Back to Authors

Colevas, Alexander Dimitrios

0000-0003-3849-4264

Mayo Clinic

Stanford Cancer Institute

Citations 5

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Head and Neck Cancers, Version 2.2025
Pfister, David G. , Spencer, Sharon A., Adkins, Douglas, Birkeland, Andrew C. , Busse, Paul M., Durm, Greg Andrew , Fakhry, Carole , Galloway, Thomas J. , Geiger, J.L. , Gillison, Maura L. , Haddad, Robert I. , Hitchcock, Ying J. , Jimeno, Antonio , Leizman, Debra S., Maghami, Ellie, Mell, Loren K. , Pinto, Harlan A. , Price, Katharine A. , Rocco, James W. , Rodriguez, Cristina P. , Sher, David J. , Wang, He , Weinstein, Gregory S., Yom, Sue S. , Zhen, Weining, Darlow, Susan, Price, Katharine, Haddad, Robert , Yom, Sue S , Colevas, Alexander Dimitrios , Cmelak, Anthony J. , Adkins, Douglas, Brizel, David M. , Caudell, Jimmy J , Glastonbury, Christine M. , Hicks, Wesley L. , Juloori, Aditya , Kase, Michael, Mittal, Bharat B. , Schwartz, David A. , Shah, Jatin P. , John, Maie A. St. , Worden, Francis P. , Bruce, Justine Y. , Montgomery, Sarah E.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | February 12, 2025 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 2-11

10.6004/jnccn.2025.0007 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancers address tumors arising in the oral cavity (including mucosal lip), pharynx, larynx, and paranasal sinuses, as well as occult primary cancer, salivary gland cancer, and mucosal melanoma (MM). The specific site of disease, stage, and pathologic findings guide treatment (eg, the appropriate surgical procedure, radiation targets, dose and fractionation of radiation, indications for systemic therapy). The NCCN Head and Neck Cancers Panel meets at least annually to review comments from reviewers within their institutions, examine relevant new data from publications and abstracts, and reevaluate and update their recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s most recent recommendations regarding management of nasopharynx cancer and ongoing research in this area.
Multicenter validation of an RNA-based assay to predict anti-PD-1 disease control in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: the PREDAPT study
Flanagan, Kevin C. , Earls, Jon, Hiken, Jeffrey, Wellinghoff, Rachel L., Ponder, Michelle, McLeod, Howard L. , Westra, William H. , Vavinskaya, Vera , Sutton, Leisa , Deichaite, Ida , Macdonald, O. Kenneth, Welaya, Karim, Wade, James L. , Azzi, Georges, Pippas, Andrew W., Slim, Jennifer N. , Bank, Bruce, Sui, Xingwei, Kossman, Steven E., Shenkenberg, Todd D., Alexander, Warren L., Price, Katharine A. , Messina, D. , Glasscock, Jarret , Adkins, Douglas, Ley, Jessica C. , Colevas, Alexander Dimitrios , Cohen, Ezra E.W. , Duncavage, Eric James

Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer | November 3, 2024 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 11 | Pages: e009573

10.1136/jitc-2024-009573 Get It

Background Despite advances in cancer care and detection, >65% of patients with squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (HNSCC) will develop recurrent and/or metastatic disease. The prognosis for these patients is poor with a 5-year overall survival of 39%. Recent treatment advances in immunotherapy, including immune checkpoint inhibitors like pembrolizumab and nivolumab, have resulted in clinical benefit in a subset of patients. There is a critical clinical need to identify patients who benefit from these antiprogrammed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitors. Methods Here, we report findings from a multicenter observational study, PREDicting immunotherapy efficacy from Analysis of Pre-treatment Tumor biopsies (PREDAPT), conducted across 17 US healthcare systems. PREDAPT aimed to validate OncoPrism-HNSCC, a clinical biomarker assay predictive of disease control in patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC treated with anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors as a single agent (monotherapy) and in combination with chemotherapy (chemo-immunotherapy). The test used RNA-sequencing data and machine learning models to score each patient and place them into groups of low, medium, or high. Results The OncoPrism-HNSCC prediction significantly correlated with disease control in both the monotherapy cohort (n=62, p=0.004) and the chemo-immunotherapy cohort (n=50, p=0.01). OncoPrism-HNSCC also significantly predicted progression-free survival in both cohorts (p=0.015 and p=0.037, respectively). OncoPrism-HNSCC had more than threefold higher specificity than programmed death-ligand 1 combined positive score and nearly fourfold higher sensitivity than tumor mutational burden for predicting disease control. Conclusions Here, we demonstrate the clinical validity of the OncoPrism-HNSCC assay in identifying patients with disease control in response to anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors. Trial registration number NCT04510129.
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Head and Neck Cancers, Version 1.2022
Gillison, Maura L. , Maghami, Ellie, Spencer, Sharon, Pfister, David G. , Birkeland, Andrew C. , Busse, Paul M., Cmelak, Anthony J. , Eisele, David W. , Galloway, Thomas J. , Geiger, J.L. , Haddad, Robert I. , Hicks, Wesley L. , Hitchcock, Ying J. , Jimeno, Antonio , Leizman, Debra S., Mell, Loren K. , Mittal, Bharat B. , Pinto, Harlan A. , Rocco, James W. , Rodriguez, Cristina P. , Savvides, P. , Sher, David J. , Weber, Randal S. , Weinstein, Gregory S., Worden, Frank , Yom, Sue S. , Zhen, Weining, Burns, Jennifer L. , Darlow, Susan, Savvides, Panayiotis S, Haddad, Robert , Mittal, Bharat B , Yom, Sue S , Caudell, Jimmy J , Adkins, Douglas R. , Brizel, David M. , Colevas, Alexander Dimitrios , Schwartz, David A. , Shah, Jatin P. , John, Maie A. St. , Bruce, Justine Y.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | March 11, 2022 | Volume: 20 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 224-234

10.6004/jnccn.2022.0016 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancers address tumors arising in the oral cavity (including mucosal lip), pharynx, larynx, and paranasal sinuses. Occult primary cancer, salivary gland cancer, and mucosal melanoma (MM) are also addressed. The specific site of disease, stage, and pathologic findings guide treatment (eg, the appropriate surgical procedure, radiation targets, dose and fractionation of radiation, indications for systemic therapy). The NCCN Head and Neck Cancers Panel meets at least annually to review comments from reviewers within their institutions, examine relevant new data from publications and abstracts, and reevaluate and update their recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s most recent recommendations regarding management of HPV-positive oropharynx cancer and ongoing research in this area.
Head and Neck Cancers, Version 2.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Pfister, David G. , Spencer, Sharon, Adelstein, David J. , Brizel, David M. , Busse, Paul M., Cmelak, Anthony J. , Eisele, David W. , Fenton, Moon J. , Foote, Robert L. , Galloway, Thomas J. , Gillison, Maura L. , Haddad, Robert I. , Hicks, Wesley L. , Hitchcock, Ying J. , Jimeno, Antonio , Leizman, Debra S., Maghami, Ellie, Mell, Loren K. , Mittal, Bharat B. , Pinto, Harlan A. , Rocco, James W. , Rodriguez, Cristina P. , Weber, Randal S. , Weinstein, Gregory S., Witek, Matthew E. , Worden, Frank , Yom, Sue S. , Zhen, Weining, Burns, Jennifer L. , Darlow, Susan, Brizel, David M , Haddad, Robert , Mittal, Bharat B , Yom, Sue S , Adkins, Douglas R. , Anzai, Yoshimi , Bruce, Justine Y. , Caudell, Jimmy J , Colevas, Alexander Dimitrios , Ridge, John Andrew , Shah, Jatin P.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | July 7, 2020 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 873-898

10.6004/jnccn.2020.0031 Get It

Treatment is complex for patients with head and neck (H&N) cancers with specific site of disease, stage, and pathologic findings guiding treatment decision-making. Treatment planning for H&N cancers involves a multidisciplinary team of experts. This article describes supportive care recommendations in the NCCN Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancers, as well as the rationale supporting a new section on imaging recommendations for patients with H&N cancers. This article also describes updates to treatment recommendations for patients with very advanced H&N cancers and salivary gland tumors, specifically systemic therapy recommendations.
Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Flavopiridol followed by 1-β-d-Arabinofuranosylcytosine and Mitoxantrone in Relapsed and Refractory Adult Acute Leukemias
Karp, Judith E. , Passaniti, Antonino , Gojo, Ivana , Kaufmann, Scott H. , Bible, Keith C. , Garimella, Τushar , Greer, Jacqueline M., Briel, Janet, Gore, Steven D. , Tidwell, Michael L., Ross, Douglas D., Wright, John J., Bauer, Kenneth S., Smith, B. Douglas , Wright, John J., Colevas, Alexander Dimitrios , Kaufmann, Scott H

Clinical Cancer Research | March 21, 2006 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 23 | Pages: 8403-8412

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-05-1201 Get It

Abstract Purpose: The serine/threonine kinase inhibitor flavopiridol targets multiple cyclin-dependent kinases, induces checkpoint arrest, and interrupts transcriptional elongation. We designed a phase I clinical trial using a timed sequential therapy approach where flavopiridol was given for the dual purpose of initial cytoreduction and enhancing cell cycle progression of the remaining leukemia cell cohort followed by cycle-dependent drugs 1-β-d-arabinofuranosylcytosine (ara-C) and mitoxantrone. Experimental Design: Flavopiridol was given by 1-hour infusion daily for 3 days beginning day 1 followed by 2 g/m2/72 h ara-C beginning day 6 and 40 mg/m2 mitoxantrone beginning day 9. In vivo correlates included pharmacokinetics, modulation of blast cycle regulators, and serum and marrow supernatant vascular endothelial growth factor levels. Results: Of 34 adults receiving induction therapy, 16 (47%) evinced direct leukemia cytotoxicity with ≥50% drop in peripheral blast counts and tumor lysis in 9 (26%). Four (12%) died during therapy (two fungal infections and two sudden death). Dose-limiting toxicity occurred at 60 mg/m2/d with profound neutropenia >40 days duration, and maximal tolerated dose was 50 mg/m2/d. Overall response rate was 31% in 26 acute myelogenous leukemia and 12.5% in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pharmacokinetics showed that a linear two-compartment model with first-order elimination provided the best fit of the observed concentration versus time data. Flavopiridol down-regulated one or more target proteins in marrow blasts in vivo. Vascular endothelial growth factor was detected in sera and marrow supernatant pretreatment, and sera obtained on day 3 inhibited bovine aortic endothelial cell proliferation by a mean of 32% (range, 10-80%). Conclusions: Our data suggest that flavopiridol is cytotoxic to leukemic cells and, when followed by ara-C and mitoxantrone, exerts biological and clinical effects in patients with relapsed and refractory acute leukemias. These findings warrant continuing development of flavopiridol at 50 mg/m2/d × 3 days in combination with cytotoxic and biological agents for acute leukemias.