Citations

Abstract Purpose Professional identities impact professional boundaries and hierarchies, influencing how physicians approach collaboration. Despite the growing emphasis on developing students to become effective collaborators, little is known about how other health professionals (OHPs) shape students' professional identity formation (PIF). This study explored how interacting with OHPs during clinical care contributed to medical students' construction of what it means to be a physician. Methods For this constructivist grounded theory study, researchers conducted 20 semi‐structured interviews with medical students during clinical clerkships. Students drew rich pictures representing their interactions with OHPs and described these pictures during their interviews. Interviews were iteratively conducted and analysed, enabling the research team to theorize how interacting with OHPs contributed to medical students' PIF. Results Participants expressed a strong desire to contribute to patient care and described how interprofessional interactions provided opportunities to do so in ways aligned with their current capabilities. These opportunities were often more accessible than the roles and responsibilities of physicians, and participating alongside OHPs fostered participants' sense of their own developing capabilities and belonging on healthcare teams. Interactions with OHPs helped participants to see the expertise of OHPs and the value of collaborating with them in ways that shifted their focus away from becoming independent. Conceptually, participants' interactions with OHPs became both a mirror reflecting their present readiness to meaningfully contribute and a prism through which they could envision their future identities as physicians in new ways. Conclusions Interprofessional interactions influenced medical students' current and future professional identities, enabling students to see themselves as contributors on health care teams and highlighting collaboration and interdependence as core attributes of the physician profession. These findings highlight opportunities to amplify the impact of interprofessional interactions on the PIF of medical students and the need for research into how OHPs view their roles in these processes.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Understanding neuroinflammation across the Alzheimer's disease (AD) spectrum is essential to elucidate disease mechanisms and individualize therapy. METHODS Human microglial translocator protein (TSPO) expression under inflammatory stimuli was assessed by immunoblot experiments. Ninety‐six participants were enrolled across four groups: cognitively unimpaired amyloid (CU A) + and −, mild cognitive impaired (MCI) A+, and Alzheimer's disease dementia (ADD) A+. Neuroinflammation using 11 C‐ER176 TSPO positron emission tomography (PET) was compared to amyloid and tau PET. Correlations between neuroinflammation, amyloid, and tau pathology were examined across disease stages. RESULTS TSPO was upregulated in human microglia under AD‐like inflammatory conditions. Neuroinflammation, defined by PET TSPO, increased in CU A+ participants and became more widespread with increasing disease severity, aligning with worsening amyloid and tau pathology. Associations with tau were particularly extensive in temporal and parietal regions. DISCUSSION These findings suggest probable amyloid association with early microglial activation, while tau pathology is closely tied to wider distribution of neuroinflammation. Highlights TSPO expression increases in human microglia under AD‐like inflammation. 11 C‐ER176 PET shows stage‐dependent neuroinflammation across the AD spectrum. Neuroinflammation overlaps with tau and is more widespread in amyloid‐positive individuals. Activity peaks in MCI, stabilizes later, and relates to vascular and neurodegenerative changes.

Abstract Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy enriched for a memory-like phenotype may persist and function longer than a nonenriched product, thereby improving duration of response (DOR). We conducted a phase I study with bb21217 (NCT03274219), an anti–B-cell maturation antigen CAR T-cell therapy manufactured in the presence of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitor bb007 to enrich for T cells with a memory-like phenotype, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (N = 72). No new safety concerns were raised with bb21217 therapy (three cases each of grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome and grade ≥3 neurotoxicity were observed). The objective response rate was 69.4% and the median DOR was 23.8 (95% confidence interval, 16.8–34.8) months. Analysis of the drug product established an association between early memory phenotype and robust expansion and depth of response. Examination of baseline characteristics indicated that tumor burden and prior therapies influenced DOR. The data indicate that generation of CAR T cells early in a disease course when tumor burden is lower and source material exhibits a more naïve phenotype may maximize the clinical benefit potential of the drug product.

Abstract Background Colonic strictures in Crohn’s disease (CD) present a complex and relatively underexplored clinical issue. Imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and intestinal ultrasound (IUS), have established criteria for evaluating small bowel CD strictures. However, radiologic definitions of benign colonic strictures and their diagnostic accuracy are not well-developed. Endoscopic definitions of colonic strictures are the most well-described. We conducted a systematic review to summarize definitions, diagnosis, and identification of inflammation and fibrosis of colonic strictures on endoscopy, CT, MR, and IUS. Methods A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines, from inception to October 6, 2024, was conducted using MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, and CENTRAL databases to identify literature on diagnostic imaging of patients with colonic CD strictures. Only studies with comparison to endoscopy or imaging to a full-thickness histologic gold standard to differentiate fibrosis from inflammation were included. Two stage screening was completed in duplicate, and risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2. Results 46 studies were eligible for inclusion of 4623 abstracts screened. Definitions of colonic strictures on CT, MR, and IUS were highly variable with combinations of bowel wall thickness, luminal narrowing, and pre-stenotic dilation. Endoscopic definitions of colonic strictures were the most consistently reported as lack of passage of a colonoscope through a narrowed lumen. Diagnostic imaging definitions used various combinations of increased bowel wall thickness, luminal narrowing, and pre-stenotic dilation with no clear cutoffs. Few studies directly compared imaging features with histologic or endoscopic gold standards, limiting evaluation of diagnostic accuracy. Meta-analyses were not conducted due to methodological heterogeneity of grading fibrosis across studies. In addition, statistical heterogeneity of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of colonic stricture diagnoses was limited by pooling with small bowel strictures in the studies. Conclusion This systematic review highlighted the absence of standardized definitions for diagnosing colonic Crohn’s disease strictures, particularly on diagnostic imaging, and the limited data distinguishing inflammatory from fibrotic components. Bowel wall thickening, luminal narrowing, and pre-stenotic dilation are key features of small bowel strictures, but their relevance to the colon requires further assessment. Establishing standardized definitions for colonic strictures that incorporate both endoscopic and imaging modalities is essential to advancing the field. Conflict of interest: Dr. Lu, Cathy: Advisory board - Abbvie, Johnson and Johnson, Takeda, Ferring, Merck, Celltrion, Lilly, Pfizer, Pendopharm, Agomab. Research Funding - Abbvie, Helmsley Charitable Trust, Alberta Innovates Dhaliwal, Ravdip: No conflict of interest Kellar, Amelia: No conflict of interest Rowan, Catherine: No conflict of interest St-Pierre, Joelle: Consultant for Pfizer, Abbvie, Eli Lilly and Pendopharm, and speaker for Takeda. Ernest-Suárez, Kenneth: Consulting/Advisory Board fees: Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Ferring, Sandoz, SatisfAI, Takeda O’Brien, Maureen: No conflict of interest Rosentreter, Ryan: No conflict of interest Gulhati, Vishrut: No conflict of interest Baker, Mark: No conflict of interest Bettenworth, Dominik: DB is on the advisory board or consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Arena, Atheneum, BNG Service GmbH, Bristol Myers Squibb, CED-Service GmbH, Celltrion, Doctorflix, DGVS, Diaplan, Else Kröner-Fresenius Foundation, Falk Foundation, Galapagos, Guidepoint, Impulze, Ferring, Janssen Cilag, Lilly, Medical Tribune, MedTriX, MSD, Mylan, Onkowissen, Pharmacosmos, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Takeda, Tetrameros, Thieme, Tillotts Pharma, UCB Biopiharma, Viatris and Vifor Pharma. Bruining, David: Advisory board fees from Janssen Bari, Dane: Grant from Helmsley Charitable Trust speaker honorarium from Siemens Healthineers support for attending meetings or travel from Siemens Healthineers member of the Olympus advisory board co-chair Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) Inflammatory Bowel Disease Disease Focused Panel (IBD DFP) and SAR Photon-Counting Detector CT Emerging Technology Commission and chair of the Society for Advanced Body Imaging Scientific Committee. Dillman, Jonathan: Grants from Philips Healthcare, GE HealthCare, Motilent, Perspectum, Guerbet, and Bracco. El Ouali, Sara: Speaker and/or consulting fees from Takeda, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Abbvie. Fletcher, John: Grant supports from Siemens Healthineers Gordon, Ilyssa: Grants to institution from Morphic Therapeutics, Alimentiv, Pliant Therapeutics, and UCB patent pending with Case Western Reserve University on radiomics signatures Jairath, Vipul: Consulting Fees: Abbvie, Alimentiv, Amgen, Anaptys Bio, Asahi Kasei, Asieris, Astra Zeneca, Attovia, Blackbird Labs, BMS, Boehringer Ingleheim, Biomebank, Caldera, Calluna, Catalytic Health, Celltrion, Ensho, Enthera, Exeliome Biosciences, Ferring, Fresenius Kabi, Gilead, Granite Bio, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Mountainfield, MRM Health, Nxera, Organon, OSE Immunotherapeutics, Pendopharm, Pioneering Medicine, Pfizer, Prometheus, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, SCOPE, Shattuck Labs, Sorriso, Spyre, Synedgen, Takeda, Teva, Tillotts, Union Therapeutics, Ventus, Ventyx, Vividion, Xencor, Zealand Pharma. Feagan, Brian Gordon: Consulting Fees: AbbVie, Abivax, Adaxion, Adiso, AgomAB Therapeutics, Akros, Alira Health, Ally Bridge Group, Apini Therapeutics, Argenx, Attovia Tx, Avoro Capital Advisors, Belmore Law, Biora Therapeutics, Blackbird Laboratories, Boehringer-Ingelheim, BMS, Boxer Capital, Celgene/BMS, Clarivate, Connect Biopharm, EcoR1, Eli Lilly, Ensho Therapeutics, Equillium, Evida, Enveda, Evommune Inc. Faes Farma, First Wave, Forbion, Galapagos, Genentech/Roche, General Atlantic, Genesis Therapeutics, Gerson Lehrman Group, Gilead, Guidepoint, Imhotex, ImiDomics, Immunic Therapeutics, Janssen, Japan Tobacco Inc., LifeMine Therapeutics, Mage Biologics, Merck, Mirador Therapeutics, Mobius Care, Monte Rosa Tx, Morphic Therapeutics, Nimbus Therapeutics, Novartis, Nxera, OncoC3, Palisade Bio, Pendopharm, Pfizer,Q32 Bio, REDX, Roche, Sanofi, Sobi, Sorriso, Spyre Therapeutics, Sun Pharma, Surrozen Inc., Synedgen, Takeda, Tegus Inc., Teva, Tillotts, Trex Bio, TR1X Inc. TVM Lifesciences, Ventyx Biosciences, Versant Ventures, Vida Ventures, Ysios Capital, Zagbio Stock Shareholder: Connect Biopharm, EnGene, Evida, SRT, Imidomics, Enveda Rieder, Florian: Personal Fees: Adiso, Adnovate, Agomab, Allergan, AbbVie, Arena, Astra Zeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene/BMS, Celltrion, CDISC, Celsius, Cowen, Ferring, Galapagos, Galmed, Genentech, Gilead, Gossamer, Granite, Guidepoint, Helmsley, Horizon Therapeutics, Image Analysis Limited, Index Pharma, Landos, Jannsen, Koutif, Mestag, Metacrine, Mopac, Morphic, Organovo, Origo, Palisade, Pfizer, Pliant, Prometheus Biosciences, Receptos, RedX, Roche, Samsung, Sanofi, Surmodics, Surrozen, Takeda, Techlab, Teva, Theravance, Thetis, UCB, Ysios, 89Bio

Abstract Objective To measure the relative levels of signal and noise in expert diagnosis of epilepsy. Methods Twenty multinational epileptologists independently reviewed 50 vignettes of adult and pediatric patients presenting with suspected seizure(s) on two separate occasions with a ≥30‐day washout period. Experts provided a diagnosis of epilepsy or non‐epilepsy based on clinical information and, if requested, routine EEG and neuroimaging data. Cases had an established clinical diagnosis of epilepsy or non‐epilepsy based on capture of habitual paroxysmal events on video‐EEG or long‐term clinical follow‐up. Experts' judgments were analyzed to decompose variability into different sources: signal (objective differences between cases), level noise (experts' bias toward over/under‐diagnosis), pattern noise (experts' idiosyncratic reactions to specific case features), and occasion noise (inconsistency across occasions). Results The probability of an expert making a different diagnosis for a given case on two different occasions was 16%. The probability of two different experts making a different diagnosis for the same case was 26%. Signal (case “difficulty”) accounted for 66–69% of total variation, with 31–34% attributable to noise. Level noise was the largest contributor in the absence of EEG/neuroimaging results (23%), while pattern noise dominated when test results were available (24%). Occasion noise contributed relatively little (1%) but was still sufficient to cause diagnostic reversals in 16–22% between occasions. Significance The degree of noise in expert diagnosis of epilepsy is substantial, stemming primarily from physicians' idiosyncratic interpretations of case features and variable dispositions toward over‐ or under‐diagnosis. Strategies to improve reliability are needed, including standardized data collection protocols and structured decision algorithms. For “difficult cases,” where expert reliability and accuracy are lowest, our findings support current clinical practice which favors early referral for video‐EEG monitoring over reliance on diagnostic anchoring. This diagnostic pathway may become more accessible with advances in EEG technology (e.g., wearable devices) and artificial intelligence.

Abstract Introduction Cardiac CT is increasingly used to screen for cardioembolism in stroke patients. We assessed the frequency and management of non-cardiac incidental findings on prospective ECG-gated cardiac CT in patients with a suspected stroke. Patients and methods This was a post-hoc analysis of the Mind the Heart study, a prospective single-centre cohort study including consecutive adult patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS), transient ischaemic attack (TIA), or a stroke mimic who underwent cardiac CT as part of an acute stroke imaging protocol. Endpoints were pre-defined non-cardiac incidental findings that were detected on cardiac CT: pulmonary embolism (PE), potential malignant lesions, pulmonary consolidations or ground-glass densities, bone fractures, lymphadenopathy, focal liver lesions, and ascending aortic or pulmonary artery dilatation. Change of management was defined as additional treatment or follow-up. Results We included 654 patients (57% men, median age 71 [IQR 59–80] years) of whom 451 (69%) had AIS, 48 had TIA (7%), and 155 had a stroke mimic (24%). Overall, 58 non-cardiac incidental findings were found in 55 (8%; 95%CI, 6–11) patients. The most frequent incidental findings were consolidations or ground-glass densities (n = 17, 3%), liver cysts or non-specific hypodensities (n = 14, 2%), pulmonary nodules or masses (n = 9, 1%), and PEs (n = 8, 1%). Incidental findings led to a change of management in 17/55 (31%) patients of whom 13/55 (24%) had additional follow-up and 9/55 (16%) received treatment (anticoagulation n = 8, chemotherapy n = 1). Discussion & Conclusion Non-cardiac incidental findings were observed on cardiac CT in 8% of patients with a suspected stroke. These findings changed management in 31% of these patients.

Abstract Introduction Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is an effective treatment for basilar artery occlusion (BAO) stroke in select patients. While there is a growing body of literature suggesting that advanced imaging modalities such as computed tomography perfusion (CTP) and magnetic resonance (MR) may not be necessary for selecting anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke patients for EVT, whether advanced imaging may be superior to conventional imaging (non-contrast CT and CT angiography) in identifying good treatment candidates among BAO patients is less clear. Patients and methods This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study of BAO EVT patients treated from 2013 to 2022 in the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry. Patients selected for EVT by advanced imaging (CTP or MR) were matched with those selected by conventional imaging using propensity score matching (PSM) accounting for possible confounders. Primary outcome was functional independence at 90 days. Other outcomes include bedridden state or death at 90-days and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Results 268 patients were included. 150 patients were selected for BAO EVT by conventional imaging, 86 by CTP, and 32 by MR. Patients selected by advanced imaging were significantly older than those selected by conventional imaging (median age 71 vs 64 years, p = 0.001); patient characteristics were otherwise similar between cohorts. After PSM, 90-day outcomes were similar between the two cohorts (p = 0.56), with similar rates of functional independence (39.4% vs 35.1%, p = 0.65), bedridden state or death (40.4% vs 44.7%, p = 0.66), and sICH (3.3% vs 5.7%, p = 0.49) for conventional and advanced imaging groups, respectively. Results were similar across treatment time windows (all p > 0.05). Conclusions Selecting patients for basilar EVT using conventional versus advanced imaging did not result in different clinical outcomes, regardless of treatment time windows. Conventional imaging appears sufficient as a first-line tool for selecting basilar EVT patients in routine clinical practice.

ABSTRACT Skeletal muscle (SM) is an integral organ component in the pathophysiology of many acute and chronic diseases. But is there a ‘gold’ standard or accepted reference method for quantifying the amount and composition of human SM mass? Exploring that question led us to recognize the existence of a SM measurement paradigm that divides methods into two broad categories, in vitro and in vivo. In vitro methods quantify SM mass, weighing intact muscles as part of whole cadaver evaluations, only 51 of which are reported in medical literature with no recent additions. In vivo methods are used to evaluate SM in vivo, and two tiers were revealed in our analyses. An upper tier that included three methods considered ‘reference’ approaches for their accuracy and precision: computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry. A lower in vivo method tier included bioimpedance analysis, three‐dimensional imaging, several approaches involving creatine metabolism, ultrasound and anthropometry. A feature common to all of the lower tier methods is their need for calibration or validation against reference approaches in the upper in vivo method tier. A critical review of the three in vivo reference methods in the upper tier revealed widely variable SM volume/mass acquisition protocols, image analysis methods and applied terminology. Some reports espouse an upper tier reference method as the ‘gold’ standard while providing minimal details of exactly how and what was measured, thus making replication in follow‐up studies difficult. Any technical issues related to an in vivo reference method are propagated to the in vivo methods in the lower tier that are calibrated or validated against them. Our review of in vivo reference methods of quantifying SM mass and composition led us to two broad recommendations. First, published reports including these reference methods should provide enough details related to acquisition and analysis protocols so that readers can replicate their findings. Second, an effort should be made to apply precise terminology in published reports in order to avoid confusion on exactly what was measured; suggestions are made on definitions of commonly used terms when referring to body composition compartments. Lastly, because there is no consensus on what constitutes a ‘gold’ standard for SM measurement, we suggest expert groups convene in the future to recommend optimum approaches and working guidelines for quantifying muscle mass and composition in vivo.

Abstract Background Measurement of cardiac troponin (cTn) using high-sensitivity assays is recommended for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction. We determined sex-specific and uniform 99th percentile upper reference limits (URLs) using the new Elecsys® Troponin T high-sensitivity Gen 6 assay in a global, healthy reference range cohort. Methods Lithium-heparin plasma and serum samples were prospectively collected from apparently healthy individuals aged ≥20 years across 34 global sites in the United States, Europe, China, and Japan. cTnT was measured using the Troponin T high-sensitivity Gen 6 assay on the Cobas® e 801 analyzer. Exclusion criteria were defined according to the 2022 IFCC guidance. Uniform and sex-specific 99th percentile URLs and nonparametric 95% CIs were determined in plasma and serum separately and combined. Results The final study population comprised 4147 participants (52.5% female) with a median (25th–75th percentiles) age of 48.0 (33.0–59.0) years; 45.8%, 47.9%, 5.2%, and 1.1% were White, Asian, Black, and other/unknown, respectively. For sample matrices combined (n = 8294), 81.0% and 99.2% of cTnT values were above the limit of detection in females and males, respectively. Sex-specific 99th percentile URLs (95% CI) were 18 (16–23) ng/L for females and 32 (28–35) ng/L for males; the uniform 99th percentile URL was 27 (24–31) ng/L. URLs were comparable in plasma and serum samples. Conclusions This study determined sex-specific and uniform 99th percentile URLs for the Troponin T high-sensitivity Gen 6 assay that were comparable irrespective of the matrix used in a large, global, healthy reference population.