Rubin, David T.

Abstract Background & Aims Central reading of endoscopy and histopathology is the current standard for disease activity assessment in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) clinical trials but is limited by interreader and intrareader variability, operational delays, and cost. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) offer the potential to improve accuracy, efficiency, and reproducibility. The International Organization for the Study of IBD (IOIBD) developed consensus statements on AI/ML use for endoscopic and histologic endpoint assessment in IBD trials. Methods As part of the IOIBD endpoints cluster initiative, a narrative, evidence-informed review with literature searches of Medline and Embase (January 2018-February 2025) identified studies applying AI/ML to endoscopy or histology in IBD. Relevant evidence informed 36 survey statements formulated by a steering committee. Seventy-two IOIBD members were invited to vote online; consensus required ≥80% agreement (score: 7-10 on a 10-point scale). Results Forty-five members completed the survey. Consensus was reached for 28 statements related to endoscopy, pathology, and trial design. Experts agreed that AI-based central reading could improve diagnostic accuracy, expedite processes, reduce costs, and enhance reproducibility. Combining human and AI assessments was favored over AI replacement. The key limitations identified included insufficient validation, generalizability concerns, and dependence on human-annotated training datasets. Conclusions This IOIBD consensus supports the integration of AI/ML into central reading for IBD clinical trials to improve objectivity, efficiency, and consistency, while maintaining human oversight. Further research should address validation, regulatory frameworks, and multimodal integration to enable broader adoption in both trials and clinical practice.

Abstract Background and Aims Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is increasingly used to monitor treatment efficacy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) trials. However, standardized definitions for response, remission, and optimal assessment timing remain undefined. An international expert consensus meeting was held to establish IUS endpoints for clinical trials. Methods A panel of 35 international gastroenterologists and radiologists participated in a modified Delphi process, reviewing the literature and developing consensus statements. Agreement was defined as at least 75% consensus. Results Consensus was reached on 150 statements across four domains: general IBD (30 statements), luminal Crohn’s disease (CD) (43), perianal CD (51), and ulcerative colitis (UC) (26). For luminal CD and UC, ultrasound response was defined by: (1) a ≥25% reduction in bowel wall thickness (BWT) from baseline, or (2) multifactorial improvement, combining BWT reduction with ≥1 grade decrease in color Doppler signal (CDS) or another IUS parameter. Assessments were set at weeks 4-8 for the colon and week 12 for the terminal ileum. Ultrasound remission in luminal CD was defined as: (1) BWT normalization (≤3 mm) or (2) normalization of multiple parameters, including BWT, CDS, and all other IUS parameters. Similar remission criteria were proposed for UC, but the sigmoid BWT normal range (3-4 mm) remained uncertain. The bowel ultrasound score (BUSS) for CD and the Milan ultrasound criteria (MUC) for UC were supported as standardized scoring systems for trials. Conclusion This consensus provides standardized IUS definitions to enhance consistency in IBD trials, supporting the integration of IUS in future research.

Abstract Background and Aims Tyrosine kinase 2 is a downstream intracellular mediator of interleukin-23 signaling, which has a key role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Deucravacitinib is a novel, oral, selective, allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor currently approved for the treatment of adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Methods Here we describe 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 studies of deucravacitinib in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease (LATTICE-CD [NCT03599622]) or ulcerative colitis (LATTICE-UC [NCT03934216] and IM011-127 [NCT04613518]). Patients were randomized to receive placebo or twice-daily deucravacitinib 3 or 6 mg (LATTICE-CD), 6 mg (LATTICE-UC), or 12 mg (IM011-127) for 12 weeks. Coprimary endpoints for LATTICE-CD were clinical remission and endoscopic response at week 12. The primary endpoint was clinical remission (per modified Mayo score) at week 12 for LATTICE-UC and clinical response (per modified Mayo score) at week 12 for IM011-127. Results A total of 239 (LATTICE-CD), 131 (LATTICE-UC), and 38 (IM011-127) patients were randomized. The primary endpoints were not met for all 3 studies, which resulted in early study termination for LATTICE-CD and IM011-127. High efficacy rates were observed in placebo groups throughout the studies. In all studies, the safety profile of deucravacitinib was consistent with the known safety profile observed in patients with psoriasis, and no new safety signals were observed. Conclusions Deucravacitinib at multiple doses did not demonstrate significant clinical benefit vs placebo in moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis. Deucravacitinib was safe and well tolerated.

Introduction Targeted immunomodulators (eg, advanced therapies) effectively achieve symptomatic remission in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, ~25%–50% of patients with IBD achieving symptomatic remission with an advanced therapy may have continued endoscopically/radiologically active bowel inflammation, and it is uncertain whether changing alternative advanced therapies in asymptomatic patients with IBD will reduce bowel inflammation and achieve durable deep remission. Methods and analysis The QUality Outcomes Treating IBD to Target (QUOTIENT) study is an open-label, multicentre, pragmatic, randomised, controlled trial that aims to compare the efficacy and safety of switching to an alternative advanced therapy targeting endoscopic/radiological remission (treat-to-target) versus continuing the initial, or index, advanced therapy, in asymptomatic patients with IBD with moderate-to-severe endoscopic/radiological bowel inflammation. Enrolment is planned for ~250 participants in Canada/USA, randomised 1:1 to switching to alternative advanced therapy or continuing index advanced therapy, and then followed 104 weeks within routine clinical practice. Patient-reported outcomes measure efficacy and quality of life/treatment burden/safety. Primary endpoint is the time from randomisation to treatment failure. Ethics and dissemination The study is conducted in compliance with the protocol, ICH Good Clinical Practice, applicable regulatory requirements and appropriate review boards/independent ethics committees (approval numbers: Pro00077486; Pro00061437; STUDY00002062; 22-004171; i22-01269; IRB22-0890; IRB_00154397; 2000032384; SHIRB#2022.095-2; STUDY00007146; MMC#2024-18; REB#125290; 17784; Pro00142214; 20240660-01H), with documented written informed consent. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, scientific presentations, and publicly available Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) websites, including lay summaries. The Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation Education, Support, and Advocacy Department, and our patient advocacy stakeholder, will develop educational and marketing resources to communicate findings to a broad audience (>250 000 patients/caregivers/healthcare professionals). Trial registration number NCT05230173 .

Abstract Background and aims This post hoc analysis evaluated the corticosteroid-sparing effects of risankizumab (RZB) therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis in the phase 3 induction and maintenance studies, INSPIRE and COMMAND. Methods Patients were randomized (2:1) to 12 weeks of intravenous RZB or placebo (PBO) induction therapy; responders to intravenous RZB were randomized (1:1:1) to receive subcutaneous RZB 180 mg, 360 mg, or PBO (RZB withdrawal) maintenance therapy. Baseline corticosteroid doses were maintained during induction, with a mandatory taper beginning at maintenance week 0. Efficacy outcomes were evaluated by baseline corticosteroid use at induction week 12, while corticosteroid-free clinical and endoscopic outcomes were assessed at maintenance week 52 among the overall population and among patients on corticosteroids at baseline. Safety was also assessed. Results At baseline, 35.7% (348/975) of patients were taking corticosteroids. At induction week 12, greater rates were observed for clinical, endoscopic, and patient-reported outcomes in RZB 1200 mg-treated patients compared with PBO, regardless of baseline corticosteroid use. RZB 180 mg and 360 mg treatment resulted in higher corticosteroid discontinuation rates (RZB 180 mg 64.9% [48/74]; RZB 360 mg 54.2% [32/59]; PBO [withdrawal] 36.8% [25/68], P ≤ .01) and corticosteroid-free clinical, endoscopic, and patient-reported outcomes at week 52, compared with PBO (withdrawal). The rates of treatment-emergent adverse events were similar regardless of baseline corticosteroid use during induction and maintenance. Conclusions The efficacy of RZB induction therapy was independent of corticosteroid use, with high rates of corticosteroid-free outcomes observed in the overall population and among patients with baseline corticosteroid use, reaffirming the potential of RZB to serve as a corticosteroid-sparing therapy for patients with ulcerative colitis. Clinicaltrial.gov numbers NCT03398148 and NCT03398135

Abstract Background Risankizumab (RZB), a high-affinity humanised IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-23 p19, has shown sustained efficacy and an acceptable safety profile for patients (pts) with ulcerative colitis (UC).1 This interim analysis reports efficacy data at week (wk) 0 and wk 96, as well as safety data of the COMMAND (NCT03398135) open-label extension (OLE). Methods The COMMAND OLE enrolled pts who completed 52-wks maintenance dosing in the COMMAND substudies or entered directly from the induction study.1 All pts received RZB180 subcutaneous (SC) starting at OLE wk 0, except pts who had prior rescue therapy (single RZB 1200 mg intravenous [IV] dose then RZB360 Q8w) who continued RZB360 in the OLE. The OLE was not designed to compare RZB180 and RZB360 groups. The data cut-off date for this interim analysis was as of June 30, 2024. Efficacy endpoints assessed were clinical remission (CR) per AMS, clinical response per AMS, endoscopic improvement, endoscopic remission, and corticosteroid-free CR per Partial AMS up to wk 96. Data are reported as observed prior to RZB rescue therapy during OLE. The safety analysis also includes pts who directly entered the OLE from induction; presented as events/100 pt years (E/100 PY). Results Of the pts who entered the OLE (RZB180, N = 701; RZB360, N = 302), approximately 40% of pts had the opportunity to reach OLE wk 96 as of the cut-off date. At OLE wk 0 and 96, a similar proportion of patients in the RZB180 group achieved clinical and endoscopic outcomes (Figure 1A). In the RZB360 group, the percent of pts achieving clinical and endoscopic endpoints increased from OLE wk 0 through OLE wk 96 (Figure 1B). Similar rates of serious AEs, severe AEs, and AEs leading to discontinuation of study drug were reported in the RZB180 group and the RZB360 group with no new safety risks identified (Table 1). Conclusion In this interim analysis of the OLE, a sustained benefit was observed with long-term RZB treatment up to 96 wks. The long-term safety profile for RZB remains consistent and supports the long-term use. References 1. Louis E et al. JAMA 2024;332(11):881-897

INTRODUCTION: Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and prior biologic failure may have reduced or delayed efficacy with subsequent advanced therapies. This analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of ozanimod during the True North (TN) study and its open-label extension (OLE) in biologic-exposed patients with UC. METHODS: TN was a randomized, placebo-controlled 52-week trial (10-week induction, 42-week maintenance period). Eligible patients could enter the OLE. Clinical outcomes were assessed at TN week (W) 10 and W52 and OLE W46 and W94. Symptomatic efficacy was evaluated through induction and in the OLE until W94. Safety was assessed. RESULTS: This analysis included 376 biologic-exposed patients. In the placebo-controlled cohort, more ozanimod-treated patients achieved clinical response than placebo at W10 regardless of the number or type of prior biologics; patients who used 1 vs ≥2 prior biologics achieved higher efficacy rates. Efficacy rates were higher at W52 than W10 and were similar across subgroups regardless of the number or type of prior biologics. Significantly greater proportions of ozanimod vs placebo patients achieved symptomatic response by W5 ( P = 0.0173) and symptomatic remission by W10 ( P = 0.0207). Among biologic-exposed TN W10 ozanimod nonresponders who entered the OLE, 61% achieved symptomatic response with an extra 10 weeks of ozanimod treatment. Ozanimod efficacy was durable for ∼3 years of continuous treatment in biologic-exposed W52 clinical responders who entered the OLE. No new safety signals were observed. DISCUSSION: Ozanimod was effective and safe in biologic-exposed patients with UC, but these patients may require more time to respond to treatment. Clinical trial registry website and trial numbers: ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT02435992 and NCT02531126.

INTRODUCTION: Spondyloarthritis (SpA), the most common extraintestinal manifestation of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), is reported in up to 39% of patients with IBD. Despite this high prevalence, risk factors of developing SpA in patients with IBD are not well described. In this study, we aimed to determine the factors associated with SpA symptoms and their prevalence in an IBD cohort. METHODS: Two validated screening questionnaires for the detection of SpA in IBD (DETAIL = DETection of Arthritis in Inflammatory boweL diseases, IBIS-Q = IBD Identification of Spondyloarthritis Questionnaire) were administered to patients with IBD without a prior diagnosis of SpA in 6 US academic medical centers. Demographic data, IBD characteristics, and medication history were recorded. RESULTS: Screening questionnaires were completed by 588 patients (220 ulcerative colitis, 349 Crohn's disease, and 19 IBD-unclassified), with a median age of 40 years (interquartile range 30–53) and median disease duration of 12 years (interquartile range 6–22). The number of positive screens was 130 (22%) for DETAIL, 196 (33%) for IBIS-Q, and 204 (35%) for either DETAIL or IBIS-Q. Age, female sex, history of smoking, prior bowel surgery, and history of any biologic or targeted small molecule exposure were associated with a positive screen on univariate analysis. After multivariate analysis, female sex (odds ratio [OR] 2.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.41–2.93), older age (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01–1.04), history of smoking (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.04–2.69), and history of any biologic or targeted small molecule exposure (OR 2.27, 95% CI 1.34–3.84) were independently associated with positive screens. Higher number of biologic exposures was associated with higher risk of positive screens, with the highest risk seen with 3 or more exposures (OR 3.25, 95% CI 1.75–6.03). DISCUSSION: A substantial number of patients with IBD screen positive for SpA symptoms, indicating a potentially high burden of undiagnosed illness. Factors associated with SpA symptoms include older age, female sex, and more severe disease (based on increased number of advanced therapies or prior surgery), whereas IBD phenotype does not independently increase the risk of a positive SpA screen. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and better characterize SpA in IBD.

ObjectiveSpondyloarthritis (SpA) is the most common extraintestinal manifestation of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The application of screening tools to detect SpA in patients with IBD may lead to earlier recognition of SpA and affect treatment decisions.MethodsA combination of two previously described SpA screening questionnaires, the Detection of Arthritis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (DETAIL) and IBD Identification of Spondyloarthritis Questionnaire (IBIS‐Q), was administered to consecutive patients with IBD attending IBD specialty clinics in six US academic medical centers. Demographic data, IBD, and rheumatology history were extracted by chart review.ResultsA total of 669 patients were analyzed. The median age was 40 years (interquartile range [IQR] 30–54) with a median disease duration of 12 years (IQR 6–22) and moderate to severe IBD based on medication exposure and history of bowel surgery. A total of 81 patients (12%) carried a diagnosis of an inflammatory rheumatic disease, whereas 75 (11%) had consulted a rheumatologist during the previous year. Using published cutoffs, 180 out of 669 patients (27%) screened positive with DETAIL, 266 (40%) with IBIS‐Q, and 275 (41%) with either questionnaire. Axial symptoms were more frequently reported than peripheral musculoskeletal complaints. Notably, 189 out of 275 (69%) screen‐positive patients had neither a documented inflammatory rheumatic disease diagnosis nor a visit with a rheumatologist within the past year.ConclusionA substantial proportion of patients with IBD have symptoms suggestive of SpA, and many of these may have undiagnosed SpA. The IBIS‐Q questionnaire appears to identify more potential SpA cases than DETAIL. Strategies are needed to prioritize rheumatology consultations for those patients with IBD who are most likely to benefit.