Montane, Heather

Abstract Immune related adverse events (irAEs) from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are well documented for nearly every organ system, except for the reproductive system. Mouse models have demonstrated that ICIs can decrease ovarian follicular reserve and impair oocyte maturation, which may have implications for fertility (PMID: 36008687). There are no studies investigating the effect of ICIs on fertility in humans. We sought to evaluate ovarian function in women treated with ICIs compared to untreated women by evaluating non-invasive surrogate markers of ovarian reserve, anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle counts (AFC). We enrolled women 18 - 40 years old diagnosed with stage III or IV melanoma. Participants underwent phlebotomy for AMH levels and a pelvic ultrasound to assess AFC. The medical record was retrospectively reviewed to obtain data on patient characteristics, treatments, and outcomes. A total of 14 patients with stage IIIA - IV melanoma participated. Six patients received ICI treatment before AMH and AFC testing while 8 had no prior ICI exposure. The ICI group ages ranged from 22-40 years with a median age of 31 years. The untreated group ages ranged from 25-39 years with a median age of 32 years. The time between starting an ICI and enrolling in the study ranged from 28 - 351 days. ICI regimens included ipilimumab/nivolumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and atezolizumab (on a clinical trial). Four of these six patients experienced an irAE during their course, including: dermatitis, hepatitis, colitis, thyroid dysfunction, and adrenal insufficiency. Median AMH levels were lower for patients treated with ICIs (2.9 vs 4.0 ng/mL), as was median AFC (22.5 vs 23.5 ng/mL). Only three patients’ clinicians discussed fertility preservation. None of the patients underwent fertility preservation. Our study found lower AMH and AFC in women with melanoma who were treated with an ICI compared to untreated women. Although AMH and AFC are surrogate markers for ovarian reserve and fertility, and our study is a small cohort, these early results suggest that ICIs may impact ovarian function. Age is less likely to be a confounding factor as the median age of the treated group was younger than the untreated group. While these results are preliminary, when considered in conjunction with recent pre-clinical data showing changes within the ovaries after ICI treatment, fertility consultation should be considered for young women prior to ICI initiation. We are investigating associations between AMH, AFC, age, ICI exposure, and future pregnancies in an ongoing prospective study. Citation Format: Ashley Hickman, Katherine Smith, Zaraq Khan, Elizabeth Ann Enninga, Yulian Zhao, Elizabeth Cathcart-Rake, Haidong Dong, Lisa Kottschade, Svetomir Markovic, Heather Montane, Anastasios Dimou, Yiyi Yan. Investigating the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) on ovarian function in young patients with melanoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 6644.

Abstract Oncologic viruses (OV) can induce tumor death through both direct oncolysis and immune-mediated destruction. Our study investigates the use of a novel OV with a Vesicular Stomatitis Virus (VSV) vector modified to express interferon-beta (IFN-b) and Tyrosinase Related Protein 1 (TYRP1) (VSV-IFNb-TYRP1). VSV is an attractive vector since humans are not naturally infected with VSV; thus, pre-existing immunity is minimal. IFN-b leads to increased T-cell responses and tumor cell apoptosis, while TYRP1, a melanocyte differentiation antigen, increases immunogenicity of the therapy. We conducted a Phase 1 clinical trial with a 3+3 design in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma. VSV-IFNb-TYRP1 was injected into a liver metastasis under image guidance, then administered on the same day as a single intravenous (IV) infusion. IV doses started at dose level (DL) 1 1 × 1010 TCID50, then escalated to DL2 3 × 10 10, DL3 1 × 1011, and DL4 3 × 1011. The dose delivered intratumorally (IT) varied based on the IV dose. The primary endpoints were safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Efficacy was a secondary endpoint. Correlative studies focused on understanding viral pharmacokinetics (PK) and immunological responses induced by VSV-IFNb-TYRP1 therapy. Twelve patients with previously treated metastatic uveal melanoma were enrolled. Median follow up was 19.1 months. Four DLs were evaluated with one patient at DL4 experiencing dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), including decreased platelet count (grade 3), increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Non-DLTs at DL4 were fatigue, fever, CRS, hematological toxicities (decreased platelets and lymphocytes), and AST elevation. Four patients had stable disease (SD) and 8 had progressive disease (PD) as their best response. ELIspot data show that three of the four patients with response to TYRP1 also had a response to gp100, suggesting possible epitope spreading. These four patients received immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment as the next line of therapy, which led to clinical benefit for two patients. Our study evaluated VSV-IFNb-TYRP1 administered via IT and IV routes in a previously treated population of metastatic uveal melanoma patients and found no major safety events. Although there were no clear objective responses to VSV-IFNb-TYRP1, dose-dependent immunogenicity to melanoma antigens was seen. While OV response alone is not sufficient for clinical benefit, the evidence of epitope spreading is encouraging. Future studies of VSV-IFNb-TYRP1 will evaluate combinations with other therapies. Citation Format: Katherine E. Smith, Adam Weisbrod, Carrie Strand, Jacob Allerd, Jose S. Pulido, Alysha Newsom, Lianwen Zhang, Nandakumar Packiriswamy, Heather Montane, Lisa Kottschade, Anastasios Dimou, Yiyi Yan, Markovic Svetomir, Kah Whye Peng, Richard G. Vile, Matthew S. Block, Roxana S. Dronca. Phase I trial of vesicular stomatitis virus expressing human interferon beta and tyrosinase related protein 1 (VSV-IFNb-TYRP1) in metastatic ocular melanoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT207.

12058 Background: It is well established that many patients with cancer are taking dietary supplements (DS) and alternative medicines and often do not disclose such to their care teams. There is potential for harm in several ways: 1) interactions with their medications that may increase side effects, 2) interactions with their treatment that may lead to decreased efficacy, 3) direct toxicity from the supplement 4) financial toxicity. We have recently started a new Integrative Oncology service to help counsel patients about improving lifestyle factors and assist patients with safe and evidence-based integrative treatments and supplements. Methods: Patient data (N=100) were collected prospectively from an Integrative Oncology Clinic. The number and type of DS were documented. Using the Natural Medicines Database (NMD), we determined whether supplements interacted with the patients’ other medications or cancer therapies. We calculated the percentage of patients in which a recommendation for discontinuation of DS was recommended, along with the supporting reasons. We calculated the most common DS being taken and other alternative therapies beyond supplements. Results: Ninety-one percent of patients took DS, with an average of 5.5 per patient (range 0-20). The most common DS patients reported taking (%): Vit D (52), Vit C (41), Multivitamin (34), probiotic (27), B Vitamins (26), Ca (20), zinc (20), fish oil (18), cannabis (18), mushrooms (18), turmeric (17), magnesium (15), melatonin (14), biotin (11), coq10 (7), iron (8), VIT E (5), and glucosamine (5). Eighty-nine percent of patients using DS were on active cancer therapy. In thirty-five percent of patients, we recommended stopping some of their DS or other therapies. Number of patients using alternative therapies beyond DS: IV Vitamin C (5), Rick Simpson oil (high dose THC) (4), extreme diets (4), mistletoe (2), re-purposed meds (2); and one each was using hyperbaric O2, ozone, homeopathic, ayurvedic, insulin-potentiated chemo, miracle mineral cure, chelation, low dose naltrexone Conclusions: Cancer patients both on and off active treatment are using large numbers of DS with potential for adverse effects and/or decreasing efficacy of treatments. This study highlights the prevalence of DS and alternative medicine usage in cancer patients referred to an integrative oncology clinic and demonstrates the need for counseling about safe supplement use; in 35% of patients, discontinuation of DS was recommended. [Table: see text]