Cmelak, Anthony J.

The NCCN Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancers address tumors arising in the oral cavity (including mucosal lip), pharynx, larynx, and paranasal sinuses, as well as occult primary cancer, salivary gland cancer, and mucosal melanoma (MM). The specific site of disease, stage, and pathologic findings guide treatment (eg, the appropriate surgical procedure, radiation targets, dose and fractionation of radiation, indications for systemic therapy). The NCCN Head and Neck Cancers Panel meets at least annually to review comments from reviewers within their institutions, examine relevant new data from publications and abstracts, and reevaluate and update their recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s most recent recommendations regarding management of nasopharynx cancer and ongoing research in this area.

The NCCN Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancers address tumors arising in the oral cavity (including mucosal lip), pharynx, larynx, and paranasal sinuses. Occult primary cancer, salivary gland cancer, and mucosal melanoma (MM) are also addressed. The specific site of disease, stage, and pathologic findings guide treatment (eg, the appropriate surgical procedure, radiation targets, dose and fractionation of radiation, indications for systemic therapy). The NCCN Head and Neck Cancers Panel meets at least annually to review comments from reviewers within their institutions, examine relevant new data from publications and abstracts, and reevaluate and update their recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s most recent recommendations regarding management of HPV-positive oropharynx cancer and ongoing research in this area.

Treatment is complex for patients with head and neck (H&N) cancers with specific site of disease, stage, and pathologic findings guiding treatment decision-making. Treatment planning for H&N cancers involves a multidisciplinary team of experts. This article describes supportive care recommendations in the NCCN Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancers, as well as the rationale supporting a new section on imaging recommendations for patients with H&N cancers. This article also describes updates to treatment recommendations for patients with very advanced H&N cancers and salivary gland tumors, specifically systemic therapy recommendations.

Objective: To report and discuss the effectiveness of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated radiotherapy (FRT) for tumor control following surgical resection of endolymphatic sac tumors (ELST). Study Design: Retrospective case series. Setting: Multi-institutional academic referral centers. Patients: Patients undergoing surgical resection for ELST followed by SRS or FRT. Intervention(s): Surgical resection followed by radiotherapy. Main Outcome Measures: Local tumor control. Results: Two of the five patients experienced tumor recurrence after gross total microsurgical at 78 and 11 months, respectively. The former patient received salvage 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and while the latter patient underwent three courses of salvage SRS for recurrence, two of which were in-field and was disease-free at last follow up. Two additional patients underwent subtotal tumor resection (STR) followed by intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and are currently without disease. One patient underwent STR followed by proton-beam therapy (PBT) and was free of disease at most recent follow-up. Conclusion: SRS/FRT remains a useful adjuvant for treatment of residual or recurrent ELSTs, where the risk of revision microsurgical resection is high.

BACKGROUNDProspective quality metrics for neck dissection have not been established for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between lymph node counts from neck dissection, local‐regional recurrence, and overall survival.METHODSThe number of lymph nodes counted from neck dissection in patients treated in 2 NRG Oncology trials (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group [RTOG] 9501 and RTOG 0234) was evaluated for its prognostic impact on overall survival with a multivariate Cox model adjusted for demographic, tumor, and lymph node data and stratified by the postoperative treatment group.RESULTSFive hundred seventy‐two patients were analyzed at a median follow‐up of 8 years. Ninety‐eight percent of the patients were pathologically N+. The median numbers of lymph nodes recorded on the left and right sides were 24 and 25, respectively. The identification of fewer than 18 nodes was associated with worse overall survival in comparison with 18 or more nodes (hazard ratio [HR], 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09‐1.74; P = .007). The difference appeared to be driven by local‐regional failure (HR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.02‐2.08; P = .04) but not by distant metastases (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.77‐1.53; P = .65). When the analysis was limited to NRG Oncology RTOG 0234 patients, adding the p16 status to the model did not affect the HR for dissected nodes, and the effect of nodes did not differ with the p16 status.CONCLUSIONSThe removal and identification of 18 or more lymph nodes was associated with improved overall survival and lower rates of local‐regional failure, and this should be further evaluated as a measure of quality in neck dissections for mucosal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer 2016;122:3464–71. © 2016 American Cancer Society.