Colombel, Jean–Frédéric

Abstract Background Upadacitinib (UPA) is an oral selective Janus kinase inhibitor approved for the management of moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease (CD). One in ten CD patients may need a permanent ostomy (colostomy or ileostomy) during their disease course, and this may impact the efficacy of UPA, given its extended-release formulation. However, there is no data available in this population since patients with an ostomy are excluded from registrational CD trials. This study addresses this gap by comparing the real-world clinical effectiveness of UPA in CD patients with and without ostomy. Methods This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from the TriNetX US Collaborative Network of sixty-eight tertiary institutions, to examine adult (≥18 years) CD patients treated with UPA from May 19th, 2023 (FDA approval date) to October 31st, 2024. Patients were categorized based on presence or absence of an ostomy during the previous 5 years, after exclusion of patients with rheumatologic disease indications for UPA usage. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance cohorts on demographics, baseline comorbidities, and CD severity indicators (CD phenotype, extraintestinal manifestations, concurrent corticosteroid and other biologics usage, hemoglobin, and body weight). Cox proportional hazards model estimated hazard ratios (HRs) in matched cohorts for clinical effectiveness as a composite outcome (corticosteroid use, hospitalizations, emergency room visits) and secondary individual outcomes, at one year post-treatment, with a significance threshold set at p < 0.05. Results The study sample of CD patients on UPA included 170 with and 1,428 without a prior ostomy. There were 144 patients in each cohort after PSM. Baseline characteristics of the cohorts are shown in Figure 1. After PSM (Figure 2), there were no significant differences between patients with CD on UPA, with and without prior ostomy, for composite outcomes (HR 0.93, p = 0.64), corticosteroid use (HR 0.78, p = 0.18), hospitalizations (HR 1.13, p = 0.64), or emergency room visits (HR 0.99, p = 0.97). Additionally, no significant differences were observed in opioid use (HR 0.95, p = 0.76), switch to another advanced therapy (HR 1.62, p = 0.06), or elevated biomarkers, including CRP (>10 mg/L, HR 1.00, p = 0.99) and fecal calprotectin (>150 µg/g, HR 0.85, p = 0.63) at the 1-year follow-up. Conclusion In CD patients, UPA demonstrated similar effectiveness for clinical outcomes of corticosteroid use, hospitalizations, emergency room visits and other secondary outcomes, regardless of their ostomy status.

Importance The clinical effects of risankizumab (a monoclonal antibody that selectively targets the p19 subunit of IL-23) for the treatment of ulcerative colitis are unknown. Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of risankizumab when administered as an induction and a maintenance therapy for patients with ulcerative colitis. Design, Setting, and Participants Two phase 3 randomized clinical trials were conducted. The induction trial was conducted at 261 clinical centers (in 41 countries) and enrolled 977 patients from November 5, 2020, to August 4, 2022 (final follow-up on May 16, 2023). The maintenance trial was conducted at 238 clinical centers (in 37 countries) and enrolled 754 patients from August 28, 2018, to March 30, 2022 (final follow-up on April 11, 2023). Eligible patients had moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis; a history of intolerance or inadequate response to 1 or more conventional therapies, advanced therapies, or both types of therapies; and no prior exposure to risankizumab. Interventions For the induction trial, patients were randomized 2:1 to receive 1200 mg of risankizumab or placebo administered intravenously at weeks 0, 4, and 8. For the maintenance trial, patients with a clinical response (determined using the adapted Mayo score) after intravenous treatment with risankizumab were randomized 1:1:1 to receive subcutaneous treatment with 180 mg or 360 mg of risankizumab or placebo (no longer receiving risankizumab) every 8 weeks for 52 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was clinical remission (stool frequency score ≤1 and not greater than baseline, rectal bleeding score of 0, and endoscopic subscore ≤1 without friability) at week 12 for the induction trial and at week 52 for the maintenance trial. Results Among the 975 patients analyzed in the induction trial (aged 42.1 [SD, 13.8] years; 586/973 [60.1%] were male; and 677 [69.6%] were White), the clinical remission rates at week 12 were 132/650 (20.3%) for 1200 mg of risankizumab and 20/325 (6.2%) for placebo (adjusted between-group difference, 14.0% [95% CI, 10.0%-18.0%], P < .001). Among the 548 patients analyzed in the maintenance trial (aged 40.9 [SD, 14.0] years; 313 [57.1%] were male; and 407 [74.3%] were White), the clinical remission rates at week 52 were 72/179 (40.2%) for 180 mg of risankizumab, 70/186 (37.6%) for 360 mg of risankizumab, and 46/183 (25.1%) for placebo (adjusted between-group difference for 180 mg of risankizumab vs placebo, 16.3% [97.5% CI, 6.1%-26.6%], P < .001; adjusted between-group difference for 360 mg of risankizumab vs placebo, 14.2% [97.5% CI, 4.0%-24.5%], P = .002). No new safety risks were detected in the treatment groups. Conclusion and Relevance Compared with placebo, risankizumab improved clinical remission rates in an induction trial and in a maintenance trial for patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. Further study is needed to identify benefits beyond the 52-week follow-up. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT03398148 and NCT03398135

The discovery of a series of genetic and serological markers associated with disease susceptibility and phenotype in inflammatory bowel disease has led to the prospect of an integrated classification system involving clinical, serological and genetic parameters. The Working Party has reviewed current clinical classification systems in Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis and indeterminate colitis, and provided recommendations for clinical classification in practice. Progress with respect to integrating serological and genetic markers has been examined in detail, and the implications are discussed. While an integrated system is not proposed for clinical use at present, the introduction of a widely acceptable clinical subclassification is strongly advocated, which would allow detailed correlations among serotype, genotype and clinical phenotype to be examined and confirmed in independent cohorts of patients and, thereby, provide a vital foundation for future work.