Klopper, Joshua

Objectives/HypothesisTo present an overview of the barriers to the implementation of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in thyroid cancer management and to introduce a computer‐based clinical support system.Data SourcesPubMed.Review Methods: A review of studies on adherence to CPGs was conducted.ResultsAwareness and adoption of CPGs is low in thyroid cancer management. Barriers to implementation include unfamiliarity with the CPGs and financial concerns. Effective interventions to improve adherence are possible, especially when they are readily accessible at the point of care delivery. Computerized clinical support systems show particular promise. The authors introduce the clinical decision making modules (CDMMs) of the Thyroid Cancer Care Collaborative, a thyroid cancer‐specific electronic health record. These computer‐based modules can assist clinicians with implementation of these recommendations in clinical practice.ConclusionComputer‐based support systems can help clinicians understand and adopt the thyroid cancer CPGs. By integrating patient characteristics and guidelines at the point of care delivery, the CDMMs can improve adherence to the guidelines and help clinicians provide high‐quality, evidence‐based, and individualized patient care in the management of differentiated thyroid cancer. Laryngoscope, 126:2640–2645, 2016

Background: Appropriate management of well-differentiated thyroid cancer requires treating clinicians to have access to critical elements of the patient's presentation, surgical management, postoperative course, and pathologic assessment. Electronic health records (EHRs) provide an effective method for the storage and transmission of patient information, although most commercially available EHRs are not intended to be disease-specific. In addition, there are significant challenges for the sharing of relevant clinical information when providers involved in the care of a patient with thyroid cancer are not connected by a common EHR. In 2012, the American Thyroid Association (ATA) defined the critical elements for optimal interclinician communication in a position paper entitled, “The Essential Elements of Interdisciplinary Communication of Perioperative Information for Patients Undergoing Thyroid Cancer Surgery.” Summary: We present a field-by-field comparison of the ATA's essential elements as applied to three contemporary electronic reporting systems: the Thyroid Surgery e-Form from Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), the Alberta WebSMR from the University of Calgary, and the Thyroid Cancer Care Collaborative (TCCC). The MSKCC e-form fulfills 21 of 32 intraoperative fields and includes an additional 14 fields not specifically mentioned in the ATA's report. The Alberta WebSMR fulfills 45 of 82 preoperative and intraoperative fields outlined by the ATA and includes 13 additional fields. The TCCC fulfills 117 of 120 fields outlined by the ATA and includes 23 additional fields. Conclusions: Effective management of thyroid cancer is a highly collaborative, multidisciplinary effort. The patient information that factors into clinical decisions about thyroid cancer is complex. For these reasons, EHRs are particularly favorable for the management of patients with thyroid cancer. The MSKCC Thyroid Surgery e-Form, the Alberta WebSMR, and the TCCC each meet all of the general recommendations for effective reporting of the specific domains that they cover in the management of thyroid cancer, as recommended by the ATA. However, the TCCC format is the most comprehensive. The TCCC is a new Web-based disease-specific database to enhance communication of patient information between clinicians in a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant manner. We believe the easy-to-use TCCC format will enhance clinician communication while providing portability of thyroid cancer information for patients.

Background: The current systems of healthcare delivery in the United States suffer from problems that often leave patients with inadequate quality of care. In their report entitled “Crossing the Quality Chasm,” the Institute of Medicine (IOM) identified reasons for poor and/or inconsistent quality of healthcare delivery and provided recommendations to improve it. The purpose of this review is to describe features of an innovative web-based program called the Thyroid Cancer Care Collaborative (TCCC) and see how it addresses IOM recommendations to improve the quality of healthcare delivery. Summary: The TCCC addresses the three actionable IOM recommendations directed at healthcare organizations and clinicians to redesign the care process. It does so by exploiting information technology (IT) in ways suggested by the IOM, and it fits within a set of 10 rules provided by the IOM. Some features of the TCCC include: (i) automated disease staging based on three validated scoring systems; (ii) highly illustrated educational videos on all aspects of thyroid cancer care; (iii) personalized clinical decision-making modules for clinicians and physicians; (iv) portability of data to share among treating physicians; (v) virtual tumor boards, “ask the expert,” and frequently asked questions modules; (vi) physician workflow integration; and (vii) data for comprehensive analysis to answer difficult questions in thyroid cancer management. Conclusion: The TCCC has the potential to improve thyroid cancer care delivery and offers several benefits to patients, clinicians, and researchers. The TCCC is a valuable example of how IOM initiatives can improve the healthcare system.

AbstractBackgroundWell‐differentiated thyroid cancer (WDTC) recurs in up to 30% of patients. Guidelines from the American Thyroid Association (ATA) and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) provide valuable parameters for the management of recurrent disease, but fail to guide the clinician as to the multitude of factors that should be taken into account. The Thyroid Cancer Care Collaborative (TCCC) is a web‐based repository of a patient's clinical information. Ten clinical decision‐making modules (CDMMs) process this information and display individualized treatment recommendations.MethodsWe conducted a review of the literature and analysis of the management of patients with recurrent/persistent WDTC.ResultsSurgery remains the most common treatment in recurrent/persistent WDTC and can be performed with limited morbidity in experienced hands. However, careful observation may be the recommended course in select patients. Reoperation yields biochemical remission rates between 21% and 66%. There is a reported 1.2% incidence of permanent unexpected nerve paralysis and a 3.5% incidence of permanent hypoparathyroidism. External beam radiotherapy and percutaneous ethanol ablation have been reported as therapeutic alternatives. Radioactive iodine as a primary therapy has been reported previously for metastatic lymph nodes, but is currently advocated by the ATA as an adjuvant to surgery.ConclusionThe management of recurrent lymph nodes is a multifactorial decision and is best determined by a multidisciplinary team. The CDMMs allow for easy adoption of contemporary knowledge, making this information accessible to both patient and clinician. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 37: 605–614, 2015

Background: Seventy-five percent of thyroid nodules with indeterminate fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology are found to be benign postoperatively. A novel genomic test, the Afirma ® gene expression classifier (AGEC), has been available for clinical use in the United States, since late 2010. In 2010, two modest-sized validation studies showed that the AGEC could identify a benign gene expression signature in indeterminate cytology thyroid FNA samples with a negative predictive value >95%. The objective of this study was to evaluate how the AGEC impacted the joint decision of the endocrinologist and patient to operate when FNA cytology was indeterminate, but the AGEC reading of the nodule was benign. Methods: In this cross-sectional cohort study, data were contributed retrospectively by 51 endocrinologists at 21 practice sites that had previously obtained ≥3 benign AGEC readings in ≥1 cm nodules with indeterminate FNA cytology readings. Information regarding demographic data, nodule size and location, decision to operate, surgery type (hemithyroidectomy [HT] or total thyroidectomy [TT]), and reason for recommending surgery was retrospectively collected. Results: Compared to a 74% previous historical rate of surgery for cytologically indeterminate nodules, the operative rate fell to 7.6% during the period that AGEC were obtained in the clinical practices, a highly significant reduction in the decision to operate ( p <0.001). The rate of surgery on cytologically indeterminate nodules that were benign by the AGEC reading did not differ from the historically reported rate of operation on cytologically benign nodules ( p =0.41). The four primary reasons reported by the physicians for operating on nodules with a benign AGEC reading, in descending order: large nodule size (46.4%), symptomatic nodules (25.0%), rapidly growing nodules (10.7%), or a second suspicious or malignant nodule in the same patient (10.7%). These reasons are concordant with those typically given for operation on cytologically benign nodules. Conclusions: In a substantial group of medical practices, obtaining an AGEC test in patients with cytologically indeterminate nodules was associated with a striking reduction in the rate of diagnostic thyroidectomy. Approximately, one surgery was avoided for every two AGEC tests run on thyroid FNAs with indeterminate cytology.

Abstract Background: Stage IVC (metastatic) anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) has a median overall survival (OS) of only 1.9 months. Single agent paclitaxel has modest activity in ATC. In pre-clinical studies, CS-7017 inhibited ATC proliferation through a novel mechanism–activation of PPAR-γ, followed by sequential upregulation of RhoB, then p21. Moreover, CS-7017 augmented the proapoptotic effects of paclitaxel. Based on these results, a multicenter study was conducted to determine if CS-7017+paclitaxel might prove safe and effective in advanced ATC. Design: A Phase 1 study was conducted to determine the Phase 2 dose. In Phase 1, patients received CS-7017 orally BID for one week (run-in phase), followed by a 3 h iv infusion of paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) every 3 weeks in combination with BID CS-7017. CS-7017 doses were escalated (0.15, 0.3, or 0.5 mg). Tissue biopsies were obtained at baseline and at one and three weeks for immunohistochemistry of PPAR-γ responsive proteins; serum CS-7017 PK studies were also performed. Results: Nineteen patients were enrolled, but 4 were not dosed (3 due to progression, 1 ineligible). Seven participated in CS-7017 dose levels 1a/1b (0.15 mg BID), six in dose level 2 (0.3 mg BID), and two in dose level 3 (run-in phase only–0.5 mg BID). Demographics: Of the 15 treated patients, 10 (67%) were women. Median age was 59 years (range: 43-82) Efficacy: Of 15 patients receiving drug, one had a confirmed partial response (PR) lasting from Day 69 to Day 175, and eight had stable disease (SD) as their best response. Median Time to Progression in 7 patients at Dose Level 1 was 49 days, but 70 days in Dose Level 2 (43% prolongation); corresponding median survival was 99 (0.15 mg BID) vs. 140 days (0.3 mg BID, 42% increase). Median peak CS-7017 blood level was 8.6 ng/mL (range: 5.1 to 13.7) for Level 1 and 22.0 ng/mL (17.0 to 31.5) for Dose Level 2. Adverse Events: Ten patients had AEs ≥ Grade 3, with two (anemia and localized edema) related to CS-7017. Thirteen events of fluid retention/edema were reported in 8 patients, with only 2 events of CTCAE grade ≥ 3. Eight patients had ≥ one SAE, with one (anemia) due to CS-7017. One SAE (anaphylactic reaction) was related to paclitaxel. No dose limiting toxicity was observed. Immunohistochemistry: Biopsies were available on 7 patients. PPAR-γ, RXR-α, RhoB were present in all; Angiopoietin-like 4 was induced by CS-7017. Conclusions: Combination therapy with CS-7017 and paclitaxel was tolerated and has biologic activity in patients with metastatic anaplastic thyroid carcinoma, with initial exploratory data suggesting a dose-dependent improvement in time to progression and survival in response to escalating CS-7017 dosage. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1278. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-1278