Bruining, David H.

INTRODUCTION: Computed tomography enterography (CTE) is a noninvasive cross-sectional imaging modality routinely used for diagnosis of Crohn's disease (CD) strictures. However, CTE is limited in individually defining the severity of inflammation, fibrosis, or smooth muscle hyperplasia/hypertrophy (SMH) within such strictures. We developed and internally validated a radiomics-based machine learning model for separately characterizing the degree of histopathological inflammation, fibrosis, and SMH in CD strictures and compared it with centrally read visual radiologist scoring of CTE. METHODS: This single-center, cross-sectional study included 100 patients with CD (n = 66 for discovery; n = 34 for validation) with terminal ileal strictures confirmed on diagnostic CTE within 15 weeks of intestinal resection. Histopathological specimens were scored for inflammation, fibrosis, and SMH and spatially linked with corresponding pre-surgical CTE sequences. Annotated stricture regions on CTE were scored visually by radiologists as well as underwent three-dimensional radiomics-based machine-learning analysis; both evaluated against histopathology scoring. RESULTS: Three distinct sets of radiomic features capturing textural heterogeneity within strictures were separately linked with severe inflammation, fibrosis, and SMH across both discovery (accuracy = 0.74, 0.71, 0.71, respectively) and validation (accuracy = 0.74, 0.68, 0.68, respectively) cohorts. Radiologist visual scoring was limited, with accuracy of 0.51 for identifying severe inflammation, 0.48 for severe fibrosis, and 0.58 for severe SMH. Augmenting radiologist scoring with radiomic features yielded improved performance in identifying severe inflammation, fibrosis, or SMH compared to radiologist scoring alone. DISCUSSION: Radiomic features of CD strictures on CTE can identify severe histopathological fibrosis, inflammation, and smooth muscle hyperplasia and perform better than radiologist visual scoring in stricture characterization.

Abstract Background & Aims Stricturing Crohn’s disease (CD) is a significant problem, and no selective anti-fibrotic therapies are available. Anti-inflammatory approaches are the mainstay of medical treatment. However, data on the efficacy of ustekinumab (USTE) in ileal stricturing CD are lacking. Our aim was to assess its efficacy in this setting. Methods We performed an international multicenter observational cohort study evaluating adult CD patients who received USTE within 6 months of imaging-confirmed symptomatic stricturing small bowel disease. Outcomes were rates of endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD), surgery, intervention (defined as the composite need for EBD or surgery), recurrent obstructive symptoms, and USTE persistence. Results Fifty-seven patients were included (51% female, median age 43 years). Median follow-up was 17 months. Intervention rates were 35%, 45%, and 69% of patients, at 12, 24, and 48 months, respectively. USTE persistence was 78%, 76%, and 52% at 12, 24, and 48 months. Estimated obstructive symptoms rates were 31% and 49% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. EBD within 6 months prior to starting USTE was associated with an increased risk of intervention. Increased bowel wall thickness on imaging, prior biologic use, and obstructive symptom duration were associated with USTE discontinuation. Occurrence of obstructive symptoms during treatment was associated with prior biologic use, EBD within 6 months of starting USTE, and a lower BMI. Conclusions USTE appears to be an appropriate medical option in biologic-experienced CD patients with ileal strictures. Further prospective data are needed to better define outcomes and predictors of response in this setting.

Abstract Background Colonic strictures in Crohn’s disease (CD) are an important, but understudied clinical problem. Cross-sectional imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and intestinal ultrasound (IUS) effectively assess the small bowel in CD allowing for the diagnosis of strictures. However, radiologic definitions of colonic strictures and their diagnostic accuracy have not been developed. Endoscopic definitions of colonic strictures are the most well-described. Aims We aimed to systematically review available data to summarize definitions, diagnosis and differentiation between inflammation and fibrosis of colonic strictures on endoscopy, CT, MR, and IUS Methods We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines using MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, and CENTRAL databases from inception to Oct 6, 2024 to identify literature with diagnostic imaging that included patients with colonic CD strictures. To distinguish fibrosis from inflammation, only studies comparing endoscopy or imaging to a full thickness histologic gold standard were included. Two stage screening was completed in duplicate, and risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2 Results 46 studies were eligible for inclusion. Definitions for colonic strictures on CT, MR, and IUS are heterogeneous with combinations of bowel wall thickness, luminal narrowing, and pre-stenotic dilation with no clear cut offs. Endoscopic definitions commonly included lack of colonoscope passage through a narrowed lumen. The diagnostic accuracy of colonic strictures on imaging to detect inflammation and fibrosis against a gold standard of endoscopy or surgical resection is unclear as direct comparisons are few. Meta-analyses were not conducted due to methodological heterogeneity of grading fibrosis and statistical heterogeneity of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of colonic stricture diagnoses limited by pooling with small bowel strictures in the studies Conclusions This systematic review describes a lack of definitions for the diagnosis of CD colonic strictures particularly on diagnostic imaging, and the limitations with the current available data to differentiate inflammation from fibrosis. Although bowel wall thickening, luminal narrowing, and pre-stenotic dilation are recognized as hallmark features of small bowel strictures, their adaptation to the colon requires further assessment. Definitions for colonic strictures should likely include imaging combined with endoscopy. Future endeavors are required to develop a consensus to define and diagnose colonic strictures on these modalities Funding Agencies None

Abstract Background Colonic strictures in Crohn’s disease (CD) present a complex and relatively underexplored clinical issue. Imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and intestinal ultrasound (IUS), have established criteria for evaluating small bowel CD strictures. However, radiologic definitions of benign colonic strictures and their diagnostic accuracy are not well-developed. Endoscopic definitions of colonic strictures are the most well-described. We conducted a systematic review to summarize definitions, diagnosis, and identification of inflammation and fibrosis of colonic strictures on endoscopy, CT, MR, and IUS. Methods A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines, from inception to October 6, 2024, was conducted using MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, and CENTRAL databases to identify literature on diagnostic imaging of patients with colonic CD strictures. Only studies with comparison to endoscopy or imaging to a full-thickness histologic gold standard to differentiate fibrosis from inflammation were included. Two stage screening was completed in duplicate, and risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2. Results 46 studies were eligible for inclusion of 4623 abstracts screened. Definitions of colonic strictures on CT, MR, and IUS were highly variable with combinations of bowel wall thickness, luminal narrowing, and pre-stenotic dilation. Endoscopic definitions of colonic strictures were the most consistently reported as lack of passage of a colonoscope through a narrowed lumen. Diagnostic imaging definitions used various combinations of increased bowel wall thickness, luminal narrowing, and pre-stenotic dilation with no clear cutoffs. Few studies directly compared imaging features with histologic or endoscopic gold standards, limiting evaluation of diagnostic accuracy. Meta-analyses were not conducted due to methodological heterogeneity of grading fibrosis across studies. In addition, statistical heterogeneity of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of colonic stricture diagnoses was limited by pooling with small bowel strictures in the studies. Conclusion This systematic review highlighted the absence of standardized definitions for diagnosing colonic Crohn’s disease strictures, particularly on diagnostic imaging, and the limited data distinguishing inflammatory from fibrotic components. Bowel wall thickening, luminal narrowing, and pre-stenotic dilation are key features of small bowel strictures, but their relevance to the colon requires further assessment. Establishing standardized definitions for colonic strictures that incorporate both endoscopic and imaging modalities is essential to advancing the field. Conflict of interest: Dr. Lu, Cathy: Advisory board - Abbvie, Johnson and Johnson, Takeda, Ferring, Merck, Celltrion, Lilly, Pfizer, Pendopharm, Agomab. Research Funding - Abbvie, Helmsley Charitable Trust, Alberta Innovates Dhaliwal, Ravdip: No conflict of interest Kellar, Amelia: No conflict of interest Rowan, Catherine: No conflict of interest St-Pierre, Joelle: Consultant for Pfizer, Abbvie, Eli Lilly and Pendopharm, and speaker for Takeda. Ernest-Suárez, Kenneth: Consulting/Advisory Board fees: Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Ferring, Sandoz, SatisfAI, Takeda O’Brien, Maureen: No conflict of interest Rosentreter, Ryan: No conflict of interest Gulhati, Vishrut: No conflict of interest Baker, Mark: No conflict of interest Bettenworth, Dominik: DB is on the advisory board or consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Arena, Atheneum, BNG Service GmbH, Bristol Myers Squibb, CED-Service GmbH, Celltrion, Doctorflix, DGVS, Diaplan, Else Kröner-Fresenius Foundation, Falk Foundation, Galapagos, Guidepoint, Impulze, Ferring, Janssen Cilag, Lilly, Medical Tribune, MedTriX, MSD, Mylan, Onkowissen, Pharmacosmos, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Takeda, Tetrameros, Thieme, Tillotts Pharma, UCB Biopiharma, Viatris and Vifor Pharma. Bruining, David: Advisory board fees from Janssen Bari, Dane: Grant from Helmsley Charitable Trust speaker honorarium from Siemens Healthineers support for attending meetings or travel from Siemens Healthineers member of the Olympus advisory board co-chair Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) Inflammatory Bowel Disease Disease Focused Panel (IBD DFP) and SAR Photon-Counting Detector CT Emerging Technology Commission and chair of the Society for Advanced Body Imaging Scientific Committee. Dillman, Jonathan: Grants from Philips Healthcare, GE HealthCare, Motilent, Perspectum, Guerbet, and Bracco. El Ouali, Sara: Speaker and/or consulting fees from Takeda, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Abbvie. Fletcher, John: Grant supports from Siemens Healthineers Gordon, Ilyssa: Grants to institution from Morphic Therapeutics, Alimentiv, Pliant Therapeutics, and UCB patent pending with Case Western Reserve University on radiomics signatures Jairath, Vipul: Consulting Fees: Abbvie, Alimentiv, Amgen, Anaptys Bio, Asahi Kasei, Asieris, Astra Zeneca, Attovia, Blackbird Labs, BMS, Boehringer Ingleheim, Biomebank, Caldera, Calluna, Catalytic Health, Celltrion, Ensho, Enthera, Exeliome Biosciences, Ferring, Fresenius Kabi, Gilead, Granite Bio, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Mountainfield, MRM Health, Nxera, Organon, OSE Immunotherapeutics, Pendopharm, Pioneering Medicine, Pfizer, Prometheus, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, SCOPE, Shattuck Labs, Sorriso, Spyre, Synedgen, Takeda, Teva, Tillotts, Union Therapeutics, Ventus, Ventyx, Vividion, Xencor, Zealand Pharma. Feagan, Brian Gordon: Consulting Fees: AbbVie, Abivax, Adaxion, Adiso, AgomAB Therapeutics, Akros, Alira Health, Ally Bridge Group, Apini Therapeutics, Argenx, Attovia Tx, Avoro Capital Advisors, Belmore Law, Biora Therapeutics, Blackbird Laboratories, Boehringer-Ingelheim, BMS, Boxer Capital, Celgene/BMS, Clarivate, Connect Biopharm, EcoR1, Eli Lilly, Ensho Therapeutics, Equillium, Evida, Enveda, Evommune Inc. Faes Farma, First Wave, Forbion, Galapagos, Genentech/Roche, General Atlantic, Genesis Therapeutics, Gerson Lehrman Group, Gilead, Guidepoint, Imhotex, ImiDomics, Immunic Therapeutics, Janssen, Japan Tobacco Inc., LifeMine Therapeutics, Mage Biologics, Merck, Mirador Therapeutics, Mobius Care, Monte Rosa Tx, Morphic Therapeutics, Nimbus Therapeutics, Novartis, Nxera, OncoC3, Palisade Bio, Pendopharm, Pfizer,Q32 Bio, REDX, Roche, Sanofi, Sobi, Sorriso, Spyre Therapeutics, Sun Pharma, Surrozen Inc., Synedgen, Takeda, Tegus Inc., Teva, Tillotts, Trex Bio, TR1X Inc. TVM Lifesciences, Ventyx Biosciences, Versant Ventures, Vida Ventures, Ysios Capital, Zagbio Stock Shareholder: Connect Biopharm, EnGene, Evida, SRT, Imidomics, Enveda Rieder, Florian: Personal Fees: Adiso, Adnovate, Agomab, Allergan, AbbVie, Arena, Astra Zeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene/BMS, Celltrion, CDISC, Celsius, Cowen, Ferring, Galapagos, Galmed, Genentech, Gilead, Gossamer, Granite, Guidepoint, Helmsley, Horizon Therapeutics, Image Analysis Limited, Index Pharma, Landos, Jannsen, Koutif, Mestag, Metacrine, Mopac, Morphic, Organovo, Origo, Palisade, Pfizer, Pliant, Prometheus Biosciences, Receptos, RedX, Roche, Samsung, Sanofi, Surmodics, Surrozen, Takeda, Techlab, Teva, Theravance, Thetis, UCB, Ysios, 89Bio

ABSTRACT Background Given the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' coverage of screening CT colonography (CTC) beginning in January 2025, we evaluated the cost‐effectiveness of CTC for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening by race (Black and White) and gender, considering real‐world screening adherence. Methods A microsimulation model compared CRC screening strategies in average‐risk adults by race and gender, incorporating 2010–2019 U.S. data on disease progression and real‐world screening adherence for colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical test (FIT). Five strategies were compared: (1) status quo (choice between colonoscopy and FIT); (2) CTC every 5 years; (3) colonoscopy every 10 years; (4) annual FIT; and (5) multitarget stool DNA test every 3 years, plus no screening. Lifetime costs, quality‐adjusted life years gained (QALYG), and incremental cost‐effectiveness ratios were projected. A willingness‐to‐pay threshold of $100,000/QALYG was used. Results Under the status quo, Black adults showed higher CRC cases and greater utilization for FIT over colonoscopy than White adults. Compared to the status quo, the CTC strategy yielded more QALYG and fewer CRC cases among Black adults, but fewer QALYG and more CRC cases among White adults. Both status quo and CTC strategies outperformed other strategies across races. The CTC strategy was the dominant strategy for Black adults. For White adults, the status quo was cost‐effective with incremental cost‐effectiveness ratios of $34,998–$73,428/QALYG, while the CTC strategy was cost saving compared to no screening. Conclusions CTC could be cost‐effective for CRC screening in Black adults under real‐world screening adherence, supporting Medicare coverage to address specific population needs and structural barriers to screening.

ABSTRACT Objectives Patients requiring long‐term enteral nutrition or continuous infusion of carbidopa/levodopa can benefit from jejunostomy tube placement. Recently, directly placed percutaneous transgastric jejunal tubes (TGJs) have been used instead of gastrostomy tubes with jejunal extensions (PEG‐Js) for enteral access. We aim to compare patient characteristics and outcomes after placement of TGJs placed via the introducer technique compared to PEG‐Js. Methods We performed a retrospective study of 141 patients (TGJ = 58, PEG‐J = 83) assessed at Mayo Clinic between 2010 and 2024. Patients were identified using a prospectively maintained procedure data registry. Demographic data, patient characteristics, procedural indications, complications, and first‐replacement date were gathered. Statistical analysis included the Wilcoxon rank sum test, chi‐square test, Fisher's exact test, and Kaplan‐Meier estimates. Patients receiving carbidopa/levodopa were excluded from complications analysis due to the carbidopa/levodopa tube's proprietary structure. A p ‐value of <0.05 was set as a threshold for significance. Results Our results demonstrated no difference in cumulative incidence of complications within 1 year for TGJs and PEG‐Js, p ‐value 0.48. Regarding time to first replacement, treating death as a competing risk factor, there was no statistically significant difference in cumulative incidence of replacement within 1 year for TGJs and PEG‐Js, p ‐value 0.389. Conclusions Our study demonstrates that both direct TGJs and PEG‐Js are safe options for long‐term jejunal feeding. More studies are needed to compare endoscopic to radiologically placed percutaneous transgastric jejunal feeding tubes.

Abstract Background and Aims Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is increasingly used to monitor treatment efficacy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) trials. However, standardized definitions for response, remission, and optimal assessment timing remain undefined. An international expert consensus meeting was held to establish IUS endpoints for clinical trials. Methods A panel of 35 international gastroenterologists and radiologists participated in a modified Delphi process, reviewing the literature and developing consensus statements. Agreement was defined as at least 75% consensus. Results Consensus was reached on 150 statements across four domains: general IBD (30 statements), luminal Crohn’s disease (CD) (43), perianal CD (51), and ulcerative colitis (UC) (26). For luminal CD and UC, ultrasound response was defined by: (1) a ≥25% reduction in bowel wall thickness (BWT) from baseline, or (2) multifactorial improvement, combining BWT reduction with ≥1 grade decrease in color Doppler signal (CDS) or another IUS parameter. Assessments were set at weeks 4-8 for the colon and week 12 for the terminal ileum. Ultrasound remission in luminal CD was defined as: (1) BWT normalization (≤3 mm) or (2) normalization of multiple parameters, including BWT, CDS, and all other IUS parameters. Similar remission criteria were proposed for UC, but the sigmoid BWT normal range (3-4 mm) remained uncertain. The bowel ultrasound score (BUSS) for CD and the Milan ultrasound criteria (MUC) for UC were supported as standardized scoring systems for trials. Conclusion This consensus provides standardized IUS definitions to enhance consistency in IBD trials, supporting the integration of IUS in future research.

This consensus by the Society of Abdominal Radiology Inflammatory Bowel Disease Disease Focused Panel provides an updated imaging-based definition of small bowel Crohn disease stricture for CT and MR enterography.

Abstract Introduction The objective of the study was to investigate the characteristics of patients who underwent surgery for dysplasia detected during chromoendoscopy (CE) surveillance for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and the incidence of cancer in the surgical specimen. Methods A retrospective review of medical records of all patients with dysplasia on a background of underlying IBD diagnosed through CE was carried out at a tri-site enterprise tertiary referral center between 2006 and 2019. We aimed to assess the clinical characteristics of patients requiring surgery for dysplasia and the incidence of cancer in the surgical specimen. Results Out of 219 patients with dysplasia on CE, 35 underwent surgery for dysplasia (16%). Indications for surgery were multifocal disease (n = 6), endoscopically unresectable lesions (n = 13), visible HGD (n = 7) and unifocal invisible LGD (n = 9). Out of 35 patients requiring surgery, 5 were found to have adenocarcinoma, one of whom with stage IIIB disease received postoperative chemotherapy. No patient with a pathologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma had any evidence of recurrent disease after a mean postoperative follow-up of 32 months. Conclusions While the incidence of cancer at the time of surgery for IBD-related dysplasia is not negligible, the rate of node-positive disease is low.