Kalabic, Jasmina

Abstract Background Risankizumab (RZB), a high-affinity humanised IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-23 p19, has demonstrated sustained efficacy, with a consistent safety profile supporting long-term use for patients (pts) with ulcerative colitis (UC).1-3 This interim analysis reports efficacy and safety through open-label extension (OLE) week (wks) 96 (3 years [yrs] of total maintenance) from the COMMAND OLE. Methods The OLE enrolled RZB-treated pts who completed the 52-wk maintenance substudies and/or responded to 12/24-wk induction therapy.1 All pts received subcutaneous RZB 180 mg (RZB180) starting at OLE wk 0, except those who received prior OLE RZB rescue therapy (1 RZB 1200 mg intravenous dose then RZB 360 mg [RZB360] every 8 wk) and continued RZB360 for 96 wks. Efficacy endpoints (clinical remission [CR] per Adapted Mayo Score [AMS], CR per Partial AMS [PAMS], corticosteroid-free CR per PAMS, clinical response per AMS, clinical response per PAMS, endoscopic improvement, and endoscopic remission) were assessed at OLE wks 0 and 96 and reported as observed (AO) prior to OLE RZB rescue therapy and nonresponder imputation (NRI), among the overall population and by inadequate response to advanced therapy (AT-IR vs non-AT-IR; data cutoff: 25Aug2025). The safety analysis included pts who received at least 1 dose of OLE RZB, with data presented as events/100 pt-yrs. Results At OLE wk 0, approximately 90% pts (N = 1003) completed the study visit; some differences were observed in the clinical characteristics of RZB180 and RZB360-treated pts, including mean AMS (2.0, 3.4); a numerically higher proportion of RZB360-pts were AT-IR (63.1%, 76.8%), and had an endoscopic score of ≥ 3 (12.1%, 31.1%). A lower proportion of RZB360-treated pts achieved CR per AMS (54.8%, 25.2%) at OLE wk 0, while a higher proportion of RZB360-treated pts received OLE rescue therapy (RZB180, 22.1%; RZB360, 34.5%). Efficacy rates remained stable at OLE wks 0 and 96 for CR per AMS; similar results were observed within each subgroup, AT-IR and non-AT-IR (Table 1). Numerically lower efficacy rates were observed in the AT-IR vs non-AT-IR pts at wk 96; efficacy was sustained through OLE wk 96 for all endpoints (AO, NRI; Table 1). Similar rates were observed for any adverse event (AE), severe AE, and serious AE in RZB180 and RZB360-treated pts. No new safety risks were identified in either treatment group (Table 2). Conclusion In the ongoing COMMAND OLE, sustained clinical and endoscopic benefit was observed in pts receiving up to 3 yrs of long-term RZB maintenance therapy, with numerically lower efficacy rates observed for AT-IR vs non-AT-IR vs pts. The long-term safety of RZB remains consistent with a favorable benefit-risk profile, supporting its long-term use in UC. References: 1.Louis E et al. JAMA. 2024;332:881-97. 2.Atreya R et al. J Crohn’s Colitis. 2025;19(S1):i108-i110. [Abstract]. 3.Panaccione R et. al. J Crohn’s and Colitis. 2025, 19(1):jjaf005. Conflict of interest: Atreya, Raja: RA has served as a speaker, or consultant, or received research grants from AbbVie, Abivax, AlfaSigma, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Astra-Zeneca, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion Healthcare, Dr Falk Pharma, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, InDex Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson, Lilly, Materia Prima, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Pfizer, Roche Pharma, Takeda Pharma, Viatris. Louis, Edouard: Education and Reserach Grants for my department: Abbvie, Takeda, Johnson and Johnson, Pfizer, Fresenius-Kabi, Celltrion, EG pharma, Sandoz, Falk Personal Fees for conferences, advisory boards and consultancy: Abbvie, Takeda, Ferring, Pfizer, Johnson and Johnson, Lilly, Galapagos, Celltrion, Arena, BMS, Falk, Biokuris, Fresenius-Kabi, Thabor Loftus, Jr, Edward: Grant: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Genentech, Gilead, Janssen, Pfizer, Receptos, Robarts Clinical Trials, Takeda, Theravance, UCB. Personal Fees: AbbVie, Allergan, Amgen, Arena, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Calibr, Celgene, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Gilead, Iterative Scopes, Janssen, Ono Pharma, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, Takeda, UCB. Rubin, David T.: Grant support: Takeda Pharmaceuticals Consultant: Abbvie, Abivax SA, Altrubio, Athos Therapeutics, Inc, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Connect BioPharma, Eli Lilly & Co., Genentech (Roche) Inc., Iterative Health, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Mirador, Odyssey Therapeutics, Pfizer, Sanofi, Spyre, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Vedanta Biosciences, and Ventyx. Dubinsky, Marla C: Personal Fees: Consultant or Advisory Board: Abbvie, Abivax, Astra Zeneca, BMS, Celltrion, Gilead, Genentech, Janssen, Johnson and Johnson, Lilly, Merck, Pfizer, Prometheus Biosciences, Sanofi, Spyre, Target RWE, Takeda Other: Shareholder, Co-founder, Board of Directors of Trellus Health Co-Founder Mi Test Health Hisamatsu, Tadakazu: Grant support: Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, EA pharma Co. Ltd., AbbVie, JIMRO Co. Ltd., Zeria Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Takeda, Pfizer., Mochida, Boston Scientific Corporation, Kissei Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. Consulting: Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, EA pharma Co. Ltd., AbbVie GK, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Bristol Myers Squibb, Abivax, MSD, Chugai. Lecture fee: Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, AbbVie GK, EA pharma Co. Ltd., Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., JIMRO Co., Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Takeda, Pfizer, Kissei Mambetsariev, Nurbek: Employee of AbbVie and may own stock and/or stock options. Kalabic, Jasmina: Employee of AbbVie and may own stock and/or stock options. Cheng, Peiyao: Employee of AbbVie and may own stock and/or stock options. Chen, Su: Employee of AbbVie and may own stock and/or stock options. O’Brien, Dan: Employee of AbbVie and may own stock and/or options. Morisset, Pierre: Employee of AbbVie and may own stock and/or stock options. Duan, W. Rachel: Employee of AbbVie and may own stock and/or stock options. Panaccione, Remo: Grant: Abbvie, Janssen, Pfizer, Takeda. Other: Consultant for: Abbott, AbbVie, Abbivax, Alimentiv (formerly Robarts), Amgen, AnaptysBio, Arena Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Cosmos Pharmaceuticals, Eisai, Elan, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Galapagos, Fresenius Kabi, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Glaxo-Smith Kline, JAMP Bio, Janssen, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Oppilan Pharma, Organon, Pandion Pharma, Pendopharm, Pfizer, Progenity, Prometheus Biosciences, Protagonist Therapeutics, Roche, Sandoz, Satisfai Health, Shire, Sublimity Therapeutics, Spyre Therapeutics, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Theravance Biopharma, Trellus, Union Biopharma, Viatris, Ventyx, UCB Speaker’s Fees for: AbbVie, Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Fresenius Kabi, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Merck, Organon, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Shire, Takeda Pharmaceuticals Advisory Boards for: AbbVie, Alimentiv (formerly Robarts), Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Fresenius Kabi, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Glaxo-Smith Kline, JAMP Bio, Janssen, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Oppilan Pharma, Organon, Pandion Pharma, Pfizer, Progenity, Protagonist Therapeutics, Roche, SandozShire, Sublimity Therapeutics, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Ventyx.

Abstract Background and aims This post hoc analysis evaluated the corticosteroid-sparing effects of risankizumab (RZB) therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis in the phase 3 induction and maintenance studies, INSPIRE and COMMAND. Methods Patients were randomized (2:1) to 12 weeks of intravenous RZB or placebo (PBO) induction therapy; responders to intravenous RZB were randomized (1:1:1) to receive subcutaneous RZB 180 mg, 360 mg, or PBO (RZB withdrawal) maintenance therapy. Baseline corticosteroid doses were maintained during induction, with a mandatory taper beginning at maintenance week 0. Efficacy outcomes were evaluated by baseline corticosteroid use at induction week 12, while corticosteroid-free clinical and endoscopic outcomes were assessed at maintenance week 52 among the overall population and among patients on corticosteroids at baseline. Safety was also assessed. Results At baseline, 35.7% (348/975) of patients were taking corticosteroids. At induction week 12, greater rates were observed for clinical, endoscopic, and patient-reported outcomes in RZB 1200 mg-treated patients compared with PBO, regardless of baseline corticosteroid use. RZB 180 mg and 360 mg treatment resulted in higher corticosteroid discontinuation rates (RZB 180 mg 64.9% [48/74]; RZB 360 mg 54.2% [32/59]; PBO [withdrawal] 36.8% [25/68], P ≤ .01) and corticosteroid-free clinical, endoscopic, and patient-reported outcomes at week 52, compared with PBO (withdrawal). The rates of treatment-emergent adverse events were similar regardless of baseline corticosteroid use during induction and maintenance. Conclusions The efficacy of RZB induction therapy was independent of corticosteroid use, with high rates of corticosteroid-free outcomes observed in the overall population and among patients with baseline corticosteroid use, reaffirming the potential of RZB to serve as a corticosteroid-sparing therapy for patients with ulcerative colitis. Clinicaltrial.gov numbers NCT03398148 and NCT03398135

Abstract Background The STRIDE-II recommendations highlighted the importance of targeting objective measures of disease control, including endoscopic healing, in patients (pts) with ulcerative colitis (UC).1 Risankizumab (RZB), an interleukin-23 specific inhibitor, showed improvement in the outcomes of clinical remission and endoscopic improvement compared to placebo in pts with moderately-to-severely active UC.2 Visualizing the changes of endoscopic scores from induction and maintenance may provide insight into pt disease course during treatment. Thus, this analysis sought to provide an overview of change in endoscopic scores of pts enrolled in UC clinical studies. Methods Using individual pt data from the Phase 2b/3 studies of RZB in UC, changes in Mayo endoscopic scores in induction and maintenance were assessed. For induction, pts received either intravenous (IV) placebo (PBO) or RZB for 12 weeks (wks). Pts from the Phase 2b and Phase 3 INSPIRE studies who had a clinical response to induction treatment were rerandomized into the maintenance study [COMMAND] and received subcutaneous PBO (withdrawal), RZB 180 mg, or RZB 360 mg every 8 wks for 52 wks. To be eligible for INSPIRE, pts had to have a baseline (BL) Mayo endoscopic score of 3 or 2 confirmed by central review. For this analysis, endoscopic scores are reported for induction BL and wk 12 and maintenance BL and wk 52 for each treatment. "Endoscopic improvement" was defined as a score of 1 or 0 at the time of follow-up. Results Among pts with a Mayo endoscopic score of 3 at induction BL, 28% achieved endoscopic improvement after 12-wk treatment with RZB 1200 mg; 57% of pts with a BL score of 2 showed endoscopic improvement (Fig. 1). In contrast, among PBO-treated pts with a score of 3 or 2 at BL, 11% and 18%, respectively, achieved endoscopic improvement after induction. Most PBO-treated pts (63%) had no score change at wk 12. During the maintenance study, 29%–35% of pts in the RZB treatment groups had an endoscopic score of 2 or 3 at maintenance BL. (Fig. 2). For those with a BL score of 3, most pts receiving RZB 360 mg achieved endoscopic improvement (62%); similarly, 65% of those with a BL score of 2 showed endoscopic improvement at wk 52. Trends were similar for RZB 180 mg with ≥80% of pts with a BL score of 1 or 0 maintained a 1 or 0 through wk 52. Among PBO-treated pts, ≥60% maintained a score of 3 or 2 from maintenance BL to wk 52; approximately one third of pts’ scores improved to 1 or 0. Conclusion This analysis showed that RZB treatment improved endoscopic outcomes from wk 0 to wk 12 of induction and wk 0 to wk 52 of maintenance. These findings may help inform treatment expectations and shared decision-making for pts with UC initiating RZB treatment. References 1.Turner D, et al. Gastroenterology. 2021;160(5):1570-1583. 2.Louis E, et al. JAMA. 2024;332(11):881-897.

Abstract Background Risankizumab (RZB), a high-affinity humanised IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-23 p19, has shown sustained efficacy and an acceptable safety profile for patients (pts) with ulcerative colitis (UC).1 This interim analysis reports efficacy data at week (wk) 0 and wk 96, as well as safety data of the COMMAND (NCT03398135) open-label extension (OLE). Methods The COMMAND OLE enrolled pts who completed 52-wks maintenance dosing in the COMMAND substudies or entered directly from the induction study.1 All pts received RZB180 subcutaneous (SC) starting at OLE wk 0, except pts who had prior rescue therapy (single RZB 1200 mg intravenous [IV] dose then RZB360 Q8w) who continued RZB360 in the OLE. The OLE was not designed to compare RZB180 and RZB360 groups. The data cut-off date for this interim analysis was as of June 30, 2024. Efficacy endpoints assessed were clinical remission (CR) per AMS, clinical response per AMS, endoscopic improvement, endoscopic remission, and corticosteroid-free CR per Partial AMS up to wk 96. Data are reported as observed prior to RZB rescue therapy during OLE. The safety analysis also includes pts who directly entered the OLE from induction; presented as events/100 pt years (E/100 PY). Results Of the pts who entered the OLE (RZB180, N = 701; RZB360, N = 302), approximately 40% of pts had the opportunity to reach OLE wk 96 as of the cut-off date. At OLE wk 0 and 96, a similar proportion of patients in the RZB180 group achieved clinical and endoscopic outcomes (Figure 1A). In the RZB360 group, the percent of pts achieving clinical and endoscopic endpoints increased from OLE wk 0 through OLE wk 96 (Figure 1B). Similar rates of serious AEs, severe AEs, and AEs leading to discontinuation of study drug were reported in the RZB180 group and the RZB360 group with no new safety risks identified (Table 1). Conclusion In this interim analysis of the OLE, a sustained benefit was observed with long-term RZB treatment up to 96 wks. The long-term safety profile for RZB remains consistent and supports the long-term use. References 1. Louis E et al. JAMA 2024;332(11):881-897

Importance The clinical effects of risankizumab (a monoclonal antibody that selectively targets the p19 subunit of IL-23) for the treatment of ulcerative colitis are unknown. Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of risankizumab when administered as an induction and a maintenance therapy for patients with ulcerative colitis. Design, Setting, and Participants Two phase 3 randomized clinical trials were conducted. The induction trial was conducted at 261 clinical centers (in 41 countries) and enrolled 977 patients from November 5, 2020, to August 4, 2022 (final follow-up on May 16, 2023). The maintenance trial was conducted at 238 clinical centers (in 37 countries) and enrolled 754 patients from August 28, 2018, to March 30, 2022 (final follow-up on April 11, 2023). Eligible patients had moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis; a history of intolerance or inadequate response to 1 or more conventional therapies, advanced therapies, or both types of therapies; and no prior exposure to risankizumab. Interventions For the induction trial, patients were randomized 2:1 to receive 1200 mg of risankizumab or placebo administered intravenously at weeks 0, 4, and 8. For the maintenance trial, patients with a clinical response (determined using the adapted Mayo score) after intravenous treatment with risankizumab were randomized 1:1:1 to receive subcutaneous treatment with 180 mg or 360 mg of risankizumab or placebo (no longer receiving risankizumab) every 8 weeks for 52 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was clinical remission (stool frequency score ≤1 and not greater than baseline, rectal bleeding score of 0, and endoscopic subscore ≤1 without friability) at week 12 for the induction trial and at week 52 for the maintenance trial. Results Among the 975 patients analyzed in the induction trial (aged 42.1 [SD, 13.8] years; 586/973 [60.1%] were male; and 677 [69.6%] were White), the clinical remission rates at week 12 were 132/650 (20.3%) for 1200 mg of risankizumab and 20/325 (6.2%) for placebo (adjusted between-group difference, 14.0% [95% CI, 10.0%-18.0%], P < .001). Among the 548 patients analyzed in the maintenance trial (aged 40.9 [SD, 14.0] years; 313 [57.1%] were male; and 407 [74.3%] were White), the clinical remission rates at week 52 were 72/179 (40.2%) for 180 mg of risankizumab, 70/186 (37.6%) for 360 mg of risankizumab, and 46/183 (25.1%) for placebo (adjusted between-group difference for 180 mg of risankizumab vs placebo, 16.3% [97.5% CI, 6.1%-26.6%], P < .001; adjusted between-group difference for 360 mg of risankizumab vs placebo, 14.2% [97.5% CI, 4.0%-24.5%], P = .002). No new safety risks were detected in the treatment groups. Conclusion and Relevance Compared with placebo, risankizumab improved clinical remission rates in an induction trial and in a maintenance trial for patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. Further study is needed to identify benefits beyond the 52-week follow-up. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT03398148 and NCT03398135

Abstract Background Ulcerative colitis (UC) has a detrimental impact on patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL).1 Long-term treatment goals for patients with moderately to severely active UC include restoration of HRQoL. This post-hoc analysis evaluated the effect of induction and maintenance treatment with risankizumab (RZB) on HRQoL outcomes. Methods Data from two Phase 2b/3 clinical trials (INSPIRE induction: NCT03398148 and COMMAND maintenance: NCT03398135) were evaluated. Patients received RZB 1200 mg intravenous (IV) or placebo (PBO) induction treatment at weeks 0, 4, and 8. Patients with a clinical response per Adapted Mayo score to RZB IV were randomised 1:1:1 to subcutaneous (SC) RZB 180 or 360 mg, or placebo (PBO [RZB withdrawal] SC) every 8 weeks for 52 weeks of maintenance. The proportion of patients achieving a meaningful within-person change (MWPC) for each HRQoL outcome was reported. HRQoL outcomes included Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue, disease-specific instruments such as Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) and Ulcerative Colitis Symptom Questionnaire (UCSQ), as well as generic quality-of-life questionnaires like Work Productivity and Activity Index-Ulcerative Colitis (WPAI-UC), 36-Item Short-Form Survey (SF-36), and EuroQoL 5 Dimensions 5 Levels. MWPCs were measured from baseline to induction Week 12 and to maintenance Week 52. Estimated differences in proportions with 95% confidence intervals and p-values between RZB and PBO were compared using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusting for baseline strata. Results For RZB 1200 mg IV (n=650) versus PBO IV-treated (n=325) patients, a greater proportion of patients achieved MWPC across all HRQoL outcomes at Week 12 of induction (p<0.01; Table). At Week 52 of maintenance, a greater proportion of patients treated with RZB 180 mg SC (N=179) versus PBO (withdrawal) SC (N=183) achieved MWPC across all HRQoL outcomes (p<0.05), except for absenteeism from WPAI-UC (p=0.33). For RZB 360 mg SC (N=186) versus PBO (withdrawal) SC, a greater proportion of patients achieved MWPC for UCSQ, IBDQ, and SF-36 physical component summary (all p<0.05). Conclusion In this analysis, a greater proportion of patients treated with RZB versus PBO achieved MWPC on various HRQoL outcomes after completing 12-week induction IV therapy. HRQoL improvements were sustained up to Week 52 of treatment. This suggests RZB has the potential to help patients achieve restoration of HRQoL as a long-term goal of treatment in patients with moderately to severely active UC. 1. Mavroudis G. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2022;15:17562848211062406.

Abstract Background Risankizumab (RZB), a monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-23 p19, was evaluated for maintenance therapy in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) and clinical response to RZB intravenous (IV) induction treatment in a phase 3 double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled withdrawal (WD) maintenance study, COMMAND (NCT03398135). Methods Patients with moderately to severely active UC who achieved a clinical response per Adapted Mayo score after 12 or 24 weeks (wks) of RZB IV treatment in the phase 2b and phase 3 INSPIRE induction studies (NCT03398148)1 were randomized 1:1:1 in COMMAND to RZB 180 mg (RZB180), 360 mg (RZB360), or PBO (RZB withdrawal) subcutaneous (SC) treatment every 8 wks for 52 wks. The efficacy analysis included responders to 12 wk of RZB IV, while the safety analysis included responders to 12 or 24 wk of RZB IV. The primary endpoint was clinical remission per Adapted Mayo score at wk 52. Key secondary endpoints included endoscopic improvement, HEMI, endoscopic remission, steroid-free clinical remission, maintenance of clinical remission, no bowel urgency, and no abdominal pain at wk 52. Results At baseline of induction, demographics and disease characteristics were similar between treatment groups; 75% of 548 patients had history of inadequate response or intolerance to ≥ 1 advanced therapy (AT). Patients receiving RZB180 (40.2%) and RZB360 (37.6%) achieved significantly higher rates of clinical remission vs WD (25.1%) (adjusted treatment difference vs WD: 16.3% and 14.2%, respectively; P ≤ .01) (Fig. 1A). Greater proportions of patients achieved endoscopic improvement, HEMI, endoscopic remission, steroid-free clinical remission, maintenance of clinical remission, no bowel urgency, and no abdominal pain with RZB180 and RZB360 vs WD (Fig. 1B). The overall rates of adverse events (AEs), and serious infections were similar among treatment groups (Table 1). Serious (presented as events/100 patient-years [E/100 PY]) (RZB180: 5.9; RZB360: 6.3; WD: 11.4) and severe AEs (RZB180: 1.6; RZB360: 4.0; WD: 8.0) were lower in the RZB arms vs WD. No active tuberculosis, adjudicated anaphylaxis, serious hypersensitivity, or adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular events were reported in any treatment group. Conclusion In patients with moderately to severely active UC responding to 12-week RZB induction therapy, RZB maintenance dosing with 180 mg and 360 mg SC was superior to placebo in achieving clinical remission as well as other key clinical, endoscopic, and histological-endoscopic endpoints. RZB was well-tolerated, with no new safety concerns observed.