Wells, Michael

Abstract Background The evaluation of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is frequently negative despite a prolonged workup involving several different radiologic and endoscopic tests. Ferumoxytol, a superparamagnetic iron oxide agent used for treatment of iron deficiency anemia, can be used off-label as a blood pool contrast agent at MRI. Purpose To perform a proof-of-concept study to determine if ferumoxytol-enhanced MRI (FeMRI) can be performed to assist in detecting the presence and location of GI bleeding in patients who have undergone a negative standard evaluation. Methods A retrospective convenience cohort of patients examined with FeMRI at a single center over a 2-year period was evaluated. Inclusion criteria included clinical suspicion for slow or intermittent, active GI bleeding not localized following conventional testing. Exclusion criteria included any allergy to ferumoxytol or iron-containing agents, additional MRI scans scheduled within the following 72 hours, current pregnancy or breastfeeding, history of medication-related hypotensive episodes not related to an acute illness, syncopal events, arrhythmia, or low resting blood pressure. The patient’s clinical characteristics, examination results, and outcome during their hospital stay were examined. Results Five males and 1 female with average age of 66 years (range, 37-79 years) were imaged with FeMRI. All had undergone full diagnostic evaluation of the GI tract including upper and lower endoscopy and small bowel evaluation with imaging and/or endoscopic testing; in all patients, repeated rounds of testing were performed. Diagnostic images were obtained in all patients who underwent FeMRI. In 4/6 (67%) patients, FeMRI demonstrated active bleeding in the small bowel (n = 3) and colon (n = 1). Conclusion FeMRI was able to demonstrate the presence and location of active GI bleeding in hospitalized patients with previous extensive negative evaluation. FeMRI should be further evaluated to determine its performance characteristics as an examination in evaluating patients with GI bleeding.

ABSTRACT Background Functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) utility is established in treatment‐naïve achalasia but less clear following lower esophageal sphincter (LES) directed therapy. Methods Achalasia patients with LES directed therapy across three tertiary care centers between 2017 and 2024 with post‐treatment FLIP and timed barium esophagram (TBE) were retrospectively identified. Reduced esophagogastric junction (EGJ) opening was defined by distensibility index (DI) < 2 mm 2 /mmHg and diameter < 12 mm. Abnormal emptying on TBE was defined as column height ≥ 5 cm at 5 min and/or retained tablet. Eckardt scores ≤ 3 defined clinical response. Key Results The study included 222 patients (46% peroral endoscopic myotomy, 46% laparoscopic Heller myotomy, 8% pneumatic dilation) with a median of 1.4 years to post‐treatment TBE/FLIP. Abnormal emptying on TBE was associated with a narrower median EGJ diameter (13.2 vs. 14.8 mm, p = 0.008), a greater frequency of EGJ diameter < 12 mm (36% vs. 21%, p = 0.012), and a smaller change in EGJ diameter (+4.6 vs. +8.6 mm, p = 0.002). Abnormal emptying on TBE occurred more frequently in patients with EGJ DI < 2 mm 2 /mmHg (8.5% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.052), but was not associated with median EGJ DI (4.5 vs. 5.1 mm 2 /mmHg, p = 0.29) nor median change in EGJ DI (+2.9 vs. +3.9 mm 2 /mmHg, p = 0.25). Patients with reduced EGJ DI or EGJ diameter more often had abnormal TBE (37% vs. 22%, p = 0.012). Only the change in DI (+3.8 vs. +1.5 mm 2 /mmHg, p = 0.012) and diameter (+8.2 vs. +1.6 mm, p = 0.002) on FLIP was associated with a clinical response based on Eckardt ≤ 3. Conclusions and Inferences FLIP following achalasia therapy generally correlates with TBE, although discrepant findings are not uncommon. In particular, FLIP EGJ‐diameter has a strong association with esophageal emptying on TBE. Both TBE and FLIP have limited association with clinical response based on Eckardt, with change in DI and diameter on FLIP most strongly associated. Consequently, FLIP as part of multimodal assessment appears useful in the longitudinal follow‐up of treated achalasia.

Abstract Objectives: Radiologist participation in multidisciplinary tumor board can be time-consuming and demanding, requiring substantial preparation. Anecdotally radiologist participation is felt to help identify discrepancies in previous interpretations; however, there are limited data assessing the actual impact of their tumor board review on patient management. This prospective study aims to evaluate how the reinterpretation of outside imaging and review at hepatobiliary tumor board (HBTB) affects the diagnosis and management of patients with hepatobiliary neoplasms. Methods: This prospective analysis included all patients presented at the weekly HBTB between 6/13/2023 - 6/25/2024. One radiologist reviewed the available reports of outside imaging, the local reinterpretation of outside imaging, the updated local imaging, and documented conclusions from discussion of the case at HBTB. HBTB included 4 radiologists who had reviewed each case. Discrepancies (presence/absence, number, and reasons for) were recorded. When discrepancies occurred, the impact on patient management (5-point Likert scale) was determined by two of the radiologists present at the HBTB in consensus, with input from clinicians if needed. A six-month follow-up was performed to confirm suspected diagnoses. Results: 208 cases (128 males, 104 chronic liver disease patients) were presented at HBTB. Disagreements in the detection or characterization of lesions were found in 59/208 (28.4%) of cases. A change in management occurred in 38/59 (64.6%) of these discrepant cases. In cases with recorded discrepancies in which follow-up confirmation was available, the final interpretation was confirmed in 34/41 (82.9%) of cases. Conclusion: Our study found a discrepant interpretation in nearly one-third of cases presented at a weekly HBTB and a resultant change in management in 65% of those cases. These findings highlight the importance of reinterpretation of prior imaging studies and the presence of radiologists at HBTB to guide optimal patient management.

Encompassing a broad spectrum of abnormalities from diffuse liver disorders to focal liver lesions, hypointense findings on hepatobiliary phase MR images offer valuable diagnostic information, provide insight on the functional status of the liver, and aid in characterization of other imaging features.

Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is the most common GI diagnosis leading to hospitalization within the United States. Prompt diagnosis and treatment of GI bleeding is critical to improving patient outcomes and reducing high healthcare utilization and costs. Radiologic techniques including computed tomography angiography, catheter angiography, computed tomography enterography, magnetic resonance enterography, nuclear medicine red blood cell scan, and technetium-99m pertechnetate scintigraphy (Meckel scan) are frequently used to evaluate patients with GI bleeding and are complementary to GI endoscopy. However, multiple management guidelines exist which differ in the recommended utilization of these radiologic examinations. This variability can lead to confusion as to how these tests should be used in the evaluation of GI bleeding. In this document, a panel of experts from the American College of Gastroenterology and Society of Abdominal Radiology provide a review of the radiologic examinations used to evaluate for GI bleeding including nomenclature, technique, performance, advantages, and limitations. A comparison of advantages and limitations relative to endoscopic examinations is also included. Finally, consensus statements and recommendations on technical parameters and utilization of radiologic techniques for GI bleeding are provided.

Abstract The Fontan procedure is the definitive treatment for patients with single-ventricle physiology. Surgical advances have led to a growing number of patients surviving into adulthood. Fontan-associated liver disease (FALD) encompasses a spectrum of pathologic liver changes that occur secondary to altered physiology including congestion, fibrosis, and the development of liver masses. Assessment of FALD is difficult and relies on using imaging alongside of clinical, laboratory, and pathology information. Ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging are capable of demonstrating physiologic and hepatic parenchymal abnormalities commonly seen in FALD. Several novel imaging techniques including magnetic resonance elastography are under study for use as biomarkers for FALD progression. Imaging has a central role in detection and characterization of liver masses as benign or malignant. Benign FNH-like masses are commonly encountered; however, these can display atypical features and be mistaken for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Fontan patients are at elevated risk for HCC, which is a feared complication and has a poor prognosis in this population. While imaging screening for HCC is widely advocated, no consensus has been reached regarding an optimal surveillance regimen.