Weisbrod, Adam J.

Abstract Objectives: Radiologist participation in multidisciplinary tumor board can be time-consuming and demanding, requiring substantial preparation. Anecdotally radiologist participation is felt to help identify discrepancies in previous interpretations; however, there are limited data assessing the actual impact of their tumor board review on patient management. This prospective study aims to evaluate how the reinterpretation of outside imaging and review at hepatobiliary tumor board (HBTB) affects the diagnosis and management of patients with hepatobiliary neoplasms. Methods: This prospective analysis included all patients presented at the weekly HBTB between 6/13/2023 - 6/25/2024. One radiologist reviewed the available reports of outside imaging, the local reinterpretation of outside imaging, the updated local imaging, and documented conclusions from discussion of the case at HBTB. HBTB included 4 radiologists who had reviewed each case. Discrepancies (presence/absence, number, and reasons for) were recorded. When discrepancies occurred, the impact on patient management (5-point Likert scale) was determined by two of the radiologists present at the HBTB in consensus, with input from clinicians if needed. A six-month follow-up was performed to confirm suspected diagnoses. Results: 208 cases (128 males, 104 chronic liver disease patients) were presented at HBTB. Disagreements in the detection or characterization of lesions were found in 59/208 (28.4%) of cases. A change in management occurred in 38/59 (64.6%) of these discrepant cases. In cases with recorded discrepancies in which follow-up confirmation was available, the final interpretation was confirmed in 34/41 (82.9%) of cases. Conclusion: Our study found a discrepant interpretation in nearly one-third of cases presented at a weekly HBTB and a resultant change in management in 65% of those cases. These findings highlight the importance of reinterpretation of prior imaging studies and the presence of radiologists at HBTB to guide optimal patient management.

Abstract Oncologic viruses (OV) can induce tumor death through both direct oncolysis and immune-mediated destruction. Our study investigates the use of a novel OV with a Vesicular Stomatitis Virus (VSV) vector modified to express interferon-beta (IFN-b) and Tyrosinase Related Protein 1 (TYRP1) (VSV-IFNb-TYRP1). VSV is an attractive vector since humans are not naturally infected with VSV; thus, pre-existing immunity is minimal. IFN-b leads to increased T-cell responses and tumor cell apoptosis, while TYRP1, a melanocyte differentiation antigen, increases immunogenicity of the therapy. We conducted a Phase 1 clinical trial with a 3+3 design in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma. VSV-IFNb-TYRP1 was injected into a liver metastasis under image guidance, then administered on the same day as a single intravenous (IV) infusion. IV doses started at dose level (DL) 1 1 × 1010 TCID50, then escalated to DL2 3 × 10 10, DL3 1 × 1011, and DL4 3 × 1011. The dose delivered intratumorally (IT) varied based on the IV dose. The primary endpoints were safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Efficacy was a secondary endpoint. Correlative studies focused on understanding viral pharmacokinetics (PK) and immunological responses induced by VSV-IFNb-TYRP1 therapy. Twelve patients with previously treated metastatic uveal melanoma were enrolled. Median follow up was 19.1 months. Four DLs were evaluated with one patient at DL4 experiencing dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), including decreased platelet count (grade 3), increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Non-DLTs at DL4 were fatigue, fever, CRS, hematological toxicities (decreased platelets and lymphocytes), and AST elevation. Four patients had stable disease (SD) and 8 had progressive disease (PD) as their best response. ELIspot data show that three of the four patients with response to TYRP1 also had a response to gp100, suggesting possible epitope spreading. These four patients received immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment as the next line of therapy, which led to clinical benefit for two patients. Our study evaluated VSV-IFNb-TYRP1 administered via IT and IV routes in a previously treated population of metastatic uveal melanoma patients and found no major safety events. Although there were no clear objective responses to VSV-IFNb-TYRP1, dose-dependent immunogenicity to melanoma antigens was seen. While OV response alone is not sufficient for clinical benefit, the evidence of epitope spreading is encouraging. Future studies of VSV-IFNb-TYRP1 will evaluate combinations with other therapies. Citation Format: Katherine E. Smith, Adam Weisbrod, Carrie Strand, Jacob Allerd, Jose S. Pulido, Alysha Newsom, Lianwen Zhang, Nandakumar Packiriswamy, Heather Montane, Lisa Kottschade, Anastasios Dimou, Yiyi Yan, Markovic Svetomir, Kah Whye Peng, Richard G. Vile, Matthew S. Block, Roxana S. Dronca. Phase I trial of vesicular stomatitis virus expressing human interferon beta and tyrosinase related protein 1 (VSV-IFNb-TYRP1) in metastatic ocular melanoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT207.

Abstract Introduction: Immune suppression is a major component of lymphoma pathogenesis. Recent advances in lymphoma treatment have been immunotherapy. We present the preliminary results of our clinical trial testing 2 vaccine strategies in patients with indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The primary objective is to determine the safety and feasibility of the vaccine approaches and secondary objectives are to describe clinical responses and identify corresponding immune changes. Methods: Autologous mature dendritic cells (mDC) were manufactured from leukapheresed cells of NHL pts. For patients with tumor lymph nodes deemed amenable to cryoablation by interventional radiologist (arm A), they received cryoablation of a node and injection of mDC into the cryoablated node followed by another 1 to 7 intratumoral mDC injections. Remaining patients had a tumor excised to generate tumor lysate ex vivo. mDC were pulsed with tumor lysate during DC maturation (arm B; DC-TL). The DC-TL vaccines were injected intradermally for 4 to 8 doses. Patients are monitored for one year after vaccines for adverse events and systemic tumor response. Correlative studies include cellular immune phenotype of peripheral blood and T cell intracellular cytokine productions. Planned accrual is 10 patients per arm (total = 20). Results: To date, 10 patients have accrued to arm A and 5 patients to arm B (Table 1). All pts tolerated vaccine treatments without major adverse events. Of the 10 evaluable patients, there were 1 CR (arm B: 1 / 4; total: 1/6) and 4 PR (arm A: 3/6; arm B: 1 / 4; total: 4/10) for an ORR of 50% for both arms (Figure 1). Time to next treatment ranged from 6.5 to 25 months (Figure 2). Correlative studies suggest that immune changes can be used as prognostic biomarkers to predict response. These include changes in vaccine induced cytokine secretion, and in the number and composition of the immune system. In addition, preliminary analysis of >40 immune phenotypes using flow cytometry and hierarchical clustering suggest there are characteristic immune system responses in patients responding to vaccine. Conclusions: Both cryoablation and intratumoral mDC vaccination are feasible and safe in NHL. Treatment responses may correlate with immune system changes. Biosystems analysis method can be used to develop novel assays as predictive biomarkers of treatment response and used to develop novel protocols that allow treating to response. Table 1. Patient Demographics Arm A (n = 10) Arm B (n = 5) Total (n = 15) Age (median, rage) 64 (55 – 80) 60 (31 – 86) 63 (31 – 86) Gender (M/F) 6/4 2/3 8/7 Histology (n, %) Follicular Marginal zone DLBCL 10 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (60%) 1 (20%) 1(20%) 13 (86.6%) 1 (6.7%) 1 (6.7%) Stage (N, %) II III IV 1 (10%) 1 (10%) 8 (80%) 2 (40%) 1 (20%) 2 (40%) 3 (20%) 2 (13.3%) 10 (66.7%) No of prior Tx (mean, range) 2.4 (0-8) 3.2 (0-7) 2.7 (0-8) FLIPI (n, %) 0-1 2 ≥ 3 1 (10%) 2 (20%) 7 (70%) 1 (20%) 2 (40%) 2 (45%) 2 (13.3%) 4 (26.7%) 9 (60%) Positive GELF criteria (n, %) 4 (40%) 1 (20%) 5 (30%) Figure 1. Waterfall plot. Figure 1. Waterfall plot. Figure 2. Time to next treatment. Figure 2. Time to next treatment. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Objectives To compare renal functional changes after percutaneous cryoablation ( PCA ) or partial nephrectomy ( PN ). Patients and Methods Patients who underwent PCA or PN for a solitary renal mass at a single institution were identified (2003–2013). Estimated glomerular filtration rates ( eGFR s) were calculated at baseline, discharge, and at the 3‐month follow‐up using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation. Changes in renal function were compared between groups using 1:1 propensity score ( PS ) matching, adjustment for PS quintile, and inverse probability weighting ( IPW ). Results There were 2 040 procedures available for the PS analyses, including 448 PCA and 1 592 PN . After PS adjustments, there were no significant differences in baseline clinical features between PCA and PN patients. In the PS ‐matched analysis, the change in eGFR from baseline to discharge for PCA and PN patients was −3.1 and −1.1 mL /min/1.73 m 2 , respectively ( P = 0.038), with percentage changes of −4.5% and 0% respectively ( P = 0.006). From baseline to the 3‐month follow‐up, the absolute change in eGFR for PCA and PN patients was −4.3 and −2.1 mL /min/1.73 m 2 , respectively ( P = 0.008), and the percentage change was −6.1% and −2.4% respectively ( P = 0.005). Similar results were obtained after adjusting for PS quintiles and in the IPW analysis. Importantly, the rate of chronic kidney disease stage progression at the 3‐month follow‐up was similar between the groups (21% vs 18%). Conclusions Our results confirm that both PCA and PN have a minor impact on renal function. While we observed a statistically greater decline in eGFR after PCA compared with PN , both approaches result in excellent preservation of renal function.