Fidler, Jeff L.

Due to increasingly nuanced Crohn disease therapy selection and disease evaluation, radiologic assessment of transmural healing, although aspirational, may be more complete than endoscopic assessment of mucosal healing, which is the current treatment target.

Abstract Background The evaluation of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is frequently negative despite a prolonged workup involving several different radiologic and endoscopic tests. Ferumoxytol, a superparamagnetic iron oxide agent used for treatment of iron deficiency anemia, can be used off-label as a blood pool contrast agent at MRI. Purpose To perform a proof-of-concept study to determine if ferumoxytol-enhanced MRI (FeMRI) can be performed to assist in detecting the presence and location of GI bleeding in patients who have undergone a negative standard evaluation. Methods A retrospective convenience cohort of patients examined with FeMRI at a single center over a 2-year period was evaluated. Inclusion criteria included clinical suspicion for slow or intermittent, active GI bleeding not localized following conventional testing. Exclusion criteria included any allergy to ferumoxytol or iron-containing agents, additional MRI scans scheduled within the following 72 hours, current pregnancy or breastfeeding, history of medication-related hypotensive episodes not related to an acute illness, syncopal events, arrhythmia, or low resting blood pressure. The patient’s clinical characteristics, examination results, and outcome during their hospital stay were examined. Results Five males and 1 female with average age of 66 years (range, 37-79 years) were imaged with FeMRI. All had undergone full diagnostic evaluation of the GI tract including upper and lower endoscopy and small bowel evaluation with imaging and/or endoscopic testing; in all patients, repeated rounds of testing were performed. Diagnostic images were obtained in all patients who underwent FeMRI. In 4/6 (67%) patients, FeMRI demonstrated active bleeding in the small bowel (n = 3) and colon (n = 1). Conclusion FeMRI was able to demonstrate the presence and location of active GI bleeding in hospitalized patients with previous extensive negative evaluation. FeMRI should be further evaluated to determine its performance characteristics as an examination in evaluating patients with GI bleeding.

This consensus by the Society of Abdominal Radiology Inflammatory Bowel Disease Disease Focused Panel provides an updated imaging-based definition of small bowel Crohn disease stricture for CT and MR enterography.

Alcohol use disorder is linked to a multitude of diseases and disorders, many of which can be diagnosed with imaging techniques such as US, CT, and MRI, enabling early detection and potentially preventing further damage and improving outcomes.

Radiologists are integral members of the interdisciplinary team for patients with mucinous appendiceal neoplasms and can directly affect care by suggesting the diagnosis of pseudomyxoma peritonei, optimizing imaging protocols for evaluating peritoneal implants, and reporting the primary tumor and spilled tumor cells thoroughly.

Abstract Objectives: Radiologist participation in multidisciplinary tumor board can be time-consuming and demanding, requiring substantial preparation. Anecdotally radiologist participation is felt to help identify discrepancies in previous interpretations; however, there are limited data assessing the actual impact of their tumor board review on patient management. This prospective study aims to evaluate how the reinterpretation of outside imaging and review at hepatobiliary tumor board (HBTB) affects the diagnosis and management of patients with hepatobiliary neoplasms. Methods: This prospective analysis included all patients presented at the weekly HBTB between 6/13/2023 - 6/25/2024. One radiologist reviewed the available reports of outside imaging, the local reinterpretation of outside imaging, the updated local imaging, and documented conclusions from discussion of the case at HBTB. HBTB included 4 radiologists who had reviewed each case. Discrepancies (presence/absence, number, and reasons for) were recorded. When discrepancies occurred, the impact on patient management (5-point Likert scale) was determined by two of the radiologists present at the HBTB in consensus, with input from clinicians if needed. A six-month follow-up was performed to confirm suspected diagnoses. Results: 208 cases (128 males, 104 chronic liver disease patients) were presented at HBTB. Disagreements in the detection or characterization of lesions were found in 59/208 (28.4%) of cases. A change in management occurred in 38/59 (64.6%) of these discrepant cases. In cases with recorded discrepancies in which follow-up confirmation was available, the final interpretation was confirmed in 34/41 (82.9%) of cases. Conclusion: Our study found a discrepant interpretation in nearly one-third of cases presented at a weekly HBTB and a resultant change in management in 65% of those cases. These findings highlight the importance of reinterpretation of prior imaging studies and the presence of radiologists at HBTB to guide optimal patient management.

Encompassing a broad spectrum of abnormalities from diffuse liver disorders to focal liver lesions, hypointense findings on hepatobiliary phase MR images offer valuable diagnostic information, provide insight on the functional status of the liver, and aid in characterization of other imaging features.

Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is the most common GI diagnosis leading to hospitalization within the United States. Prompt diagnosis and treatment of GI bleeding is critical to improving patient outcomes and reducing high healthcare utilization and costs. Radiologic techniques including computed tomography angiography, catheter angiography, computed tomography enterography, magnetic resonance enterography, nuclear medicine red blood cell scan, and technetium-99m pertechnetate scintigraphy (Meckel scan) are frequently used to evaluate patients with GI bleeding and are complementary to GI endoscopy. However, multiple management guidelines exist which differ in the recommended utilization of these radiologic examinations. This variability can lead to confusion as to how these tests should be used in the evaluation of GI bleeding. In this document, a panel of experts from the American College of Gastroenterology and Society of Abdominal Radiology provide a review of the radiologic examinations used to evaluate for GI bleeding including nomenclature, technique, performance, advantages, and limitations. A comparison of advantages and limitations relative to endoscopic examinations is also included. Finally, consensus statements and recommendations on technical parameters and utilization of radiologic techniques for GI bleeding are provided.