Citations

Abstract Concurrent thyrotropin (TSH) secreting and growth hormone (GH) secreting pituitary adenomas are rare entities. Although tumors of the PIT-1 lineage may coexpress TSH and GH, concurrent biologically active secretion resulting in central hyperthyroidism and acromegaly is uncommon. We report the case of a 42-year-old woman presenting with weight loss, palpitations, amenorrhea, and progressive acromegalic features. Biochemical evaluation revealed central hyperthyroidism with elevated free T4 and inappropriately normal TSH, markedly elevated insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and GH, hyperprolactinemia, and elevated α-subunit. Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a 2.7-cm macroadenoma with cavernous sinus extension. She underwent transsphenoidal resection without complications. Pathology confirmed a mature plurihormonal PIT-1 lineage adenoma immunopositive for TSH, GH, and prolactin with a Ki-67 of 3%. Immediately postoperatively, thyrotoxicosis and hyperprolactinemia resolved, IGF-1 levels declined, acromegalic features improved, and menses resumed. Over the ensuing months, thyroid and prolactin tests remained within normal range, but the IGF-1 level remained elevated. This case illustrates the rare presentation of a PIT-1 lineage adenoma secreting biologically active TSH, GH, and prolactin. Comprehensive hormonal evaluation and long-term biochemical and radiologic surveillance are essential, given the risk of incomplete remission despite apparent surgical cure.

Importance Sex-related disparities affect diagnosis, referral, and prognosis of aortic valvular diseases. Contemporary US data on transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) by sex are limited. Objective To characterize 10-year trends in TAVI use, periprocedural complications, and long-term outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries, stratified by sex. Design, Setting, and Participants This nationwide, retrospective, population-based cohort study used US Medicare claims data from fee-for-service beneficiaries discharged after TAVI from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2022. The median follow-up time was 2.19 (IQR, 0.94-3.79) years. Exclusions included patients who had concomitant valve surgery, infective endocarditis, valve-in-valve TAVI, transapical TAVI, TAVI for pure aortic insufficiency, or later conversion to Medicare Advantage. Analyses were conducted between October 1, 2024, and April 1, 2025. Exposure TAVI. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included periprocedural mortality, vascular complications, acute kidney injury, major or life-threatening bleeding, stroke, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI), and hospitalization for heart failure (HF). Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and hazard ratios (AHRs) with 95% CIs were estimated. Results The study included 314 123 patients (141 233 women [45.0%] and 172 890 men [55.0%]). Women were older than men (mean [SD] age, female: 80.3 [7.8] years; male: 79.4 [7.7] years; standardized mean difference, 12%). The proportion of female patients who underwent TAVI declined from 47.6% in 2013 to 43.6% in 2022 ( P < .001). Compared with men, women had higher periprocedural mortality (2.5% vs 2.2%; AOR, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.14-1.26]), vascular complications (5.8% vs 3.6%; AOR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.60-1.71]), and bleeding (10.4% vs 6.8%; AOR, 1.67 [95% CI, 1.62-1.71]) but less PPI (16.9% vs 20.0%; AOR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.79-0.82]). Long-term mortality was lower in female patients (AHR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.91-0.93), although their risks of HF hospitalization, AMI, stroke, and bleeding were higher. Conclusions and Relevance Among Medicare beneficiaries, women constituted a progressively declining proportion of patients treated with TAVI, experienced more periprocedural complications, and demonstrated modestly better long-term survival compared with men. Further work is needed to understand factors influencing these trends and to refine sex-specific strategies for optimal outcomes.

ABSTRACT Background Metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) exhibits marked heterogeneity in fibrosis progression and liver‐related outcomes. Liver biopsy is not feasible for longitudinal risk stratification at scale, creating a need for validated non‐invasive biomarkers, particularly imaging biomarkers, that can predict clinically meaningful disease progression and liver‐related outcomes. Aims To describe the design and rationale of the GOLDMINE study, established to determine whether non‐invasive imaging biomarkers predict MASLD progression and liver‐related clinical outcomes. Methods GOLDMINE is an investigator‐initiated, multi‐centre, international longitudinal cohort enrolling up to 1000 adults with either biopsy‐proven MASLD or MASLD cirrhosis across the full fibrosis spectrum. Participants are recruited from 15 sites in the US and 4 international sites (Japan, Singapore and France). At baseline, participants undergo clinical phenotyping, vibration‐controlled transient elastography, and advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including proton‐density‐fat‐fraction and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE). MRI (and biospecimen banking) is repeated at 2‐year intervals (years 2 and 4), with annual follow‐up visits for up to 10 years. Baseline liver histology is centrally processed, digitized and reviewed by a single expert hepatopathologist; all MRI/MREs are centrally interpreted. Results The prespecified clinical outcomes include progression to cirrhosis, clinically significant portal hypertension, major adverse liver‐related outcomes (ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, portal hypertensive bleeding, liver transplantation/qualification), hepatocellular carcinoma, major adverse cardiovascular events, and all‐cause mortality, with independent central adjudication of all events. Conclusions GOLDMINE establishes a rigorously phenotyped MASLD cohort integrating centralized histology, advanced MRI‐based biomarkers, longitudinal biobanking, and adjudicated outcomes, providing a platform to validate imaging and blood‐based prognostic biomarkers in MASLD.

ABSTRACT Background Visceral myopathy (VSCM) is an ultra‐rare life‐threatening condition characterized by severe impairment of gastrointestinal (GI), genitourinary, and uterine smooth muscle. This disorder represents a significant clinical challenge due to variable presentation and the lack of standardized diagnostic and therapeutic protocols. Methods To discuss advances in the field, scientists and clinicians with a special interest in VSCM met in Arenzano, Genova, Italy in October 2024 for the second International Forum on Visceral Myopathy 2024 (IFVM2024) ( https://ifvm2024.ge.ibf.cnr.it/ ). Key Results As in the previous edition of the event ( https://poic‐e‐dintorni.org/efvm‐2022/ ), attendees included clinicians and researchers from around the world who study this disease, representatives from support organizations, patients affected by VSCM and their families, and companies that co‐funded the event. The present manuscript aims to summarize knowledge shared during the IFVM2024 conference, thus providing an updated state‐of‐the‐art summary of VSCM biology and disease management. Conclusions Here, we pay particular attention to the epidemiology of the disease, histopathology, genetics, novel treatments, advances in molecular and cell biology, experimental models, and the lived experiences and impact of this disorder on families.

Importance Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) demonstrated superior outcomes over medical therapy in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in the Edwards EVOQUE Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement: Pivotal Clinical Investigation of Safety and Clinical Efficacy Using a Novel Device II (TRISCEND II) randomized clinical trial, and received regulatory approval in the US in 2024. Contemporary real-world data on its effectiveness and safety remain limited. Objective To evaluate 30-day clinical, echocardiographic, and health status outcomes of TTVR in real-world use. Design, Setting, and Population Retrospective cohort study of all consecutive patients who underwent TTVR in the US from February 2024 through March 2025 in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry. Patients had symptomatic, severe TR despite optimal medical therapy and TTVR was deemed appropriate by a heart team. Statistical analysis was conducted from September 2025 to February 2026. Exposure Device-enabled TTVR. Main Outcomes and Measures Thirty-day event rates (all-cause death, stroke, bleeding, new cardiac implantable electronic device [CIED] implantation, heart failure hospitalizations), TR reduction, and changes in health status (New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary [KCCQ-OS] score) are reported. Subgroup analyses examined the impact of baseline CIED status on outcomes. Results Among 1034 attempted procedures at 82 centers (mean [SD] age, 77.1 [10.6] years; 69.1% female; 73.2% NYHA functional class III/IV), a valve was successfully implanted in 1017 patients (98.4%). Mild or less TR was achieved in 98.4% of patients post procedure and in 97.7% at 30 days. At 30 days, all-cause mortality was 3.1%; stroke, 0.2%; bleeding, 7.9%; new CIED, 15.9% in CIED-naive patients; and heart failure hospitalization, 3.1%. There were significant improvements in NYHA functional class (class I/II, 82.7%; P < .001) and mean KCCQ-OS score (22.4 points; P < .001) from baseline to 30 days. There were no significant differences in 30-day mortality ( P = .47), heart failure hospitalization ( P > .99), and functional outcomes ( P = .55) when patients were stratified by baseline CIED status. Conclusions and Relevance Early US real-world experience with TTVR confirms safety and effectiveness in patients with severe TR. Thirty-day outcomes are consistent with the TRISCEND II pivotal trial, demonstrating acceptable safety, near-complete TR elimination, and significant health status improvements in an older, comorbid population. Rates of new CIED implantation and bleeding were lower than randomized clinical trial experience.

Abstract Purpose: This multicenter, multi-surgeon retrospective study aimed to identify risk factors for postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak following endonasal resection of craniopharyngioma, while evaluating the "perception gap" through a surgeon survey. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 416 patients who underwent endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ETS) for craniopharyngioma from 20 institutions. Factors were compared between patients with and without postoperative CSF leak, and between Early (2007-2015) and Late (2016-2025) Epochs. Complementing the clinical data, a survey of 19 neurosurgeons captured expert perspectives on risk stratification and management strategies. Results: Overall postoperative CSF leak rate was 13.5% (56/416 patients). Univariate analysis identified predominantly cystic tumors (34% vs. 21%, p = 0.034)and intraoperative lumbar drain (LD) use ( p < 0.028) as associated with postoperative CSF leak. BMI ( p = 0.587), prior surgery ( p = 0.576), and tumor size ( p = 0.363) were not significant. In the multivariable analysis, LD use was associated with a higher postoperative CSF leak rate (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.06–3.46; p = 0.030). Between Epochs, nasoseptal flap (NSF) utilization increased from 70.7% to 87.6% ( p <0.001). NSF was protective (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.07–0.92; p = 0.037) in the Early Epoch; no factors were significant in the Late Epoch. The surgeons’ survey identified prior surgery and intraoperative high flow leaks as primary risks; however, their LD protocols diverged from clinical data. Conclusion: Despite increased use of NSF, CSF leak persists. The study highlights a significant divergence between expert perception and clinical data regarding lumbar drains.

Disclaimer: These guidelines are intended for educational use to build the knowledge of physicians and other health professionals in assessing the conditions and managing the treatment of patients undergoing extracorporeal life support (ECLS)/ECMO and describe what are believed to be useful and safe practice for ECLS and ECMO. The aim of clinical guidelines was to help clinicians to make informed decisions about their patients. However, adherence to a guideline does not guarantee a successful outcome. Healthcare professionals must make their own treatment decisions about care on a case-by-case basis, after consultation with their patients, using their clinical judgment, knowledge, and expertise. These guidelines do not take the place of physicians’ and other health professionals’ judgment in diagnosing and treatment of patients. These guidelines are not intended to and should not be interpreted as setting a standard of care or being deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care nor exclusive of other methods of care directed at obtaining the same results. The ultimate judgment must be made by the physician and other health professionals and the patient considering all the circumstances presented by the individual patient, and the known variability and biologic behavior of the clinical condition. These guidelines reflect the data at the time the guidelines were prepared; the results of subsequent studies or other information may cause revisions to the recommendations in these guidelines to be prudent to reflect new data, but ELSO is under no obligation to provide updates. In no event will ELSO be liable for any decision made or action taken in reliance upon the information provided through these guidelines.

This chapter focuses on key factors that impact effective teamwork in healthcare organizations, including a case study on the applications of a teamwork model at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN. Studies have found positive correlations among effective teamwork, patient care, and provider satisfaction. Key factors such as teamwork training, leaderless online group discussion, servant leadership, and top management support lead to effective teamwork, which would positively impact the quadruple aim—patient experience, high-quality and safe delivery of patient care, lower costs, and provider satisfaction.

This chapter explores, analyzes, and discusses the challenges and potential recommendations for the unprecedented physician shortage affecting US healthcare systems. As a result, patients are waiting long periods to get an appointment, and in many cases, even longer to see a physician. Especially older patients who may need immediate attention and medical care end up waiting several weeks. Healthcare seems to be facing a crisis that is getting worse by the day. How did we get here, why, and what do we do about it are some of the questions addressed in this chapter.