Christensen, Eric

ABSTRACT Background Given the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' coverage of screening CT colonography (CTC) beginning in January 2025, we evaluated the cost‐effectiveness of CTC for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening by race (Black and White) and gender, considering real‐world screening adherence. Methods A microsimulation model compared CRC screening strategies in average‐risk adults by race and gender, incorporating 2010–2019 U.S. data on disease progression and real‐world screening adherence for colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical test (FIT). Five strategies were compared: (1) status quo (choice between colonoscopy and FIT); (2) CTC every 5 years; (3) colonoscopy every 10 years; (4) annual FIT; and (5) multitarget stool DNA test every 3 years, plus no screening. Lifetime costs, quality‐adjusted life years gained (QALYG), and incremental cost‐effectiveness ratios were projected. A willingness‐to‐pay threshold of $100,000/QALYG was used. Results Under the status quo, Black adults showed higher CRC cases and greater utilization for FIT over colonoscopy than White adults. Compared to the status quo, the CTC strategy yielded more QALYG and fewer CRC cases among Black adults, but fewer QALYG and more CRC cases among White adults. Both status quo and CTC strategies outperformed other strategies across races. The CTC strategy was the dominant strategy for Black adults. For White adults, the status quo was cost‐effective with incremental cost‐effectiveness ratios of $34,998–$73,428/QALYG, while the CTC strategy was cost saving compared to no screening. Conclusions CTC could be cost‐effective for CRC screening in Black adults under real‐world screening adherence, supporting Medicare coverage to address specific population needs and structural barriers to screening.

BACKGROUND: An increasing proportion of pediatric hospital days are attributed to technology-dependent children. The impact that a pediatric home care nursing (HCN) shortage has on increasing length of hospital stay and readmissions in this population is not well documented. METHODS: We conducted a 12-month multisite prospective study of children with medical complexity discharging with home health. We studied the following 2 cohorts: new patients discharging for the first time to home nursing and existing patients discharging from the hospital to previously established home nursing. A modified delay tool was used to categorize causes, delayed discharge (DD) days, and unplanned 90-day readmissions. RESULTS: DD occurred in 68.5% of 54 new patients and 9.2% of 131 existing patients. Lack of HCN was the most frequent cause of DD, increasing costs and directly accounting for an average length of stay increase of 53.9 days (range: 4–204) and 35.7 days (3–63) for new and existing patients, respectively. Of 1582 DDs, 1454 (91.9%) were directly attributed to lack of HCN availability. DD was associated with younger age and tracheostomy. Unplanned 90-day readmissions were due to medical setbacks (96.7% of cases) and occurred in 53.7% and 45.0% of new and existing patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: DD and related costs are primarily associated with shortage of HCN and predominantly affect patients new to HCN. Medical setbacks are the most common causes of unplanned 90-day readmissions. Increasing the availability of home care nurses or postacute care facilities could reduce costly hospital length of stay.