Morisset, P

Abstract Background Risankizumab (RZB), a high-affinity humanised IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-23 p19, has demonstrated sustained efficacy, with a consistent safety profile supporting long-term use for patients (pts) with ulcerative colitis (UC).1-3 This interim analysis reports efficacy and safety through open-label extension (OLE) week (wks) 96 (3 years [yrs] of total maintenance) from the COMMAND OLE. Methods The OLE enrolled RZB-treated pts who completed the 52-wk maintenance substudies and/or responded to 12/24-wk induction therapy.1 All pts received subcutaneous RZB 180 mg (RZB180) starting at OLE wk 0, except those who received prior OLE RZB rescue therapy (1 RZB 1200 mg intravenous dose then RZB 360 mg [RZB360] every 8 wk) and continued RZB360 for 96 wks. Efficacy endpoints (clinical remission [CR] per Adapted Mayo Score [AMS], CR per Partial AMS [PAMS], corticosteroid-free CR per PAMS, clinical response per AMS, clinical response per PAMS, endoscopic improvement, and endoscopic remission) were assessed at OLE wks 0 and 96 and reported as observed (AO) prior to OLE RZB rescue therapy and nonresponder imputation (NRI), among the overall population and by inadequate response to advanced therapy (AT-IR vs non-AT-IR; data cutoff: 25Aug2025). The safety analysis included pts who received at least 1 dose of OLE RZB, with data presented as events/100 pt-yrs. Results At OLE wk 0, approximately 90% pts (N = 1003) completed the study visit; some differences were observed in the clinical characteristics of RZB180 and RZB360-treated pts, including mean AMS (2.0, 3.4); a numerically higher proportion of RZB360-pts were AT-IR (63.1%, 76.8%), and had an endoscopic score of ≥ 3 (12.1%, 31.1%). A lower proportion of RZB360-treated pts achieved CR per AMS (54.8%, 25.2%) at OLE wk 0, while a higher proportion of RZB360-treated pts received OLE rescue therapy (RZB180, 22.1%; RZB360, 34.5%). Efficacy rates remained stable at OLE wks 0 and 96 for CR per AMS; similar results were observed within each subgroup, AT-IR and non-AT-IR (Table 1). Numerically lower efficacy rates were observed in the AT-IR vs non-AT-IR pts at wk 96; efficacy was sustained through OLE wk 96 for all endpoints (AO, NRI; Table 1). Similar rates were observed for any adverse event (AE), severe AE, and serious AE in RZB180 and RZB360-treated pts. No new safety risks were identified in either treatment group (Table 2). Conclusion In the ongoing COMMAND OLE, sustained clinical and endoscopic benefit was observed in pts receiving up to 3 yrs of long-term RZB maintenance therapy, with numerically lower efficacy rates observed for AT-IR vs non-AT-IR vs pts. The long-term safety of RZB remains consistent with a favorable benefit-risk profile, supporting its long-term use in UC. References: 1.Louis E et al. JAMA. 2024;332:881-97. 2.Atreya R et al. J Crohn’s Colitis. 2025;19(S1):i108-i110. [Abstract]. 3.Panaccione R et. al. J Crohn’s and Colitis. 2025, 19(1):jjaf005. Conflict of interest: Atreya, Raja: RA has served as a speaker, or consultant, or received research grants from AbbVie, Abivax, AlfaSigma, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Astra-Zeneca, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion Healthcare, Dr Falk Pharma, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, InDex Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson, Lilly, Materia Prima, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Pfizer, Roche Pharma, Takeda Pharma, Viatris. Louis, Edouard: Education and Reserach Grants for my department: Abbvie, Takeda, Johnson and Johnson, Pfizer, Fresenius-Kabi, Celltrion, EG pharma, Sandoz, Falk Personal Fees for conferences, advisory boards and consultancy: Abbvie, Takeda, Ferring, Pfizer, Johnson and Johnson, Lilly, Galapagos, Celltrion, Arena, BMS, Falk, Biokuris, Fresenius-Kabi, Thabor Loftus, Jr, Edward: Grant: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Genentech, Gilead, Janssen, Pfizer, Receptos, Robarts Clinical Trials, Takeda, Theravance, UCB. Personal Fees: AbbVie, Allergan, Amgen, Arena, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Calibr, Celgene, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Gilead, Iterative Scopes, Janssen, Ono Pharma, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, Takeda, UCB. Rubin, David T.: Grant support: Takeda Pharmaceuticals Consultant: Abbvie, Abivax SA, Altrubio, Athos Therapeutics, Inc, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Connect BioPharma, Eli Lilly & Co., Genentech (Roche) Inc., Iterative Health, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Mirador, Odyssey Therapeutics, Pfizer, Sanofi, Spyre, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Vedanta Biosciences, and Ventyx. Dubinsky, Marla C: Personal Fees: Consultant or Advisory Board: Abbvie, Abivax, Astra Zeneca, BMS, Celltrion, Gilead, Genentech, Janssen, Johnson and Johnson, Lilly, Merck, Pfizer, Prometheus Biosciences, Sanofi, Spyre, Target RWE, Takeda Other: Shareholder, Co-founder, Board of Directors of Trellus Health Co-Founder Mi Test Health Hisamatsu, Tadakazu: Grant support: Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, EA pharma Co. Ltd., AbbVie, JIMRO Co. Ltd., Zeria Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Takeda, Pfizer., Mochida, Boston Scientific Corporation, Kissei Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. Consulting: Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, EA pharma Co. Ltd., AbbVie GK, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Bristol Myers Squibb, Abivax, MSD, Chugai. Lecture fee: Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, AbbVie GK, EA pharma Co. Ltd., Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., JIMRO Co., Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Takeda, Pfizer, Kissei Mambetsariev, Nurbek: Employee of AbbVie and may own stock and/or stock options. Kalabic, Jasmina: Employee of AbbVie and may own stock and/or stock options. Cheng, Peiyao: Employee of AbbVie and may own stock and/or stock options. Chen, Su: Employee of AbbVie and may own stock and/or stock options. O’Brien, Dan: Employee of AbbVie and may own stock and/or options. Morisset, Pierre: Employee of AbbVie and may own stock and/or stock options. Duan, W. Rachel: Employee of AbbVie and may own stock and/or stock options. Panaccione, Remo: Grant: Abbvie, Janssen, Pfizer, Takeda. Other: Consultant for: Abbott, AbbVie, Abbivax, Alimentiv (formerly Robarts), Amgen, AnaptysBio, Arena Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Cosmos Pharmaceuticals, Eisai, Elan, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Galapagos, Fresenius Kabi, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Glaxo-Smith Kline, JAMP Bio, Janssen, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Oppilan Pharma, Organon, Pandion Pharma, Pendopharm, Pfizer, Progenity, Prometheus Biosciences, Protagonist Therapeutics, Roche, Sandoz, Satisfai Health, Shire, Sublimity Therapeutics, Spyre Therapeutics, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Theravance Biopharma, Trellus, Union Biopharma, Viatris, Ventyx, UCB Speaker’s Fees for: AbbVie, Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Fresenius Kabi, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Merck, Organon, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Shire, Takeda Pharmaceuticals Advisory Boards for: AbbVie, Alimentiv (formerly Robarts), Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Fresenius Kabi, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Glaxo-Smith Kline, JAMP Bio, Janssen, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Oppilan Pharma, Organon, Pandion Pharma, Pfizer, Progenity, Protagonist Therapeutics, Roche, SandozShire, Sublimity Therapeutics, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Ventyx.

Abstract Background The STRIDE-II recommendations highlighted the importance of targeting objective measures of disease control, including endoscopic healing, in patients (pts) with ulcerative colitis (UC).1 Risankizumab (RZB), an interleukin-23 specific inhibitor, showed improvement in the outcomes of clinical remission and endoscopic improvement compared to placebo in pts with moderately-to-severely active UC.2 Visualizing the changes of endoscopic scores from induction and maintenance may provide insight into pt disease course during treatment. Thus, this analysis sought to provide an overview of change in endoscopic scores of pts enrolled in UC clinical studies. Methods Using individual pt data from the Phase 2b/3 studies of RZB in UC, changes in Mayo endoscopic scores in induction and maintenance were assessed. For induction, pts received either intravenous (IV) placebo (PBO) or RZB for 12 weeks (wks). Pts from the Phase 2b and Phase 3 INSPIRE studies who had a clinical response to induction treatment were rerandomized into the maintenance study [COMMAND] and received subcutaneous PBO (withdrawal), RZB 180 mg, or RZB 360 mg every 8 wks for 52 wks. To be eligible for INSPIRE, pts had to have a baseline (BL) Mayo endoscopic score of 3 or 2 confirmed by central review. For this analysis, endoscopic scores are reported for induction BL and wk 12 and maintenance BL and wk 52 for each treatment. "Endoscopic improvement" was defined as a score of 1 or 0 at the time of follow-up. Results Among pts with a Mayo endoscopic score of 3 at induction BL, 28% achieved endoscopic improvement after 12-wk treatment with RZB 1200 mg; 57% of pts with a BL score of 2 showed endoscopic improvement (Fig. 1). In contrast, among PBO-treated pts with a score of 3 or 2 at BL, 11% and 18%, respectively, achieved endoscopic improvement after induction. Most PBO-treated pts (63%) had no score change at wk 12. During the maintenance study, 29%–35% of pts in the RZB treatment groups had an endoscopic score of 2 or 3 at maintenance BL. (Fig. 2). For those with a BL score of 3, most pts receiving RZB 360 mg achieved endoscopic improvement (62%); similarly, 65% of those with a BL score of 2 showed endoscopic improvement at wk 52. Trends were similar for RZB 180 mg with ≥80% of pts with a BL score of 1 or 0 maintained a 1 or 0 through wk 52. Among PBO-treated pts, ≥60% maintained a score of 3 or 2 from maintenance BL to wk 52; approximately one third of pts’ scores improved to 1 or 0. Conclusion This analysis showed that RZB treatment improved endoscopic outcomes from wk 0 to wk 12 of induction and wk 0 to wk 52 of maintenance. These findings may help inform treatment expectations and shared decision-making for pts with UC initiating RZB treatment. References 1.Turner D, et al. Gastroenterology. 2021;160(5):1570-1583. 2.Louis E, et al. JAMA. 2024;332(11):881-897.

Abstract Background Risankizumab (RZB), a high-affinity humanised IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-23 p19, has shown sustained efficacy and an acceptable safety profile for patients (pts) with ulcerative colitis (UC).1 This interim analysis reports efficacy data at week (wk) 0 and wk 96, as well as safety data of the COMMAND (NCT03398135) open-label extension (OLE). Methods The COMMAND OLE enrolled pts who completed 52-wks maintenance dosing in the COMMAND substudies or entered directly from the induction study.1 All pts received RZB180 subcutaneous (SC) starting at OLE wk 0, except pts who had prior rescue therapy (single RZB 1200 mg intravenous [IV] dose then RZB360 Q8w) who continued RZB360 in the OLE. The OLE was not designed to compare RZB180 and RZB360 groups. The data cut-off date for this interim analysis was as of June 30, 2024. Efficacy endpoints assessed were clinical remission (CR) per AMS, clinical response per AMS, endoscopic improvement, endoscopic remission, and corticosteroid-free CR per Partial AMS up to wk 96. Data are reported as observed prior to RZB rescue therapy during OLE. The safety analysis also includes pts who directly entered the OLE from induction; presented as events/100 pt years (E/100 PY). Results Of the pts who entered the OLE (RZB180, N = 701; RZB360, N = 302), approximately 40% of pts had the opportunity to reach OLE wk 96 as of the cut-off date. At OLE wk 0 and 96, a similar proportion of patients in the RZB180 group achieved clinical and endoscopic outcomes (Figure 1A). In the RZB360 group, the percent of pts achieving clinical and endoscopic endpoints increased from OLE wk 0 through OLE wk 96 (Figure 1B). Similar rates of serious AEs, severe AEs, and AEs leading to discontinuation of study drug were reported in the RZB180 group and the RZB360 group with no new safety risks identified (Table 1). Conclusion In this interim analysis of the OLE, a sustained benefit was observed with long-term RZB treatment up to 96 wks. The long-term safety profile for RZB remains consistent and supports the long-term use. References 1. Louis E et al. JAMA 2024;332(11):881-897