Weinstein, Gregory S.

PURPOSE The ECOG-ACRIN E3311 phase II trial demonstrated outstanding disease control (90.6% 54-month progression-free survival) after transoral surgery (TOS) with de-escalated, risk-based postoperative management in resectable human papillomavirus–associated oropharyngeal cancer. The goal of de-escalation was functional preservation. The objective of this work was to evaluate clinician-graded modified barium swallow (MBS) studies from E3311 over time and across arms for (1) aspiration and high-grade pharyngeal residue rates, (2) differences in swallow safety and efficiency, and (3) accuracy of site clinicians reporting against central MBS review. METHODS Eight hundred eighty-five MBS studies were performed on 314 patients from 50 of 59 sites at baseline, post-TOS, and 6 and 24 months postradiotherapy (RT). Swallow outcomes (aspiration, high-grade residue) were recorded by site clinicians. A subset of 414 MBS studies was centrally graded using penetration-aspiration scale scores and the Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) scale. RESULTS Aspiration, residue, and dysphagia rates significantly increased from baseline to post-TOS ( P < .01) and then decreased modestly at 6 and 24 months. At 6 months, swallow outcomes favored the 50- versus 60-Gy arm, with significantly lower aspiration and high-grade dysphagia rates, but this difference was not maintained at 24 months. MBS results reported by site clinicians demonstrated substantial agreement with those assessed by the central laboratory (PABAK, 0.75-0.84; P < .01). CONCLUSION Swallowing worsened after TOS but improved by 6 and 24 months despite adjuvant therapy. De-escalated adjuvant RT at 50 Gy reduced acute aspiration. Site-reported MBS metrics strongly aligned with DIGEST, showing potential as an accessible metric in cooperative group settings.

This phase II trial of transoral surgery (TOS) with deintensified postoperative management in human papillomavirus (HPV)–associated oropharynx cancer (OPC) enrolled patients with resectable cT1-2 stage III/IV American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) seventh edition p16+ OPC without matted neck nodes. Those with clear margins, 0-1 + nodes (LN), and no extranodal extension (ENE) were observed (arm A); those with clear margins, 2-4 + LN, or ENE ≤1 mm were randomly assigned to 50 Gy (arm B) or 60 Gy (arm C); and those with involved margins, >4 + LN, or >1 mm ENE received weekly cisplatin and 60-66 Gy (arm D). Among 359 evaluable patients, the 54-month progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 90.6% (90% CI, 87.2% to 93.1%) and 95.3% (93.0% to 96.9%), respectively. The 54-month PFS by arm was A 93.2% (79.6% to 97.8%; all four recurrences among N1 patients), B 94.9% (89.7% to 97.5%), C 90.2% (82.7% to 94.6%), and D 85.5% (77.5% to 90.8%). The 54-month OS by arm was A 97.1% (85.7% to 99.4%), B 97.9% (93.5% to 99.3%), C 95.1% (90.1% to 97.6%), and D 92.5% (86.9% to 95.7%). PFS or OS did not differ by primary site or smoking history. TOS and neck dissection with deintensified postoperative management results in outstanding 54-month PFS and OS. Among patients with favorable pathologic characteristics, those with N1 disease are at risk of late recurrence without radiation.

The NCCN Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancers address tumors arising in the oral cavity (including mucosal lip), pharynx, larynx, and paranasal sinuses, as well as occult primary cancer, salivary gland cancer, and mucosal melanoma (MM). The specific site of disease, stage, and pathologic findings guide treatment (eg, the appropriate surgical procedure, radiation targets, dose and fractionation of radiation, indications for systemic therapy). The NCCN Head and Neck Cancers Panel meets at least annually to review comments from reviewers within their institutions, examine relevant new data from publications and abstracts, and reevaluate and update their recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s most recent recommendations regarding management of nasopharynx cancer and ongoing research in this area.

6009 Background: E3311 is a phase II trial of TOS by credentialed surgeons with pathology-driven deintensified post-operative management in HPV+ OPC. Intermediate risk patients were randomized between standard and reduced dose radiation. We present mature outcome data, at median follow up of 52.4 months (m). Methods: Patients were eligible who had resectable cT1-2 stage III/IV AJCC7 p16+ OPC without matted neck nodes. Those with clear margins, 0-1 + nodes (LN), and no extranodal extension (ENE) were observed (Arm A, N=38); those with clear margins, 2-4 + LN, or ENE ≤1mm were randomized to 50Gy (Arm B, N=100) or 60Gy (Arm C, N=108); those with involved margins, >4 + LN, or >1mm ENE received weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2 and 60-66Gy (Arm D, N=113). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using a log-rank test, stratified by arm for comparisons of primary site and smoking history. Results: Among 359 evaluable patients, 54-m PFS and OS were 90.6% (90% CI: 87.2%, 93.1%) and 95.3% (90% CI: 93.0%, 96.9%). 54-m PFS by arm was: A 93.2% (90% CI: 79.6%, 97.8%); B 94.9% (90% CI: 89.7%, 97.5%); C 90.2% (90% CI: 82.7%, 94.6%) and D 85.5% (90% CI: 77.5%, 90.8%). 54-m OS by arm was: A 97.1% (90% CI: 85.7%, 99.4%); B 97.9% (90% CI: 93.5%, 99.3%), C 95.1% (90% CI: 90.1%, 97.6%) and D 92.5% (90% CI: 86.9%, 95.7%). Among patients in Arm A, 11 had N0 and 27 N1 stage. Median Arm A lymph node yield (LNY) was 29 (11 to 91 LN) and did not differ for patients with/without recurrence (p=0.83). All Arm A recurrences were in N1 patients: 1 at 18 m and 3 at > 40 m. No significant difference in PFS or OS was observed by prescribed radiation dose for intermediate risk patients (Arm B vs. C). Outcome did not differ by primary site of tonsil vs. other OPC (oOPC): 54-m PFS Tonsil 89.3% (90% CI: 84.9%, 92.5%) vs. oOPC 92.9% (90% CI: 87.0%, 96.2%), p=0.28, and 54-m OS Tonsil 94.6% (90% CI: 91.5%, 96.6%) vs oOPC 96.6% (90% CI: 92.4%, 98.5%), p=0.35. Smoking history also did not impact outcome. 54-m PFS was 89.9% (90% CI: 85.9%, 92.9%) for those with ≤10 pack-years (PY) tobacco exposure and 91.7% (90% CI: 83.9%, 95.9%) for those with >10 PY. Conclusions: TOS, neck dissection with deintensified risk-based post-operative management results in outstanding 54-m PFS and OS across all subsites of T1-2 p16+ OPC, irrespective of smoking history. Late recurrence is not increased when post-operative radiation is reduced from 60 to 50Gy for intermediate risk patients. Pathologic >1mm ENE (N=87), involved margin (N=12) or >4 involved LN (N=30) accurately identify patients at increased recurrence risk and outcomes were favorable among such patients. Among patients with favorable pathologic characteristics, a subset with N1 disease are at risk for late recurrence and further characterization of these patients is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT01898494 .

6036 Background: E3311 is a phase II randomized study of intermediate risk HPV+ OPC patients who underwent TOS by credentialed surgeons and were then treated by pathology-guided, deintensified post-operative treatment. Recent retrospective population data suggest that time to post-operative radiotherapy (PORT) > 6 weeks is associated with worse progression-free survival (PFS). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed demographics, pathologic characteristics, and oncologic outcomes in E3311 by time to initiation of PORT (short vs long, exploring both 6 and 7 weeks postop as the cutpoint). Binary and categorical variables were compared using a chi-square test (or a Fisher’s exact test for small sample sizes). Ordinal variables were compared using a Wilcoxon rank sum test. PFS and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using a log-rank test, which was stratified by intermediate- (Arms B/C) vs high-risk (Arm D). Results: Among 321 evaluable patients, the median time to initiation of PORT was 5.1 weeks (range 0.7-15.7); 5.0 (0.7-15.7) for Arm B, 5.1 (2.4-7.0) for Arm C, 5.6 (3.6-7.9) for Arm D. No significant difference in PFS or OS was observed whether PORT commenced by 6 or 7 weeks postoperatively, compared with longer time to initiation of PORT (p = 0.62 and 0.65, p = 0.30 and p = 0.41, respectively). 3-yr PFS rates were 93.5% (95% CI: 89.4%, 96.0%) among those treated ≤6 weeks, and 91.2% (95% CI: 81.4%, 95.9%) among those treated > 6 weeks; 3-yr OS rates were 96.1% (95% CI: 92.7%, 98.0%) among those treated ≤6 weeks, and 94.1% (95% CI: 84.9%, 97.8%) among those treated > 6 weeks. No significant differences in outcomes were observed between intermediate risk treatment arms (deintensified (50Gy) or standard dose (60Gy) RT). Additional demographic and pathologic characteristics, including primary site, margin status, histologic grade, stage, and extranodal extension were not significantly different between those with short vs long time to PORT, whether 6 or 7 weeks was used as the cutpoint. There were more T2 tumors in those treated > 7 weeks postop (84% vs. 49%, p = 0.007). PS = 1 patients were more numerous among those with shorter time to PORT (10% vs 0%, with the 7 week cutpoint). Conclusions: In contrast to retrospective NCDB data, intermediate- and high-risk HPV+ OPC patients enrolled on E3311 had favorable 3-yr PFS and OS rates that were not significantly worse when adjuvant therapy was started > 6 wks or > 7wks. These results argue against a survival advantage for initiation of PORT within 6 or 7 weeks for early-stage HPV+ OPC managed with high-quality transoral resection. The optimal time window to initiate PORT in HPV+ OPC patients remains to be determined. Clinical trial information: NCT01898494 .

6077 Background: E3311 is a phase II randomized study which showed favorable outcomes among intermediate (INT) risk HPV+ OPC patients (pts) who underwent TOS followed by pathology-guided or adapted, deintensified adjuvant treatment. Among HPV+ pts treated with definitive chemoradiation, survival outcomes are worse among those who smoked > 10 pack years (pk-yrs). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed demographics, pathologic results, and efficacy outcomes from E3311 by smoking group (current (C) vs. former (F) and > 10 vs. ≤10 pk-yrs – the latter a pre-specified stratification factor for INT patients). Binary and categorical variables were compared using a chi-square test (or Fisher’s exact test for small sample sizes). Ordinal variables were compared using a Wilcoxon rank sum test. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using a log-rank test. Results: Among 359 evaluable pts, performance status (PS) was significantly worse for pts with > 10 pk-yrs vs. ≤10 pk-yrs (15.4% vs. 7.9% with PS of 1, p = 0.034). Primary site, margin status, histologic grade, stage, and extranodal extension were not significantly different between the groups of > 10 vs. ≤10 pk-yrs. Smoking status (F vs. C) was available for 182 pts with a history of smoking. Slightly more C vs. F smokers had tonsil as primary site (79.5% vs. 65.0%, p = 0.09). Positive margins were significantly more frequent among C smokers (10.3% vs. 2.1%; p = 0.029). Overall, there were no significant differences in PFS (p = 0.55) or OS (p = 0.94), comparing those with > 10 vs. ≤10 pk-yrs, or comparing C vs. F smokers (p = 0.76, p = 0.82, respectively). Similarly, no significant differences were observed within the treatment arms. (Table 1) Conclusions: In this analysis of smoking status in E3311, INT risk HPV+ OPC pts who are C smokers or have a history of > 10 pk-yrs had favorable 3-yr PFS and OS rates that were not significantly worse than those with < 10 pk-yrs history. This data represents the first treatment approach for HPV+ OPC in which outcomes were not influenced by smoking status. Clinical trial information: NCT01898494. [Table: see text]

Objectives: To determine whether 2 different methods of post-operative head and neck free flap monitoring affect flap failure and complication rates. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 803 free flaps performed for head and neck reconstruction by the same microvascular surgeon between July 2013 and July 2020 at 2 separate hospitals within the same healthcare system. Four-hundred ten free flaps (51%) were performed at Hospital A, a medical center where flap checks were performed at frequent, scheduled intervals by in-house resident physicians and nurses; 393 free flaps (49%) were performed at Hospital B, a medical center where flap checks were performed regularly by nursing staff with resident physician evaluation as needed. Total free flap failure, partial free flap failure, and complications (consisting of wound infection, fistula, and reoperation within 1 month) were assessed. Results: There were no significant differences between Hospitals A and B when comparing rates of total free flap failure, partial free flap failure, complication, or re-operation ( P = .27, P = .66, P = .65, P = .29, respectively). There were no significant differences in urgent re-operation rates for flap compromise secondary to thrombosis and hematoma ( P = .54). Conclusions: In our series, free flap outcomes did not vary based on the degree of flap monitoring by resident physicians. This data supports the ability of a high-volume, well-trained, nursing-led flap monitoring program to detect flap compromise in an efficient fashion while limiting resident physician obligations in the age of resident duty hour restrictions.

The NCCN Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancers address tumors arising in the oral cavity (including mucosal lip), pharynx, larynx, and paranasal sinuses. Occult primary cancer, salivary gland cancer, and mucosal melanoma (MM) are also addressed. The specific site of disease, stage, and pathologic findings guide treatment (eg, the appropriate surgical procedure, radiation targets, dose and fractionation of radiation, indications for systemic therapy). The NCCN Head and Neck Cancers Panel meets at least annually to review comments from reviewers within their institutions, examine relevant new data from publications and abstracts, and reevaluate and update their recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s most recent recommendations regarding management of HPV-positive oropharynx cancer and ongoing research in this area.

6010 Background: Definitive or postoperative chemoradiation (CRT) is highly curative for human papillomavirus-associated (HPV+) oropharynx cancer (OPC) but induces significant toxicity. As a potential deintensification strategy, we studied primary transoral surgery (TOS) and, in intermediate pathologic risk patients, reduced dose postoperative RT (PORT). Methods: E3311 is a phase II trial with randomization to reduced- or standard-dose PORT for resected stage III-IVa (AJCC7) intermediate pathologic risk HPV+ OPC, stratified by smoking history. Primary endpoints have been reported; we now present updated 3-year PFS and patient-reported outcomes (PRO), including head and neck-cancer specific quality of life (FACT-H&N) and swallowing perception and performance (MDADI). Results: Of 519 enrolled patients, 495 underwent TOS. The primary oncologic endpoint was 2-year PFS for 50 Gy (Arm B) or 60Gy (Arm C). Among 360 eligible and treated patients (ETP), Arm A (observation, N = 38) enrolled 11%, Arms B (N = 100) or C (N = 109) randomized 58%, and Arm D (66Gy + weekly cisplatin, N = 113) enrolled 31%. With 35.1 months median follow-up, 3-year PFS Kaplan-Meier estimate is 96.9% (90% CI [91.9%, 100%]) for Arm A; 94.9% (90% CI [91.3%, 98.6%]) for Arm B; 93.5% (90% CI [89.4%, 97.9%]) for Arm C; and 90.7% (90% CI [86.2%, 95.4%]) for Arm D. Recurrences and death without recurrence were 4 and 1 in Arm B, and 5 and one in Arm C. Smokers ( > 10 pack-years) did not have worse 3-year PFS in Arms B or C. Treatment arm distribution and outcome for ineligible patients who started adjuvant therapy mirrored the 360 ETP. A comparison combining arms B/C versus arm D in the proportion of patients stable/improved in FACT-H&N total score, from baseline to 6 months post-treatment as a pre-specified endpoint, was 56% vs. 38% (p value = 0.011, one-sided Fisher’s exact test); however, underlying differences in treatment and risk may be confounding. An exploratory comparison between Arms B and C revealed improvement in FACT H&N (63% in Arm B vs. 49% in Arm C had a stable/improved score, p-value = 0.056). Conclusions: Primary TOS and reduced PORT retained outstanding oncologic outcome at 35 months follow up, with favorable QOL and functional outcomes, in intermediate risk HPV+ OPC. Clinical trial information: NCT 01898494.

Treatment is complex for patients with head and neck (H&N) cancers with specific site of disease, stage, and pathologic findings guiding treatment decision-making. Treatment planning for H&N cancers involves a multidisciplinary team of experts. This article describes supportive care recommendations in the NCCN Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancers, as well as the rationale supporting a new section on imaging recommendations for patients with H&N cancers. This article also describes updates to treatment recommendations for patients with very advanced H&N cancers and salivary gland tumors, specifically systemic therapy recommendations.