Mehra, Saral

PURPOSE The ECOG-ACRIN E3311 phase II trial demonstrated outstanding disease control (90.6% 54-month progression-free survival) after transoral surgery (TOS) with de-escalated, risk-based postoperative management in resectable human papillomavirus–associated oropharyngeal cancer. The goal of de-escalation was functional preservation. The objective of this work was to evaluate clinician-graded modified barium swallow (MBS) studies from E3311 over time and across arms for (1) aspiration and high-grade pharyngeal residue rates, (2) differences in swallow safety and efficiency, and (3) accuracy of site clinicians reporting against central MBS review. METHODS Eight hundred eighty-five MBS studies were performed on 314 patients from 50 of 59 sites at baseline, post-TOS, and 6 and 24 months postradiotherapy (RT). Swallow outcomes (aspiration, high-grade residue) were recorded by site clinicians. A subset of 414 MBS studies was centrally graded using penetration-aspiration scale scores and the Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) scale. RESULTS Aspiration, residue, and dysphagia rates significantly increased from baseline to post-TOS ( P < .01) and then decreased modestly at 6 and 24 months. At 6 months, swallow outcomes favored the 50- versus 60-Gy arm, with significantly lower aspiration and high-grade dysphagia rates, but this difference was not maintained at 24 months. MBS results reported by site clinicians demonstrated substantial agreement with those assessed by the central laboratory (PABAK, 0.75-0.84; P < .01). CONCLUSION Swallowing worsened after TOS but improved by 6 and 24 months despite adjuvant therapy. De-escalated adjuvant RT at 50 Gy reduced acute aspiration. Site-reported MBS metrics strongly aligned with DIGEST, showing potential as an accessible metric in cooperative group settings.

Background: Appropriate management of well-differentiated thyroid cancer requires treating clinicians to have access to critical elements of the patient's presentation, surgical management, postoperative course, and pathologic assessment. Electronic health records (EHRs) provide an effective method for the storage and transmission of patient information, although most commercially available EHRs are not intended to be disease-specific. In addition, there are significant challenges for the sharing of relevant clinical information when providers involved in the care of a patient with thyroid cancer are not connected by a common EHR. In 2012, the American Thyroid Association (ATA) defined the critical elements for optimal interclinician communication in a position paper entitled, “The Essential Elements of Interdisciplinary Communication of Perioperative Information for Patients Undergoing Thyroid Cancer Surgery.” Summary: We present a field-by-field comparison of the ATA's essential elements as applied to three contemporary electronic reporting systems: the Thyroid Surgery e-Form from Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), the Alberta WebSMR from the University of Calgary, and the Thyroid Cancer Care Collaborative (TCCC). The MSKCC e-form fulfills 21 of 32 intraoperative fields and includes an additional 14 fields not specifically mentioned in the ATA's report. The Alberta WebSMR fulfills 45 of 82 preoperative and intraoperative fields outlined by the ATA and includes 13 additional fields. The TCCC fulfills 117 of 120 fields outlined by the ATA and includes 23 additional fields. Conclusions: Effective management of thyroid cancer is a highly collaborative, multidisciplinary effort. The patient information that factors into clinical decisions about thyroid cancer is complex. For these reasons, EHRs are particularly favorable for the management of patients with thyroid cancer. The MSKCC Thyroid Surgery e-Form, the Alberta WebSMR, and the TCCC each meet all of the general recommendations for effective reporting of the specific domains that they cover in the management of thyroid cancer, as recommended by the ATA. However, the TCCC format is the most comprehensive. The TCCC is a new Web-based disease-specific database to enhance communication of patient information between clinicians in a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant manner. We believe the easy-to-use TCCC format will enhance clinician communication while providing portability of thyroid cancer information for patients.

Background: The current systems of healthcare delivery in the United States suffer from problems that often leave patients with inadequate quality of care. In their report entitled “Crossing the Quality Chasm,” the Institute of Medicine (IOM) identified reasons for poor and/or inconsistent quality of healthcare delivery and provided recommendations to improve it. The purpose of this review is to describe features of an innovative web-based program called the Thyroid Cancer Care Collaborative (TCCC) and see how it addresses IOM recommendations to improve the quality of healthcare delivery. Summary: The TCCC addresses the three actionable IOM recommendations directed at healthcare organizations and clinicians to redesign the care process. It does so by exploiting information technology (IT) in ways suggested by the IOM, and it fits within a set of 10 rules provided by the IOM. Some features of the TCCC include: (i) automated disease staging based on three validated scoring systems; (ii) highly illustrated educational videos on all aspects of thyroid cancer care; (iii) personalized clinical decision-making modules for clinicians and physicians; (iv) portability of data to share among treating physicians; (v) virtual tumor boards, “ask the expert,” and frequently asked questions modules; (vi) physician workflow integration; and (vii) data for comprehensive analysis to answer difficult questions in thyroid cancer management. Conclusion: The TCCC has the potential to improve thyroid cancer care delivery and offers several benefits to patients, clinicians, and researchers. The TCCC is a valuable example of how IOM initiatives can improve the healthcare system.