease remission status, and other factors. Results Of 338 women surveyed, 243 (74%) used some form of contraception. Oral birth control pills (28%) and barrier methods (18%) were most used but 20% used long-acting methods. Women with active disease were more likely to use long-acting contraception (23%) compared to those in remission (17%). Contraceptive priorities were effectiveness (78%), ease of use (75%), and minimal side effects (68%). Only 25% women had discussed reproductive issues with their IBD clinician, though 85% were comfortable to do so. Preferred sources for reproductive counseling were IBD nurses (79%), general practitioners (75%), IBD doctors (68%), and gynecologists (49%). Conclusions A quarter of women with IBD were not using any contraception, and long-acting contraceptive use was low. Women prefer effective, easy-to-use contraceptives with minimal side effects but lack knowledge on effective contraception-related issues. Better education and proactive discussions between healthcare providers and patients could improve reproductive health in women with IBD.