Back to Authors

Sharma, Prateek

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3364-821X

Mayo Clinic

University of Kansas

Citations 2

Computer‐aided detection for esophageal achalasia (with video)
Shiwaku, Hironari , Misawa, Masashi , Inoue, Haruhiro , Boškoski, Ivo , Shimamura, Yuto , Ikebuchi, Yuichiro , Ominami, Masaki , Htet, Hein , Messmann, H, Colosso, Bianca Maria Quarta , Repici, Alessandro , Stavropoulos, Stavros N. , Bechara, Robert , Sethi, Amrita, Beyna, Torsten , Santi, Esperanza Grace , Sharma, Prateek , Eleftheriadis, Nikolas, Minami, Hitomi, Haber, Gregory , Seewald, Stefan , Shiwaku, Akio, Shiwaku, Yoshiyuki, Mori, Kensaku, Costamagna, Guido , Shimamura, Yuto , Ikebuchi, Yuichiro , Iwaya, Yugo , Htet, Hein Myat Thu , Colosso, Bianca Maria Quarta , Bechara, Robert , Kahaleh, Michel , Beyna, Torsten , Jiang, Kai, Oda, Masahiro , Familiari, Pietro , Hayee, Bu , Ho, Khek Yu , So, Jimmy Bok Yan , Bhandari, Pradeep , Grimes, Kevin L. , Maselli, Roberta , Hassan, Cesare , Fukami, Norio , Kahaleh, Michel , Sethi, Amrita , Neuhaus, Horst Ekkehard , Chiu, Philip Wai Yan , Eleftheriadis, Nikolas, Draganov, Peter V. , Mori, Kensaku , Kudo, Shin‐ei , Hasegawa, Suguru

Digestive Endoscopy | June 12, 2025 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 851-861

10.1111/den.15028 Get It

ObjectivesAchalasia is an esophageal motility disorder that impairs quality of life and is often missed (20–50%) on endoscopy. A newly developed computer‐aided detection (CAD) software has shown high accuracy for achalasia diagnosis in preclinical settings. However, its benefit in a clinical setting remains unclear.MethodsBetween February and August 2023, 83 endoscopists from 27 centers assessed 50 randomized endoscopic videos (25 achalasia, 25 nonachalasia) without and with CAD. Endoscopists assessed videos without CAD, then with CAD after 2 months. The primary end‐point was improvement in sensitivity for nonexperienced endoscopists (no endoscopic experience of achalasia). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy with and without CAD were compared using the McNemar test.ResultsSensitivity for diagnosing achalasia increased significantly with CAD, rising from 74.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 72.2–76.0%) to 91.2% (95% CI 89.9–92.4%) for all readers, showing a difference of 17.1% (95% CI 15.1–19.0%). Specifically, sensitivity improved from 66.9% (95% CI 63.6–70.0%) to 91.9% (95% CI 89.9–93.6%) among nonexperienced endoscopists, resulting in a difference of 25.0% (95% CI 21.7–28.4%), and from 79.5% (95% CI 77.1–81.8%) to 90.8% (95% CI 89.0–92.3%) among experienced endoscopists (endoscopic experience of at least one achalasia case), with a difference of 11.3% (95% CI 8.9–13.6%). Accuracy and specificity improved significantly with CAD assistance, regardless of reader's experience.ConclusionCAD improves achalasia detection by 17%, confirming preclinical results. The benefit was higher for nonexperienced endoscopists. CAD assistance may lead to prompt and effective treatment, minimizing the risk of false‐negative diagnosis in clinical practice.Trial registrationThis study was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/) number: UMIN000053047.
Position statement of the World Endoscopy Organization: Role of endoscopy in screening, diagnosis, and treatment of esophageal superficial squamous neoplasiaia
Hassan, Cesare , Goda, Kenichi, Iyer, Prasad G. , Awadhi, Sameer Al , Lehibi, Abed Al , Arantes, Vitor , Burgos, Herbert, Cerisoli, Cecilio L., Dawsey, Sanford, Fleischer, David, Fluxá, Fernando, Inoue, Haruhiro , John, Sneha , Khashab, Mouen A., Kothari, Shivangi , Lee, Yeong Yeh, Ngamruengphong, Saowanee , Sharara, Ala I. , Shimamura, Yuto , Varocha, Mahachai, Villa‐Gomez, Guido, Wang, Kenneth K. , Yip, Hon Chi , Sharma, Prateek , Lee, Yeong Yeh , Chiu, Philip Wai Yan , Emura, Fabian , G Iyer, Prasad, Kim, Gwang Ha , Shimamura, Yuto , Yip, Hon-Chi , Hassan, Cesare , Lee, Yeong Yeh , Antonelli, Giulio , Burgos, Herbert, Dawsey, Sanford, Draganov, Peter V. , González, Nicolás , Kashin, Sergey V. , Khashab, Mouen A. , Lee, Yeong Yeh, Remes Troche, José M , Varocha, Mahachai, Wang, Wen‐Lun

Digestive Endoscopy | December 26, 2024 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 470-489

10.1111/den.14967 Get It

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains a significant global health challenge, being the sixth leading cause of cancer mortality with pronounced geographic variability. The incidence rates range from 125 per 100,000 in northern China to 1–1.5 per 100,000 in the United States, driven by environmental and lifestyle factors such as tobacco and alcohol use, dietary habits, and pollution. Major modifiable risk factors include tobacco and alcohol consumption, with a synergistic risk increase when combined. Nonmodifiable risk factors include previous diagnoses of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (H&N SCC), achalasia, and prior radiotherapy. Prevention strategies must be tailored to specific regional burdens to efficiently allocate medical and financial resources. Gastrointestinal endoscopy is crucial in reducing ESCC burden through early detection and characterization of neoplastic changes, such as high‐grade dysplasia. Early diagnosis significantly improves survival rates, while endoscopic resection of noninvasive dysplasia can prevent ESCC onset, reducing treatment burden for advanced disease. Postresection surveillance can detect high‐risk metachronous lesions. Despite these benefits, endoscopic prevention faces challenges, including the lack of high‐level evidence supporting its efficacy, opportunity costs, the need for specialized training and techniques, and the requirement for advanced technology investments. This Position Statement from the World Endoscopy Organization (WEO) aims to address these challenges, supplying recommendations for the exploitation of endoscopic resources regarding the possible role of screening, quality, and training for the detection, characterization, resection, and surveillance of ESCC.